Newsletter Subject

Congress Passes Short-Term Spending Bill to Avert Shutdown

From

thefiscaltimes.com

Email Address

newsletter@thefiscaltimes.com

Sent On

Thu, Jan 18, 2024 11:49 PM

Email Preheader Text

Plus: House budget panel advances fiscal commission plan ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ?

Plus: House budget panel advances fiscal commission plan ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ [The Fisc](   By Yuval Rosenberg and Michael Rainey Good evening! Congress passed a bill this afternoon to avert a shutdown this weekend — and it did so with a whole day to spare before the deadline, giving lawmakers time to clear out of the capital ahead of a dusting of snow forecast for Friday. Here’s the latest. Johnson relied on Democrats to pass the spending patch. (Sipa USA) Shutdown Averted as Congress Passes Short-Term Spending Bill Our nation’s capital famously [freaks out]( at the sight of more than a few snowflakes, so a weather forecast calling for an inch or two of snow to fall on Washington, D.C., by Friday morning sent lawmakers scrambling on Thursday to pass the short-term spending bill needed to avert a partial government shutdown this weekend. The Senate on Thursday afternoon approved the stopgap measure by a 77-18 margin, sending the bill to the House, where it was quickly passed, 314-108, despite the opposition of hard-right conservatives who had unsuccessfully pressed Speaker Mike Johnson to [amend]( the legislation to include Republican border policy changes. To bypass conservative objections that could have derailed the bill, the House vote came under suspension of the rules, meaning a two-thirds majority was required to pass it. That hurdle was easily cleared, as 207 Democrats joined with 107 Republicans in supporting the bill, while 106 Republicans and two Democrats opposed it. Johnson had said last year that he was done with short-term spending packages, but he agreed to this one — and relied on Democratic votes to pass it — to avoid having Republicans bear the blame for a disruptive shutdown during an election year and to give appropriators more time to finish writing their annual spending bills. Johnson said in a statement early this week that the short-term funding patch “is required to complete what House Republicans are working hard to achieve: an end to governance by omnibus, meaningful policy wins, and better stewardship of American tax dollars.” Two new deadlines: The bill will keep the government open and set up two new deadlines, with some agencies funded through March 1 and the rest through March 8, providing six or seven weeks, respectively, for appropriators to continue drafting spending bills totaling $1.66 trillion for the 2024 fiscal year that started back in October. Lawmakers are looking to finish the appropriations process ahead of an April deadline that would otherwise require across-the-board 1% spending cuts. “Once we put the threat of a shutdown behind us, I hope we continue seeing even more bipartisanship as appropriators complete the very important task of fully funding the government in the coming weeks,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said. “This is what the American people want to see: both sides working together and governing responsibly. No chaos. No spectacle. No shutdown.” Schumer went on to criticize the House conservatives who opposed the stopgap, calling them “a loud contingent of hard right rabble-rousers who, amazingly, believe that causing a shutdown is somehow a good thing, if it gets them what they want.” What’s next: President Joe Biden is expected to sign the continuing resolution before the Friday night deadline. Appropriators still have much work to do to finalize the details of the 12 annual spending bills, and Johnson will face the fury of GOP hardliners who are demanding he push for some conservative wins, including border measures and abortion restrictions that Democrats call poison pills. While the spending bills are negotiated and drafted, lawmakers are expected to turn their focus to the border deal being negotiated in the Senate to unlock a supplemental spending package including aid for Ukraine and Israel. Quote of the Day “I think the vast majority of members of Congress support aid to Ukraine. The question is whether or not a small minority are going to hold it up, which would be a disaster.” − President Joe Biden, asked about the outlook for further aid to Ukraine after yesterday's White House meeting with congressional leaders. House Budget Committee Approves Bill to Create Bipartisan Fiscal Commission The House Budget Committee on Thursday approved a landmark bill to create a bipartisan fiscal commission that would make recommendations on how to address the rising national debt. The commission has been a priority for Republicans and has divided Democrats, many of whom warn that it would open the door to Social Security and Medicare cuts. Thursday’s 22-12 committee vote saw three Democrats join with Republicans to support the bill. “As stewards of taxpayer dollars, Congress has a moral responsibility to future generations to stop the madness and bring spending under control,” Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, said in a statement. “Today’s vote by the Budget Committee to establish a fiscal commission is a positive step towards fiscal sanity.” Rep. Brendan Boyle of Pennsylvania, the top Democrat on the budget panel, has argued that the commission would be used as “a backdoor way to force through unpopular cuts” to entitlement programs and that lawmakers need to have the courage to raise the revenues going to Social Security and Medicare. “We can put both trust funds on the path to full solvency for the rest of this century,” he said Thursday. “We don't need a commission to do that.” What the bill would do: The Fiscal Commission Act would create a 16-member panel including 12 members chosen from both parties and both chambers of Congress as