Take the Emotions Out of Investing

In today's Masters Series, adapted from the November 6, 2023 issue of the Empire Financial Daily e-letter, Whitney discusses one of the biggest pitfalls that many investors fall into... details how he lost money in the past by committing this costly mistake... and shares a simple three-step process to help you avoid falling into the same situation... [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [Stansberry Master Series] Editor's note: Don't be your own worst enemy... In an uncertain market like the one we're in today, you can't let your emotions get in the way. If you want to avoid massive losses in this volatile market, you must go into every investment with a plan and stick to it... That's why Wall Street legend Whitney Tilson stresses it's crucial for investors to keep their emotions in check in order to make sound investment decisions. Whitney founded Empire Financial Research, which has integrated its operations with Stansberry Research. He now serves as lead editor of our flagship publication Stansberry's Investment Advisory. In today's Masters Series, adapted from the November 6, 2023 issue of the Empire Financial Daily e-letter, Whitney discusses one of the biggest pitfalls that many investors fall into... details how he lost money in the past by committing this costly mistake... and shares a simple three-step process to help you avoid falling into the same situation... --------------------------------------------------------------- Take the Emotions Out of Investing By Whitney Tilson, editor, Stansberry's Investment Advisory When you buy a stock, one of two things will inevitably happen... It will go up. Or it will go down. In the beginning, it's really that simple. You buy a stock with just two possible outcomes. But the truth is, things can get complicated really fast. And as that happens, it often leads to one of the biggest mistakes an investor can make... letting your emotions get in the way. When you let your emotions take over, you often rush into decisions that you'll regret later... That's the case no matter which way a stock is moving. One common and costly mistake is selling a big winner too early... That happened to me with Netflix (NFLX). On the day Netflix's stock bottomed in October 2012, I pitched it to a crowd of 500 at my Value Investing Congress and then went on national television on CNBC. I said Netflix was going to be the decade's Amazon (AMZN), a stock that had risen 20 times in the previous 10 years. And as it turns out, my analysis was spot on... Over the next two years, the stock rose sevenfold as Netflix's streaming business grew. But as the stock kept moving higher, I made a terrible mistake... I started to let my emotions take over. After the stock doubled, I sold half my shares. And when it doubled again, I sold some more. As the stock was doubling a third time, I exited the position altogether. My analysis revealed that Netflix was trading at a 90% discount to its intrinsic value – in other words, a "10-cent dollar." So as the story played out even better than I could have hoped for, why was I selling it after it doubled? It was still a "20-cent dollar." I thought I was conservatively managing risk and didn't want to be greedy. But I had it backward... To build a successful long-term track record, you must be greedy when the opportunity arises. Finding a monster stock like Netflix only happens maybe once in a decade – or even once in a lifetime. So it's critical that you make the maximum amount of money on such moonshots. I should've made more than $100 million on Netflix for myself and my investors. Instead, I made less than $10 million. Of course, that's not terrible... But it was a costly mistake. It's equally important to harness your emotions when a stock is running against you... Take SodaStream, for example. Its machines help you turn regular tap water into sparkling water with the touch of a button. I knew SodaStream had a great business model. The company sells something that people use over and over. And the carbon dioxide bottles in its machines need to be replaced regularly. So SodaStream made something like an 80% profit margin doing so. But the company had botched its marketing in the U.S. and was also relocating its main factory to Israel, so its sales and earnings were down. I patiently waited until the stock had been cut in half and bought a small position in 2014. It turns out that I was much too early. The company continued to struggle, and the stock kept drifting lower and lower... for nearly two years! Making the right decision in these situations is critical. Had I stumbled into a "value trap" that would never turn around (in which case I would have needed to sell)? Or was the company still strong, with fixable problems (in which case I should have bought more)? It was extremely painful losing so much money for so long. Emotionally, I wanted to sell and never think about that terrible investment again. But I was able to set aside my emotions and focus my analysis on the fundamentals, which remained strong. I added to my position all the way to the bottom – and was well rewarded. --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Link: # [Have You Tried the Stansberry Score?]