Artificial Intelligence Takes on Lithium Batteries

A long-known but no less infuriating truth about batteries today is that they have wildly varying life spans. But one company is looking to change that using artificial intelligence technology. And despite these world-changing advancements, it's still tiny... You are receiving this email because you subscribed to Wealth Daily. [Click here]( to manage your e-mail preferences. [Wealth Daily logo] Artificial Intelligence Takes on Lithium Batteries [Alex Koyfman Photo] By [Alex Koyfman]( Written Jan. 24, 2019 Dear Reader, Here's an interesting experiment: Next time one of the remote controls in your house stops working, replace all the batteries in its battery bay and mark the date. A year or so down the line, when it stops working again, before replacing both of the batteries again, try testing a new battery in combination with one of the old ones and see if the remote magically comes back to life. Chances are close to 100% that it will, demonstrating a long-known but no less infuriating truth about batteries today: they have wildly varying life spans. I first noticed this phenomenon as a kid and didn't give it too much thought. I wasn't alone, either. In the 1980s, companies like Duracell started pasting "charge meters" onto their batteries' outer casings so you could manually test the life expectancy of each unit. Why bother? Because they knew, as did almost all consumers, that batteries lived unpredictable, nonstandard lives. Even those unpackaged and put into use side by side would kick the bucket on their own schedules — with life spans varying by weeks. It wasn't until recently that I learned why. You see, the battery is a largely organic product. Yes, two units from the same line will be constructed of the same materials, to the same exacting specifications, and will deliver a similar voltage, but there are so many variables that determine their longevity and functionality that predicting this is nearly impossible. Inevitably, the quality and nature of the materials will vary (based on the way they're mined, refined, and processed) on a molecular level. So while they're similar on the surface, the internal variations will compound into noticeable differences in performance. For the companies, increasing quality standards to the point where battery cell life becomes completely uniform is simply not worth the cost. People have been dealing with longer and shorter unit life expectancies for decades and nobody has raised much of a stink yet, so why bother investing billions when the products are already sufficient? Well, in Norway, that question finally has an answer. Why Does Tesla Fear This Barely Known Startup? If I had a product line worth tens of billions and it was rolling off the production line with technology I knew was about to become obsolete, I’d be worried, too. That’s exactly what Elon Musk faces today, because the electric motors in every Tesla car built to date have just become obsolete. Thanks to a historic innovation and the first major change to basic electric motor design in almost 200 years, a tiny Canadian startup is about to cause a lot of people sleepless nights. [Here’s its story.]( For Sale By Owner: Lightly Used, Garage-Kept Tesla Model S With one of the biggest secondhand electrical vehicle markets in the world, Norwegians have a very good reason to demand more from their batteries than most other people. The same problems that plague the disposable AAs that you put into your TV remotes also plague giant rechargeable batteries — like the kind that make your Tesla Model S go. Except instead of one cell per battery, a Tesla S will have a battery array containing over 7,000 of these individual cells, each of them living and dying according to its own unpredictable internal schedule. This may go unnoticed for new EV buyers, but for those buying their cars secondhand, the problems of depleting charge retention and rapidly dropping driving range are very real issues that dramatically affect the resale value of a vehicle. It should come as no surprise then that it was a Norwegian scientist who finally figured out a way to rein in these issues. Setting much stricter manufacturing standards was one solution, but as mentioned earlier, shouldering the costs of redesign and retooling with only a marginal expected improvement was not the way to go. To improve the life span and efficiency of the big, complex battery arrays that powered electrical vehicles, there had to be a way to manage the performance degradation on a case-by-case basis... and that's exactly what this engineer did. Electronic Brains to the Rescue He came up with a way to constantly monitor the performance characteristics of each cell and then, using artificial intelligence algorithms, individually manage the way voltage was distributed to each of these cells during charging, and the way it was depleted during usage. Weaker cells were treated one way, stronger cells another way. The algorithms governing how voltage was distributed and how it was expended had to be tested and "trained" over the course of months, even years of experimentation, but in the end, the result was a battery that was up to 10% more efficient and longer lasting than its predecessors. This charge management system also cut down