Newsletter Subject

The Horror of Change

From

stansberryresearch.com

Email Address

customerservice@exct.stansberryresearch.com

Sent On

Fri, Feb 24, 2023 11:15 PM

Email Preheader Text

The horror of change... Retail investors haven't changed their destructive behavior... Institutional

The horror of change... Retail investors haven't changed their destructive behavior... Institutional investors are human, too... Extreme duress hasn't arrived yet... The Fed won't change until the pain becomes unbearable... [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [Stansberry Digest] The horror of change... Retail investors haven't changed their destructive behavior... Institutional investors are human, too... Extreme duress hasn't arrived yet... The Fed won't change until the pain becomes unbearable... --------------------------------------------------------------- As humans, we don't like changing our behavior... It doesn't matter if the behavior is obviously stupid or destructive, either. We would rather find some way to justify it than change it. I (Dan Ferris) am convinced that's why many people seek out therapists... Therapists might naively think clients want help changing a stupid or destructive behavior. The clients might say they want help changing – and they might even think that they do. But what they often really want is to pay someone to tell them they don't need to change. Many bestselling self-help authors realize this idea, too. That's why they make more money than most therapists. Just look at a few of the genre's most popular titles... - You Are a Badass: How to Stop Doubting Your Greatness and Start Living an Awesome Life - Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can't Stop Talking - The Gifts of Imperfection These titles all seem to be designed to let you know you're fine and don't need to change. The world is messed up, not you. You're an imperfectly introverted little badass. Humans will do anything to justify not changing their bad behavior. They'll twist their minds into shapes so impossible that M.C. Escher would kick himself for not thinking of them first. They'll do whatever it takes to avoid the horror of change. That brings us to the following chart from the Financial Times... The financial-news publication featured this chart in an article at the end of last week. The article was titled, "Meme-stock 2.0: Wall Street's retail trading boom is back." Oh boy. More specifically, the chart shows the average daily stock market inflows from retail investors over the past decade. It recently hit a record $1.5 billion per day. Take a look... The Financial Times is actually wrong about this chart... It doesn't show that retail investors are back. If you look closer, it shows they never left. Even the lowest daily inflows since 2020 were much higher than the highest inflows as far back as 2014. Bear market or not, retail investors put the pedal to the metal in 2020. And they still haven't let up. Even worse, they haven't changed their destructive behavior... They're still shopping in areas where they've gotten burned already. For example, they're still dabbling in special purpose acquisition companies ("SPACs"). Regular Digest readers know these "blank check" companies sell shares to the public to raise money, often without an actual business in mind. They promise to acquire one within two years. If the SPAC sponsors acquire a business, they walk away with a 20% ownership stake for doing practically nothing. If they don't acquire one, they must return the money and won't get rich. As a result, many SPAC sponsors just settle for any company. That's what they're rewarded for doing. Now, not all SPACs acquire garbage companies – but many of them do. And yesterday, a bunch of SPACs went absolutely nuts as the retail crowd piled in. From Bloomberg... Ocean Biomedical Inc. at one point surged as much as 453% Thursday, triggering at least 11 trading halts before cutting gains to 125%, while special-purpose acquisition companies Genesis Growth Tech Acquisition Corp. spiked as much as 163% and Lionheart III Corp. soared as high as 113%. Genesis Growth's rally was trimmed to 64% as gains for Lionheart III mostly evaporated... The risks that come with chasing rallies were also on display Thursday. Intuitive Machines Inc., which had soared 1,200% in a raucous stretch to briefly become the best performing ex-SPAC, tumbled 75% on Thursday. The stock has wiped out 85% from an intraday high hit on Wednesday. It's like these retail investors are wearing special glasses that only let them see garbage stocks. If they type in "Berkshire Hathaway" while wearing them, the screen goes blank. The retail crowd obviously isn't changing. It's sticking with the new status quo. These investors learned in 2008, 2019, and again in March 2020 that the Federal Reserve has their backs. They concluded from those episodes that no dip is too scary to buy. Just look back at the above chart... In March 2020, stock market inflows from retail investors shifted into high gear... The 33-day COVID-19 bear market in 2020 ended as quickly as it began. Starting on March 23 of that year, the newly lobotomized and subsidized masses put their government stimulus checks and unemployment toppers into a giant punch bowl at the biggest speculative party ever held. Since then, like every good human, they do whatever they can to not change. They only stray from the new status quo under the most extreme duress. (We'll get to that in a bit.) Retail investors never seemed happier or more confident than on November 17, 2021. That day, U.S. stocks hit their all-time peak value of $54.4 trillion, according to Bloomberg data. But the thing is... That was the single worst moment in recorded history to believe the future of U.S. equity returns looked bright. In fact, as the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index peaked two days later, [that's what I said right here in the Digest](... My sense of resolution about the unattractiveness of most stocks today is stronger and clearer than ever... I'm more bearish about stocks today, November 19, 2021, than I've ever been in my life about anything. You could say that my bearishness just hit a new all-time high. We all know what happened from there... Stocks plunged throughout all of last year. They slid into an official bear market. And yet, that still didn't break retail investors' sense that any and all dips are buyable. It's not just retail investors. Institutional investors are human, too... Of course, they don't blather on about sending AMC Entertainment (AMC) "to the moon." But in some ways, they're worse than retail investors... That's because they have more money to play with than retail investors. It allows the humans inside those institutional investors to push the status quo harder for longer. They'll push until the market's duress punishes their clients badly enough to put them out of a job. Take Cathie Wood, for example... Wood still has her job as founder, CEO, and chief investment officer of ARK Investment Management. She's still