Newsletter Subject

Debate winners and losers

From

vox.com

Email Address

newsletter@vox.com

Sent On

Fri, Jun 28, 2024 10:30 AM

Email Preheader Text

Plus: The Supreme Court's been busy, the joy of Nerds candy, and more. June 28, 2024 Happy Friday! L

Plus: The Supreme Court's been busy, the joy of Nerds candy, and more. June 28, 2024 [View in browser]( Happy Friday! Last night was a doozy of a presidential debate. Senior correspondent Andrew Prokop is here to break it down. —Caroline Houck, senior editor of news   [trump and biden at the debate] Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images 2 winners and 2 losers from last night’s debate So many important issues are at stake in the 2024 election: [foreign policy](, [reproductive rights](, [immigration](, the [future of American democracy](. But coming out of the first debate between Joe Biden and Donald Trump, one topic has crowded all those out: Biden’s performance. Biden’s rationale for agreeing to this historically early presidential debate was, in part, to try and put concerns over his age to rest. Instead, they’ve been supercharged. Multiple reports soon after the debate claimed that top Democrats were downright panicked by how Biden came off onstage. Major media outlets wrote that Biden “[struggled](” and appeared “[shaky](.” Biden is the oldest president ever, and Republicans have long been trying to push an exaggerated narrative that he is senile. He didn’t seem senile on stage — but he didn’t seem sharp, either. He spoke very softly, his answers were often messy on the substance, and when he did have decent lines they were usually hampered by his halting and understated delivery. Sources told NBC News midway through the debate that Biden [has a cold](, implying his affect was a one-off fluke. The risk, though, is that voters determined after watching that he is simply not up for the job he wants to keep. This was, after all, the most prolonged look at Biden in an adversarial setting we’ve gotten in some time, and he didn’t come off well. Trump’s performance was no great shakes: He said absurd and untrue things, rambled and lost coherence. But he did it more energetically — and, more to the point, he was typical Trump, no one would be surprised by what he said or how he said it. On one level, all of the above is so shallow and superficial that I feel somewhat embarrassed to have written it. Politics should be about more than theater criticism and affect. It’s about important issues that will affect the lives of millions of people. Unfortunately, the question of what a relatively small group of swing voters thinks about Joe Biden’s age may well be what the 2024 election hinges on. Many Democrats think they have a winning argument against Trump on the issues, but they’re worried that Biden simply can’t make the case. So the most immediate consequence of Thursday’s debate will be a revival of chatter about [whether Biden should even stay]( in the race or [whether there’s still some other option]( for Democrats. And that consequence makes for a pretty clear set of takeaways for the race in the wake of this debate. [joe biden] Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images Loser: Joe Biden No need to belabor the point: If the debate ends with your party debating whether you should even stay in the race, it’s pretty obvious you lost. The Biden “age issue” is really a conflation of a few separate things. Again, there’s the exaggerated right-wing narrative that he’s senile. There are normal concerns about aging slowing people down somewhat mentally and physically. There’s the question about whether his health would hold up in a second term. There are questions about whether any of this has impaired his decision-making or governance (I don’t believe it has; it’s hard to point to an example of any administration that would be different if he was Joe Biden but younger). But there’s also a more difficult concern for Biden to rebut: that he has failed to appropriately “perform” the role of president or presidential candidate. That he hasn’t been good at seeming like he’s in command, like he’s energetic, can handle tough questioning, and is up to the job. This is where he failed most glaringly during the debate. For many elite Democrats, the worry about Biden’s age is mainly a meta-worry: It’s about what swing voters will think about Biden’s age. If that’s your rubric, it doesn’t matter if you think he’s doing a great job as president; what matters is what the swing voters will think. And it’s hard to believe many liked what they saw on Thursday. Winner: Donald Trump By default, in a two-person contest, Trump won the debate due to Biden’s weakness. But his performance was not particularly impressive. As usual, Trump got sidetracked into his perennial grievances (“Russia Russia Russia,” “the laptop,” James Comey, false claims of 2020 election fraud). He lied, said ridiculous things, and dodged questions. He also missed opportunities: Biden was shaky enough that a more disciplined and savvy Republican candidate could well have embarrassed him far more — by, for instance, posing questions directly to him and truly throwing him off. Trump did benefit from the relative lack of focus on his attempt to steal the 2020 election and his recent criminal conviction. And perhaps the way he won most was that the debate seemed to normalize him: His attack on American democracy was just one issue among many, only showing up halfway through. [donald trump] Justin Sullivan/Getty Images Loser: Substantive issues Look, it never seemed particularly likely that with these two candidates on stage this debate would be an enlightening and nuanced exchange about policy issues. Neither are wonks, Trump lies constantly, and every debate he has participated in ends up devolving into a mudslinging contest. Still, for anyone interested in substance, this debate was a truly desultory affair. On abortion, Trump accused Biden of wanting to kill 9-month-old babies and Biden [struggled to explain]( Roe v. Wade’s three-trimester framework. On climate change, Trump bragged that while he was president the country had clean air and “H2O.” On the economy, Biden claimed Trump destroyed the economy in 2020, while Trump claimed Biden solely caused inflation and has only created jobs for migrants — all false. The nadir was the supremely stupid exchange in which both candidates insulted each other’s golf games. ”I’m happy to play golf if you carry your own bag,” Biden said. Trump responded by mocking Biden’s “swing.” Why? Winner: Kamala Harris Back in March, Biden’s fiery State of the Union address quieted many concerns among Democrats over whether he was up to the rigors of another campaign. Now, the debate has reopened that topic of discussion. It will take more time (and polling numbers) to determine just how serious the damage to Biden is. Maybe mainly politics die-hards who have their minds made up were the people watching this very early debate. The media may focus on Biden’s age for a while, but attention will inevitably shift to other topics. Still, the odds that Kamala Harris ends up the Democratic presidential nominee for 2024 are, in my view, higher after the debate than they were before it. The Democratic National Convention is at the end of August. Biden won the primaries and has most Democratic delegates pledged to him, so he can’t be totally pushed out against his will. But if power players in the party tell him that he has to step down — and he listens — then Harris would be the obvious next in line. When this scenario has been discussed, it’s often been about an “open” convention, where delegates would [come together]( to somehow choose their own nominee, as in older political eras. My guess is that this would be far too messy and impractical, and coordination and consensus-building around one option would be too difficult. There have been doubts within the party about Harris’s political strength, but if Democratic elites come to agree Biden is fatally politically flawed, they’d be more likely to roll the dice with her. For now, dropping Biden still seems very unlikely. But it seems less unlikely than it did Thursday morning. —[Andrew Prokop, senior correspondent](   [Listen]( How Spotify picks its winners No, Sabrina Carpenter probably isn’t paying the streamer to play “Espresso” every time you’re listening to music. But the app is making changes to its business model that could impact your listening. [Listen now](   FOOD - What a time to be alive: The Nerds Gummy Cluster is candy perfection, according to the internet. Here’s an ode/investigation into its viral popularity. [[Slate](] - Showing my age, but now I have Subway’s old “five, five-dollar, five-dollar footlong” song stuck in my head: Here’s how that number — $5 — has now become the whole fast food industry's magic number. [[Axios](] [nerds candy display] Denise Truscello/Getty Images for ITSUGAR THE SUPREME COURT’S BEEN BUSY - They just lit a match and tossed it into dozens of federal agencies: Their decision in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy, explained. [[Vox](] - Their new abortion decision, explained: After accidentally publishing their decision in an abortion case out of Idaho on Wednesday, the Supreme Court officially released it Thursday. It’s not a win for abortion rights. [[Vox](] - State officials can engage in a little corruption, as a treat: The justices ruled 6-3 that state officials may accept “gratuities” from people who wish to reward them for their official actions, despite a federal anti-corruption statute that appears to ban such rewards. [[Vox](] TWO SIDES OF THE SAME COIN - Can Democrats replace Biden as their nominee?: Eh, no, not really, my colleague Christian Paz explains. Unless Biden himself decides to drop out. [[Vox](] - Which takes us to the argument that ... Joe Biden should save his legacy by ending his candidacy: My colleague Eric Levitz's case for somebody, anybody else. [[Vox](]   Ad   We can learn from a sea creature orgy Vox's Benji Jones explains how horseshoe crabs carry life on their backs (literally). [Read more »](   Are you enjoying the Today, Explained newsletter? Forward it to a friend; they can [sign up for it right here](. Love Vox podcasts? Then help us make a new one, launching this fall! Each episode will start with a question from Vox readers and listeners – ranging from the heavy to the silly, the systemic to the personal. We’ll cover culture, finance, politics, technology, and more! Anything from why dating feels harder these days to why jars are so hard to open. If you want something in your world explained, and Google can’t get you the answer, submit questions to askvox@vox.com or give us a call at 1-800-618-8545. Today's edition was produced and edited by Caroline Houck. We'll see you next week!   [Become a Vox Member]( Support our journalism — become a Vox Member and you’ll get exclusive access to the newsroom with members-only perks including newsletters, bonus podcasts and videos, and more. [Join our community](   Ad   [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [YouTube]( [Instagram]( [TikTok]( [WhatsApp]( This email was sent to {EMAIL}. Manage your [email preferences]( [unsubscribe](param=sentences). If you value Vox’s unique explanatory journalism, support our work with a one-time or recurring [contribution](. View our [Privacy Notice]( and our [Terms of Service](. Vox Media, 1701 Rhode Island. NW, Washington, DC 20036. Copyright © 2024. All rights reserved.

