Newsletter Subject

$191 Billion in Improper Payments

From

thefiscaltimes.com

Email Address

newsletter@thefiscaltimes.com

Sent On

Thu, Feb 9, 2023 12:06 AM

Email Preheader Text

Plus: Biden and GOP clash over Social Security and Medicare ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ?

Plus: Biden and GOP clash over Social Security and Medicare ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ [The Fisc](   By Yuval Rosenberg and Michael Rainey Happy Wednesday! Who predicted that Social Security and Medicare would dominate the post-State of the Union discussion? Here’s a look at the fallout from Biden’s big speech. The president during an event in Wisconsin on Wednesday (Reuters) Biden and GOP Clash Over Social Security and Medicare Rabble-rousing Republicans keep giving President Joe Biden wins. In a particularly tumultuous moment in his State of the Union address Tuesday night, Biden accused a handful of Republicans of planning to wipe out some of the nation’s bedrock social welfare programs, Social Security and Medicare. “Instead of making the wealthy pay their fair share, some Republicans – some Republicans want Medicare and Social Security to sunset,” Biden said. Republicans in the chamber responded with a round of jeers and catcalls in protest, with one lawmaker — the flamboyantly dressed bomb thrower from Georgia, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene — shouting, “Liar!” Biden, who noted that it was only a minority of Republicans promoting such a proposal, said he’d be happy to provide proof of his claim. “Anybody who doubts it, contact my office,” he said. “I'll give you a copy. I'll give you a copy of the proposal!” Biden then embraced the uproar, saying it provided proof that Republicans and Democrats agree that Social Security and Medicare should be exempt from cuts – an important issue as Republicans press for reductions in federal spending in exchange for raising the debt limit. “So, tonight, let's all agree – and we apparently are – let's stand up for seniors,” he said. “Stand up and show them we will not cut Social Security. We will not cut Medicare.” It was a bit of presidential jiu-jitsu that has been widely chalked up as a double win for Biden, taking those programs off the table and showing that he can spar with Republicans as he gears up for a re-election bid. Is there a GOP plan? Although he didn’t name any specific lawmakers on Tuesday night, Biden made clear in remarks delivered in Wisconsin on Wednesday that he was referring in part to a proposal from Sen. Rick Scott, the Florida Republican who last year issued a “[Plan to Rescue America]( Under Scott’s plan, all federal legislation would expire every five years — including the legislation authorizing Social Security and Medicare, among many other programs. Biden has attacked the proposal for months and used it as a foil during last year’s midterm elections. Scott has pushed back against the notion that sunsetting the legislation means that the programs would be eliminated, since Congress could reauthorize them again. But the fact remains that his plan would do just as Biden said: sunset Social Security and Medicare while exposing the programs to the whims of a new Congress every five years. “The president was correct here,” said CNN’s Daniel Dale, in a fact check of Biden’s claim. “He was not lying.” So why are Republicans expressing such outrage at Biden’s comments? For one thing, Scott’s proposal — which originally included a controversial plan to raise taxes on millions of Americans who he says don’t have sufficient “skin in the game” — isn’t exactly popular in the GOP, and does not express any formal party agenda. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) quickly rejected the Scott proposal when it appeared last year, even as he refused to provide an agenda of his own. “We will not have as part of our agenda a bill that raises taxes on half the American people and sunsets Social Security and Medicare within five years,” McConnell said. In addition, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) has said Republicans will leave Social Security and Medicare aside as they press for spending cuts amid a burgeoning debt ceiling showdown. Those programs should be “completely off the table,” McCarthy has said, though there are questions about whether McCarthy’s view is fully shared within the quarrelsome House Republican caucus. Still, it’s worth noting that Scott’s plan has drawn some support within the GOP. Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) said earlier this year that he was “on board” with the proposal. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) has expressed approval, too, and even offered his own plan in which all federal legislation would sunset every single year. More broadly, many Republicans over the years have expressed doubts about Social Security and Medicare if not out outright opposition to the programs, which were created under Democratic presidents, pushing the country toward “socialism” in the eyes of many conservatives. President George W. Bush famously attempted to privatize the Social Security system in 2005, a popular idea among conservatives that has recently been revived by former Vice President Mike Pence as he maneuvers for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination. Sen. Mike Lee – the Utah Republican who appeared to be particularly offended by Biden’s comments Tuesday night, and who accused the president of lying about the Republican agenda – was once [recorded]( saying that his objective in running for the Senate is to “phase out Social Security, to pull it up by the roots and get rid of it,” adding that, “Medicare and Medicaid are of the same sort and need to be pulled out.” Biden on Wednesday used those comments as evidence he was right. Debt ceiling negotiations aside, many Republicans are currently mulling options for how to shore up the finances of Medicare and Social Security, both of which face funding shortfalls in the coming years as the baby boomers age and place an enormous strain on both systems. Most of their proposals involve some kind of cuts, such as raising the retirement age, capping payment levels and means-testing benefits — cuts that many say are essential for maintaining the viability of the programs. At his appearance in Wisconsin, Biden continued to play up the idea of Republicans targeting the popular programs, while portraying himself as their defender. “They sure didn’t like me calling them [out] on it,” Biden said. “A lot of Republicans, their dream is to cut Social Security, Medicare. Well, let me just say this. It’s your dream, but I’m going to, with my veto pen, make it a nightmare.” The bottom line: Biden was seeking to score political points in his State of the Union address by citing a marginal conservative plan that could undermine Social Security and Medicare. Despite Republican complaints, the plan does exist — as do questions about just how willing Republican lawmakers will be in the coming months to push for cuts to Social Security and Medicare in the long run. But both programs face funding shortfalls, with Social Security’s trust funds projected to be insolvent by 2035 and the Medicare Hospital Insurance on track to be depleted by 2028. Lawmakers will have to address those shortfalls if they want to avoid abrupt benefit cuts in the programs. Deficit Rose to $459 Billion for First Four Months of the Year: CBO The federal budget deficit for the first four months of fiscal year 2023 totaled $459 billion, up $200 billion from the same period last year, according to an estimate published Wednesday by the [Congressional Budget Office](. Outlays were 9% higher and revenues were 3% lower, CBO projects. The