spending clients' money while refusing to change her behavior... Wood's flagship ARK Innovation Fund (ARKK) is down about 75% from its February 12, 2021 all-time-high closing price. [In the February 13, 2023 Digest]( I called it "my favorite publicly traded garbage can" due to it containing a bunch of money-losing, tech-trash stocks. But Wood isn't deterred by the fund's miserable performance or knowing full well that the average ARK investor has lost money since its inception. On February 2, she told Bloomberg TV... [ARKK is] the new Nasdaq. Yes, she was serious. Wood's rationale was that ARKK had outperformed the Nasdaq handily for one month. From the end of 2022 through February 2 of this year, ARKK was up about 40%. Meanwhile, the Nasdaq had gained around 17% over that span. Well, the market took Wood's comments as a contrarian signal... ARKK is down roughly 14% since then. That's around double the Nasdaq's drop over that period. A few weeks isn't enough time to establish ARKK's alleged superiority over the Nasdaq – or vice versa. Still, it's obviously crazy behavior... A few dozen, mostly garbage names make up ARKK. Many of the most cash-gushing tech companies of all time rule the Nasdaq. Which one do you think will do better over the next 10 years? But ARKK's obvious inferiority hasn't caused enough pain yet... So the status quo will continue. Retail investors will refuse to change their behavior... ARKK will likely keep outperforming the Nasdaq during rallies. And it will likely keep underperforming the index on declines. Eventually, this process will wipe out retail investors. And they'll have no choice but to leave the market. Then, moribund companies like Bed Bath & Beyond (BBBY), GameStop (GME), AMC Entertainment, and Carvana (CVNA) will lose the only folks dumb enough to buy them. And finally, they'll slip into oblivion where they belong. (If you think I'm obsessed with this stuff, that's a fair critique. But nobody else talks about it. And it's a huge mistake for folks to ignore it.) We can't talk about changing only under duress without mentioning the Fed... As a massive bureaucracy, the central bank's track record in terms of this behavior is legendary. St. Louis Federal Reserve President James Bullard wrote a piece last June about the lessons the Fed learned about monetary policy during inflation starting in the 1970s. In it, he said... In 1974, the [Federal Open Market Committee] focused on nonmonetary factors affecting inflation – such as government budget deficits, oil price shocks, and "excessive" price and wage increases by firms and labor unions – as opposed to monetary policy. It kept the policy rate relatively low, even in the face of rising inflation... What followed was high and variable inflation over the next decade. In other words, history tells us that the extreme duress of double-digit inflation was needed to inspire a change in the Fed's behavior... The Fed eventually shifted to a more aggressive policy. It wound up shoving its benchmark federal-funds rate up to roughly 20% in March 1980. But even then, it took time for the Fed to completely change its behavior... It thought the job was done, so it dropped the fed-funds rate back to 9.5% by June 1980. Three more tries at 20% – in December 1980, January 1981, and May 1981 – were needed before inflation backed off enough for the Fed to declare its mission accomplished... That chart looks like a screen from Super Mario Bros. It shows that the Fed clearly had no idea what it was doing. It didn't really know how long to keep rates at 20%. I'm not saying it could have known. But that's a discussion for another day. The point is... The Fed never admits it doesn't really know what it's doing – despite the fact that it's obviously just playing video games with our wealth until the economy says "game over." And it's worth noting that a brutal recession stretched from July 1981 to November 1982. When the Fed abandoned the 1974 low-interest-rate status quo, it shifted the status quo... It pursued what today's Fed would call "highly restrictive policy rates." And fighting inflation became the new status quo for more than a decade. Then came the Japanese mega-bubble... the U.S. savings and loan crisis... the Long-Term Capital Management crisis... the dot-com bust... the 2008 financial crisis... the European debt crisis... and finally, the COVID-19 pandemic crash of March 2020. Just like that, the old status quo of easy money and lower rates was back and bigger than ever. So when rising inflation finally showed up in 2021, the Fed didn't recognize it. Instead, Fed members twisted themselves into half-baked pretzels trying to justify their inaction. Do you remember how Fed Chair Jerome Powell and his buddies called inflation a "transitory" effect of post-pandemic reopening? Whoops. As I told The Ferris Report subscribers in this month's issue... Inflation took off on a steep trajectory starting around February 2021. It hit a 40-year high of 6.8% in November 2021, but the Fed didn't start hiking rates until March 2022... It took several months of extreme duress before the Fed even acknowledged the issue. And then, it took a few more months for the Fed to begin its most aggressive rate-hiking cycle since Paul Volcker roamed the halls of the Eccles Building. I'm not saying that the Fed can or should fight inflation with interest-rate policy. Regular readers know I don't think the Fed should even exist. I'm just saying that the Fed is like most human groups and individuals. It won't change what it's doing until the pain becomes unbearable. And no matter what you think about inflation peaking and the Fed backing off, the pain hasn't become unbearable. So the Fed won't change what it's doing yet. Here's another point worth making... Like it did in the 1970s and early 1980s, the Fed might do nothing for a meeting or two this time. The Fed members might just sit on their hands. But don't be fooled... The Fed is like a blindfolded man throwing darts at a wall with a few balloons randomly taped onto it here and there. Its goal is to keep throwing darts until it hears a pop. Remember, retail investors are committing a record $1.5 billion a day to every publicly traded piece of garbage they can get their hands on. As long as that keeps happening, there won't be any duress, any pops, or any changes of the status quo from them or the Fed. This brings me to a revelation I had recently while recording the Stansberry Investor Hour podcast... After interviewing probably 200 different folks on the podcast since 2018, I've noticed something... Every professional investor and trader winds up saying the same thing. They wind up saying that risk controls are paramount. And notably, that's the opposite of the retail traders, who focus solely on all the money they think they'll make any minute. I recently interviewed poker champion and author Annie Duke about her latest book, Quit: The Power of Knowing When to Walk Away. ([The episode will publish next week]( Part of the reason people don't stop what they're doing to do something