Newsletter Subject

Nvidia’s shocking truth vs. the Dot-Com bubble

From

substack.com

Email Address

joshbelanger@substack.com

Sent On

Thu, Oct 17, 2024 01:53 AM

Email Preheader Text

Hey there, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

Hey there, ͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­ Forwarded this email? [Subscribe here]() for more [Nvidia’s shocking truth vs. the Dot-Com bubble]( [Josh Belanger](joshbelanger) Oct 17 joshbelanger   [READ IN APP](   Hey there, There’s a chart going around that’s getting a lot of attention. It’s comparing Nvidia (NVDA) today with Cisco at the height of the Dot-Com bubble. And, yeah, it’s shocking at first glance: Nvidia is now worth 11.7% of the entire US GDP, while at its peak, Cisco was worth just 5.5% of US GDP. At face value, that sounds like Nvidia is double the bubble Cisco was. But hold on a second… it’s important to understand that we’re comparing apples to oranges. Here’s why this comparison is way off: 1. The Market Is Very Different Now The US stock market has lost half of its publicly traded companies since the 1990s. That means we have far fewer companies today, and the ones that remain—like Nvidia—are more concentrated, leading to these higher valuations. 2. Inflation Makes Money Worth Less The buying power of the dollar today isn’t what it was in 2000. Inflation means you need more dollars today to buy the same things you could buy back then. So when you look at Nvidia’s market cap, remember that it’s inflated by today’s weaker dollar. 3. Compare Valuation, Not Just Market Cap Here’s where things get really interesting—if you want to compare Nvidia today with Cisco back in 2000, don’t look at market cap, look at valuation. - Nvidia’s forward P/E (2024) is 37x. - Cisco’s forward P/E in 2000? 105x. That’s a huge difference! Nvidia is actually far more reasonably valued than Cisco ever was at its peak. So while it’s tempting to compare market caps, you have to dig deeper and look at the numbers that matter. The Trade Opportunity Right now, Nvidia is trading at $135—the same level it hit back in June, before reaching an all-time high and then pulling back. It’s recovered, and now it’s just 3% away from breaking through to fresh highs. Back in September, I sent out a trade alert on Nvidia, and it landed right in your inbox. That trade ended up being a 75% winner in just 9 days. But… you didn’t act on it. You missed it. Maybe you passed on it. And that’s fine—it happens. But here’s the kicker: you could’ve re-entered that same trade two more times for additional profits. Others did, and they cashed in—again and again. But you didn’t. Now, Nvidia is trading at $135, just 3% away from breaking into fresh highs. And I’ve got another big move lined up. This is your shot at redemption. Don’t let the next one slip through your fingers. If you’re ready to take advantage of Nvidia’s next big move, join me inside Belanger Trading Advisory. I’ll send you the exact trade setup and show you how to play Nvidia again. [Click here to join and get the next NVDA trade.]( The markets may be different, but the opportunities are still huge. Trade smart, Josh Belanger You’re currently a free subscriber. Upgrade for the full experience and receive exclusive special reports like "How to Get Rich in The Stock Market" and "Congress' Secret Stock Playbook: The Top 5 Power Picks Revealed”. [Upgrade to paid](   [Like]( [Comment]( [Restack](   © 2024 Josh Belanger 548 Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104 [Unsubscribe]() [Get the app]( writing]()

Marketing emails from substack.com

View More
Sent On

15/10/2024

Sent On

15/10/2024

Sent On

15/10/2024

Sent On

15/10/2024

Sent On

14/10/2024

Sent On

12/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.