Newsletter Subject

Mailbag: Losing the Barn

From

widemoatresearch.com

Email Address

feedback@exct.widemoatresearch.com

Sent On

Mon, Oct 7, 2024 09:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

Mailbag: Losing the Barn By Brad Thomas, Editor, Wide Moat Daily Today, we?ll share some feedback,

[Wide Moat Daily]( Mailbag: Losing the Barn By Brad Thomas, Editor, Wide Moat Daily Today, we’ll share some feedback, questions, and comments from our readers. If you recently submitted a question, read on. And if you’d like me to tackle a topic in a future mailbag edition, please write to me at: feedback@widemoatresearch.com. Losing the Barn Brad, we’re neighbors of sorts. I live on Hwy 110. I awoke around 6:00 am on Friday, September 27, with the brunt of Helene sitting right on top of me. I consider myself a bit of a “prepper” and went to bed Thursday night after referencing Helene’s projected path and felt that we would be fine. Man, did the prognosticators get it wrong! All in all, we (my daughter and I) came out unscathed. I did lose my barn, but my home only suffered minor damage, and all of my beasts (horses) are fine. It’s Wednesday, October 2, as I type this, and we are still without power. One of the power poles in front of my home is still down, and I doubt Duke will get to it soon. We suffered minimally compared to those in North Carolina, which you referenced in your last communication, but the damage in the area that you referenced is severe. I have a college buddy who had an investment property in Chimney Rock that he says is gone. Probably sitting at the bottom of Lake Lure. I appreciate you drawing attention to the devastation in your last communication. It really is surreal. On a more positive note, I smoke a really good Texas-style brisket. So, if you ever have a gathering in Spartanburg of your members, I’d love to contribute a tasty brisket. Hope you and your crew are okay, and hopefully you have power by now. -David David, thanks so much for writing in with your story. I’m happy to hear that you and your family (not to mention the horses) came through alright. I’m sorry to hear about the barn, though. You’re absolutely right. It’s difficult to put into words the scale of destruction down here. As I wrote [on Tuesday,]( you no doubt know as well, it’s going to be a while before this area is fully back on its feet. And my heart goes out to all the residents who lost loved ones, homes, or businesses. I came through alright. I lost power (everybody did) and I’m still bouncing around coffee shops in order to get an internet connection to publish our Wide Moat issues. My local mall parking lot has turned into a small city. It seems like everybody – utility crews, emergency response crews, etc. – are all camped out there. I can’t imagine what it must be like in North Carolina. I think a lot of people have a negative perception of “preppers” or those with prepper tendencies. If this ordeal has taught us anything, though, it’s that catastrophic events like this don’t happen often… but they do happen. Why wouldn’t you want to be prepared for it? At the very least, a small generator and a supply of water and non-perishable foods is never a bad idea. Perhaps you’ll never need them. But if you ever do, you’ll be glad to have them. Thanks again for writing in, David. Baby Steps Countless thanks are due for the work everybody puts in so the information gets to my inbox. I'm glad to share that, while slow on acting on the information from July 10 to September 10, my small portfolio is up 10.5%. The majority of my portfolio is REITs, as I have all of them on the list except Regency. A few other mentions include MNST, NKE, and MO. Now that I've gotten my feet wet, a big question has come to mind. What do I do in order to increase the portfolio size? Meaning if I have $10k cash, should I only ever have $2k in stocks to diversify? The goal would be to own stocks to a degree where dividends can add up to four figures. Apart from following the buy and sell alerts, what are the next steps to become a better and more profitable SWAN investor? -Brendan D. Brendan, I’m happy to hear you’ve been finding value with your membership to The Wide Moat Letter. As a publisher, I can’t offer personalized advice. And the answers to your questions will depend on factors like risk tolerance, investing time horizon, and whatever non-investment income you have. So, a financial advisor would probably be a good resource for more specific advice. But having said all that, there are a few general observations I could make. To start, we generally recommend that investors allocate a pre-determined amount of capital to the portfolio. That number will be different for everybody. For some subscribers, it might be $1 million-plus. For others, it might only be a few thousand dollars. But it has to be right for you, and it shouldn’t be causing you unnecessary angst. Here at Wide Moat, we firmly believe in SWAN (sleep well at night) investing. If we ever find ourselves tossing and turning at night, worrying about the stocks we own, chances are good that we allocated too much to something or maybe shouldn’t own it at all. Once we determine a figure we can breathe easily with – whatever that may be – we do offer allocation recommendations for each position. At the bottom of each issue, I’ll say something like “allocate no more than 5% of your portfolio” to a single stock. You mentioned you hold many of our real estate investment trust (REIT) recommendations. While I have confidence in every single portfolio position, my general guidance is to not allocate more than 25% of a portfolio to REITs. This is entirely for diversification reasons. Our portfolio positions span a wide array of industries and businesses. And by diversifying, it means we’re never overly exposed to one industry or one business in the event something goes wrong. Because something going wrong is always a possibility. In markets – as in life – risk can only ever be managed, not eliminated. Another thing we often recommend is to not sell our holdings unnecessarily. Oftentimes, investors will see a large return and feel they “must” take profits. It’s ultimately each reader’s decision which investments they buy and sell. And as they say, nobody ever went broke taking profits. But so long as our investment thesis remains intact and the business remains strong, we’re usually inclined to hold on. A simple example would be a company like Lowe’s (LOW). We recommended the stock in March 2020, which turned out to be great timing. It’s returned 295% as I write to you. After such a run, we might think that LOW is “expensive.” But that’s not necessarily the case. The nominal share price might be up, but Lowe’s has earned that return with great financial performance. Relative to its earnings, LOW is trading near the middle of its historical range. It was a great business when we recommended it, and it’s still a great business. You know what they say: If it ain’t broke… That isn’t to say we’ll never take profits. Just last month, we closed out several positions for approximate returns of 54.1%, 74.1%, 3.4%, and 73.1%. And we’ll especially consider selling if a stock becomes extremely overvalued, threatening the gains we’ve made. But as a general rule, we’re usually happy to let great businesses be great businesses. As investors, we like to sit back, collect dividends we believe are reliable and likely to rise, and let compounding do its work. It really is that simple, but that doesn’t mean it’s easy. Building a world-class, income-generating portfolio takes patience and process. It may not be easy, but it can be done. I hope that helps, Brendan. Thanks again to all the readers who sent in feedback. And if you have a question for a future edition, feel free to send it to feedback@widemoatresearch.com. Regards, Brad Thomas Editor, Wide Moat Daily [Wide Moat Research]( Wide Moat Research 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 [www.widemoatresearch.com]( To ensure our emails continue reaching your inbox, please [add our email address]( to your address book. This editorial email containing advertisements was sent to {EMAIL} because you subscribed to this service. To stop receiving these emails, click [here](. Wide Moat Research welcomes your feedback and questions. But please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized advice. To contact Customer Service, call toll free Domestic/International: 1-888-415-6046, Mon–Fri, 9am–5pm ET, or email us [here](mailto:feedback@widemoatresearch.com). © 2024 Wide Moat Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution of our content, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Wide Moat Research. [Privacy Policy]( | [Terms of Use]( | [Unsubscribe](

Marketing emails from widemoatresearch.com

View More
Sent On

09/10/2024

Sent On

08/10/2024

Sent On

04/10/2024

Sent On

03/10/2024

Sent On

02/10/2024

Sent On

01/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.