else is simple... Quitting has a bad reputation. And research suggests we're just not wired to do it... In a section called "Waiting Until It Hurts," Duke reports on a 1975 study published by two psychologists. According to Duke, the psychologists wanted to answer two questions... How long will people wait for something that never arrives, and what price will they pay to continue waiting? If turns out people will wait a surprisingly long amount of time, and they will pay an amount that clearly exceeds the value of what they were waiting for... There are all sorts of ways we get stuck in our decisions. Presented with the opportunity and the relevant information, we will over-persist, rejecting the chance to quit and backing up our original decision by spending even more resources to try to save the endeavor. The retail investor's endeavor is similar to a gambling addict... Stay in the game, come what may. The institutional investor's endeavor is to stay in the game as long as he doesn't get fired. And the Fed's endeavor is to keep the status quo until the American people suffer so much financial pain that it needs to do something to avoid a societal meltdown. Retail investors still have enough money to keep placing their bets. Institutional investors still have their cushy Wall Street jobs. And the economy hasn't destroyed enough lives for the Fed to feel like it needs to change what it's doing. But that won't last forever... Retail investors will stop buying when they're wiped out. Institutional investors will stop gathering assets and taking your fees only when you fire them out of your life forever. And the Fed will pursue a new status quo only after you and your neighbors are soaking torches in kerosene and making effigies of Jerome Powell to burn on the White House lawn. The typical talking head acts like every data point means something new, exciting, and very different is about to happen. But it's almost never true. And the data is nearly 100% noise. They're only acting that way because they're paid to make all this boring finance stuff seem exciting. It's not, trust me. So despite the constant noise in the press, it means nothing that the Fed's last two rate hikes were smaller than the previous four. Before we wrap up today, go back and look at the Volcker-era chart of the fed-funds rate... It was all over the map, even though inflation burned hot the whole time. They were trying out a brand-new status quo. And they had to throw several darts at it before they got the desired pop. So I wouldn't get too excited about the idea that inflation has peaked. As I said last Friday, it's [the dumbest narrative I've ever heard in my life](. And I wouldn't spend too much time pretending you have any idea what the Fed will do. We don't get to know that. We just get to know that they're humans like the rest of us. And as we've learned, humans don't like to change unless they're under extreme duress. --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Links: # [Ultra-Low Risk and 10 Times Upside Potential Make This Too Good Not to Share]( The biggest winner (by far) of 2023 could be a small group of ultra-low-risk stocks the world can't live without... that suddenly has as much as 10 times upside potential... no matter what the market does next. Until midnight tonight only, [get the full details and claim a massive free bonus, right here](. --------------------------------------------------------------- # ['The EXACT Day Stocks Will Finally Bottom']( Goldman Sachs doesn't know... Bank of America doesn't know... Morningstar doesn't know... But Marc Chaikin believes he does. He called the bottom in 2020, just 24 hours before the fastest bull market in history. Now, Marc has spotted the NEXT market bottom... and he's sounding the alarm. Plus, he's sharing the names of what he says will be the best- and worst-performing stocks of 2023. [Click here for full details](. --------------------------------------------------------------- New 52-week highs (as of 2/23/23): Comfort Systems USA (FIX), indie Semiconductor (INDI), Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS), MYR Group (MYRG), and Flutter Entertainment (PDYPY). In today's mailbag, feedback for Stansberry Venture Technology editor Dave Lashmet, who wrote here about developments in the defense sector over the past two days. (If you missed Dave's contributions, you can catch up [here]( and [here]( Do you have a comment or question? As always, e-mail us at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. "Thank you for your e-mail [on Thursday]. I've been considering a 'defense stock' homemade ETF. Your timing is everything." – Stansberry Alliance member Bill B. "I really appreciate reading Dave Lashmet's Venture Technology newsletter. I have been reading it for at least six years and his Nvidia pick in 2016 was extraordinary. I find his research to be fascinating, especially with new and smaller companies." – Stansberry Alliance member Steve H. Good investing, Dan Ferris Eagle Point, Oregon February 24, 2023 --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Top 10 Open Recommendations Top 10 highest-returning open positions across all Stansberry Research portfolios Stock Buy Date Return Publication Analyst MSFT Microsoft 11/11/10 917.6% Retirement Millionaire Doc ADP Automatic Data 10/09/08 795.3% Extreme Value Ferris MSFT Microsoft 02/10/12 788.2% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter WRB W.R. Berkley 03/16/12 585.7% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter ETH/USD Ethereum 02/21/20 581.7% Stansberry Innovations Report Wade HSY Hershey 12/07/07 579.0% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter BRK.B Berkshire Hathaway 04/01/09 437.4% Retirement Millionaire Doc AFG American Financial 10/12/12 433.6% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter FSMEX Fidelity Sel Med 09/03/08 305.5% Retirement Millionaire Doc ALS-T Altius Minerals 02/16/09 305.0% Extreme Value Ferris Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 10 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the model portfolio of any Stansberry Research publication. The buy date reflects when the editor recommended the investment in the listed publication, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if a security is still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber to that publication and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 10 Totals 4 Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter 3 Retirement Millionaire Doc 2 Extreme Value Ferris 1 Stansberry Innovations Report Wade --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 5 Crypto Capital Open Recommendations Top 5 highest-returning open positions in the Crypto Capital model portfolio Stock Buy Date Return Publication Analyst ETH/USD Ethereum 12/07/18 1,332.7% Crypto Capital Wade ONE-USD Harmony 12/16/19 1,208.8% Crypto Capital Wade POLY/USD Polymath 05/19/20 1,067.5% Crypto Capital Wade MATIC/USD Polygon 02/25/21 989.5% Crypto Capital Wade BTC/USD Bitcoin 11/27/18 537.3% Crypto Capital Wade Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 5 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the Crypto Capital model portfolio. The buy date reflects when the recommendation was made, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if it's still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Hall of Fame Top 10 all-time, highest-returning closed positions across all Stansberry portfolios Investment Symbol Duration Gain Publication Analyst Nvidia^* NVDA 5.96 years 1,466% Venture Tech. Lashmet Band Protocol crypto 0.32 years 1,169% Crypto Capital Wade Terra crypto 0.41 years 1,164% Crypto Capital Wade Inovio Pharma.