Newsletter Subject

Squeezing More Out Of This Trade

From

tradewins.com

Email Address

marketwealthdaily@tradewins.com

Sent On

Fri, Sep 6, 2024 11:56 AM

Email Preheader Text

Tough Criticism Showed Another Way To Make it Work? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

Tough Criticism Showed Another Way To Make it Work͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ I must’ve struck a nerve with someone over my article yesterday. I proposed that it would have been impossible to dup I must’ve struck a nerve with someone over my article yesterday. I proposed that it would have been impossible to duplicate the results of the trade I shared yesterday, on the basis that I was able to take this Asymmetrical Put Butterfly Spread all the way to Expiration and have it Cash Settle for $9.93. I shared that I felt it would have been impossible to enter a similar trade using SPY options and get out before the day was over. My premise was that the Market Makers would do what Market Makers do – Avoid Giving you Fair Value! My critic did not doubt me on that premise. What he did say was what I didn’t say! He pointed out to me my strike price selection. He correctly reminded me that SPX options are roughly 10 times the size of SPY options. My $5530 Put would have an equivalent SPY option with a strike price of say $553. My $5520 Put would have an equivalent SPY option with a strike price of say $552. But there is no $551.50 strike price SPY option to match up with my $5515 Put. The fact of the matter is that he pointed out to me, that I did not point out to you that SPX has twice as many strike prices as SPY. Therefore, a trader cannot trade SPY options with as much precision as they can trade SPX options. I’ve been trying to make the point all along that traders should quit trading SPY options and instead trade the Cash Settling SPX & XSP options solely on the premise that a trader can hold SPX & XSP options to the end of the day and have their Intrinsic Value simply deposited in one’s account. While that is true, there’s more reasons still. Just as this one reader pointed out to me. While I have your attention, I want to go over my position with you explaining just how this worked out so well to my benefit: First off, this was a three-sided position. But I didn’t have to placed three separate orders to enter it. I placed a Limit Order which was filled at a Net Debit of $3.55. Doing so cost me a total of $355. That was all I paid and that’s all that was at Risk. When SPX closed the day at $5520.07 only my $5530 Put (which I was Long) ended the day being In-the-Money (ITM). As such, I was credited the difference between my strike price and the Settlement Price (the Intrinsic Value). The SPX $5520 Puts which I had sold Expired Worthless. They ended the day being Out-of-the-Money (OTM). But it was close. I made it by just seven cents. Finally, my Lower Wing Option, SPX $5515 Put expired worthless as well. It ended the day being $5.07 Out-of-the-Money. But understand if SPX had crashed and all of these options ended up In-the- Money (ITM), they all would have Cash Settled with money being placed into my account for both my $5530 Put and my $5515 Put. They would have taken money out of my account for the SPX $5520 Puts. But since everything works out to the penny, if SPX had crashed I would had still netted $5.00 in Cash. This was a good trade! And this is a trade that couldn’t have been equaled by trading SPY options. Cash Settled Options are the way to go! I’ll have more reports sharing why as the days pass. Feel free to point out anything I miss. I very much appreciate constructive criticism. Thanks and Good Trading, Chris --------------------------------------------------------------- See Related Articles on [TradewinsDaily.com]( [Squeezing More Out Of This Trade]( [Chart of the Day: Nvidia (NVDA)]( [Hard to Ignore this Staple’s Trend]( [Institutions Piling into this Utility Stock]( [Dollar Tree, Inc. (DLTR), Trending Stock Report]( --------------------------------------------------------------- [TradeWins Logo]( © 2024 Tradewins Publishing. All rights reserved. | [Privacy Policy]( | [Terms and Conditions]( | [Contact Us]( Auto-trading, or any broker or advisor-directed type of trading, is not supported or endorsed by TradeWins. For additional information on auto-trading, you may visit the SEC's website: All About Auto-Trading, TradeWins does not recommend or refer subscribers to broker-dealers. You should perform your own due diligence with respect to satisfactory broker-dealers and whether to open a brokerage account. You should always consult with your own professional advisers regarding equities and options on equities trading. 1. The information provided by the newsletters, trading, training and educational products related to various markets (collectively referred to as the "Services") is not customized or personalized to any particular risk profile or tolerance. Nor is the information published by TradeWins Publishing ("TradeWins") a customized or personalized recommendation to buy, sell, hold, or invest in particular financial products. The Services are intended to supplement your own research and analysis. 2. TradeWins' Services are not a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any financial products, and the Services are not intended to provide money management advice or services. 3. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Trading and investing involve substantial risk. Trading on margin carries a high level of risk, and may not be suitable for all investors. Other than the refund policy detailed elsewhere, TradeWins does not make any guarantee or other promise as to any results that may be obtained from using the Services. No person subscribing for the Services ("Subscriber") should make any investment decision without first consulting his or her own personal financial adviser, broker or consultant. TradeWins disclaims any and all liability in the event anything contained in the Services proves to be inaccurate, incomplete or unreliable, or results in any investment or other loss by a Subscriber. 4. You should trade or invest only "risk capital" money you can afford to lose. Trading stocks and stock options involves high risk and you can lose the entire principal amount invested or more. 5. All investments carry risk and all trading decisions made by a person remain the responsibility of that person. There is no guarantee that systems, indicators, or trading signals will result in profits or that they will not produce losses. Subscribers should fully understand all risks associated with any kind of trading or investing before engaging in such activities. 6. Some profit examples are based on hypothetical or simulated trading. This means the trades are not actual trades and instead are hypothetical trades based on real market prices at the time the recommendation is disseminated. No actual money is invested, nor are any trades executed. Hypothetical or simulated performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. Also, the hypothetical results do not include the costs of subscriptions, commissions, or other fees. Because the trades underlying these examples have not actually been executed, the results may understate or overstate the impact of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity. Simulated trading services in general are also designed with the benefit of hindsight, which may not be relevant to actual trading. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. TradeWins makes no representations or warranties that any account will or is likely to achieve profits similar to those shown. 7. No representation is being made that you will achieve profits or the same results as any person providing testimonial. No representation is being made that any person providing a testimonial is likely to continue to experience profitable trading after the date on which the testimonial was provided, and in fact the person providing the testimonial may have experienced losses. 8. The author experiences are not typical. The author is an experienced investor and your results will vary depending on risk tolerance, amount of risk capital utilized, size of trading position and other factors. Certain Subscribers may modify the author methods, or modify or ignore the rules or risk parameters, and any such actions are taken entirely at the Subscriber's own election and for the Subscriber's own risk. If you wish to unsubscribe from our newsletter, click [here]( TradeWins Publishing Corp.528 North Country Rd., St. James, NY 11780

Marketing emails from tradewins.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.