The Evening Wrap: Delhi court grants bail to Zubair, says voice of dissent necessary for democracy

A Delhi court granted bail on Friday to Alt News co-founder Mohammed Zubair in a case related to a tweet in 2018, stating, “The voice of dissent is necessary for healthy democracy. Therefore, for mere criticism of any political parties it is not justified to invoke Section 153A (promoting enmity) and 295A (deliberate and malicious acts to outrage religious feelings) of the IPC.” Mr. Zubair was arrested by the Delhi Police on June 27 in this FIR, registered based on a social media complaint claiming it hurt religious sentiments of Hindus. The tweet in question contained an image from a 1983 CBFC-approved film Kissi Se Na Kehna where a fictional hotel’s name had been changed from “Honeymoon hotel” to “Hanuman hotel”. With this, Mr. Zubair had posted the text: “Before 2014: Honeymoon Hotel/ After 2014: Hanuman Hotel”. Granting Mr. Zubair bail in this case, Additional Sessions Judge Devender Kumar Jangala held, “The applicant/accused is also stated to have used the words “Before 2014 and After 2014” to point out towards a political party. In Indian democracies the political parties are open for their criticism… The voice of dissent is necessary for healthy democracy.” While the scribe has been granted bail in the Delhi Police case, he will remain in jail till he is granted bail in all six FIRs registered against him in Uttar Pradesh. Of the six U.P. cases, Mr. Zubair has been arrested in three (Hathras, Lakhimpur Kheri, and Sitapur). In the Sitapur case, he has been granted interim bail by the Supreme Court and in the Hathras and Lakhimpur Kheri cases, he is currently in judicial custody. Mr. Zubair’s lawyers have already moved the top court seeking quashing of the U.P. FIRs or clubbing them together and moving them to Delhi. As for the case over the 2018 tweet, the judge held that there was no offence in naming a hotel or institution after a Hindu god if done without malice, noting that “Hindu religion is one of the oldest religion and most tolerant”. It added, “It is also not out of place to mention that the alleged tweet of the accused was made in the year 2018 but till the date of registration of the present FIR in 2022, no other complaint was received that the tweet of the accused is offensive to the Hindu community or showing disrespect to Lord Hanuman.” The court went on to note that though the Delhi Police had registered the FIR based on the hurt sentiment of a Twitter user, “till today during the investigation the police has failed to establish the identity of said Twitter user who felt offended by the tweet of the accused” and record their statement under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). On the now-added charge under Section 35 of the Foreign Contributions (Regulation) Act, the court agreed with Mr. Zubair’s lawyers that he and his company Alt News had exercised all necessary due diligence as called for under Section 39 of the FCRA to prevent the receipt of any foreign contribution. The journalist had submitted that they had clearly mentioned on their website that they do not take foreign remittances and that their payments gateway had also said that foreign payments were not enabled for them. He had also submitted that the website does not allow one to donate unless they disclose their citizenship, PAN and other details. Noting that all evidence in the case is documentary in nature, that the police had already questioned Mr. Zubair in custody for five days and that they had already made recoveries in the case, the court cited a Supreme Court judgment to reiterate that the object of denying bail is neither punitive nor preventative and that deprivation of liberty must be considered a punishment unless it is proved that it is required to secure the presence of an accused for their trial. The court granted bail to Mr. Zubair on a bond of ₹50,000 and one surety of the like amount, adding that he must not leave the country without the court’s explicit permission, directing him to surrender his passport to the police within three days of his release from jail. Sri Lanka’s Parliament to elect President for the first time since 1978 Sri Lanka’s Parliament Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardana said on Friday that Parliament will convene to choose a new President after the resignation of Gotabaya Rajapaksa. After Gotabaya emailed his resignation letter Thursday night, protesters in the island nation retreated from the government buildings they had occupied as the country battles a crippling economic crisis. The Parliamentary Speaker confirmed on Friday morning that Gotabaya’s resignation had been accepted. Gotabaya, who rose to power in 2019 on a thumping election win, fled the country and sought refuge on two other islands, as mass anti-government protests rapidly escalated last weekend. Early on Wednesday, he was flown to the Maldives by a Sri Lankan military