( It's a new way to see which of 4,817 different stocks could double your money... by measuring the likelihood of every potential outcome before you invest. Since going live, it has outperformed the market by up to 10-fold, gold by up to twice over, and bitcoin by up to 20-fold. Plus, it has crushed almost all of the "Magnificent Seven" stocks. [Click here to claim free access right now](. --------------------------------------------------------------- In early 2016, SodaStream's stock took off as I expected... By the time I closed my funds in late 2017, it was up five times. And then PepsiCo (PEP) bought the company in 2018 for 12 times the price from only two years earlier. It can be challenging to figure out whether a stock is just hitting a few speed bumps (like SodaStream) or if it's doomed for good (like old-school film company Kodak). But by following a simple three-step process, I realized that I should hold on to SodaStream... First, assume the market is right and you're wrong... You must begin with this mindset because it helps overcome the natural bias we all have to not want to admit to making a mistake. You must respect the market. The hard truth is that most of the time it's right... and you're wrong. My experience with SodaStream is the exception, not the rule. Then, you must figure out what you've missed and actively seek out disconfirming information... Redo your work... But don't just rehash what you already did. That won't lead to any new conclusions. Instead, you must ask – and honestly and correctly answer – a series of key questions. Have you made a research error? Are you possibly missing anything? Have you openly and carefully considered contrary arguments? Have you invented new reasons to own the stock (so-called "thesis drift")? Many smart investors lost a lot of money owning Kodak's stock in the decade before it filed for bankruptcy in January 2012. It wasn't an unreasonable investment initially... The company had one of the strongest brands in the world, it generated robust cash flows, and its stock traded at a low multiple of earnings. Sure, digital photography was a threat to Kodak's film business, but it seemed far off – and the company was making investments to compete in this space. For most investors who lost money with Kodak, the mistake wasn't so much the initial purchase. Rather, it was failing to recognize that the film industry was rapidly being obliterated and that Kodak was getting no traction in the digital arena. So its profits were destined to disappear. The key is to tune out the noise and think clearly and rationally. Focus on the fundamentals... If the company's earnings rebound, its stock will as well. Finally, to make the right decision, you must pretend like you don't already own the stock... It's so hard to make the right decision about a stock you've lost money on. The emotions are so powerful! On one hand, you're probably telling yourself that if you liked it at the price you bought it, you should like it more now that it's cheaper. That may be true – but it could also be a value trap. No matter what, you must resist the temptation to double down again and again to try to recoup your losses. Remember the old saying... "You don't have to make it back the same way you lost it." On the other hand, your emotions are likely telling you to sell, so that you don't have to suffer any more pain and never have to think about this terrible stock ever again. There's also a powerful feeling of wanting to wait until it gets back to the price you bought it at before selling. You must resist all of these feelings! Emotions are deadly when it comes to investing... I've found that it helps my thinking to pretend like I don't own the stock. I ask myself, "If I were 100% in cash today and building a portfolio from scratch, would I own this stock? And if so, what size of a position would I have?" Doing nothing may be the best option, but you also must have the courage to admit to making a mistake and get out – or know that you haven't made a mistake and buy more. If a stock is going against you, follow this simple three-step process. And if you wouldn't buy the stock if you were constructing a portfolio from scratch, then you should sell it immediately. Best regards, Whitney Tilson --------------------------------------------------------------- Editor's note: Keeping your emotions in check is easier said than done, but it's a critical skill to learn as this year plays out. Mastering this fundamental ability could open the door for larger profits in 2024. You see, Whitney is stepping forward to join in unveiling a powerful new investment strategy that will help you identify which stocks could double your money moving forward... Normally, you'd need to be a multimillionaire to access this information, but Whitney is opening the doors for everyone to learn this unique strategy with an online presentation on Thursday at 10 a.m. Eastern time. [Learn more here](... --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Link: # [Why We Might Not Have a President Next January]( A retired U.S. Army colonel is warning that next year's presidential inauguration could be postponed. But not for reasons you're likely expecting. If you thought the 2020 election was mired in controversy... or couldn't believe how quickly the country came crashing to a halt from COVID-19... brace yourself for even worse uncertainty. [Click here to see how it could all unfold](. --------------------------------------------------------------- You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to Stansberry Digest. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from Stansberry Digest [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You’re receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberryresearch.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized financial advice. © 2024 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.