Newsletter Subject

CBS Woes Get Worse - Smacked With FCC Complaint Over Harris

From

steadfastupdates.com

Email Address

mail@steadfastupdates.com

Sent On

Fri, Oct 25, 2024 09:59 PM

Email Preheader Text

Scandal isn't going away. Well, folks, the mainstream media is up to its old tricks again, and this

[Logo]( [CBS Woes Get Worse - Smacked With FCC Complaint Over Harris] [CBS Woes Get Worse - Smacked With FCC Complaint Over Harris]( Scandal isn't going away. Well, folks, the mainstream media is up to its old tricks again, and this time, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is getting dragged into the mess. CBS' beloved 60 Minutes is under fire for its interview with Vice President Kamala Harris, and the accusations flying around are serious enough that FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr is getting involved. Apparently, CBS may have done some "creative editing" in a way that could fall under the FCC's "news distortion" rule-an accusation that isn't just going away quietly. Here's the kicker. It's not just some partisan complaint coming from a random corner of the conservative media landscape. No, the Center for American Rights (CAR) stepped in and filed a formal complaint with the FCC, accusing CBS of what they call "significant and intentional news distortion." Their gripe? CBS allegedly aired two different answers to the exact same question in its 60 Minutes interview with Harris. Now, if that's not some blatant narrative management, what is? Republican Commissioner Nathan Simington has been pushing on this issue, calling for CBS to release the full, unedited transcript of the interview. He's not buying the excuse CBS threw out that they just used a "more succinct" portion of Harris' answer. After all, we're not talking about shaving off a few unnecessary words here and there. If the network really swapped answers to the same question between Face the Nation and 60 Minutes, that goes beyond tidying up an interview-it's deliberate deception. Carr hit the nail on the head when he laid out what would constitute a violation of the FCC's news distortion rule. If you take an answer like "yes" from one question and paste a "no" from a different one, that's not just editorial liberty; it's straight-up lying to the American public. And if the media's doing that during one of the most important election cycles in modern history, what does that say about the state of journalism today? Let's not forget, the public's trust in the media has been hanging by a thread for years now. And Daniel Suhr, CAR's president, didn't mince words when he said this isn't just about one interview. This is about national security, international relations, and yes-about the public's right to the truth. The media likes to paint itself as the bastion of democracy, but when it's caught manipulating the facts, it undermines the very thing it claims to protect. CBS isn't helping its case by staying silent for weeks before finally releasing a half-hearted statement claiming no "deceitful editing" took place. According to them, it was just a matter of using a "more succinct" part of the answer. Really? The American public isn't dumb. Editing is one thing, but crafting a narrative by distorting answers is another. As Carr rightfully pointed out, CBS could clear this up in a heartbeat if they'd just release the transcript. If everything's above board, what's the harm in transparency? But, of course, transparency isn't the media's strong suit when it doesn't suit their agenda. Watch the latest video at [foxbusiness.com]( This whole mess reminds us of the larger problem: the media's willingness to [manipulate]( the narrative when it suits them, even if it means bending or outright breaking the rules. It's about time the FCC took these complaints seriously and stepped in to protect the public from these shady practices. If CBS has nothing to hide, they should welcome the opportunity to clear their name. Until then, the public will continue to question just how much of what they see on TV is real and how much is just carefully curated fiction to serve a political agenda. [Media Launches Their Ugliest Anti-Trump Attacks Yet] [Media Launches Their Ugliest Anti-Trump Attacks Yet]( October desperation. [Segment On 'The View' Shows How Crazy They Are Getting] [Segment On 'The View' Shows How Crazy They Are Getting]( The left is starting to lose it. [Watch What Teacher Did To Kids Who Voted Trump] [Watch What Teacher Did To Kids Who Voted Trump]( Mock election in school. [Dems Fume After Trump Gives Hilarious Message To Kamala] [Dems Fume After Trump Gives Hilarious Message To Kamala]( This really got under their skin. [Nathan Wade Makes Shocking Admission During Hearing] [Nathan Wade Makes Shocking Admission During Hearing]( Just blew the lid off Biden-Harris Admin. You are receiving this email because you opted in to Steadfast Updates daily newsletter. We take your privacy very seriously and will keep your information in the strictest confidence. We will email you from time to time with relevant news and updates, but you can stop receiving information from us at any time by following very simple instructions that will be included at the bottom of any correspondence you should receive from us. Copyright 2024. Steadfast Updates. All rights reserved. 2423 S Orange Ave, Suite 340 Orlando, FL 32806 [UNSUBSCRIBE]( | [VIEW IN BROWSER]( | [PRIVACY POLICY](

Marketing emails from steadfastupdates.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.