aircraft. He reached Singapore on Thursday evening, the country’s Foreign Ministry confirmed. The 225-member Parliament will elect the new President by a secret vote. Meanwhile, Sri Lanka’s top court on Friday barred former Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa and former Finance Minister Basil Rajapaksa from leaving the country without permission until July 28, anti-corruption group Transparency International Sri Lanka said. Three other former officials, including two former central bank governors, also cannot travel outside the country without the court’s permission till July 28, the group said in a tweet. Circular banning demonstration within Parliament premises triggers furore A fresh bulletin from the Parliament secretariat ahead of the monsoon session of Parliament prohibiting the members from using the premises for “demonstration, dharna, strike, fast or for the purpose of performing any religious ceremony”, has raised a furore with the Opposition members calling it yet another attempt to bulldoze dissent. Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha officials have pointed out that this is a routine advisory which is released at the beginning of every Parliament session. To back this claim they also released circulars with same language which was released in December 2013 and February 2014 during the tenure of the Congress-led UPA government. Congress general secretary (communication) Jairam Ramesh launched a broadside at the government calling it “vishguru’s” latest salvo, “D(h)arna Mana Hai!” a play on Darna Mana Hai (Not allowed to be afraid). Replying to Ramesh’s tweet, Trinamool Congress’s Rajya Sabha floor leader Derek O’Brien said, “Every year they issue these notices in #Parliament bulletins. Demonstrations, dharnas, strikes, fast are part of legitimate parliamentary tactics to register protest. No stopping us. However, can you please update me. Didn’t SOMEONE conduct a religious ceremony recently?” O’Brien’s Lok Sabha colleague Mahua Moitra elaborated further. “By the way honourable MP Varanasi performed a religious ceremony on top of new Parliament building just four days ago,” Moitra tweeted. Prime Minister Narendra Modi is an MP from Varanasi. CPI(M) General Secretary Sitaram Yechury called the circular an attempt to “muzzle the soul of India.” “The more useless the government, the more cowardly it is. Such dictatorial orders mock democracy. Protesting in the Parliament House complex is a political right of the MPs,” Yechury tweeted. Senior RJD leader Manoj K Jha said the orders like these undermine the very idea of disagreement which is essential part of the parliamentary democracy. “This order is bizarre and shocking. I would urge the government, please stop this brutal assault on the right to protest. We are moving towards Sri Lanka if we continue like this,” Jha said. Battle on for second place to beat Rishi Sunak in U.K. PM race With Rishi Sunak now firmly placed as the candidate to beat, the battle lines are drawn for second place in the race to replace Boris Johnson as Conservative Party leader and British Prime Minister, with the remaining five contenders set for their first public clash on Friday. Sunak, who was the winner of the first two rounds of voting by Tory members of Parliament, will appear for a series of televised debates over the weekend with his remaining opponents – Trade Minister Penny Mordaunt, Foreign Secretary Liz Truss, former minister Kemi Badenoch and Tory backbencher Tom Tugendhat. Suella Braverman, the Indian-origin Attorney General who was knocked out of the race in round two, has thrown her support behind Truss – boosting the third-placed candidate’s chances. “Liz is the best person to unleash the opportunities of Brexit, and deliver much-needed tax cuts,” said Braverman, in a statement after the second round of voting on Thursday. All eyes are now on who between Truss and Mordaunt will clinch the No. 2 spot to go head-to-head with Sunak when the final two candidates have to campaign for votes among the Conservative Party membership around the UK from later next week. According to ‘The Times’, caretaker Prime Minister Johnson and his camp are running an “anyone but Rishi” hidden campaign after feeling betrayed over the former Chancellor’s resignation which precipitated his exit from 10 Downing Street. While Johnson has said he would not publicly endorse any of the contenders in the race to succeed him, behind the scenes it is believed that he is in favour of either Truss or Mordaunt. “The whole No.10 [Downing Street] team hates Rishi. It’s personal. It’s vitriolic. They don’t blame Saj [Sajid Javid] for bringing him down. They blame Rishi. They think he was planning this for months,” the newspaper quoted a source as saying. Pakistani-origin Javid resigned from Johnson’s Cabinet as Health Secretary just minutes before Sunak’s resignation as finance minister last week, in a move both have denied was coordinated in any way and