^ INO 1.01 years 1,139% Venture Tech. Lashmet Seabridge Gold^ SA 4.20 years 995% Sjug Conf. Sjuggerud Frontier crypto 0.08 years 978% Crypto Capital Wade Binance Coin crypto 1.78 years 963% Crypto Capital Wade Nvidia^* NVDA 4.12 years 777% Venture Tech. Lashmet Intellia Therapeutics NTLA 1.95 years 775% Amer. Moonshots Root Rite Aid 8.5% bond 4.97 years 773% True Income Williams ^ These gains occurred with a partial position in the respective stocks. * The two partial positions in Nvidia were part of a single recommendation. Editor Dave Lashmet closed the first leg of the position in November 2016 for a gain of about 108%. Then, he closed the second leg in July 2020 for a 777% return. And finally, in May 2022, he booked a 1,466% return on the final leg. Subscribers who followed his advice on Nvidia could've recorded a total weighted average gain of more than 600%. You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to Stansberry Digest. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from Stansberry Digest [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You’re receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberryresearch.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized investment advice. © 2023 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [www.stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility. @media all and (max-width:720px) { .header__20-logo-banner-wrapper { height: 38px!important } .header__20-logo-banner { height: 38px!important; width: auto!important } .header__logo-banner-wrapper { height: 60px!important } .outer { min-width: 100%!important } .hide-on-mobile { display: none!important } .content { padding: 20px 15px!important } .content h1 { font-size: 28px!important } .content .img-wr img { width: 100%!important; height: auto!important } .content .table.table_with-total table td { font-size: 11px } .content .table.table_with-total table .tfoot td span { font-size: 17px } .content .table.table_with-total table td span { font-size: 13px } .table-article { margin-bottom: 20px!important } .table-article:last-child { margin-bottom: 0!important } .table-article th { display: block!important } th.table-article__image-holder { display: none!important } .campaign-banner-link_mobile { display: inline-block!important; overflow: auto!important; max-height: none!important; font-size: inherit!important } .table-blog .row th { display: block!important; max-width: 300px!important; margin: auto!important; text-align: center!important } .table-blog .title { margin-bottom: 23px } .content .table.table_rich table td { font-size: 10px } .content .table.table_rich table td span { font-size: 12px } .content .note .note__content p { margin-bottom: 15px } .content .note .note__vspacer { height: 18px!important } .content .note .note__hspacer { width: 18px!important } .content .image-with-caption__container { width: 100%!important } .content .image-with-caption__container img { width: 100%!important; max-width: 100%!important } .content .article-sidebar { width: 100%!important } .content .image-with-caption { width: 300px; margin-top: 0; margin-left: 0; margin-right: 0; margin-bottom: 0 } .content .mailing-image { width: 100%!important; margin-top: 0; margin-left: 0; margin-right: 0; margin-bottom: 0 } .content .mailing-image__container { width: 300px!important; margin: 0 auto!important } .content .mailing-image__container img { width: 100%!important; max-width: 100%!important } img.responsive { float: none; height: auto!important; width: 100%!important; margin: 0 } } @media all and (max-width:500px) { .header__text-sr { background-color: #fff; font-size: 15px!important; padding-bottom: 15px } .header__logo-banner-sr { background-color: #fff; padding-top: 15px } .hide-border-on-mobile { display: none } .footer { padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 5px } } @media all and (max-width:385px) { .content .mailing-image { width: 100%!important } .content .mailing-image__container { width: 100%!important; margin: 0 auto!important } .header__logo-image { width: 155px } .header__text-sr { font-size: 14px!important } } @media all and (max-width:360px) { .header__text-sr { font-size: 11px!important } } @media only screen and (max-width:600px) { .post-list-item { direction: ltr!important } } @media only screen and (max-width:600px) { .post-list-item__image { display: block!important; width: 100%!important; margin-bottom: 10px!important } } @media only screen and (max-width:600px) { .post-list-item__description { display: block!important; padding: 0!important; font-weight: 400!important; width: 100%!important } } @media only screen and (max-width:600px) { .post-list-item a { display: inline-block!important } } @media only screen and (max-width:600px) { .content-image { width: auto!important } } @media only screen and (max-width:720px) { .footer-content__pal-dm p { padding-left: 15px!important; padding-right: 15px!important } } [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [Stansberry Digest] The horror of change... Retail investors haven't changed their destructive behavior... Institutional investors are human, too... Extreme duress hasn't arrived yet... The Fed won't change until the pain becomes unbearable... --------------------------------------------------------------- As humans, we don't like changing our behavior... It doesn't matter if the behavior is obviously stupid or destructive, either. We would rather find some way to justify it than change it. I (Dan Ferris) am convinced that's why many people seek out therapists... Therapists might naively think clients want help changing a stupid or destructive behavior. The clients might say they want help changing – and they might even think that they do. But what they often really want is to pay someone to tell them they don't need to change. Many bestselling self-help authors realize this idea, too. That's why they make more money than most therapists. Just look at a few of the genre's most popular titles... - You Are a Badass: How to Stop Doubting Your Greatness and Start Living an Awesome Life - Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can't Stop Talking - The Gifts of Imperfection These titles all seem to be designed to let you know you're fine and don't need to change. The world is messed up, not you. You're an imperfectly introverted little badass. Humans will do anything to justify not changing their bad behavior. They'll