Newsletter Subject

Special Shutdown Edition: How Long Will This Mess Last?

From

thefiscaltimes.com

Email Address

newsletter@thefiscaltimes.com

Sent On

Sun, Dec 23, 2018 12:02 PM

Email Preheader Text

2019, here we come! By Yuval Rosenberg How Long Will the Shutdown Mess Last? There was no deal. Ther

2019, here we come! By Yuval Rosenberg How Long Will the Shutdown Mess Last? There was no deal. There is no deal. And there isn’t likely to be a deal anytime soon. Large portions of the federal government shut down early Saturday and are likely to remain closed until at least Thursday after President Trump earlier scuttled a bipartisan short-term spending bill and insisted on additional money to build a wall — or fence-like structure of some sort — along the border with Mexico. A late scramble by White House and congressional negotiators Friday evening failed to break the impasse over the president’s demand for $5 billion in wall funding, and there were no signs of significant progress on Saturday, even as Vice President Mike Pence returned to the Capitol for talks with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY). As a result, nine of 15 Cabinet-level departments and dozens of agencies will be closed well into next week, and possibly much longer, after their funding expired Friday at midnight. It is the third government shutdown of the year. On Saturday, Trump delayed plans for a 16-day trip to his Mar-A-Lago resort in Florida. He had lunch at the White House with a group of conservative lawmakers, many of whom reportedly pushed Trump to continue fighting for border wall funding. The House and Senate opened at noon Saturday, but both chambers quickly adjourned for the weekend without any votes. Many lawmakers left the capital Friday night to return home, having been assured that they would get 24 hours notice before any vote to reopen to government (though if a deal does come together, it could be put up for a voice vote that wouldn’t require senators to return to Capitol Hill). Senate Chaplain Barry Black, in his Saturday morning prayer, reportedly asked that the Senate be saved "from the pitfalls of partisan brinkmanship." That prayer is unlikely to be answered for days, or even weeks. One senior Republican aide [told Politico]( that there may be no significant movement until after Christmas. Another told the site that if negotiators don’t reach a quick compromise over the weekend, the shutdown is likely to drag on until January, when Democrats take control of the House. Trump tweeted Saturday: “We are negotiating with the Democrats on desperately needed Border Security ... but it could be a long stay.” Trump also continues to make it more difficult to reach a deal by refusing to specify or signal [what kind of compromise he would accept](. Lawmakers are reticent to support any compromise without assurances that the president will sign off on it. As the standoff continues, most Americans likely won’t notice any immediate effects of the shutdown, especially given the upcoming holiday, but some 800,000 of the 2.1 million federal workers nationwide [will be affected]( with 420,000 “essential” employees, including Border Patrol agents and Transportation Security Administration officials, required to work without pay and another 380,000 forced to take unpaid leave until a deal is reached. The next paycheck for furloughed federal workers isn’t due to be processed until January 11, a Republican source [told Politico]( — timing that lessens the urgency of reaching a deal. A number of other federal agencies, including the military, won’t be affected by the shutdown because Congress already passed bills funding them through September. For more on the effects of the partial shutdown, [see our piece from Friday](. Here’s what you need to know as the shutdown fight continues: Trump probably can’t win this fight: The president’s best hope may be to ratchet up pressure on Democrats and try to pin the blame for the shutdown on them, as he has over the past couple of days. The House vote Thursday night passing $5.7 billion in wall funding helps a bit in that regard by positioning Senate Democrats as blocking a measure that would have kept the government open. But Trump’s comment last week that he’d be “proud” to shut down the government over border security makes it nearly impossible to lay blame elsewhere. Democrats have little incentive to give in: Democrats will take control of the House when a new Congress convenes on January 3, and they plan to pass legislation to re-open the government and provide $1.3 billion in border security funding as one of their first acts, giving them additional leverage in the current battle. “President Trump, you will not get your wall,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said Friday. “You’re not getting your wall today, next week or on Jan. 3 when Democrats take control of the House.” And Trump is likely to get the public blame: A recent Quinnipiac University [poll]( showed that 51 percent of voters would primarily blame Trump and congressional Republicans in Congress for the shutdown, while 37 