was the result of a number of scandals, including partygate, that had plagued the Johnson-led administration. An ally of Johnson rejected the claim that he wants “anyone but Rishi” to win but admitted that the outgoing Prime Minister harboured resentment over Sunak’s “betrayal”. Meanwhile, there is intense lobbying at work in an effort to bolster the chances of the top three candidates. Under the latest votes tally, Sunak has 101, Mordaunt 83, Truss 64, Badenoch 49 and Tugendhat 32. Both Badenoch and Tugendhat – the fourth and fifth placed candidates – have refused to withdraw before the next few rounds of voting starting Monday, which will whittle down the list to the final two by Thursday’s deadline. “People obviously are trying to stop me getting into the final because they don’t want to run against me,” said Mordaunt, who is currently the bookie’s favourite in the race with her perceived support among the Tory party membership base. Sunak’s camp has, meanwhile, played down suggestions that his strong support does not extend beyond the Tory MPs. “I think he really will start to connect and hopefully we can move away and offer a positive vision rather than this Conservative-on-Conservative attacks, which I really don’t like,” said Richard Holden, a Tory backbench MP backing Sunak. Russia outlaws two investigative outlets as ‘undesirable’ Russian authorities on Friday declared two investigative news outlets “undesirable”, outlawing their operation in Russia, the latest in a series of steps to stifle any critical reporting amid Moscow’s war in Ukraine. The Prosecutor General’s office designated the investigative group Bellingcat and Russian online outlet The Insider, as well as the Czech nonprofit CEELI Institute, “undesirable”. Russia’s state news agency Tass quoted the office as saying that “their activities pose a threat to the foundations of the constitutional order and security of” Russia. A 2015 law that introduced the concept of “undesirable” organisations made membership in them a criminal offense, and dozens of non-governmental organisations have since been outlawed under the legislation. The Insider, a news outlet registered in Latvia, has worked with Bellingcat on high-profile cases such as the nerve agent poisonings of former Russian spy Sergei Skripal and Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny. Websites of both have been blocked in Russia since the beginning of the war in Ukraine. The Kremlin unleashed a massive wave of crackdowns on independent news outlets in Russia last year. It culminated shortly after President Vladimir Putin sent troops to Ukraine on February 24, with authorities blocking dozens of news sites and even taking a renowned critical radio station off the airwaves Websites of several foreign news outlets have also been blocked in Russia, as Moscow sought to control the narrative of what it called a “special military operation” in Ukraine and stifled any and all voices that decried it as a war or an invasion and accused Russian military of committing atrocities in the neighboring country. In Brief Rubaiya Sayeed, former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Mufti Mohammed Sayeed’s daughter, appeared before a special CBI court on July 15 in a case related to her 1989 abduction and identified JKLF chief Yasin Malik and three others as her abductors, officials said. This is the first time Rubaiya Sayeed has been asked to appear in the case. She had been freed after five terrorists were released in exchange. Sayeed, who stays in Tamil Nadu, is listed as a prosecution witness by the CBI, which took over investigations into the case in early 1990. The U.S. House of Representatives has passed a legislative amendment that approves an India-specific waiver for punitive CAATSA sanctions. Authored and introduced by Indian-American Congressman Ro Khanna, the amendment urges the Biden administration to use their authority to provide India with a Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAASTA) waiver to help deter aggressors like China. The legislative amendment was passed on Thursday by voice vote as part of an en bloc (all together as a single unit) amendment during floor consideration of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). Evening Wrap will return tomorrow [logo] The Evening Wrap 15 JULY 2022 [The Hindu logo] Welcome to the Evening Wrap newsletter, your guide to the day’s biggest stories with concise analysis from The Hindu. [[Arrow]Open in browser]( [[Mail icon]More newsletters]( Delhi court grants bail to Alt News co-founder Mohammed Zubair A [Delhi court granted bail]( on Friday to Alt News co-founder [Mohammed Zubair]( in a case related to a tweet in 2018, stating, “The voice of dissent is necessary for healthy democracy. Therefore, for mere criticism of any political parties it is not justified to invoke Section 153A (promoting enmity) and 295A (deliberate and malicious acts to outrage religious feelings) of the