Newsletter Subject

The Market Is Undecided

From

stansberryresearch.com

Email Address

customerservice@exct.stansberryresearch.com

Sent On

Tue, Sep 10, 2024 10:05 PM

Email Preheader Text

Trump vs. Harris… What the market is saying… The presidential election cycle… How to

Trump vs. Harris… What the market is saying… The presidential election cycle… How to know the winner… The recession factor… Then comes the next four years… [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [Stansberry Digest] Trump vs. Harris... What the market is saying... The presidential election cycle... How to know the winner... The recession factor... Then comes the next four years... --------------------------------------------------------------- There's a big debate tonight, of course... As we send out today's Digest, Donald Trump and Kamala Harris are about to meet onstage in Philadelphia for their first – and possibly only – presidential debate before November's election. Devoted readers might recall back in late June when we previewed the first debate between Trump and President Joe Biden. "Anything could happen," we said, for various reasons. It did. Nearly three months later, we're back... this time, with Harris on stage with Trump. Anything could still happen. Outside of a handful of brief appearances in front of reporters, it will be Harris' first major unscripted event since her vice-presidential debate against Mike Pence four years ago. In any case, we'll be watching – the high or lowlights, at least – and I (Corey McLaughlin) will report back tomorrow with significant economic or market-related points. In the meantime, you can send your thoughts to feedback@stansberryresearch.com, as usual. I'm also human and American, so like many of you, I will keep tabs on any "moments" that could shake up the race, too. Though as I will explain today, you might want to look at something else instead if you want to know who will win the White House. Short term vs. long term... During and after the debate (or any major news event, really), emotions will be stoked and analysis issued. You may see parts of the market reflect certain ideas about taxes or health care reform from either side. And you'll hear who everyone thinks won the debate and what that will mean for the presidential race. All of this may present [trading opportunities](. Our friend and Ten Stock Trader editor Greg Diamond is looking out to see if the debate turns out to be a catalyst in either direction for the market, though [he told subscribers today]( he's not certain it will play out that way. (I'm personally interested to see how Harris' idea of price mandates for cereal and other foods plays tonight and afterward... or if that part of the economic agenda has gone into a dark place, never to be seen again.) But remember our frequent, perhaps disappointing view on the long-term impact of presidential elections on the market. Over time, the outcome of the election tends to matter less and less than the dates on the calendar – and than what the market is saying. Since I started working at Stansberry Research, I've learned a few big things about the market and presidential election years. I've also written the Digest through an entire cycle, and I've been fortunate to learn from all the bright minds on our team. Firstly... Respect the presidential election cycle... History has clearly shown that a "presidential election cycle" pattern exists over a century of market history, for each of the four years in the cycle. You can debate the "why," but the history is there. Broadly speaking, as our colleague and True Wealth editor Brett Eversole [wrote a couple years ago](... Stocks perform OK during a president's first year in office. Then, in the second year, they go through a major slump. That's when the worst returns show up. Many believe this happens because of the uncertainty around midterm elections. After the midterms, certainty returns to the markets... and Year 3 leads to the biggest returns. Year 4 is also usually another solid year as we head into the next presidential election. The pattern is more or less playing out again this year. The S&P 500 Index's average return in presidential election years is around 11%, and stocks finished higher roughly three-quarters of the time. The S&P 500 is up roughly 15% in 2024. And with concerns and uncertainties about the economy (and politics) ahead with rising unemployment (at least if you're reading our work), perhaps more of a trim is due before year end. More than anything else, the market tends to predict the election winner... Most people look at the stock market and try to think about which will be the "winning" companies or sectors if a certain candidate wins the White House or one party or the other controls Congress. It's true that some parts of the economy may benefit from the specific policies of Democrats or Republicans. And there may be trades to be made around the likelihood of either side winning in the short term. But that's not the most telling information to consider. I'm not going to sit here and predict November's election result with any certainty. Whoever wins, we will end up with more debt as a nation. We will want to own inflation protection, like shares of high-quality stocks and other assets that can't be printed because Congress or a central banker says so. We will sleep easier that way. If you need to scratch an election-prediction itch, though, the more reliable thing to do is to look at what the market is doing before a presidential election to see who will win the election. In brief, if the stock market is up from July 31 to October 31, the incumbent party's candidate generally wins. When the market is down, it's a more likely victory for the challenger. It's