Newsletter Subject

ICYMI: Five Embarrassing Moments From Kamala Harris’ MSNBC Interview

From

thefederalist.com

Email Address

donate@thefederalist.com

Sent On

Thu, Sep 26, 2024 11:34 PM

Email Preheader Text

=.IapVzsvfn9AnLsZMgFhTuE7c9TUyIg_YWK4G_yBhsUw Dear Reader, Kamala Harris finally sat down for an int

[View in browser](=.H2sTDlwt9hLxA9oF3wpaE2qTu9Wgf-VvITAVGVhkTzs) =.IapVzsvfn9AnLsZMgFhTuE7c9TUyIg_YWK4G_yBhsUw Dear Reader, Kamala Harris finally sat down for an interview, and it went about as poorly as you’d expect. During her conversation with MSNBC’s Stephanie Ruhle, Harris was given the chance to address pressing issues facing the American people—and she completely flopped. Of course, it was no surprise that Harris chose to speak with one of her most loyal supporters in the accomplice media. Stephanie Ruhle, like so many others at MSNBC, did everything she could to prop Harris up. But even Ruhle’s blatant bias couldn’t hide the Vice President’s incoherent responses and lack of real answers. From dodging direct questions to offering incoherent explanations, Harris made it clear she isn’t equipped to handle the challenges America is facing. We’ve broken down the five most embarrassing moments from this disastrous interview—and they’re even worse than you might imagine. You can check it out by reading our latest article: =.fmBy6NJc_VfIqqRYIHUGQ2UbiweiX2PSkAs3SfTne3k[Five Embarrassing Moments FromKamala Harris’ MSNBC Interview](=.nQwdUWzZfp1AdKiwxjapq-dFzae8VhcjWBgJfPevcqE)=.YI6uHak70yzOAUic8Gciw_HH1g_DR2KNiuVze6nP56g [READ NOW](=.jTy8Ni6Ypn_sUX0UaHMWZGLRsa1_o0iqkzLuUBecZ2U) Harris’ performance in this interview wasn’t just embarrassing—it was a glaring example of how unprepared she is to lead. When even MSNBC can’t save you from your own disastrous answers, you know it’s bad. This is the Vice President of the United States, and she couldn’t even articulate basic positions on the economy or labor unions without fumbling her way through word salads and deflections. At The Federalist, we believe in holding our leaders accountable and cutting through the corporate media’s spin. But our work relies on your support. Will you stand with us and help provide the American people with the truth-seeking journalism they deserve? [SUPPORT THE FEDERALIST](=.CKemeUfIbAD9SpvrmAuRoDsPuTrQPgFd0RzbaMaKfYw) Thank you for your loyal support! =.6i5ncBE27F5yAuZpj4_Z3KwNapYVHk1Kc8c9S_ZS1f0 Sincerely, The Federalist [facebook](=.cM799yujh4Ogif7EvQNwYWrmSFu0zxXTgHTHvLtG9gQ) [twitter](=.6Z6HNcYbYR38KBAzWHP3qL0TQ7qnG2fKxmrAWZAQ52w) [instagram](=.QElx5efVi4fnf_sl4V91YpGaAI3ASTW-5optZmjug9U) [youtube](=.XqXUvf4KkubPO_mcXAf-liUj6AV2jT-40qXbTyGzJzU) [rss](=.jQI8p0JoHrAxdcalH1p37ReIr-UtMSu9HHvcx84x95M) The Federalist © 2023 THE FEDERALIST, A WHOLLY INDEPENDENT DIVISION OF FDRLST MEDIA. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. You received this email because you signed up on our website or made a purchase from us. [Unsubscribe](=.s9-jZDrnH4RyocncW_ut-CgCjy7gcoxTd4fsW6MxY0Q) [Sent by MailerLite](=.spRonbvG8uJiHNAko3clWyscma3WmwwbZCHxt_Qp00Q)

Marketing emails from thefederalist.com

View More
Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

31/10/2024

Sent On

30/10/2024

Sent On

29/10/2024

Sent On

29/10/2024

Sent On

24/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.