well as four outside experts who would not have voting power. It would look for ways to balance the federal budget “at the earliest reasonable date,” stabilize the nation’s debt-to-GDP ratio at or below 100% within 10 years and propose plans to improve the long-term outlook for Social Security and Medicare. Tax Package That Boosts Child Credit and Business Deductions Would Be Fully Offset: JCT A proposed tax package that would temporarily boost the child tax credit while providing more generous deductions for business investments would be fully paid for by the early elimination of a pandemic-era employee retention credit, the Joint Committee on Taxation [said](file:///C:/Users/mrainey/Downloads/x-3-24.pdf) late Wednesday. The combination of tax cuts in the Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act of 2024, which would expire after three years, would reduce revenues by $79 billion, JCT said. Limiting payouts from the troubled Employee Retention Credit program, which paid businesses that kept employees on their payrolls during the pandemic, by ending the program in January rather than on April 15, 2025, would fully cover that loss in revenue. Specifically, the increase in the child tax credit would cost about $33 billion over three years, JCT said. The business tax breaks, which include more generous deductions for research and development costs, as well as depreciation, would cost about the same. A handful of miscellaneous provisions covering disaster relief and low-income housing construction add another $13 billion, bringing the total projected revenue loss to $79 billion. Low-income households would benefit most: An [analysis]( by the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center found that about half of all households with children in the lowest 20% of the income distribution would get a tax cut from the legislation, while just 2.6% of those in the middle quintile would benefit. Overall, 16.6% of households with children would get a tax cut. Among households that would benefit, the average tax cut would come to $680 in 2023. The Tax Policy Center has not yet provided a distributional analysis of the business tax cuts, although it has done so in the past on a similar proposal, when the changes were thought to be permanent rather than temporary. The American Prospect’s David Dayen [said]( Thursday that Republicans appear to be assuming that the business tax cuts will be made permanent in the end (which is how House Ways and Means Chair Rep. Jason Smith could assert that the bill “locks in over $600 billion in proven pro-growth, pro-America tax policies,” rather than $33 billion, as the JCT reports.) If that’s the case, then the business tax cuts in the proposal will likely cost far more than projected; an analysis by the Committee for a Responsible Budget estimated the 10-year cost of fully extended business tax cuts would come to about $525 billion over 10 years. Fiscal News Roundup - [Congress Passes Short-Term Funding Extension, Averting Government Shutdown Ahead of Friday Deadline]( – CNN - [Conservatives Pitch Last-Minute Border Amendment on Bill to Avert Shutdown]( – The Hill - [Trump Moves to Quash Hopes of Congress Ukraine, Border Deal]( – Bloomberg - [Johnson Says He Speaks ‘Pretty Frequently’ With Trump About Border Deal]( – Politico - [Netanyahu's Opposition to Palestinian State Could Complicate Senate Aid Package]( – NBC News - [A Pandemic-Era Tax Break Is Unraveling, and the Lawsuits Are Flying]( – Wall Street Journal - [‘He Doesn’t Know What He’s Talking About’: Biden Bashes Trump on the Economy]( – The Hill - [Drugmakers Hiking Prices for More Than 700 Medications, Including Ozempic and Mounjarom]( – CBS News - [Sanders Plans to Subpoena Merck, J&J CEOs on Drug Pricing]( – The Hill - [Bad Vibes for New House Freedom Caucus Chair Bob Good]( – Politico Views and Analysis - [National Debt Is the Greatest Threat to Our Country; It’s Time for Congress to Act]( – Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT), Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV), Rep. Bill Huizenga (R-MI) and Rep. Scott Peters (D-CA), The Hill - [It’s Time to Put Social Security, Medicare, and Taxes on the Table]( – Brian Riedl, The Dispatch - [Record-High National Debt Is Fiscal Time Bomb for US. Congress Must Defuse It]( – David M. Walker and Mark J. Higgins, USA Today - [Seniors’ Advocacy Group Implores Congress to Reject Fiscal Commission Act]( – National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare - [An Unequal Tax Trade]( – David Dayen, American Prospect - [Mr. Smith’s Lousy Tax Deal]( – Wall Street Journal Editorial Board - [How the Right Aims to Scuttle Border Talks]( – Leigh Ann Caldwell and Theodoric Meyer, Washington Post - [Turning Down Food Aid for Millions of Children Reflects Shocking Political Callousness]( – Charles M. Blow, New York Times - [Even This Congress Might Find Its Way to Helping Lots of Poor Kids]( – Washington Post Editorial Board - [Why Are Voters So Upset? Consider the Snickers Bar]( – Paul Donovan, New York Times - [The Supreme Court Sounds Eager to Break the Government for Good]( – Timothy Noah, New Republic - [Why a New Study Gives a Misleading View of Inequality in America]( – Elise Gould and Josh Bivens, CNN - [Forget About Securing the Border. It Won’t Work]( – Eduardo Porter, Washinton Post - [America’s First Federal Emissions Tax Will Only Increase Emissions]( – Oliver McPherson-Smith, The Hill Copyright © 2024 The Fiscal Times, All rights reserved. You are receiving this newsletter because you subscribed at our website or through Facebook. The Fiscal Times, 399 Park Avenue, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10022, United States Want to change how you receive these emails? [Update your preferences]( or [unsubscribe](

Marketing emails from thefiscaltimes.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

06/11/2024

Sent On

30/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.