Newsletter Subject

The Lying Hacks At Rolling Stone Are Attacking Us, But We’re Not Backing Down

From

thefederalist.com

Email Address

donate@thefederalist.com

Sent On

Thu, Sep 12, 2024 04:21 PM

Email Preheader Text

=.OfMSR9zNwrBwH4-WZo0OSrBmYjgKPgo5KANGUMGDZtc Dear Reader, If you needed another reminder of how des

[View in browser](=.oyo0IjDd4wop5Mlq3uazt_CQqhCjDTSGNkYRXssZy9E) =.OfMSR9zNwrBwH4-WZo0OSrBmYjgKPgo5KANGUMGDZtc Dear Reader, If you needed another reminder of how desperate the left is to silence anyone who dares to tell the truth, Rolling Stone just delivered it. Even in the filthy septic tank that is modern corporate journalism, somehow Rolling Stone manages to distinguish itself as particularly disgusting. [In their latest pathetic smear](=.o7or4guGL-GFGEfoqsiqJ-zgQ4vUCe9TWwTxONuxRuY), they came after The Federalist, tossing around the term “election denier” TWENTY-ONE TIMES (yes, you read that correctly.) But guess what? As you've probably come to expect from the hacks masquerading as reporters there, they couldn’t point to a single factual error in any of our reporting. That’s right—this so-called “investigation” into our election coverage is nothing more than a lazy attempt to discredit us. Why? Because they can’t handle the truth. Rolling Stone would rather slap a cheap, meaningless label on us than actually engage with the facts. This shouldn’t come as a shock to anyone who’s been paying attention. Rolling Stone has a long history of pushing lies and propaganda. They’re the same publication that ran one of the most infamous fake news stories in modern history—[the UVA rape hoax](=.BtSR11evfw7mh__Io45YDjbvFi_KQ_H-R8IuvCFbkh0)—destroying innocent lives in the process. They’ve glorified terrorists, putting the Boston Bomber on their cover like some kind of twisted rock star. And let’s not forget their role in spreading COVID lies, pushing the false narratives that kept Americans locked down and muzzled for years. So when Rolling Stone attacks The Federalist for doing real journalism—reporting on the Radical Left’s blatant attempts to manipulate election laws and undermine our system of government—it’s almost laughable. They can’t argue with the facts, so they resort to their favorite tactic: name-calling and smearing truth-tellers. Here’s the reality: they want us to shut up because they know we’re exposing the truth. While Rolling Stone is busy with other members of the corporate media playing PR agent for the Radical Left, The Federalist is out here digging into the real issues. We’ve been relentless in covering the left’s efforts to rig the system in their favor, from their push for mass mail-in ballots to their infiltration of local election offices. We’ve shone a spotlight on the dangerous and corrupt tactics they’re using to control future elections—and the left-wing media hates us for it. Rolling Stone’s attack only confirms that we’re over the target. They know that The Federalist is one of the few outlets willing to stand up and tell the truth about election integrity, and that terrifies them. And let’s be clear: they’re not coming after us because we’re wrong—they’re coming after us because we’re right. Their smear campaign won’t slow us down one bit. In fact, it’s only going to fuel us. We’ve been exposing the left’s lies for years, and we’re not stopping now. But we can’t do it alone. We need your support to keep fighting this battle. When the corporate media giants like Rolling Stone come after us, they’re not just attacking The Federalist—they’re attacking all of us who believe in free speech, fair elections, and truth. They want to silence us, but with your help, they won’t succeed. [Now is the time to stand with us. Share our reporting, support our work, and let the world know that Rolling Stone’s lies and smears won’t stop The Federalist from continuing to tell the truth.](=.mErMrQhqYOSxPv_B1LQn0piNH2Xpj8-t-tQPHZ9hIZc) [DONATE TODAY TO HELP US FIGHT BACK!](=.LdllNZgaX1fj1kFdj-UBzWeQ3EyBpErzRayIKZdiTPU) We’re not backing down, and we’re not going anywhere. Sincerely, Sean Davis CEO The Federalist [facebook](=.LIvHhJnOeGW7oAqNKd-VP9loDbCdKNqnZ41i7Jo2Gxs) [twitter](=.QqGcmZVF4JZYhVOCW8ViTyZOdZG8K5YS_NXhN0l642k) [instagram](=.SVJImGZVlx-uZsC0Xqa617vQ_PtoO-ms1Tlr17X_DN4) [youtube](=.-8taW1xcoznQI0Yi9FhCunomm-K9kbsJ7fS9BnKJxKY) [rss](=.IOFPELTJuKMjd758nTGaWQ-zKtks7FBrtw_cZ6u-IyI) The Federalist © 2023 THE FEDERALIST, A WHOLLY INDEPENDENT DIVISION OF FDRLST MEDIA. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. You received this email because you signed up on our website or made a purchase from us. [Unsubscribe](=.NGaiCH8o7XqZiYxs4qO5MzaBH_THO9CSILLDFo8XuJc) [Sent by MailerLite](=.L819zA_YY3P9R3iOmT5gXIeY7yvFVGy6LWwj_KAvV1g)

Marketing emails from thefederalist.com

View More
Sent On

07/11/2024

Sent On

31/10/2024

Sent On

30/10/2024

Sent On

29/10/2024

Sent On

29/10/2024

Sent On

24/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.