Newsletter Subject

An ex-speechwriter and a rhetoric expert watched the debate with us

From

theconversation.com

Email Address

us.newsletter@theconversation.com

Sent On

Fri, Jun 28, 2024 02:20 PM

Email Preheader Text

+ tech inspires sci-fi inspires tech inspires sci-fi inspires tech US Edition - Today's top story: B

+ tech inspires sci-fi inspires tech inspires sci-fi inspires tech US Edition - Today's top story: Biden crashes, Trump lies: A campaign-defining presidential debate [View in browser]( US Edition | 28 June 2024 [The Conversation] [The Conversation]( Top headlines - [Hunger could leave a mark on generations of Gazans]( - [Report exposes ICE’s failures to care for detainees]( - [Take our quiz and spark some Friday joy]( Lead story After an avalanche of pre-debate news coverage that asked what the two presidential candidates should or must consider, do or say and what viewers should expect and how to watch, the actual candidates finally got on a CNN stage in Atlanta and had their debate. And what ensued was not the debate that everyone expected. Democrats were panicking after President Joe Biden turned in what was widely perceived as a disastrous performance. Trump supporters, meanwhile, were celebrating their candidate’s confident and largely controlled appearance, despite multiple fact checkers declaring many of Trump’s often wild assertions just that – fabrications. Two scholars give you their analysis of the debate in today’s lead story. Karrin Vasby Anderson, a political communications expert at Colorado State, quotes the ancient Roman scholar and rhetoric teacher Quintilian, who said that “the ideal orator was a good person, speaking well. He was particularly concerned about the danger that a skilled rhetorician who lacked character could pose to society. A presidential debate ought to showcase two ideal orators − skilled speakers who are also people of character. [The June 27 debate offered voters an either-or scenario](.” Mary Kate Cary, a senior fellow in the politics department at the University of Virginia and a former presidential speechwriter, was blunt in her analysis. Biden, she said, “will most likely have caused a disaster for the Democratic Party.” “Our assignment tonight was to find a moment to react to and put it in context,” Cary said. “I’ve been to multiple presidential debates and watched many more on television over the years, and have never seen anything like this.” [ [We don’t have a paywall or subscription fees. We rely on the generosity of readers like you to sustain our work.]( ] Naomi Schalit Senior Editor, Politics + Democracy Today's newsletter supported by [readers like you.]( U.S. President Joe Biden and Donald Trump participate in the CNN Presidential Debate on June 27, 2024. Justin Sullivan/Getty Images [Biden crashes, Trump lies: A campaign-defining presidential debate]( Mary Kate Cary, University of Virginia; Karrin Vasby Anderson, Colorado State University Scholars of communication and politics assess a presidential debate with a clear loser, but no clear winner. Health + Medicine - [Gazans’ extreme hunger could leave its mark on subsequent generations]( Hasan Khatib, University of Wisconsin-Madison Hunger, stress, trauma, inadequate sanitation and other factors are converging to create a widespread humanitarian disaster with consequences that could last for generations. - [ICE detainees suffer preventable deaths − Q&A with a medical researcher about systemic failures]( Cara R. Muñoz Buchanan, Harvard Kennedy School ICE detention facilities suffer from outdated systems, a lack of translation services – and a penchant for releasing ailing detainees to reduce the death count. Economy + Business - [Supreme Court rejects settlement with OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma over legal protections for the Sackler family that owned the company]( Jonathan Lipson, Temple University The company helped spur a public health crisis through its deceptive marketing and aggressive sales of prescription opioids. Politics + Society - [Supreme Court sidesteps case on whether federal law on medical emergencies overrides Idaho’s abortion ban]( Naomi Cahn, University of Virginia; Sonia Suter, George Washington University The Supreme Court conceded that it should not have taken up the case to begin with. Science + Technology - [Federal funding for major science agencies is at a 25-year low]( Chris Impey, University of Arizona Research funding is down in recent years despite promises made with the CHIPS and Science Act. Ethics + Religion - [Western interest in ayahuasca is creating challenges for local Indigenous communities and raising issues of cultural appropriation]( Pardis Mahdavi, University of La Verne The psychotropic allure of the ayahuasca plant for hundreds of thousands of non-Indigenous consciousness seekers is raising many concerns. Arts + Culture - [ChatGPT and the movie ‘Her’ are just the latest example of the ‘sci-fi feedback loop’]( Rizwan Virk, Arizona State University Science fiction and technological innovation feed off each other in an ongoing back-and-forth that can play out over decades. Podcast 🎙️ - [Who designed the FGC-9? Unmasking the man behind the world’s most popular 3D-printed gun]( Gemma Ware, The Conversation Rajan Basra explains the backstory to the FGC-9, the world’s most popular 3D printed gun - and his search for its anonymous creator. Listen on The Conversation Weekly podcast. Trending on site - [Lead water pipes created a health disaster in Flint, but replacing them with cheaper plastic − as some cities are doing − carries hidden costs]( - [Extreme heat waves aren’t ‘just summer’: How climate change is heating up the weather, and what we can do about it]( - [Lucy, discovered 50 years ago in Ethiopia, stood just 3.5 feet tall − but she still towers over our understanding of human origins]( News Quiz 🧠Here’s the first question of [this week’s edition:]( Wang Hongquanxing, AKA "China's Kim Kardashian," is one of many influencers who have run afoul of Chinese regulations that ban flaunting what on social media? - A. Abs - B. Corgis - C. Wealth - D. Tattoos [Test your knowledge]( - - More of The Conversation Like this newsletter? You might be interested in our weekly and biweekly emails: • [Weekly Highlights]( • [Science Editors' Picks]( • [Giving Today]( [New!] • [This Week in Religion]( • [Politics Weekly]( • [Global Perspectives]( • [Global Economy & Business]( Follow us on social media: • [Bluesky]( • [Mastodon]( • [Threads]( • [Nostr]( • [LinkedIn]( • [Instagram]( • [Facebook]( • Or [get a daily text from us]( - - About The Conversation We're a nonprofit news organization dedicated to bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to [help you make sense of our complex world](. We can give away our articles thanks to the help of foundations, universities and readers like you. [Donate now to support research-based journalism]( [The Conversation]( You’re receiving this newsletter from [The Conversation]( 303 Wyman Street, Suite 300 Waltham, MA 02451 [Forward to a friend]( • [Unsubscribe](

Marketing emails from theconversation.com

View More
Sent On

30/06/2024

Sent On

29/06/2024

Sent On

29/06/2024

Sent On

27/06/2024

Sent On

27/06/2024

Sent On

27/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.