twist their minds into shapes so impossible that M.C. Escher would kick himself for not thinking of them first. They'll do whatever it takes to avoid the horror of change. That brings us to the following chart from the Financial Times... The financial-news publication featured this chart in an article at the end of last week. The article was titled, "Meme-stock 2.0: Wall Street's retail trading boom is back." Oh boy. More specifically, the chart shows the average daily stock market inflows from retail investors over the past decade. It recently hit a record $1.5 billion per day. Take a look... The Financial Times is actually wrong about this chart... It doesn't show that retail investors are back. If you look closer, it shows they never left. Even the lowest daily inflows since 2020 were much higher than the highest inflows as far back as 2014. Bear market or not, retail investors put the pedal to the metal in 2020. And they still haven't let up. Even worse, they haven't changed their destructive behavior... They're still shopping in areas where they've gotten burned already. For example, they're still dabbling in special purpose acquisition companies ("SPACs"). Regular Digest readers know these "blank check" companies sell shares to the public to raise money, often without an actual business in mind. They promise to acquire one within two years. If the SPAC sponsors acquire a business, they walk away with a 20% ownership stake for doing practically nothing. If they don't acquire one, they must return the money and won't get rich. As a result, many SPAC sponsors just settle for any company. That's what they're rewarded for doing. Now, not all SPACs acquire garbage companies – but many of them do. And yesterday, a bunch of SPACs went absolutely nuts as the retail crowd piled in. From Bloomberg... Ocean Biomedical Inc. at one point surged as much as 453% Thursday, triggering at least 11 trading halts before cutting gains to 125%, while special-purpose acquisition companies Genesis Growth Tech Acquisition Corp. spiked as much as 163% and Lionheart III Corp. soared as high as 113%. Genesis Growth's rally was trimmed to 64% as gains for Lionheart III mostly evaporated... The risks that come with chasing rallies were also on display Thursday. Intuitive Machines Inc., which had soared 1,200% in a raucous stretch to briefly become the best performing ex-SPAC, tumbled 75% on Thursday. The stock has wiped out 85% from an intraday high hit on Wednesday. It's like these retail investors are wearing special glasses that only let them see garbage stocks. If they type in "Berkshire Hathaway" while wearing them, the screen goes blank. The retail crowd obviously isn't changing. It's sticking with the new status quo. These investors learned in 2008, 2019, and again in March 2020 that the Federal Reserve has their backs. They concluded from those episodes that no dip is too scary to buy. Just look back at the above chart... In March 2020, stock market inflows from retail investors shifted into high gear... The 33-day COVID-19 bear market in 2020 ended as quickly as it began. Starting on March 23 of that year, the newly lobotomized and subsidized masses put their government stimulus checks and unemployment toppers into a giant punch bowl at the biggest speculative party ever held. Since then, like every good human, they do whatever they can to not change. They only stray from the new status quo under the most extreme duress. (We'll get to that in a bit.) Retail investors never seemed happier or more confident than on November 17, 2021. That day, U.S. stocks hit their all-time peak value of $54.4 trillion, according to Bloomberg data. But the thing is... That was the single worst moment in recorded history to believe the future of U.S. equity returns looked bright. In fact, as the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index peaked two days later, [that's what I said right here in the Digest](... My sense of resolution about the unattractiveness of most stocks today is stronger and clearer than ever... I'm more bearish about stocks today, November 19, 2021, than I've ever been in my life about anything. You could say that my bearishness just hit a new all-time high. We all know what happened from there... Stocks plunged throughout all of last year. They slid into an official bear market. And yet, that still didn't break retail investors' sense that any and all dips are buyable. It's not just retail investors. Institutional investors are human, too... Of course, they don't blather on about sending AMC Entertainment (AMC) "to the moon." But in some ways, they're worse than retail investors... That's because they have more money to play with than retail investors. It allows the humans inside those institutional investors to push the status quo harder for longer. They'll push until the market's duress punishes their clients badly enough to put them out of a job. Take Cathie Wood, for example... Wood still has her job as founder, CEO, and chief investment officer of ARK Investment Management. She's still spending clients' money while refusing to change her behavior... Wood's flagship ARK Innovation Fund (ARKK) is down about 75% from its February 12, 2021 all-time-high closing price. [In the February 13, 2023 Digest]( I called it "my favorite publicly traded garbage can" due to it containing a bunch of money-losing, tech-trash stocks. But Wood isn't deterred by the fund's miserable performance or knowing full well that the average ARK investor has lost money since its inception. On February 2, she told Bloomberg TV... [ARKK is] the new Nasdaq. Yes, she was serious. Wood's rationale was that ARKK had outperformed the Nasdaq handily for one month. From the end of 2022 through February 2 of this year, ARKK was up about 40%. Meanwhile, the Nasdaq had gained around 17% over that span. Well, the market took Wood's comments as a contrarian signal... ARKK is down roughly 14% since then. That's around double the Nasdaq's drop over that period. A few weeks isn't enough time to establish ARKK's alleged superiority over the Nasdaq – or vice versa. Still, it's obviously crazy behavior... A few dozen, mostly garbage names make up ARKK. Many of the most cash-gushing tech companies of all time rule the Nasdaq. Which one do you think will do better over the next 10 years? But ARKK's obvious inferiority hasn't caused enough pain yet... So the status quo will continue. Retail investors will refuse to change their behavior... ARKK will likely keep outperforming the Nasdaq during rallies. And it will likely keep underperforming the index on declines. Eventually, this process will wipe out retail investors. And they'll have no choice but to leave the market. Then, moribund companies like Bed Bath & Beyond (BBBY), GameStop (GME), AMC Entertainment, and Carvana (CVNA) will lose the only folks dumb enough to buy them. And finally, they'll slip into oblivion where they belong. (If you think I'm obsessed with this stuff, that's a fair critique. But nobody else talks about it. And it's a huge mistake for folks