EDM Keywords (225)

younger written would worry worried work wish winners win whether wednesday weakness way watching wants wanting wake vox videos unlikely trying try trump treat tossed topic time thursday think terms takeaways take systemic swing surprised superficial subway substance streamer still step steal start stake stage spoke softly simply silly sign showing shallow serious sent senile see securities scenario saw save said rubric roll role rigors right reward revival republicans reopened rebut really rationale race questions question push produced primaries president politics point physically personal perhaps performance people paying party participated part option open one often odds normalize nominee newsroom need nadir music millions migrants messy members matters matter match manage make mainly lost long lives lit listens listening line likely legacy learn keep joy join job jars itsugar issues internet impractical impaired idaho heavy head harris hard happy halting halfway h2o guess governance gotten google good glaringly get future friend food focus fluke far false fall failed example episode enlightening enjoying engage energetically energetic ends ending end embarrassed email edition edited economy drop dozens doozy discussion discussed disciplined difficult different dice devolving determine democrats default decision decides debate days damage crowded country coordination conflation coming come coin chatter case carry candidacy call busy break biden benefit believe belabor become ban attention attempt attack argument appears app anything answers also alive agreeing age affect administration 2024 2020

Marketing emails from vox.com

View More
Sent On

30/06/2024

Sent On

30/06/2024

Sent On

30/06/2024

Sent On

28/06/2024

Sent On

28/06/2024

Sent On

27/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.