Newsletter Subject

Don't Put All Your Eggs in This Popular Basket

From

stansberryresearch.com

Email Address

customerservice@exct.stansberryresearch.com

Sent On

Sat, Oct 26, 2024 11:34 AM

Email Preheader Text

It's easy to get blinded by high returns in a single corner of the market. But trying to ride a one-

It's easy to get blinded by high returns in a single corner of the market. But trying to ride a one-basket approach to consistent, long-term returns is a mistake... [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [DailyWealth] Editor's note: One "basket" of stocks has nearly doubled the return of the S&P 500 Index this year. But according to Vic Lederman, the editorial director of our corporate affiliate Chaikin Analytics, investing in just one basket isn't a good way to generate consistent, long-term returns. So in today's Weekend Edition, we're taking a break from our usual fare to share one of Vic's essays, recently published in the free Chaikin PowerFeed e-letter. In it, Vic explains why serious financial pain could be in store for investors who use a one-basket approach. --------------------------------------------------------------- Don't Put All Your Eggs in This Popular Basket By Vic Lederman, editorial director, Chaikin Analytics --------------------------------------------------------------- Huckster Jordan Belfort made a fortune selling "pink sheet" penny stocks to unsuspecting investors... You've probably heard of Belfort before. Leonardo DiCaprio portrays him in the hit movie The Wolf of Wall Street. Belfort thought he had the system beat. But he made one fatal mistake... His contingency plan was to store most of his ill-gotten wealth in Switzerland. Belfort put the money in an account named after his wife's aunt. He did it to avoid his wealth being confiscated by the feds in case he got caught. It was a near-perfect plan... But then his wife's aunt unexpectedly died of a stroke in 1999. That shut him out of his offshore account holding his wealth stockpile. Belfort made the big mistake of putting all his eggs in one basket. By that, I mean he deposited all his backup savings into one account under one person's name. And it wasn't even his name. Most Americans don't own a Swiss bank account, let alone one under someone else's name. But a majority (62%) do own stocks... And they're always looking for ways to outperform the market. These days, one particular "basket" of stocks gets most of the attention for folks chasing outperformance... --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Link: [Wall Street Legend Warns to Prepare for October 29]( A Wall Street legend is warning 892,000 Americans to prepare immediately for October 29. A historic disconnect in the U.S. financial markets will open the biggest rapid-fire moneymaking opportunity of his 50-year career. You could double or triple your portfolio, without putting a penny into Nvidia or any other popular AI stock. [Click here to learn more](. --------------------------------------------------------------- I'm talking about the so-called "Magnificent Seven." Regular readers know all about this group of stocks. They're seven of the world's largest companies listed in the U.S. This list is made up of Apple (AAPL), Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOGL), Meta Platforms (META), Microsoft (MSFT), Nvidia (NVDA), and Tesla (TSLA). Combined, they have a colossal market cap of more than $16 trillion. To put that in perspective, that's roughly 30% of the value of the entire U.S. stock market. All seven companies are part of the S&P 500 Index, in which they also have a combined weighting of about 30%. That's an average weighting of more than 4% for each. The other 493 companies in the S&P 500 each carry an average weight of just more than 0.1%. Each Magnificent Seven stock is about 30 times more significant than the other 493 companies. Because of this, the Magnificent Seven became a basket of investments. And as you would expect, there's an exchange-traded fund focusing solely on these seven companies. It's called the Roundhill Magnificent Seven Fund (MAGS). And it has boasted big gains this year... Since the start of 2024, MAGS is up 47%. That's nearly double the 22% return of the S&P 500 over the same time frame. Take a look... Folks, a 22% return for the broad market in less than a year is impressive. But making nearly double that from seven stocks picked from the same basket is mind-boggling. Thanks to these big gains and all the media attention on the Magnificent Seven, it's no surprise that ordinary investors are pouring into the fund. Back in January, MAGS had $69 million in assets under management ("AUM"). Today, it has around $795 million in AUM. People investing heavily in MAGS, or assembling their own "Magnificent Seven basket," are clearly hoping to continue the amazing stretch of market-beating returns. They're putting their eggs in one small basket. However, if three companies in this basket have a bad quarter, the entire group takes a big hit. But if three companies in a basket of 500 companies have a bad quarter, it's more of a hiccup. Investing in the smaller basket is a big risk to take. And the Power Gauge sees trouble ahead... The Power Gauge is a tool we use to gather a wide array of investment fundamentals, technicals, and more into a simple, actionable rating such as "bullish," "bearish," or "neutral." According to our system, three of the Magnificent Seven stocks have weak strength and timing indicators. The lesson here is simple... It's easy to get blinded by high returns when it happens in one corner of the market. That creates an urge to jump on the bandwagon – especially when it involves the seven biggest stocks in the market. But as investors, we should take a more nuanced view. You don't have to just jump in the basket and hope for the best. That's not to say the Magnificent Seven stocks are bad investments... But simply riding them in hopes of making consistent, long-term returns is a one-basket approach. Don't make that mistake today. Good investing, Vic Lederman --------------------------------------------------------------- Editor's note: Chaikin Analytics founder Marc Chaikin recommended Nvidia before it soared 32,000%. But right now, he says that's an "old story"... The S&P 500 has made nearly 50 new record highs this year alone. And Marc sees a lot of investors acting foolishly with their money. But a market shift is coming – and it's creating what he calls the "greatest rapid-fire moneymaking opportunity" of his 50-year career. That's why Marc is going on camera to share all the details on Tuesday, October 29, at 10 a.m. Eastern time. Learn how to watch his big reveal for free by [clicking here](. --------------------------------------------------------------- [Tell us what you think of this content]( [We value our subscribers' feedback. To help us improve your experience, we'd like to ask you a couple brief questions.]( [Click here to rate this e-mail]( You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to DailyWealth. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from DailyWealth [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You're receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberryresearch.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized financial advice. © 2024 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.

Marketing emails from stansberryresearch.com

View More
Sent On

29/10/2024

Sent On

29/10/2024

Sent On

28/10/2024

Sent On

27/10/2024

Sent On

25/10/2024

Sent On

25/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.