to ignore it.) We can't talk about changing only under duress without mentioning the Fed... As a massive bureaucracy, the central bank's track record in terms of this behavior is legendary. St. Louis Federal Reserve President James Bullard wrote a piece last June about the lessons the Fed learned about monetary policy during inflation starting in the 1970s. In it, he said... In 1974, the [Federal Open Market Committee] focused on nonmonetary factors affecting inflation – such as government budget deficits, oil price shocks, and "excessive" price and wage increases by firms and labor unions – as opposed to monetary policy. It kept the policy rate relatively low, even in the face of rising inflation... What followed was high and variable inflation over the next decade. In other words, history tells us that the extreme duress of double-digit inflation was needed to inspire a change in the Fed's behavior... The Fed eventually shifted to a more aggressive policy. It wound up shoving its benchmark federal-funds rate up to roughly 20% in March 1980. But even then, it took time for the Fed to completely change its behavior... It thought the job was done, so it dropped the fed-funds rate back to 9.5% by June 1980. Three more tries at 20% – in December 1980, January 1981, and May 1981 – were needed before inflation backed off enough for the Fed to declare its mission accomplished... That chart looks like a screen from Super Mario Bros. It shows that the Fed clearly had no idea what it was doing. It didn't really know how long to keep rates at 20%. I'm not saying it could have known. But that's a discussion for another day. The point is... The Fed never admits it doesn't really know what it's doing – despite the fact that it's obviously just playing video games with our wealth until the economy says "game over." And it's worth noting that a brutal recession stretched from July 1981 to November 1982. When the Fed abandoned the 1974 low-interest-rate status quo, it shifted the status quo... It pursued what today's Fed would call "highly restrictive policy rates." And fighting inflation became the new status quo for more than a decade. Then came the Japanese mega-bubble... the U.S. savings and loan crisis... the Long-Term Capital Management crisis... the dot-com bust... the 2008 financial crisis... the European debt crisis... and finally, the COVID-19 pandemic crash of March 2020. Just like that, the old status quo of easy money and lower rates was back and bigger than ever. So when rising inflation finally showed up in 2021, the Fed didn't recognize it. Instead, Fed members twisted themselves into half-baked pretzels trying to justify their inaction. Do you remember how Fed Chair Jerome Powell and his buddies called inflation a "transitory" effect of post-pandemic reopening? Whoops. As I told The Ferris Report subscribers in this month's issue... Inflation took off on a steep trajectory starting around February 2021. It hit a 40-year high of 6.8% in November 2021, but the Fed didn't start hiking rates until March 2022... It took several months of extreme duress before the Fed even acknowledged the issue. And then, it took a few more months for the Fed to begin its most aggressive rate-hiking cycle since Paul Volcker roamed the halls of the Eccles Building. I'm not saying that the Fed can or should fight inflation with interest-rate policy. Regular readers know I don't think the Fed should even exist. I'm just saying that the Fed is like most human groups and individuals. It won't change what it's doing until the pain becomes unbearable. And no matter what you think about inflation peaking and the Fed backing off, the pain hasn't become unbearable. So the Fed won't change what it's doing yet. Here's another point worth making... Like it did in the 1970s and early 1980s, the Fed might do nothing for a meeting or two this time. The Fed members might just sit on their hands. But don't be fooled... The Fed is like a blindfolded man throwing darts at a wall with a few balloons randomly taped onto it here and there. Its goal is to keep throwing darts until it hears a pop. Remember, retail investors are committing a record $1.5 billion a day to every publicly traded piece of garbage they can get their hands on. As long as that keeps happening, there won't be any duress, any pops, or any changes of the status quo from them or the Fed. This brings me to a revelation I had recently while recording the Stansberry Investor Hour podcast... After interviewing probably 200 different folks on the podcast since 2018, I've noticed something... Every professional investor and trader winds up saying the same thing. They wind up saying that risk controls are paramount. And notably, that's the opposite of the retail traders, who focus solely on all the money they think they'll make any minute. I recently interviewed poker champion and author Annie Duke about her latest book, Quit: The Power of Knowing When to Walk Away. ([The episode will publish next week]( Part of the reason people don't stop what they're doing to do something else is simple... Quitting has a bad reputation. And research suggests we're just not wired to do it... In a section called "Waiting Until It Hurts," Duke reports on a 1975 study published by two psychologists. According to Duke, the psychologists wanted to answer two questions... How long will people wait for something that never arrives, and what price will they pay to continue waiting? If turns out people will wait a surprisingly long amount of time, and they will pay an amount that clearly exceeds the value of what they were waiting for... There are all sorts of ways we get stuck in our decisions. Presented with the opportunity and the relevant information, we will over-persist, rejecting the chance to quit and backing up our original decision by spending even more resources to try to save the endeavor. The retail investor's endeavor is similar to a gambling addict... Stay in the game, come what may. The institutional investor's endeavor is to stay in the game as long as he doesn't get fired. And the Fed's endeavor is to keep the status quo until the American people suffer so much financial pain that it needs to do something to avoid a societal meltdown. Retail investors still have enough money to keep placing their bets. Institutional investors still have their cushy Wall Street jobs. And the economy hasn't destroyed enough lives for the Fed to feel like it needs to change what it's doing. But that won't last forever... Retail investors will stop buying when they're wiped out. Institutional investors will stop gathering assets and taking your fees only when you fire them out of your life forever. And the Fed will pursue a new status quo only after you and your neighbors are soaking torches in kerosene and making effigies of Jerome Powell to burn on the White House lawn. The typical talking head acts like every data point means something new, exciting, and very different is about to happen. But it's almost never true. And the data is nearly 100% noise. They're only acting that