not a perfect predictor, but the evidence is pretty compelling. We [last discussed this in July]( just before this indicator was about to get going... In the 23 presidential elections since 1928, 14 were preceded by gains in the three months prior. In 12 of those 14 instances, the incumbent (or the incumbent party) won the White House. Conversely, in eight of the nine elections preceded by three months of stock market losses, incumbents were sent packing. This was the case in 2020, by the most razor-thin of margins. From July 31, 2020, to October 31, the S&P 500 lost a slim 0.04%. And, perhaps appropriately, the election result was slim in Biden's favor (and contested by Trump). In any case, this indicator was again "right" about the election result, as it has been about every one since 1984. Today, many polls – and believe them as much or as little as you'd like – have Harris and Trump neck and neck to win November's election. So does the market. Since July 31, the S&P 500 is nearly flat, down roughly half a percent. The benchmark index was up slightly, 0.4%, today. Pay attention to how the market performs over the next two months if you want to predict who might win come November. And don't forget about one more feature of election season... The 'recession factor' is strong... Since 1932, the incumbent or incumbent party has never failed to win reelection unless a recession has occurred during his time in office. That's also what we had in 2020, albeit briefly amid the COVID-19 panic. This makes some sense because if voters are upset with the economy, they want change. Whether that change works or is "right" is another story. In most cases, the answer is simply "more spending" and inflation and debt, but we digress... Today, the unemployment rate has been generally trending higher since April 2023, up to 4.2%. We're seeing various recession indicators flash (the Sahm Rule and an uninverting yield curve). The Federal Reserve is signaling it will cut interest rates. Defensive sectors of the market, like consumer staples, have become the leaders. It looks like pre-recession or early-stage-recession market behavior. Yet while the economy may indeed be weakening as we speak – and job creation is dwindling – it's unlikely right now you'll hear an "official" recession declaration before Election Day. That's not a conspiracy theory, on the surface at least, but a matter of timing. The job market may be weakening, but the other part of the "recession" equation, GDP, is still holding up. (Of course, government spending plays a role, but we play the cards we are dealt here.) Estimates for the current (third) quarter still call for GDP growth in the 2% range. But if GDP growth turns negative by the end of the quarter, folks won't wait around to talk about a recession. The first third-quarter GDP estimate is due on October 30. Wouldn't that be some timing, a week before people head to the polls? Otherwise, though, any further economic weakness isn't likely to come to light until after the election. Then we'll deal with the next four years. --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Links: [URGENT RESPONSE TO THE MARKET SELL-OFF]( "This is how I'd invest $1 million right now," says legendary investor Whitney Tilson. He just posted a portfolio that includes four must-see new stock picks. He's using the Monte Carlo method to see which of 4,817 stocks could double your money in today's uncertain market. [Click here to learn more – before it goes offline in 48 hours](. --------------------------------------------------------------- [Why Are These Strange 'Accidents' Happening All Over America?]( Across America, strange "accidents" are happening in greater numbers than ever before. Jets are falling apart, chemicals are spilling, construction workers are being electrocuted – and no one knows why. In his new exposé, American financial analyst Dan Ferris reveals the silent force behind this trend... why it's destroying this country from the inside... and where all the signs suggest it's about to strike next: the U.S. stock market. [Click here to watch now](. --------------------------------------------------------------- New 52-week highs (as of 9/9/24): American Financial (AFG), Altius Renewable Royalties (ARR.TO), Clorox (CLX), Compass (COMP), Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares (DRN), JPMorgan Chase – Series LL (JPMPRL), Kenvue (KVUE), Lockheed Martin (LMT), London Stock Exchange Group (LNSTY), NYLI CBRE Global Infrastructure Megatrends Term Fund (MEGI), Northrop Grumman (NOC), Pembina Pipeline (PBA), Procter & Gamble (PG), ResMed (RMD), iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond Fund (SHY), Stryker (SYK), Travelers (TRV), Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities (VTIP), Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP), and the short position in SolarEdge Technologies (SEDG). A quiet mailbag for today. As always, send your comments, questions, concerns, suggestions, gripes, praise, rage, etc., to feedback@stansberryresearch.com. All the best, Corey McLaughlin Baltimore, Maryland September 10, 2024 --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Top 10 Open Recommendations Top 10 highest-returning open stock positions across all Stansberry Research portfolios. Returns represent the total return from the initial recommendation. Investment Buy Date Return Publication Analyst MSFT Microsoft 11/11/10 1,347.5% Retirement Millionaire Doc MSFT Microsoft 02/10/12 1,292.9% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter ADP Automatic Data Processing 10/09/08 994.3% Extreme Value Ferris WRB W.R. Berkley 03/16/12 820.7% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter BRK.B Berkshire Hathaway 04/01/09 