IPC.” [Mr. Zubair was arrested by the Delhi Police]( on June 27 in this FIR, registered based on a social media complaint claiming it hurt religious sentiments of Hindus. The tweet in question contained an image from a 1983 CBFC-approved film Kissi Se Na Kehna where a fictional hotel’s name had been changed from “Honeymoon hotel” to “Hanuman hotel”. With this, Mr. Zubair had posted the text: “Before 2014: Honeymoon Hotel/ After 2014: Hanuman Hotel”. Granting Mr. Zubair bail in this case, Additional Sessions Judge Devender Kumar Jangala held, “The applicant/accused is also stated to have used the words “Before 2014 and After 2014” to point out towards a political party. In Indian democracies the political parties are open for their criticism… The voice of dissent is necessary for healthy democracy.” While the scribe has been granted bail in the Delhi Police case, he will remain in jail till he is granted bail in all [six FIRs registered against him in Uttar Pradesh](. Of the six U.P. cases, Mr. Zubair has been arrested in three (Hathras, Lakhimpur Kheri, and Sitapur). In the Sitapur case, he has been granted interim bail by the Supreme Court and in the Hathras and Lakhimpur Kheri cases, he is currently in judicial custody. Mr. Zubair’s lawyers have already moved the top court seeking quashing of the U.P. FIRs or clubbing them together and moving them to Delhi. As for the case over the 2018 tweet, the judge held that there was no offence in naming a hotel or institution after a Hindu god if done without malice, noting that “Hindu religion is one of the oldest religion and most tolerant”. It added, “It is also not out of place to mention that the alleged tweet of the accused was made in the year 2018 but till the date of registration of the present FIR in 2022, no other complaint was received that the tweet of the accused is offensive to the Hindu community or showing disrespect to Lord Hanuman.” The court went on to note that though the Delhi Police had registered the FIR based on the hurt sentiment of a Twitter user, “till today during the investigation the police has failed to establish the identity of said Twitter user who felt offended by the tweet of the accused” and record their statement under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). On the now-added charge under Section 35 of the Foreign Contributions (Regulation) Act, the court agreed with Mr. Zubair’s lawyers that he and his company Alt News had exercised all necessary due diligence as called for under Section 39 of the FCRA to prevent the receipt of any foreign contribution. The journalist had submitted that they had clearly mentioned on their website that they do not take foreign remittances and that their payments gateway had also said that foreign payments were not enabled for them. He had also submitted that the website does not allow one to donate unless they disclose their citizenship, PAN and other details. Noting that all evidence in the case is documentary in nature, that the police had already questioned Mr. Zubair in custody for five days and that they had already made recoveries in the case, the court cited a Supreme Court judgment to reiterate that the object of denying bail is neither punitive nor preventative and that deprivation of liberty must be considered a punishment unless it is proved that it is required to secure the presence of an accused for their trial. The court granted bail to Mr. Zubair on a bond of ₹50,000 and one surety of the like amount, adding that he must not leave the country without the court’s explicit permission, directing him to surrender his passport to the police within three days of his release from jail. Sri Lanka’s Parliament to elect President for the first time since 1978 Sri Lanka’s Parliament Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardana said on Friday that [Parliament will convene to choose a new President]( after the resignation of Gotabaya Rajapaksa. After Gotabaya emailed his resignation letter Thursday night, protesters in the island nation retreated from the government buildings they had occupied as the country battles a crippling economic crisis. [A demonstrator sleeps at the Presidential Secretariat in Colombo on July 15, 2022 after Parliament Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena officially announced the resignation of President Gotabaya Rajapaksa who fled to Singapore.] The Parliamentary Speaker confirmed on Friday morning that Gotabaya’s resignation had been accepted. Gotabaya, who rose to power in 2019 on a thumping election win, fled the country and sought refuge on two other islands, as mass anti-government protests rapidly escalated last weekend. Early on Wednesday, he was flown to the Maldives by a Sri Lankan military aircraft. He reached Singapore on Thursday evening, the country’s Foreign Ministry confirmed. The 225-member Parliament will elect the new President by a secret vote. Meanwhile, Sri Lanka’s top court on Friday barred former Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa and former Finance Minister Basil Rajapaksa from leaving the country without permission until July 28, anti-corruption group Transparency International Sri Lanka said. Three other former officials, including two former central bank governors, also cannot travel outside the country without the court’s permission till July 28, the group said in a tweet. Circular banning demonstration within Parliament premises triggers furore A [fresh bulletin from the Parliament secretariat]( ahead of the monsoon session of Parliament prohibiting the members from using the premises for “demonstration, dharna, strike, fast or for the purpose of performing any religious ceremony”, has raised a furore with the Opposition members calling it yet another attempt to bulldoze dissent. Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha officials have pointed out that this is a routine advisory which is released at the beginning of every Parliament session. To back this claim they also released circulars with same language which was released in December 2013 and February 2014 during the tenure of the Congress-led UPA government. Congress general secretary (communication) Jairam Ramesh launched a broadside at the government calling it “vishguru’s” latest salvo, “D(h)arna Mana Hai!” a play on Darna Mana Hai (Not allowed to be afraid). Replying to Ramesh’s tweet, Trinamool Congress’s Rajya Sabha floor leader Derek O’Brien said, “Every year they issue these notices in #Parliament bulletins. Demonstrations, dharnas, strikes, fast are part of legitimate parliamentary tactics to register protest. No stopping us. However, can you please update me. Didn’t SOMEONE conduct a religious ceremony recently?” O’Brien’s Lok Sabha colleague Mahua Moitra elaborated further. “By the way honourable MP Varanasi performed a religious ceremony on top of new Parliament building just four days ago,” Moitra tweeted. Prime Minister Narendra Modi is an MP from Varanasi. CPI(M) General Secretary Sitaram Yechury called the circular an attempt to “muzzle the soul of India.” “The more useless the government, the more cowardly it is. Such dictatorial orders mock democracy. Protesting in the Parliament House complex is a political right of the MPs,” Yechury tweeted. Senior RJD leader Manoj K Jha said the orders like these undermine the very idea of disagreement which is essential part of the parliamentary democracy. “This order is bizarre and shocking. I would urge the government, please stop this brutal assault on the right to protest. We are moving towards Sri Lanka if we continue like this,” Jha said. Battle on for second place to beat Rishi Sunak in U.K. PM race With Rishi Sunak now firmly placed as the candidate to beat, the [battle lines are drawn for second place in the race]( to replace Boris Johnson as Conservative Party leader and British Prime Minister, with the remaining five contenders set for their first public clash on Friday. Sunak, who was the winner of the first two rounds of voting by Tory members of Parliament, will appear for a series of televised debates over the weekend with his remaining opponents – Trade Minister Penny Mordaunt, Foreign Secretary Liz Truss, former minister Kemi Badenoch and Tory backbencher Tom Tugendhat. Suella Braverman, the Indian-origin Attorney General who was knocked out of the race in round two, has thrown her support behind Truss – boosting the third-placed candidate’s chances. “Liz is the best person to unleash the opportunities of Brexit, and deliver much-needed tax cuts,” said Braverman, in a statement after the second round of voting on Thursday. All eyes are now on who between Truss and Mordaunt will clinch the No. 2 spot to go head-to-head with Sunak when the final two candidates have to campaign for votes among the Conservative Party membership around the UK from later next week. According to ‘The Times’, caretaker Prime Minister Johnson and his camp are running an “anyone but Rishi” hidden campaign after feeling betrayed over the former Chancellor’s resignation which precipitated his exit from 10 Downing Street. While Johnson has said he would not publicly endorse any of the contenders in the race to succeed him, behind the scenes it is believed that he is in favour of either Truss or Mordaunt. “The whole No.10 [Downing Street] team hates Rishi. It’s personal. It’s vitriolic. They don’t blame Saj [Sajid Javid] for bringing him down. They blame Rishi. They think he was planning this for months,” the newspaper quoted a source as saying. Pakistani-origin Javid resigned from Johnson’s Cabinet as Health Secretary just minutes before Sunak’s resignation as finance minister last week, in a move both have denied was coordinated in any way and was the result of a number of scandals, including partygate, that had plagued the Johnson-led administration. An ally of Johnson rejected the claim that he wants “anyone but Rishi” to win but admitted that the outgoing