borrowing works out to $3.7 billion per day, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. President Biden said in his State of the Union speech that the budget blueprint he will release next month would cut the deficit by $2 trillion, likely over 10 years, without cutting “a single bit of Medicare or Social Security.” Wrongful Pandemic Unemployment Payments Topped $191 Billion: Watchdog At least $191 billion in pandemic unemployment benefits may have been paid out improperly, a federal watchdog told Congress on Wednesday at a House Ways and Means Committee oversight hearing titled “The Greatest Theft of Taxpayer Dollars: Unchecked Unemployment Fraud.” The new total for wrongful payments is nearly $30 billion higher than a previous rough estimate of $163 billion. The updated number is based on applying the Labor Department’s latest estimate of the improper payment rate for the unemployment insurance program overall — 21.52%, up from 18.71% last year — to the $888 billion in total federal and state unemployment benefits paid during the pandemic. Larry D. Turner, the inspector general of the Labor Department, told the House Ways and Means panel Wednesday that the improper payment rate for pandemic unemployment programs was likely higher than 21.52%. If so, that would mean that the improper payments could well total more than $200 billion —and while improper payments include overpayments and underpayments, intentional and unintentional, Turner said that a “significant portion” of the total is attributable to fraud. Why it matters: The unemployment insurance program has some of the highest improper payment rates across the federal government, with estimates topping 10% for 15 of the last 19 years, according to Turner’s testimony. “The unemployment system is particularly vulnerable because it is administered jointly by individual states and the federal government, resulting in a patchwork of rules and — in many states — outmoded technology that got overwhelmed during the heights of the pandemic,” Politico’s Nick Niedzwiadek [notes](. The emergency unemployment programs enacted during the pandemic were particularly prone to abuse as lawmakers in both parties opted to impose fewer safeguards as they sought to quickly pump money into the economy to prevent a sharper downturn. “Their efforts — signed into law starting under President Donald Trump — at one point added an extra $600 to workers’ weekly checks and provided new benefits to those who previously would not have qualified for federal help,” The Washington Post’s Tony Romm [writes](. “The money helped rescue the economy from the worst crisis since the Great Depression. But it also invited an unprecedented wave of theft and abuse, as criminals seized on the government’s generosity — and its race to disburse aid — to bilk state and federal agencies for massive sums.” House Republicans, newly in the majority, are pledging to ramp up oversight of such programs. Jason Smith (R-MO), chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, pointed Wednesday to varying estimates of pandemic unemployment fraud. “The range of estimates alone is sufficient reason for today’s hearing,” he said in prepared remarks. “ID.me, an identity verification company hired by many states, estimated an astounding $400 billion in fraud. That suggests thieves may have stolen almost half of the $878 billion taxpayers spent on unemployment insurance. The White House itself acknowledged that tens of billions were made in improper payments. They estimate $104 billion lost. More recently, the Government Accountability Office released its own report, making an early estimate that at least $60 billion went to criminals.” What’s next: Republicans are looking to score political points with their hearings, charging that Democrats have been lax in their oversight, but in his State of the Union address Tuesday night, President Biden also pledged to give federal watchdogs more power. “Now, let’s triple the anti-fraud strike force going after these criminals, double the statute of limitations on these crimes and crack down on identity fraud by criminal syndicates stealing billions of dollars, billions of dollars, from the American people,” he said. “The data shows that for every dollar we put into fighting fraud, the taxpayers get back at least 10 times as much.” Whether Congress will provide more funding for watchdogs to pursue such fraud cases is still unclear — but, as the Post’s Romm points out, many such requests have gone unheeded so far. The bottom line: We still don’t know just how much Covid aid was lost to fraud, but the projections keep growing larger. Gene L. Dodaro, the comptroller general of the United States and head of the Government Accountability Office, emphasized that his agency’s estimate of $60 billion in pandemic unemployment insurance fraud was on the low end and that an estimate of the high end would be ready this summer. --------------------------------------------------------------- Send your feedback to yrosenberg@thefiscaltimes.com. And please encourage your friends to [sign up here]( for their own copy of this newsletter. --------------------------------------------------------------- News - [Biden, in State of the Union, Mixes Bipartisanship With Defiance]( – Washington Post - [How the House GOP Blew Up at Biden’s State of the Union]( – The Hill - [What Republicans Have Actually Said About Cuts to Social Security and Medicare]( – The Hill - [Scott Doubles Down on Sunsetting All Federal Programs After Biden’s Jab]( – The Hill - [Here Are the Spending Cuts Republicans Have Pitched in Debt Limit Talks]( – The Hill - [Biden State of the Union Uncorks High-Stakes Standoff Over U.S. Debt]( – CBC - [Public Support Soft on GOP Debt Limit Demands]( – The Hill - [Schumer: Biden ‘Rope-a-Doped’ Republicans Into ‘Trap’ on Social Security, Medicare]( – The Hill - [Don’t File Your Taxes Yet, IRS Says Amid Confusion Over State Benefits]( – Washington Post - [Federal Official Warns $191 Billion in Covid Unemployment Aid May Have Been Misspent]( – Washington Post - [Estimate of Misspent Covid Unemployment Payments Leaps to $191B]( – Politico - [CVS Makes Primary Care Play With $10.6 Billion Oak Street Health Deal]( – Washington Post Views and Analysis - [Breaking Down the Most Contentious Exchange Between Biden and the GOP]( – Aaron Blake, Washington Post - [The State of the Union Could Be a Lot Worse]( – Washington Post Editorial Board - [Even Biden’s ‘Unity’ Agenda Could Be Tough Going]( – Lindsey McPherson, Roll Call - [Biden Springs Trap for Republicans in State of the Union]( – Ed Kilgore, New York - [Biden Forges a New Democratic Paradigm]( – Harold Meyerson, American Prospect - [Biden Talked a Lot About Seniors. There’s an Obvious Reason]( – Philip Bump, Washington Post - [A Speech Heavy on Jobs but Light on Wages Spells Trouble for Biden]( – Ramesh Ponnuru, Washington Post - [Republicans Would Be Fools Not to Get Behind Biden’s 4 Percent Tax on Stock Buybacks]( – Timothy Noah, New Republic - [Republicans Turn Themselves Into Props for Biden]( – John F. Harris, Politico - [Republicans Are Too Thirsty for Social Security Cuts]( – Teresa Ghilarducci, Bloomberg - [Would You Have Four Kids if It Meant Never Paying Taxes Again?]( – Jessica Grose, New York Times - [Should There Be an Annual Coronavirus Booster? It Depends]( – Leana S. Wen, Washington Post Copyright © 2023 The Fiscal Times, All rights reserved. You are receiving this newsletter because you subscribed at our website or through Facebook. The Fiscal Times, 399 Park Avenue, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10022, United States Want to change how you receive these emails? [Update your preferences]( or [unsubscribe](

