Newsletter Subject

Tornadoes vs. AI

From

vox.com

Email Address

newsletter@vox.com

Sent On

Fri, Jun 21, 2024 11:05 AM

Email Preheader Text

Plus: International nuclear bromances, Biden's advertising pivot, and more June 21, 2024 Happy Frida

Plus: International nuclear bromances, Biden's advertising pivot, and more June 21, 2024 [View in browser]( Happy Friday! Today, correspondent Umair Irfan is here to explain how tornado forecasting works. Very cool. —Caroline Houck, senior editor of news   [A huge dark cloud with a swirling funnel in southwest Texas] Wirestock/Getty Images Can we ever really beat tornadoes? The United States just experienced the busiest stretch of tornado activity in more than a decade. Between April 25 and May 27, there were only two days when [tornadoes didn’t touch down](. According to a preliminary tally from the [National Centers for Environmental Information](, 1,117 tornadoes were detected between January and May of this year, the highest count over this time frame since 2011. These menacing funnels of spinning air are deadly. Twisters over Memorial Day weekend [killed at least 21 people]( across states including Kentucky, Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Texas. They’ve racked up [billions of dollars]( in damages. They’ve also dropped down from the sky in places that rarely see them, like [central California]( and [outside of Washington, DC](, forcing people who may have never experienced these storms before to seek shelter that may not exist. Tornadoes remain one of the most dangerous weather events. And they buck an otherwise promising trend: While many types of [natural disasters are killing fewer people]( over time thanks to better forecasting and stronger infrastructure, tornadoes can catch people off guard. The [lead time for tornado warnings]( is often less than 10 minutes, and progress has been frustratingly slow, especially when compared to other types of severe weather. In the last few years, scientists have made progress in anticipating when the next twisters will touch down. In particular, forecasters are now testing a new set of tools built on [machine learning](, an artificial intelligence technique that trains computers to detect patterns without explicitly programming them. These algorithms depend on good data to teach them, and that poses a major challenge for getting ahead of this particularly confounding phenomenon: As global average temperatures rise and as land use changes, past tornado activity might not reflect how these storms will whip through cities in the future. [Tree-cutting crews remove cut branches from a car destroyed by a tornado.] Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images Why tornadoes are so tricky to predict One of the biggest obstacles to forecasting tornadoes is their size. “In the grand scheme of the atmosphere, they're very small-scale,” said [Russ Schumacher](, a professor of atmospheric science at Colorado State University. “The biggest ones might be a mile wide. Most of them are smaller than that.” Tornadoes can rip entire homes off their foundations while houses a few blocks away are left unscathed. Tornadoes are also short-lived, often just a few minutes. Detecting tornadoes with instruments like Doppler radars requires looking for subtle cues and still needs verification from [storm spotters]( on the ground. Weather monitoring stations are often spaced too far apart to pick up smaller tornadoes before they form. Hurricanes, in contrast, gather strength over days, can span hundreds of miles, and are visible to satellites, yielding ample time and information to generate useful forecasts, issue alerts, and get people out of the way. “I don’t think we’re ever going to have the level of specificity of forecasts for tornadoes that we do for hurricanes,” Schumacher said. Most tornadoes erupt from a particular type of thunderstorm known as a [supercell](, which contains a rotating column of air that moves upward. But not every supercell leads to tornadoes, and not every tornado hatches from a supercell. “Forecasters now are really good at identifying the days when the ingredients are in place, when the potential is there for a lot of tornadoes to happen,” Schumacher said. “But it’s still really difficult to identify which of those storms is going to make a tornado.” [In this aerial view, a home is crushed by a fallen tree knocked down by a tornado.] Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images Could AI eventually hack the twister problem? While it’s been difficult, there have been improvements in tornado forecasting over the past decade, and artificial intelligence has sped up progress more recently. As AI could boost potential here, researchers had already refined [numerical models]( and enhanced their resolution in the past decade, creating a sharper picture of how severe weather forms, particularly the kinds of storms that allow the convection needed to create supercells. Scientists have also developed a better understanding of how tornadoes are influenced by broader global factors. The recent burst of tornado activity was influenced by the shift away from the Pacific Ocean’s warm phase of its temperature cycle, known as [El Niño](. Since the Pacific Ocean begins to telegraph when it’s likely to shift gears months in advance, this swing between El Niño and La Niña can be a [warning sign that more tornadoes are brewing](. The intense [heat wave over Central America and Mexico]( last month then evaporated plenty of water into the atmosphere that served as fuel for convective storms. Now scientists are taking these