Prime Minister harboured resentment over Sunak’s “betrayal”. Meanwhile, there is intense lobbying at work in an effort to bolster the chances of the top three candidates. Under the latest votes tally, Sunak has 101, Mordaunt 83, Truss 64, Badenoch 49 and Tugendhat 32. Both Badenoch and Tugendhat – the fourth and fifth placed candidates – have refused to withdraw before the next few rounds of voting starting Monday, which will whittle down the list to the final two by Thursday’s deadline. “People obviously are trying to stop me getting into the final because they don’t want to run against me,” said Mordaunt, who is currently the bookie’s favourite in the race with her perceived support among the Tory party membership base. Sunak’s camp has, meanwhile, played down suggestions that his strong support does not extend beyond the Tory MPs. “I think he really will start to connect and hopefully we can move away and offer a positive vision rather than this Conservative-on-Conservative attacks, which I really don’t like,” said Richard Holden, a Tory backbench MP backing Sunak. Russia outlaws two investigative outlets as ‘undesirable’ Russian authorities on Friday [declared two investigative news outlets “undesirable”]( outlawing their operation in Russia, the latest in a series of steps to stifle any critical reporting amid Moscow’s war in Ukraine. The Prosecutor General’s office designated the investigative group Bellingcat and Russian online outlet The Insider, as well as the Czech nonprofit CEELI Institute, “undesirable”. Russia’s state news agency Tass quoted the office as saying that “their activities pose a threat to the foundations of the constitutional order and security of” Russia. A 2015 law that introduced the concept of “undesirable” organisations made membership in them a criminal offense, and dozens of non-governmental organisations have since been outlawed under the legislation. The Insider, a news outlet registered in Latvia, has worked with Bellingcat on high-profile cases such as the nerve agent poisonings of former Russian spy Sergei Skripal and Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny. Websites of both have been blocked in Russia since the beginning of the war in Ukraine. The Kremlin unleashed a massive wave of crackdowns on independent news outlets in Russia last year. It culminated shortly after President Vladimir Putin sent troops to Ukraine on February 24, with authorities blocking dozens of news sites and even taking a renowned critical radio station off the airwaves Websites of several foreign news outlets have also been blocked in Russia, as Moscow sought to control the narrative of what it called a “special military operation” in Ukraine and stifled any and all voices that decried it as a war or an invasion and accused Russian military of committing atrocities in the neighboring country. In Brief [Rubaiya Sayeed, daughter of former J&K Chief Minister Mufti Mohammed Sayeed, arrives to appear before a court in Jammu district on July 15, 2022. ] Rubaiya Sayeed, former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Mufti Mohammed Sayeed’s daughter, appeared before a special CBI court on July 15 in a case related to her 1989 abduction and [identified JKLF chief Yasin Malik and three others as her abductors]( officials said. This is the first time Rubaiya Sayeed has been asked to appear in the case. She had been freed after five terrorists were released in exchange. Sayeed, who stays in Tamil Nadu, is listed as a prosecution witness by the CBI, which took over investigations into the case in early 1990. The [U.S. House of Representatives has passed a legislative amendment]( that approves an India-specific waiver for punitive CAATSA sanctions. Authored and introduced by Indian-American Congressman Ro Khanna, the amendment urges the Biden administration to use their authority to provide India with a Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAASTA) waiver to help deter aggressors like China. The legislative amendment was passed on Thursday by voice vote as part of an en bloc (all together as a single unit) amendment during floor consideration of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). Evening Wrap will return tomorrow  Today’s Top Picks [[Prathap Pothen, an actor who made his characters believable] Prathap Pothen, an actor who made his characters believable]( [[With Droupadi Murmu’s presidential nomination, great expectations on the ground] With Droupadi Murmu’s presidential nomination, great expectations on the ground]( [[IIT Madras remains India’s best educational institute: Education Ministry] IIT Madras remains India’s best educational institute: Education Ministry]( [[Madras HC relief to actor Vijay in car import case] Madras HC relief to actor Vijay in car import case]( Copyright @ 2022, THG PUBLISHING PVT LTD. If you are facing any trouble in viewing this newsletter, please [try here]( If you do not wish to receive such emails [go here](