The Amazon Problem

While retail stores begin to focus more on e-commerce, Amazon is doing the opposite and getting further into brick and mortar. How should investors approach this? Briton Ryle explains... You are receiving this email because you subscribed to Wealth Daily. [Click here]( to manage your e-mail preferences. [Wealth Daily logo] The Amazon Problem [Briton Ryle Photo] By [Briton Ryle]( Written Mar. 11, 2019 Value is a funny thing... The most valuable company in the world right now is Google (or Alphabet, if you wanna get technical — personally, I don't see why we need extra names for companies, it just confuses things), with a market cap just shy of $800 billion. A few months back, it was Amazon, when it was the first to break that magical $1 trillion barrier (founder/CEO Jeff Bezos also became the world's richest man around the same time). Both Apple and Microsoft are close enough to keep things interesting. Rounding out the top 10, there are two Chinese companies — Tencent and Alibaba — as well as Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway, Facebook, JP Morgan, and Johnson & Johnson. If you want to talk biggest company by revenue, it's Walmart, with over $500 billion in sales. (Walmart is also the world's third-largest employer, with 2.3 million full-time employees — just behind the 2.5 million people "employed" by China's People's Liberation Army). If we exclude five oil companies and China's State Grid, the remaining top revenue companies are Toyota, Volkswagen, and Berkshire Hathaway. Are you seeing a pattern here? Did you know Amazon is legally obligated to pay billions of dollars to people every year? The company has grown so big that it's forced to pay a "tax" just to continue operating. And this year, a group of in-the-know investors will split $1.5 BILLION in payments. The investors are taking advantage of a little-known strategy that'll get them a share of Amazon's mandated payouts. And now, you can get in on this amazing opportunity, too. [Click here to learn how.]( What I see is that the companies that take in the most cash money from sales of their products are not considered to be the most valuable companies from an investment perspective. There's a good reason for this: profit margins. Google makes 22 pennies in profit on every dollar it takes in. Walmart makes 1.3 pennies. For investors, it's the profits that put food on the table. That's why Walmart is "worth" just $300 billion, while Google is $800 million. Another observation about those lists: The most valuable company in the world is the one that figured out how to turn the internet into one big store. Think about it. If you send someone an email (from your Gmail account) saying you need new shoes, guess what happens? You start seeing webpage ads from Nike and Target about shoe sales. God forbid you actually google "new shoes" — you'll be seeing those ads for the rest of your life... The Real 1% From an overall economic standpoint, Target is far more valuable to our day-to-day lives than, say, Facebook. Target sells clothes and food. Maslow's hierarchy of needs doesn't say anything about posting pics of your dinner or reposting fake news stories. The stock market says Facebook is worth $480 billion and Target is worth $40 billion, even though Target produces 50% more revenue and employs 10 times as many people. Again, it's about profits. Facebook makes $20 billion in net profit a year. Target makes about $3.5 billion. I've been thinking about all this a lot because of the whole "death of retail" thing that's been going around for the last five years at least (thanks, Amazon)... So I wonder: How much do people really care where they buy stuff? Seems to me most shopping is a value proposition. Where do I get the quality I want for the right price? And now that you have Google, Facebook, and Amazon telling you constantly where to get what you want at the price you want, the playing field is about as level and competitive as it's ever been. Add in the fact that e-commerce has siphoned off 10% of retail sales, and that's why we have come to a life-or-death scenario for retailers. With profit margins as slim as they are, there simply is no margin for error for the Targets and Walmarts of the world. Strategies have to be airtight. Because if you attract just 1% fewer shoppers, it could cut your profits by 10–20%. That is simply amazing. It's that 1% that gets Target a price target hike, while Nordstrom gets downgraded. March 29th Meeting Will Set the Stage to Unleash Massive Cannabis Gains On March 29th, New York lawmakers will meet to discuss recreational marijuana legalization measures proposed by Governor Andrew Cuomo... And this has the potential to send a group of pot stocks skyrocketing by 1,000% in very short order. This could be the last chance for everyday Americans to get rich from marijuana. There’s no time to waste... [Click here to get started.]