EDM Keywords (227)

years year wisconsin wipe whims wednesday website ways watchdogs want view viability used unsubscribe union turner triple trap track total today thirsty theft testimony tens table systems sure sunsetting subscribed still statute state stand spar sought sort sign showing show shortfalls shore seniors senate seeking scott says say said running rules round roots revived revenues requests republicans refused referring reductions recently receiving receive ready range ramp raising race questions qualified put push pursue pulled pull provide protest props proposal programs privatize prevent press president preferences predicted power post portraying pledging play planning plan place pitched phase patchwork part pandemic paid oversight outrage office objective notion noted nightmare newsletter need nation name months minority millions medicare medicaid matters many maneuvers making majority maintaining made lying lot lost looking look limitations like light let lax lawmakers know kind jobs jeers jab insolvent improperly idea hill heights hearing head happy handful half government gop going give generosity gears game funding friends fraud fools foil fisc finances file feedback far fallout facebook eyes express exposing exist exempt exchange evidence event estimate essential embraced economy dream drawn doubts dollars depleted democrats deficit defender cuts criminals crimes created crack correct copy contact completely committee comments claim citing change catcalls calling board bit billions bill biden based attributable attacked applying appeared appearance apparently americans agree agenda agency address adding acknowledged accused abuse 2035 2005 15

Marketing emails from thefiscaltimes.com

View More
Sent On

20/04/2024

Sent On

19/04/2024

Sent On

18/04/2024

Sent On

17/04/2024

Sent On

16/04/2024

Sent On

15/04/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.