way because they're paid to make all this boring finance stuff seem exciting. It's not, trust me. So despite the constant noise in the press, it means nothing that the Fed's last two rate hikes were smaller than the previous four. Before we wrap up today, go back and look at the Volcker-era chart of the fed-funds rate... It was all over the map, even though inflation burned hot the whole time. They were trying out a brand-new status quo. And they had to throw several darts at it before they got the desired pop. So I wouldn't get too excited about the idea that inflation has peaked. As I said last Friday, it's [the dumbest narrative I've ever heard in my life](. And I wouldn't spend too much time pretending you have any idea what the Fed will do. We don't get to know that. We just get to know that they're humans like the rest of us. And as we've learned, humans don't like to change unless they're under extreme duress. --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Links: # [Ultra-Low Risk and 10 Times Upside Potential Make This Too Good Not to Share]( The biggest winner (by far) of 2023 could be a small group of ultra-low-risk stocks the world can't live without... that suddenly have as much as 10 times upside potential... no matter what the market does next. Until midnight tonight only, [get the full details and claim a massive free bonus, right here](. # --------------------------------------------------------------- # ['The EXACT Day Stocks Will Finally Bottom']( Goldman Sachs doesn't know... Bank of America doesn't know... Morningstar doesn't know... But Marc Chaikin believes he does. He called the bottom in 2020, just 24 hours before the fastest bull market in history. Now, Marc has spotted the NEXT market bottom... and he's sounding the alarm. Plus, he's sharing the names of what he says will be the best- and worst-performing stocks of 2023. [Click here for full details](. --------------------------------------------------------------- New 52-week highs (as of 2/23/23): Comfort Systems USA (FIX), indie Semiconductor (INDI), Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS), MYR Group (MYRG), and Flutter Entertainment (PDYPY). In today's mailbag, feedback for Stansberry Venture Technology editor Dave Lashmet, who wrote here about developments in the defense sector over the past two days. (If you missed Dave's contributions, you can catch up [here]( and [here]( Do you have a comment or question? As always, e-mail us at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. "Thank you for your e-mail [on Thursday]. I've been considering a 'defense stock' homemade ETF. Your timing is everything." – Stansberry Alliance member Bill B. "I really appreciate reading Dave Lashmet's Venture Technology newsletter. I have been reading it for at least six years and his Nvidia pick in 2016 was extraordinary. I find his research to be fascinating, especially with new and smaller companies." – Stansberry Alliance member Steve H. Good investing, Dan Ferris Eagle Point, Oregon February 24, 2023 --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Top 10 Open Recommendations Top 10 highest-returning open positions across all Stansberry Research portfolios Stock Buy Date Return Publication Analyst MSFT Microsoft 11/11/10 917.6% Retirement Millionaire Doc ADP Automatic Data 10/09/08 795.3% Extreme Value Ferris MSFT Microsoft 02/10/12 788.2% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter WRB W.R. Berkley 03/16/12 585.7% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter ETH/USD Ethereum 02/21/20 581.7% Stansberry Innovations Report Wade HSY Hershey 12/07/07 579.0% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter BRK.B Berkshire Hathaway 04/01/09 437.4% Retirement Millionaire Doc AFG American Financial 10/12/12 433.6% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter FSMEX Fidelity Sel Med 09/03/08 305.5% Retirement Millionaire Doc ALS-T Altius Minerals 02/16/09 305.0% Extreme Value Ferris Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 10 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the model portfolio of any Stansberry Research publication. The buy date reflects when the editor recommended the investment in the listed publication, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if a security is still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber to that publication and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 10 Totals 4 Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter 3 Retirement Millionaire Doc 2 Extreme Value Ferris 1 Stansberry Innovations Report Wade --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 5 Crypto Capital Open Recommendations Top 5 highest-returning open positions in the Crypto Capital model portfolio Stock Buy Date Return Publication Analyst ETH/USD Ethereum 12/07/18 1,332.7% Crypto Capital Wade ONE-USD Harmony 12/16/19 1,208.8% Crypto Capital Wade POLY/USD Polymath 05/19/20 1,067.5% Crypto Capital Wade MATIC/USD Polygon 02/25/21 989.5% Crypto Capital Wade BTC/USD Bitcoin 11/27/18 537.3% Crypto Capital Wade Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 5 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the Crypto Capital model portfolio. The buy date reflects when the recommendation was made, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if it's still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Hall of Fame Top 10 all-time, highest-returning closed positions across all Stansberry portfolios Investment Symbol Duration Gain Publication Analyst Nvidia^* NVDA 5.96 years 1,466% Venture Tech. Lashmet Band Protocol crypto 0.32 years 1,169% Crypto Capital Wade Terra crypto 0.41 years 1,164% Crypto Capital Wade Inovio Pharma.^ INO 1.01 years 1,139% Venture Tech. Lashmet Seabridge Gold^ SA 4.20 years 995% Sjug Conf. Sjuggerud Frontier crypto 0.08 years 978% Crypto Capital Wade Binance Coin crypto 1.78 years 963% Crypto Capital Wade Nvidia^* NVDA 4.12 years 777% Venture Tech. Lashmet Intellia Therapeutics NTLA 1.95 years 775% Amer. Moonshots Root Rite Aid 8.5% bond 4.97 years 773% True Income Williams ^ These gains occurred with a partial position in the respective stocks. * The two partial positions in Nvidia were part of a single recommendation. Editor Dave Lashmet closed the first leg of the position in November 2016 for a gain of about 108%. Then, he closed the second leg in July 2020 for a 777% return. And finally, in May 2022, he booked a 1,466% return on the final leg. Subscribers who followed his advice on Nvidia could've recorded a total weighted average gain of more than 600%. You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to Stansberry Digest. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from Stansberry Digest [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You’re receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberryresearch.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized investment advice. © 2023 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [www.stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.

