Newsletter Subject

More Selling, Lots More Buying

From

stansberryresearch.com

Email Address

customerservice@exct.stansberryresearch.com

Sent On

Fri, Sep 13, 2024 10:08 PM

Email Preheader Text

The 'smart money' is selling... Even art owners are raising cash... 19 more signs stocks are overval

The 'smart money' is selling... Even art owners are raising cash... 19 more signs stocks are overvalued... Investing in sideways markets... Obsessing about the Fed... [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [Stansberry Digest] The 'smart money' is selling... Even art owners are raising cash... 19 more signs stocks are overvalued... Investing in sideways markets... Obsessing about the Fed... --------------------------------------------------------------- The selling continues... [Last month]( I (Dan Ferris) told you the "smart money" was raising cash. Legendary investor Warren Buffett recently sold roughly 60% of Berkshire Hathaway's (BRK-B) largest equity position, Apple (AAPL). Berkshire once held a little more than a billion shares and now holds just 400 million shares. Berkshire has also begun reducing its large position in Bank of America (BAC) from slightly more than a billion shares to around 900 million shares. Meanwhile, Berkshire is now holding a record amount of cash and safe securities like T-bills. And now, another important Berkshire executive is selling... Ajit Jain heads up Berkshire's insurance operations. Buffett admires Jain so much that in his 2016 shareholder letter, he wrote: When Ajit entered Berkshire's office on a Saturday in 1986, he did not have a day's experience in the insurance business... Since then, Ajit has created tens of billions of value for Berkshire shareholders. If there were ever to be another Ajit and you could swap me for him, don't hesitate. Make the trade! Buffett doesn't just think Jain is immensely talented. He also genuinely loves the guy. Buffett has admitted that Jain is like a brother or a son to him. Well, according to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission regulatory filings, Jain recently sold more than half of his stake in Berkshire Hathaway – 200 Berkshire A shares – for proceeds of roughly $139 million. Now, insiders tend to buy for one reason (they're bullish), but they sell for any number of reasons. Maybe Jain is selling to begin the process of dividing up his estate for his heirs... though he could do that by converting his A shares to lower-price B shares and distributing them. A Fortune article suggests Jain might be selling now because he thinks capital gains tax rates will rise after the next president gets into office. But since Jain could rearrange his estate without selling, I assume that Jain wants the cash. Now, it could be sheer coincidence that Buffett's most valued employee has reduced his stake in Berkshire – which I assume is Jain's largest holding – by almost as much as Buffett reduced Berkshire's stake in its biggest holding. And maybe the fact that a big part of Jain's job is to understand the risk of loss is also just a coincidence. Perhaps Jain thinks the stock is fully valued and he could get a better return investing the money elsewhere. But Buffett has often said that his favorite holding period for an investment is forever. And Jain is an insurance guy, not a trader. His job is to buy good insurance operations and hang onto them for the long term. So it's notable that some of the smartest money ever is selling stocks and raising cash right now. As I've said before, it's no time to take big risks. That's why I've told The Ferris Report subscribers to buy short-term T-bills and newly issued government-guaranteed mortgage-backed securities... and have made a few sell recommendations lately (and several others in Extreme Value). Both government-backed investments I recommended are safe sources of income that should maintain the value of your principal in a steep bear market or other chaotic environment. These are two of the safest – and, yes, smartest – plays on Earth right now. Buffett and Jain are lucky they're not trying to sell art... Bloomberg reports that "the major May New York [art] auction season fell about 23% by value from the prior year." It makes you wonder... What does a poor rich person do if they need cash to buy a sports team or renovate their estate and can't sell their art? Why, borrow against it, of course. Deloitte estimates outstanding loans against art could surpass $36 billion in 2024, up from $29 billion to $34 billion last year. That also compares with $20.3 billion to $23.6 billion of such loans outstanding five years ago, according to Deloitte. Thank goodness these poor souls found a way to get cash for their art. Art, gold, and land are the three traditional stores of value for wealthy, old (mostly European) families. Art and land occasionally become more difficult to sell. But you can always borrow against them. Art has the advantage of not fluctuating in value daily, as most fine art collections are appraised at most once a year. Land can fluctuate, but its owners generally aren't obsessed with getting daily quotes the way most folks do with stocks and bonds. And gold... well... if you're selling your gold, maybe you have bigger problems than a need for cash. In short, it's not just Berkshire executives raising cash today. But hardly anybody else is... Stocks are wildly overvalued right now... [Last week]( I showed you a valuation measure that says stocks have never been more expensive than they are today... It comes from economist and portfolio manager John Hussman. Hussman's ratio compares the total market cap of U.S. nonfinancial companies with a measure of their profitability called gross value added ("market cap/GVA"). Hussman has compared this measure with subsequent 10-year and 12-year returns in the market and found that when market cap/GVA is high, market returns are consistently low. When it peaks, returns go flat or negative for 10 or 12 years. Market cap/GVA hit its all-time peak on August 23. That's higher than the previous market cap/GVA peak in 1929. In short, stocks have never been more expensive than they are today based on this ratio. Well, this week, we have 19 more valuation measures showing stocks are expensive. According to data originally published by Bank of America and reposted on social network X by certified financial analyst Win Smart, the S&P 500 is expensive in 19 out of 20 different valuation measures. All but one of the 19 metrics are double- or triple-digit percentages above their long-term averages, with some of the data going back as far as 1792. The exception was the equity risk premium, which compares a stock's yield with a government bond yield (usually the 10-year Treasury note). It's a mere 7.9% above its average value since 1980. I've said before that valuation metrics aren't timing indicators... If you