Newsletter Subject

Now Testing: Mineral sunscreen

From

thewirecutter.com

Email Address

notes@thewirecutter.com

Sent On

Wed, Jun 17, 2020 11:31 PM

Email Preheader Text

An exclusive, behind-the-scenes look at our testing Nancy Redd We all scream for ice cream, but Wire

An exclusive, behind-the-scenes look at our testing Nancy Redd We all scream for ice cream, but Wirecutter screens for sunscreen! Not all sunscreens are created equal, or with the same ingredients. Recent studies have shown that some sunscreen ingredients can be harmful to coral reefs and [some chemicals persist in the bloodstream](. So we decided to put 11 mineral, reef-friendly sunscreens to the test against our current mineral sunscreen pick, [Thinksport SPF 50+](. — Nancy Redd Wirecutter is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. [Learn more](. What we tested We tested 11 mineral sunscreen lotions. Seven are specifically marketed for the face: - [Drunk Elephant Umbra Sheer Physical Daily Defense SPF 30]( - [Drunk Elephant Umbra Tinte Physical Daily Defense SPF 30]( - [All Good Tinted SPF 30]( - [Coppertone Pure & Simple Face SPF 50]( - [Neutrogena Sheer Zinc SPF 50]( - [Aveeno Positively Mineral Sensitive Skin SPF 50]( - [Thinksport Everyday Face SPF 30+]( And four are face and body formulas: - [SPF RX SPF 40]( - [Coppertone Pure & Simple SPF 50]( - [Goddess Garden SPF 50]( - [Blue Lizard Sensitive SPF 30]( How we tested We looked for lightweight, sheer, broad-spectrum sunscreens. On top of that, we needed them to have an SPF of 30 or higher, the minimum that experts suggest for proper protection. We separated our testing pool by face and body sunscreens, and we asked our testers to fill out a questionnaire for each one. For facial sunscreens, testers unanimously fell in love with [Drunk Elephant’s mineral-only sunscreen](. Despite its hefty price tag, its superior absorbency and lightweight feel (in both tinted and “sheer” formulas) were impossible to beat. Although [Thinksport SPF 30 Everyday Face Tinted Sunscreen]( didn’t test as well as our pick, it’s much more budget-friendly than Drunk Elephant and was praised for its near-invisibility. Our testers also paid attention to how each sunscreen felt and looked on their skin, whether it was sticky or heavy, and if it gummed up body hair or left a white cast. [Neutrogena Sheer Zinc Dry-Touch Face Sunscreen]( was kind of sticky and difficult to absorb, frequently leaving a whitish cast. One of our hairiest testers said it turned their beard “white like Santa Claus.” As for body sunscreen, our testers determined how long it took for each sunscreen to fully absorb—which in the case of some sunscreens, like SPF RX SPF 40, was never. The [SPF RX SPF 40]( felt heavy on the skin and looked very chalky. We wanted to like this sunscreen more since it’s the most affordable option in our testing pool, at only $1.50 per ounce in the gallon size (compared with Thinksport’s $3.50 per ounce in its largest iteration, the 6-ounce tube). SPF RX SPF 40 (left) looks chalky compared with Thinksport. Video: Nancy Redd [Thinksport]( trusty, long-term reef-friendly sunscreen pick—remained the top mineral-only body sunscreen by a wide margin with testers. It applied effortlessly to our skin. For now, look and feel are our most important concerns. But we’ll take our top picks out with us while we’re social distancing this summer, and we will report any adverse reactions that may sway our choices in the long run. By the numbers 3 Weeks spent in the sun 11 Additional mineral-only sunscreens tested 100+ Total limbs slathered in lotions over years of testing sunscreen The verdict Nancy Redd [Drunk Elephant’s sunscreen]( will be our top pick for mineral-only facial sunscreen. For mineral-only body sunscreen, [Thinksport]( remains our top pick. What else we’re testing - Instant noodles - Hiking boots - Baby vital sign monitors Look for a behind-the-scenes preview of some of our testing in your inbox each month. You’ll also find the latest on our site. What else should we test? Reply and let us know, or send us a [tweet](. Copyright © 2020 Wirecutter, Inc., all rights reserved. You are receiving this email because you signed up for our newsletters. You are free to unsubscribe at any time.‌ Our mailing address is: Wirecutter, Inc. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018‌ [View this email in your browser]( [Unsubscribe from this list]( | [Update subscription preferences‌](

Marketing emails from thewirecutter.com

View More
Sent On

30/07/2020

Sent On

30/07/2020

Sent On

26/07/2020

Sent On

23/07/2020

Sent On

23/07/2020

Sent On

19/07/2020

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.