714.9% Retirement Millionaire Doc HSY Hershey 12/07/07 505.8% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter AFG American Financial 10/12/12 472.9% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter TT Trane Technologies 04/12/18 452.9% Retirement Millionaire Doc TTD The Trade Desk 10/17/19 378.6% Stansberry Innovations Report Engel NVO Novo Nordisk 12/05/19 378.6% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Gula Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 10 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the model portfolio of any Stansberry Research publication. The buy date reflects when the editor recommended the investment in the listed publication, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if a security is still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber to that publication and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 10 Totals 5 Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter/Gula 3 Retirement Millionaire Doc 1 Extreme Value Ferris 1 Stansberry Innovations Report Engel --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 5 Crypto Capital Open Recommendations Top 5 highest-returning open positions in the Crypto Capital model portfolio Investment Buy Date Return Publication Analyst wstETH Wrapped Staked Ethereum 12/07/18 2,291.8% Crypto Capital Wade BTC/USD Bitcoin 11/27/18 1,417.9% Crypto Capital Wade ONE/USD Harmony 12/16/19 1,124.6% Crypto Capital Wade MATIC/USD Polygon 02/25/21 721.2% Crypto Capital Wade OPN OPEN Ticketing Ecosystem 02/21/23 279.3% Crypto Capital Wade Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 5 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the Crypto Capital model portfolio. The buy date reflects when the recommendation was made, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if it's still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Hall of Fame Top 10 all-time, highest-returning closed positions across all Stansberry portfolios Investment Symbol Duration Gain Publication Analyst Nvidia^* NVDA 5.96 years 1,466% Venture Tech. Lashmet Microsoft^ MSFT 12.74 years 1,185% Retirement Millionaire Doc Inovio Pharma.^ INO 1.01 years 1,139% Venture Tech. Lashmet Seabridge Gold^ SA 4.20 years 995% Sjug Conf. Sjuggerud Nvidia^* NVDA 4.12 years 777% Venture Tech. Lashmet Intellia Therapeutics NTLA 1.95 years 775% Amer. Moonshots Root Rite Aid 8.5% bond 4.97 years 773% True Income Williams PNC Warrants PNC-WS 6.16 years 706% True Wealth Systems Sjuggerud Maxar Technologies^ MAXR 1.90 years 691% Venture Tech. Lashmet Silvergate Capital SI 1.95 years 681% Amer. Moonshots Root ^ These gains occurred with a partial position in the respective stocks. * The two partial positions in Nvidia were part of a single recommendation. Editor Dave Lashmet closed the first leg of the position in November 2016 for a gain of about 108%. Then, he closed the second leg in July 2020 for a 777% return. And finally, in May 2022, he booked a 1,466% return on the final leg. Subscribers who followed his advice on Nvidia could've recorded a total weighted average gain of more than 600%. --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Crypto Hall of Fame Top 5 highest-returning closed positions in the Crypto Capital model portfolio Investment Symbol Duration Gain Publication Analyst Band Protocol BAND/USD 0.31 years 1,169% Crypto Capital Wade Terra LUNA/USD 0.41 years 1,166% Crypto Capital Wade Polymesh POLYX/USD 3.84 years 1,157% Crypto Capital Wade Frontier FRONT/USD 0.09 years 979% Crypto Capital Wade Binance Coin BNB/USD 1.78 years 963% Crypto Capital Wade You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to Stansberry Digest. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from Stansberry Digest [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You’re receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberryresearch.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized financial advice. © 2024 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.

EDM Keywords (218)

year writers work winner win whole week weakening way watching watch want voters usual using upset uncertainties try trump true trim trend trades today timing time thoughts though think taxes talk surface suggestions subscription subscribers subscriber stoked still stage spending speak slim sit simply signaling sent sense send seen see security sectors scratch saying said role right responsibility republicans reporters remember refer redistribution recorded recommendation recommend recession receiving received reading read race questions published publication printed previewed president predict preceded posted possibly position portfolio play philadelphia percent pattern parts part outcome one office occurred nvidia november need neck nation must much money moments meantime mean may matter markets market margins makes make made lowlights looking look little likely likelihood like light less least learned learn leaders know july jets investment inside information inflation indicator incumbent history high hear head harris happens happening handful gone going go gains gain front friend fortunate forget followed first finally feedback feature favor evidence ever estimates endorse end employees electrocuted election eight economy dwindling due digest destroying democrats debt debate dealt deal dates date cycle course country contested consider congress concerns comes come colleague closed challenger certain cereal century catalyst cases case cards calendar brief booked biden believe become based back assets answer american also afterward advice address acting account 2024 2020 12 108

Marketing emails from stansberryresearch.com

View More
Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.