understand valuation and are buying for the long term, timing hardly matters (and most timing indicators are totally worthless). Cutting your losses quickly and with discipline can protect you from bad timing. But as we explained last week, not understanding valuation and thinking that you'll be okay if you just hold long enough can lock you into mediocre returns for a decade or more. And it sure looks like today is one of those occasions. Imagine getting caught up in the dot-com mania and putting a big chunk of your 401(k) into a Nasdaq Composite Index fund in March 2000... and leaving it there as the index lost 78% of its value and went sideways for 15 years. Or imagine thinking Japan was a great bet in 1989 and watching as your investment declined 76% and went sideways for 34 years. The main reason it's hard to be a long-term investor is because people get scared out of the market during the times they ought to be buying as much as they can. The flip side of that is that too many folks tend to commit the biggest sums of money at the very worst times to buy (like right now). That's what I'm afraid folks buying regular, market-cap-weighted S&P 500 Index funds are doing today. It's why I'm always telling you that you're better off buying great businesses and preparing your portfolio for a wide variety of outcomes. Someday, after stocks fall far enough, I'll say nearly the opposite: to forget about anything but stocks. But most folks tend to have the highest conviction at the exact wrong moment. And we're likely to see more of that in the weeks ahead... The folks from Research Affiliates just put out a note that says in elections that are too close to call, history suggests that the market is likely to rise in the week prior to election day and continue higher after some volatility around the election itself. Just remember what I said last week: The more you pay for an investment, the lower your return will be. Finally, since we're all way too obsessed with the Federal Reserve... The Fed's hotly anticipated meeting will take place next Tuesday and Wednesday. Fed Chair Jerome Powell has publicly said that the Fed is now in cutting mode, so it seems likely we'll see an interest-rate cut next week. But it's a little crazy that so many folks are obsessed with how much the Fed will cut. Millions of people are wringing their hands wondering if it'll be 25 or 50 basis points. In other words, will the top end of the Fed's target range drop to 5.25% or 5% from the current 5.5%? In the end, it doesn't matter. Fed policy is simply a reaction to economic reality, poisoned by the deeply flawed belief that the Fed can and should try to do something about it. The Fed couldn't prevent the great inflation and sideways market from 1966 to 1982, numerous recessions, the savings and loan crisis in the 1980s, the dot-com bust of 2002, or the 2007 to 2008 great financial crisis. So we have no reason to believe it will prevent the biggest financial mega bubble in recorded history from bursting. And as we've repeatedly pointed out in these pages, a rate-cutting cycle is nothing to get excited about, unless you really like recessions and bear markets... because that's when rate-cutting cycles tend to happen. We've had four big drawdowns since 2000: the dot-com bust, the great financial crisis, the pandemic crash, and the 2022 bear market. The Fed cut rates during three of those times. It raised rates in the last one. Rate cuts are an attempt to stimulate economic activity during a time of weakness. Praying for rate cuts is like praying for a recession. It makes no sense. The only reason people want lower rates is because we saw them for most of the period between 2008 and 2022, and investors liked seeing the S&P 500 Index rise 600% (from its March 2009 bottom to the January 2022 top). People loved speculating on all kinds of garbage that went up a lot more than that, sometimes over very short time frames. In short, folks are addicted to the idea that low rates are good, even though they're one of the most important signs of slowing economic activity. The probability of rates falling back to zero and staying there for most of the next decade and a half is very low. (I'm reminded of the old bumper sticker seen in Silicon Valley after the dot-com crash, which said, "Please God, just one more bubble.") So you had better hope that when the Fed cuts rates next week, it's followed by plenty of hot consumer price index reports and falling unemployment. Because if it's not, the Fed will feel like it has to keep cutting until unemployment stops rising and "prices stabilize." However, prices never truly stabilize. The Fed would be better off leaving rates unchanged, or at least confining them to a much narrower range (with current levels making up the bottom of the range). Instead, the Fed goes on lengthy cutting and hiking cycles. And through it all, it fails to prevent booms, busts, bubbles, recessions, and full-blown financial crises. It makes you wonder why the Fed even exists. The Fed's true purpose... The Fed was created in 1913 to backstop bankers' fortunes because bankers love using leverage to try to make as much money as quickly as they can before the next blowup. The Panic of 1907 scared Wall Street bankers enough that they knew they had to do something. So they shoved the Federal Reserve down our throats as a lender of last resort for the next time they needed one... And they'll always need one. Bankers can take more risk, use more leverage, and generally screw things up for everybody else because they know the Fed is there to save them when it all goes wrong. The 2008 crisis proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Fed will help its friends out. If there was nobody to bail anybody out, we might just get more prudent behavior out of bankers. The Fed either hasn't figured out or doesn't care that it's part of the problem, and that letting the business cycle run its course – including letting overleveraged banks fail – would likely be much better for everyone. So here we are, once again, waiting for the Fed to tell us all what it'll do. Just remember, a rate cut is not a buy signal. It's a signal that the laziest, least competent bankers on the planet have a large enough pile of data telling them the economy is weakening. So I'll repeat my advice from above: Focus on buying great businesses instead of index funds that mix great businesses with less-than-great ones. And buy alternative investments that will keep your money safe and generate returns while you wait for more attractive valuations to arrive in U.S. stocks. See you on the other side of Wednesday's Fed announcement. Recommended Links: [Stock Warning: 90 Days to Move Your Money]( It doesn't matter if you have money in the markets or are waiting on the sidelines. The short period we are about to enter could have the power to make – and destroy – fortunes. And what you do in the next 90 days could determine your financial success for the next decade. [Here's what's happening and how to prepare](. --------------------------------------------------------------- [How the Boeing Disasters Could Hit Nvidia Investors]( You may have heard about Boeing planes falling apart midflight and catching fire. But, according to Dan Ferris, there's something much darker going on here that could threaten Nvidia, the "Magnificent Seven," and the entire U.S. stock market. [Click here for the full story](. --------------------------------------------------------------- New 52-week highs (as of 9/12/24): Alamos Gold (AGI), Altius Minerals (ALS.TO), Altius Renewable Royalties (ARR.TO), Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box Fund (BOXX), Costco Wholesale (COST), Fair Isaac (FICO), Fidelity National Financial (FNF), SPDR Gold Shares (GLD), Intuitive Surgical (ISRG), Nuveen Preferred & Income Opportunities Fund (JPC), Kinross Gold (KGC), London Stock Exchange Group (LNSTY), NYLI CBRE Global Infrastructure Megatrends Term Fund (MEGI), Omega Healthcare Investors (OHI), Oracle (ORCL), Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS), Planet Fitness (PLNT), RadNet (RDNT), Sherwin-Williams (SHW), Skeena Resources (SKE), S&P Global (SPGI), Stryker (SYK), ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL), Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities (VTIP), and Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU). In today's mailbag, a thought on some history that we shared [earlier this week]( – about the market predicting who wins the White House, most of the time... Do you have a comment or question? As always, e-mail us at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. "Where the mailing [on Tuesday] said: 'In the 23 presidential elections since 1928, 14 were preceded by gains in the three months prior. In 12 of those 14 instances, the incumbent (or the incumbent party) won the White House.' "The thing is, this says that [in] 2 of the 14 instances the incumbent didn't win... This could be the 3rd of 15 instances [this] year!" – Subscriber Richard A. Good investing, Dan Ferris Eagle Point, Oregon September 13, 2024 --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Top 10 Open Recommendations Top 10 highest-returning open stock positions across all Stansberry Research portfolios. Returns represent the total return from the initial recommendation. Investment Buy Date Return Publication Analyst MSFT Microsoft 11/11/10 1,387.4% Retirement Millionaire Doc MSFT Microsoft 02/10/12 1,362.1% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter ADP Automatic Data Processing 10/09/08 1,003.5% Extreme Value Ferris WRB W.R. Berkley 03/16/12 798.1% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter BRK.B Berkshire Hathaway 04/01/09 699.4% Retirement Millionaire Doc HSY Hershey 12/07/07 493.9% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter TT Trane Technologies 04/12/18 474.9% Retirement Millionaire Doc AFG American Financial 10/12/12 462.9% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter NVO Novo Nordisk 12/05/19 395.3% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Gula TTD The Trade Desk 10/17/19 391.5% Stansberry Innovations Report Engel Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 10 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the model portfolio of any Stansberry Research publication. The buy date reflects when the editor recommended the investment in the listed publication, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if a security is still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber to that publication and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 10 Totals 5 Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter/Gula 3 Retirement Millionaire Doc 1 Extreme Value Ferris 1 Stansberry Innovations Report Engel --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 5 Crypto Capital Open Recommendations Top 5 highest-returning open positions in the Crypto Capital model portfolio Investment Buy Date Return Publication Analyst wstETH Wrapped Staked Ethereum 12/07/18 2,291.8% Crypto Capital Wade BTC/USD Bitcoin 11/27/18 1,446.1% Crypto Capital Wade ONE/USD Harmony 12/16/19 1,127.7% Crypto Capital Wade POL/USD Polygon 02/25/21 720.6% Crypto Capital Wade OPN OPEN Ticketing Ecosystem 02/21/23 279.3% Crypto Capital Wade Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 5 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the Crypto Capital model portfolio. The buy date reflects when the recommendation was made, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if it's still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Hall of Fame Top 10 all-time, highest-returning closed positions across all Stansberry portfolios Investment Symbol Duration Gain Publication Analyst Nvidia^* NVDA 5.96 years 1,466% Venture Tech. Lashmet Microsoft^ MSFT 12.74 years 1,185% Retirement Millionaire Doc Inovio Pharma.^ INO 1.01 years 1,139% Venture Tech. Lashmet Seabridge Gold^ SA 4.20 years 995% Sjug Conf. Sjuggerud Nvidia^* NVDA 4.12 years 777% Venture Tech. Lashmet Intellia Therapeutics NTLA 1.95 years 775% Amer. Moonshots Root Rite Aid 8.5% bond 4.97 years 773% True Income Williams PNC Warrants PNC-WS 6.16 years 706% True Wealth Systems Sjuggerud Maxar Technologies^ MAXR 1.90 years 691% Venture Tech. Lashmet Silvergate Capital SI 1.95 years 681% Amer. Moonshots Root ^ These gains occurred with a partial position in the respective stocks. * The two partial positions in Nvidia were part of a single recommendation. Editor Dave Lashmet closed the first leg of the position in November 2016 for a gain of about 108%. Then, he closed the second leg in July 2020 for a 777% return. And finally, in May 2022, he booked a 1,466% return on the final leg. Subscribers who followed his advice on Nvidia could've recorded a total weighted average gain of more than 600%. --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Crypto Hall of Fame Top 5 highest-returning closed positions in the Crypto Capital model portfolio Investment Symbol Duration Gain Publication Analyst Band Protocol BAND/USD 0.31 years 1,169% Crypto Capital Wade Terra LUNA/USD 0.41 years 1,166% Crypto Capital Wade Polymesh POLYX/USD 3.84 years 1,157% Crypto Capital Wade Frontier FRONT/USD 0.09 years 979% Crypto Capital Wade Binance Coin BNB/USD 1.78 years 963% Crypto Capital Wade You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to Stansberry Digest. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from Stansberry Digest [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You’re receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberryresearch.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized financial advice. © 2024 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.