historical records, present weather measurments, and computer simulations and feeding them into machine learning models to better predict tornadoes. One such [forecasting model]( that’s currently undergoing testing at the National Weather Service’s [Storm Prediction Center]( could anticipate heightened tornado activity over a region several days in advance of a strike. Schumacher said the machine learning system has proven especially useful roughly three to seven days ahead of a storm — a period when forecasters don’t have a lot of other tools that can make useful predictions in that time frame. “I think the human forecasters tend to be a bit conservative,” Schumacher said. “[The machine learning tool] tends to be a little bit more bullish even at those longer lead times, but it’s turned out that a lot of the time it’s right.” But scientists don’t want to take their hands off the radars and leave everything up to the AI just yet either. [Victor Gensini](, a meteorology professor at Northern Illinois University who studies tornadoes, dubbed the current strategy “human-in-the-loop AI,” where a meteorologist evaluates predictions from the machine learning model to ensure they line up with the laws of physics. At the same time, researchers also want to keep an open mind and an eye out for any new, previously unrecognized relationships in weather that can cause tornadoes that might show up in the AI forecast. “As an expert, you look at some of these and you’re like, ‘That doesn’t make any sense. Why is the model weighting that?” Gensini said. “Maybe it’s picking up on something.” The big challenge for machine-learning forecasts, however, is that they’re learning from history. Robust tornado records don’t go back that far and there are lots of gaps in sensor networks. And as humans alter the flows of rivers, cut down forests, and change the climate, future tornadoes will arise in a regime that looks less like the past. “If you’re seeing something or trying to forecast something that's never happened before, then the model gets into some trouble,” Gensini said. That’s why a key part of developing better tornado forecasts is gaining better observations. To catch the tornado of the future, we need more eyes on the weather of the present. —[Umair Irfan, correspondent](   [Listen]( It’s not easy being a green conservative Fighting climate change is not a very common Republican position. Climate activist Benji Backer argues it should be, and Climate Capitalism author Akshat Rathi explains how the free market could play a role. [Listen now](   AROUND THE WORLD - China is basically fighting with the Philippines, ramming their boats and injuring at least one crew member: It’s over the Second Thomas Shoal, a reef inside the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone that China also claims is in its own waters. You can see a video of part of the encounters, released by the armed forces of the Philippines, here. [[FT](] - The Greek coast guard’s horrific crimes: A BBC investigation found that over 40 migrants had died because of the coast guard’s actions, including nine people who were “deliberately thrown into the water.” [[BBC](] - The Putin-Kim Jong-un nuclear [bromance](: Earlier this week, in a sign of returning Cold War-era security arrangements, Russia and North Korea announced a pact to provide “mutual assistance in the event of aggression.” [[NYT](] - Sudan on the brink: Analysis of satellite imagery shows that cemeteries across the country are rapidly expanding as a result of fighting and hunger amid the yearlong conflict. [[Reuters](] [A small boat full of migrants seen at night.] Ugur Yildirim/ dia images via Getty Images POLITICS - If any of you are billionaires, rejoice at the Supreme Court’s latest ruling: The rest of us, probably not so much. [[Vox](] - Gender divides: “Almost every path to victory for President Biden relies on strong support from women. But his current standing among women is the weakest lead a Democrat has had since 2004.” [[NYT](] - One forecast puts Trump’s odds of victory at 70 percent: And while Biden’s campaign has been spending millions each month on advertising, Trump’s hasn’t even started. Can a new strategy from Biden change things up? [[Vox](]   Ad   Most Americans are wrong about crime [[ratio]  ](   Are you enjoying the Today, Explained newsletter? Forward it to a friend; they can [sign up for it right here](. And if you're interested in more Vox delivered to your inbox ... Specifically political stories about what's happening on the American right, [sign up for our new newsletter, On The Right](, from senior correspondent Zack Beauchamp. Today's edition was produced and edited by Caroline Houck. We'll see you Monday!   [Become a Vox Member]( Support our journalism — become a Vox Member and you’ll get exclusive access to the newsroom with members-only perks including newsletters, bonus podcasts and videos, and more. [Join our community](   Ad   [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [YouTube]( [Instagram]( [TikTok]( [WhatsApp]( This email was sent to {EMAIL}. Manage your [email preferences]( [unsubscribe](param=sentences). If you value Vox’s unique explanatory journalism, support our work with a one-time or recurring [contribution](. View our [Privacy Notice]( and our [Terms of Service](. Vox Media, 1701 Rhode Island. NW, Washington, DC 20036. Copyright © 2024. All rights reserved.

Marketing emails from vox.com

View More
Sent On

25/06/2024

Sent On

24/06/2024

Sent On

24/06/2024

Sent On

21/06/2024

Sent On

20/06/2024

Sent On

20/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.