percent would blame congressional Democrats more. And Quinnipiac polling also [finds]( that most Americans still oppose Trump’s wall. But winning may not be the point: Even if the shutdown won’t result in money for a wall, Trump’s willingness to push for one was about pleasing his conservative base, especially after he faced withering criticism from Fox News and right-wing firebrands Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh when, earlier in the week, he signaled he’d sign off on a bipartisan stopgap measure to keep the government open without funding a wall. “Trump’s advisers acknowledged that the funding may not be secured in the end but boasted that the spectacle would be remembered favorably by his base voters as proof of his mettle,” The Washington Post reported Thursday. And the Post’s editorial board [added]( “Any doubt that it is politics — not principle — driving Mr. Trump was erased when he flip-flopped this week on the stopgap spending bill.” That’s bound to affect his standing with moderate voters, but this standoff may not matter much to them by 2020. Trump also has other, more immediate concerns: As The New York Times Editorial Board noted, “revving up the wall fight allows Mr. Trump to divert attention from so much of the other drama threatening to swallow him up.” Trump may be undermining his support among congressional Republicans: Combined with the president’s sudden decisions to withdraw American troops from Syria and Afghanistan, and the resignation of Defense Secretary Jim Mattis, the shutdown over border wall funding has some Republican lawmakers [angry or nervous]( about the path of the Trump presidency — and its impact on their own political prospects. “By placating the far right on immigration, embracing his instincts on foreign policy and unnerving investors with his trade wars and policy gyrations, Mr. Trump is elevating the nativist and noninterventionist elements of his party,” The New York Times [reported](. “In doing so, he is deeply straining his most important links to mainstream Republican governance, and the national security hawks and conservative business executives who have long been pillars of the right.” And the shutdown may heighten Wall Street’s fears: While the partial shutdown isn’t likely to cause a sizable economic hit — credit rating analysts at Standard & Poor’s estimate that it could trim $1.2 billion a week from U.S. gross domestic product, according to the Times — it once again raises concerns about the country’s dysfunctional governance. “The shutdown could also contribute to the growing sense of worry on Wall Street, in part by raising fears about the ability of Congress to manage a more consequential deadline: the need to authorize an increase in government borrowing before the federal debt reaches the current limit, most likely in March,” the Times’ Alan Rappeport and Binyamin Appelbaum [noted](. A programming note: Unless shutdown developments or other fiscal news warrants, The Fiscal Times email newsletter will be back in your inbox January 2. You can visit [our website]( for updates until then. Send your tips and feedback to yrosenberg@thefiscaltimes.com. Or connect with us on Twitter: [@yuvalrosenberg]( [@mdrainey]( and [@TheFiscalTimes](. News - [5 Ways a Partial Government Shutdown Would Inflict Pain]( – Politico - [Inside the Frantic Negotiations That Failed to Avert a Shutdown]( – Politico - [Lawmakers Shrug Off Shutdown Drama]( – The Hill - [GOP Discord on Wall Prolongs Shutdown Fight]( – The Hill - [As Trump Battles Congress, Federal Workers Are Caught in the Middle]( – Washington Post - [Amid Government Shutdown, a Host of Bigger Worries]( – Washington Post - [‘This Is Tyranny of Talk Radio Hosts, Right?’: Limbaugh and Coulter Blamed for Trump’s Shutdown]( – Washington Post - [What Will Happen if the Government Shuts Down: Late Paychecks, Closed Museums and More]( – Washington Post - [Mississippi’s Republican Governor Quietly Considering Medicaid Expansion]( – Politico Views and Analysis - [Trump’s Shutdown Stunt Is an Act of Needless Stupidity]( – Washington Post Editorial Board - [Shutdown? More Like a Breakdown]( – New York Times Editorial Board - [Trump Is to Blame for Government Shutdown, but Border Security Is Important]( – Douglas E. Schoen, Fox News - [Affordable Care Act Predictions Are Always Wrong]( – David Nather, Axios Copyright © 2018 The Fiscal Times, All rights reserved. You are receiving this newsletter because you subscribed at our website, thefiscaltimes.com, or through Facebook. Our mailing address is: The Fiscal Times 399 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10022 [Add us to your address book]( If someone has forwarded this email to you, consider signing up for The Fiscal Times emails on our [website](. Want to change how you receive these emails? You can [update your preferences]( or [unsubscribe from this list](

Marketing emails from thefiscaltimes.com

View More
Sent On

28/06/2024

Sent On

27/06/2024

Sent On

26/06/2024

Sent On

24/06/2024

Sent On

21/06/2024

Sent On

20/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.