( Luck or Skill? About that persistent theme that Amazon is killing retail — is it really true? The facts are that e-commerce has now taken about 10% of the entire $5.7 trillion retail market. And Amazon has about 40% of the e-commerce market. That works out to about 4% of all retail for Amazon. (For comparison's sake, Walmart would weigh in just under 10%.) That's a pretty good performance for Amazon. But is it safe to assume that Amazon's growth continues until it's as big as Walmart? And then it keeps taking market share until it's twice as big as Walmart? This seems unlikely to me. Now, granted, I'm old and grumpy. For the most part, I don't shop online. When I need socks, I go to Marshalls so I can be sure that I like the thickness of the material (for a while it was Adidas, now it's Under Armour). Right now, I'm operating on the premise that the perfect retail strategy involves an optimal mix of physical locations and online strategy. Now, we don't know exactly what that balance is. But we do know two things. One, brick-and-mortar retailers have over-invested in the bricks and mortar. Some are too far gone (like Sears and 100 others) and have already declared bankruptcy. Some (like J.C. Penney) are teetering on the brink (note that Dollar Tree is closing hundreds of Family Dollar stores). The other thing we know is that Amazon has ridden a perfect wave of internet growth to become a serious player. But now what? Amazon bought Whole Foods. I'm hearing they wanna open up more grocery stores, maybe some actual retail stores, smaller convenience stores... In other words, just as traditional retailers are focusing more and more on e-commerce (Kroger just announced a $3 billion investment that will knock 2019 EPS down by about 5–10%), Amazon is going to focus more and more on bricks and mortar. Seems risky. The Targets and Walmarts of the world have been operating stores for decades. Amazon? Not so much. Right now, investors seem to be assuming that Amazon's success with e-commerce will carry over, no prob. But long-term leases, property ownership, and management — this is new territory for Amazon. I find it hard to believe it will all be smooth sailing for Bezos and Co. But the thing is Amazon can weather some storms. Because while net income was around $10 billion in 2018 (good for a P/E of 40), Amazon R&D spending was $28 billion. That's more than Apple and Facebook — combined. And I'll tell you something else: A good portion of that money goes right to a few under-the-radar companies that handle many of Amazon's mission-critical operations. Amazon's going to invest billions for its next phase of growth. These little beauties will be the big winners. Even better, these companies are the ones that pay out as Amazon grows. They've paid out billions already, and there's still time for you to [get in on the next round, coming March 15](. Until next time, [brit''s sig] Briton Ryle [[follow basic]@BritonRyle on Twitter]( A 21-year veteran of the newsletter business, Briton Ryle is the editor of [The Wealth Advisory]( income stock newsletter, with a focus on top-quality dividend growth stocks and REITs. Briton also manages the [Real Income Trader]( advisory service, where his readers take regular cash payouts using a low-risk covered call option strategy. He also contributes a weekly column to the [Wealth Daily]( e-letter. To learn more about Briton, [click here.]( Enjoy reading this article? [Click here]( to like it and receive similar articles to read! Browse Our Archives [Bill Gates' Top Technology Picks of 2019: An Investor's Guide (Part 2)]( [Billionaire Philanthropist to Give Away Over $1.5 Billion in 2019]( [Tesla Choices: License, Acquire... or Die]( [What to Do With Your Retirement Accounts During Retirement]( [Is Amazon Finally Failing?]( --------------------------------------------------------------- This email was sent to {EMAIL}. It is not our intention to send email to anyone who doesn't want it. If you're not sure why you've received this e-letter, or no longer wish to receive it, you may [unsubscribe here](, and view our privacy policy and information on how to manage your subscription. To ensure that you receive future issues of Wealth Daily, please add newsletter@wealthdaily.com to your address book or whitelist within your spam settings. For customer service questions or issues, please contact us for assistance. [Wealth Daily](, Copyright © 2019, [Angel Publishing LLC](. All rights reserved. 111 Market Place #720 Baltimore, MD 21202. The content of this site may not be redistributed without the express written consent of Angel Publishing. Individual editorials, articles and essays appearing on this site may be republished, but only with full attribution of both the author and Wealth Daily as well as a link to www.wealthdaily.com. Your privacy is important to us -- we will never rent or sell your e-mail or personal information. [View our privacy policy here.]( No statement or expression of opinion, or any other matter herein, directly or indirectly, is an offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities or financial instruments mentioned. While we believe the sources of information to be reliable, we in no way represent or guarantee the accuracy of the statements made herein. [Wealth Daily]( does not provide individual investment counseling, act as an investment advisor, or individually advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment. Neither the publisher nor the editors are registered investment advisors. Subscribers should not view this publication as offering personalized legal or investment counseling. Investments recommended in this publication should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company in question.