EDM Keywords (373)

yet yesterday year wrote writers wrap wound worse world work wood wired wiped wipe wind whole whatever weeks wednesday wearing wealth ways way wall waiting wait value us unattractiveness type two twist turns trying try trust trimmed tries took told today titles timing time thursday thought thinking think thing therapists terms tell talk taking takes suggestions suddenly subscription subscribers subscriber stupid stuff stronger stray stop stock still sticking stay spotted spend specifically speak sounding sorts something smaller slip slid sit similar shows show shoving shifted sharing share shapes settle sent sense seem security screen scary says saying savings save said risks rewarded revelation rest responsibility resources resolution research remember refusing refuse refer redistribution recording recorded recommendation recommend recognize recently receiving received reading read rationale rally rallies quit quickly questions question put push pursued pursue published publication public promise process price press power position pops point play period people pedal peaked pay part paramount pain paid outperformed opposite opposed opportunity one obviously obsessed oblivion nvidia nothing notably next new neighbors needs needed need nasdaq names must much moon months month money minute minds mind metal messed meeting may matter market marc many make made lose look longer long like life let lessons leave learned learn known knowing know kerosene kept keep justify job issue investment introverts inspire information inflation individuals index inception inaction impossible imperfection ignore idea humans human horror hit history high hears happened happen hands halls greatness got good goal gifts get genre garbage game gains gain future fund fooled followed folks first firms fire fine find finally fees feedback fed far fact face extraordinary excited example ever even episodes episode enough endorse endeavor end employees economy duress duke due dropped drop done discussion dips dip digest different developments deterred despite designed declare decade day date data course could convinced contributions containing considering confident concluded company committing comments comment come closed clearer claim choice chart changing changes changed change chance catch came called buyable buy business burn bunch brings bottom booked blather bigger better best belong believe behavior begin bearishness bearish based badass backs backing back avoid article arkk areas anything amount america also allows advice address acting account 85 75 64 600 2022 2021 2020 2016 20 1974 1970s 163 125 108

Marketing emails from stansberryresearch.com

View More
Sent On

26/03/2024

Sent On

26/03/2024

Sent On

25/03/2024

Sent On

25/03/2024

Sent On

25/03/2024

Sent On

24/03/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.