Newsletter Subject

Only People That Pay Income Tax or the Capital Gains Tax Should Be Able to Vote

From

substack.com

Email Address

culturcidal@substack.com

Sent On

Thu, Jun 20, 2024 08:14 PM

Email Preheader Text

A more responsible way of looking at voting and taxes ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

A more responsible way of looking at voting and taxes ͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­͏   ­ Forwarded this email? [Subscribe here]() for more [Only People That Pay Income Tax or the Capital Gains Tax Should Be Able to Vote]( A more responsible way of looking at voting and taxes [John Hawkins](culturcidal) Jun 20 culturcidal   [READ IN APP](   There is a tale as old as time about the way popular restaurants often die an ignominious death. It starts with a business owner building an incredible new place to eat. The food is great, the service is amazing, and word of mouth is so good that the restaurant fills up every night. Then, as time goes on, the restaurant owner gets tired of working long hours and stops paying attention to the details. He shrinks the size of the plates and waters down the ingredients and for a while, it seems like he’s making more money than ever, but he puts that into his lifestyle, not updating the restaurant. After a few years, the décor looks a little out of date, the restaurant’s reputation has slipped, and the crowds are no longer flocking in. Then, the competition gets a little tougher or the restaurant gets pegged as old and out of date, and eventually, the place closes or “accidentally” burns down. Game over. Well, most people don’t think of a government like a restaurant, but they’re much more alike than you might think. Just as the lifeblood of a restaurant is the paying customers, the lifeblood of a government is the taxpayers. They’re the ones who support themselves and pay enough in taxes on top of that to float the government. The military, police, street signs, regulatory agencies, welfare, you name it, it’s all dependent on these people. Just like the paying customers of a restaurant, if you take the taxpayers out of the equation, everything collapses soon after. That’s because our government already has some assets and it can borrow money, but like the restaurant owner whose customers flee to greener pastures, the doors close in a hurry without that new money coming in. Granted, in a nation with lots of competing interests, the government can’t always do whatever the taxpayers want, but they should still get a lot of deference. Plain and simple, the people who pay the bills are more important than those that don’t. So, for example, taxpayers matter more and should be prioritized ahead of junkies, homeless people, criminals, illegals and welfare recipients. Along these lines paying either the income tax or capital gains tax in a given year should be a basic qualification for voting (With an exemption for people who paid in for say 10-20+ years throughout their lives and maybe one for the military, too). In a world where the government is spending our collective money, it shouldn’t even be controversial to say that the people who are paying taxes should have a lot more say about what’s done with that money than the freeloaders who only take, but never give.   In general, the idea that the people who pay all the bills and want let’s say roads can be overruled by the people who aren’t paying into the system and want “free goodies” everyone else has to pay for is nuts. Granted, America didn’t have this problem early on because they were smarter than we are today in a lot of ways. Back then, it wasn’t quite “If you don’t work, you don’t eat,” but it was pretty close. They also had a small government and no welfare. People had to work, almost by necessity. Today, we have an overly progressive tax system and a welfare state in place that has created a large body of people who take more from society than they give. That puts us in a very dangerous position that could literally lead to the end of America. It’s like the famous quote goes: [Alexander Fraser Tytler quote: A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government...]( That’s the direction America is moving in today and a big part of the reason why is that so many people with no skin in the game have a say in what other people’s money is being spent on. The [numbers are huge]( In total, about 59.9 percent of U.S. households paid income tax in 2022. The remaining 40.1 percent of households paid no individual income tax. How do you think the government is ever going to control spending, act responsibly, and make some kind of effort to give taxpayers value for their money when such a large percentage of the population is basically voting on what to do with money they had no part in earning? Certainly, if it were actually working, I’d be the first to say, “If it’s not broken, don’t fix it.” However, at this point, it’s hard to see how we can possibly escape financial destruction when we’re spending like this. Would only letting taxpayers vote fix this problem? At this point, it’s hard to say because we’re so far gone. It’s like asking, “How do I avoid dying of a heart attack?” It’s a lot easier to answer that question if it’s asked by a healthy 30-year-old than a seventy-year-old with awful habits, blocked arteries, and out-of-control blood pressure. That being said, if our country is going to avoid dying of an economic “heart attack,” having taxpayers call the shots would be one our best shots to do it because as the [late, great Milton Friedman said]( [Milton Friedman quote: Nobody spends somebody else's money as carefully as he spends...]( If the people who were paying the taxes were entirely responsible for electing the representatives who determined how those taxes were spent, you could be absolutely certain our government would look very different. It would be a lot smaller, with a lot less debt, and a lot less welfare. Politicians would be focused like a laser on showing taxpayers that they’re getting value for their money, as opposed to spending money like water, borrowing more, and calling the people who pay the bills “greedy” for not wanting to give the government more of their money to waste on projects they wouldn’t want to be done at any price. The Founding Fathers of our country were right to be adamantly opposed to taxation without representation, but I’d like to think that if they could see the world we have today, they’d be just as opposed to the sheer number of people who effectively get representation without taxation because they get so much more in welfare and government programs than they’ll ever pay into the system. The purpose of the dog isn’t supposed to be to feed an ever-growing population of ticks and fleas. Taxpayers aren’t supposed to be workhorses that just blindly pull everyone else along to wherever they want to go. We’re at a point in America where the government is ignoring most of the makers, the producers and the people paying the bills to cater to the takers, the leeches and the people who’ve lived their lives dependent on mommy and daddy or the dole. Long term, America is not going to survive that way. --------------------------------------------------------------- [Upgrade to paid]( [Share]( [Leave a comment]( [101 Things All Young Adults Should Know]( You're currently a free subscriber to [Culturcidal by John Hawkins](. For the full experience, [upgrade your subscription.]( [Upgrade to paid](   [Like]( [Comment]( [Restack](   © 2024 John Hawkins 548 Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104 [Unsubscribe]() [Get the app]( writing]()

Marketing emails from substack.com

View More
Sent On

19/10/2024

Sent On

18/10/2024

Sent On

18/10/2024

Sent On

17/10/2024

Sent On

15/10/2024

Sent On

15/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.