on things like catastrophic failures, making the famous lithium battery meltdown issue largely a thing of the past. It didn't take long for a technology this disruptive to catch the eye of the industry, and soon enough, it was acquired. The company that bought it, however, wasn't an automotive giant like GM, Ford, or Tesla itself. It wasn't a consumer/commercial tech giant like GE or even a tech-crazed monster like Google. Instead, this company was a tiny, young tech firm that in the last few years perfected a similar power-management system for electrical motors. Bank 1,000% on the Death of Comcast America’s most hated cable company is standing on its last leg. And it’s not because of terrible customer service or mediocre products. It’s because of a technological shift that’s scheduled to start in late-2018. It's a shift that could earn you 1,000% gains as three companies bring down big cable. [Click here for their ticker symbols.]( Disrupting a Trillion-Dollar Market Its advancements in making electrical motors more efficient, more powerful, and more reliable were heralded as the first major evolution of the device since its very advent. [You can check out that research report right here.]( However, with the addition of this battery technology, this tiny company, based in British Columbia, now has a complete system on its hands: a power source and an engine. The combination has singlehandedly made every other battery/motor system in existence today obsolete. And if companies like Tesla, Mercedes, Chevy, or anybody else in the business of building large, expensive, battery-powered machines wants to keep up, they will have to enter into licensing deals with this tiny company to make it happen. A major builder of a wide spectrum of major commercial products ranging from wind turbines to high-speed trains has already done so, and more are expected to come on board in the coming months. Like I said, the company that's making these world-changing advancements is tiny, but it's already public, and its stock is already trading. To get the full story, [click here](. Just remember, this industry secret won't stay a secret for long. This time next year, it may be trading at 1,000% of its current market cap or more. Don't miss your chance to get a jump on the opportunity before it becomes the next major tech trend. Fortune favors the bold, [alex koyfman Signature] Alex Koyfman [[follow basic]@AlexKoyfman on Twitter]( Coming to us from an already impressive career as an independent trader and private investor, Alex's specialty is in the often misunderstood but highly profitable development-stage microcap sector. Focusing on young, aggressive, innovative biotech and technology firms from the U.S. and Canada, Alex has built a track record most Wall Street hedge funders would envy. Alex contributes his thoughts and insights regularly to [Wealth Daily](. To learn more about Alex, [click here](. Enjoy reading this article? [Click here]( to like it and receive similar articles to read! Browse Our Archives [I'll Make This as Difficult as I Can for You]( [Is Slack Following in Spotify's Footsteps?]( [How Do You Make Money?]( [These Stocks Could Be the Next Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL)... in a Bad Way]( [The Jeff Bezos Divorce: Why I'm Selling Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) Stock]( --------------------------------------------------------------- This email was sent to {EMAIL}. It is not our intention to send email to anyone who doesn't want it. If you're not sure why you've received this e-letter, or no longer wish to receive it, you may [unsubscribe here](, and view our privacy policy and information on how to manage your subscription. To ensure that you receive future issues of Wealth Daily, please add newsletter@wealthdaily.com to your address book or whitelist within your spam settings. For customer service questions or issues, please contact us for assistance. [Wealth Daily](, Copyright © 2019, [Angel Publishing LLC](. All rights reserved. 111 Market Place #720 Baltimore, MD 21202. The content of this site may not be redistributed without the express written consent of Angel Publishing. Individual editorials, articles and essays appearing on this site may be republished, but only with full attribution of both the author and Wealth Daily as well as a link to www.wealthdaily.com. Your privacy is important to us -- we will never rent or sell your e-mail or personal information. [View our privacy policy here.]( No statement or expression of opinion, or any other matter herein, directly or indirectly, is an offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities or financial instruments mentioned. While we believe the sources of information to be reliable, we in no way represent or guarantee the accuracy of the statements made herein. [Wealth Daily]( does not provide individual investment counseling, act as an investment advisor, or individually advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment. Neither the publisher nor the editors are registered investment advisors. Subscribers should not view this publication as offering personalized legal or investment counseling. Investments recommended in this publication should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company in question.