EDM Keywords (304)

zero yield wrote writers wringing work words wonder wins win whole went week wednesday weakening way watching waiting wait value unless understand two trying try trader told today times time throats three thought thinking thing take suggestions subscription subscribers subscriber stocks stock still staying stake speak son sometimes something slightly simply signal sidelines side showed shoved short shares shadow sent sense selling sell see security securities says saw savings save saturday said safest risk rise return responsibility reposted repeat renovate reminded remember refer reduced redistribution recorded recommended recommendation recommend recession receiving received reason read reaction quickly questions question putting put published publication protect process proceeds problem probability principal prevent preparing prepare preceded power position portfolio plenty planet period people pay part panic pages ought opposite one okay office obsessed nvidia number nothing note notable nobody never negative need must much move money might measure maybe may matter markets market makes make maintain mailing mailbag made lucky lower low lot loss lock little likely like leverage letting less lender leaving learned learn land know knew kinds keep job jain investment information incumbent income idea holds holding history higher help held heard hard happening happen half get garbage gains gain friends found forget forever followed folks focus fluctuating fluctuate finally figured feedback fed far fails fact experience expensive exception everyone ever estate endorse end employees elections election economy economist doubt double dividing distributing discipline difficult decade day date created could converting compares compared commit comment comes closed close cash care buying buy bursting bullish buffett bubble brother bottom borrow booked bonds bills billions better berkshire believe begin based bankers bank attempt assume art arrive appraised anything america also almost ajit advice advantage admitted address addicted acting account according 3rd 25 23 2024 2022 2008 2007 2002 1989 1986 1980s 1966 1929 1913 19 1792 12 108 10

Marketing emails from stansberryresearch.com

View More
Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.