Newsletter Subject

Don't Be a Fool – You Can Beat the Market

From

stansberryresearch.com

Email Address

customerservice@exct.stansberryresearch.com

Sent On

Sat, Aug 10, 2024 12:37 PM

Email Preheader Text

In today's Masters Series, we're featuring a timeless essay that Porter first published in 2014, whe

In today's Masters Series, we're featuring a timeless essay that Porter first published in 2014, where he shares a unique strategy that can help boost your average investment results no matter what's happening in the markets... [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [Stansberry Master Series] Editor's note: If the market volatility this week has shown us anything, it has driven home the fact that successful investors need to be prepared for whatever the market throws at them. And that means having a plan... That's why our founder Porter Stansberry has always stressed that you must have a strategy in place to beat the market in order to protect your wealth from being wiped out. In today's Masters Series, we're featuring a timeless essay that Porter first published in 2014, where he shares a unique strategy that can help boost your average investment results no matter what's happening in the markets... --------------------------------------------------------------- Don't Be a Fool – You Can Beat the Market By Porter Stansberry, founder, Stansberry Research Out of all of the things I've said or written in my career, the thing that gets me in the most "hot water" is my view that you can and should time the market. When I write "you," I don't mean some representative sample or some investor somewhere. No, I mean you... the person reading this essay... the person who is going to put his savings at risk when he invests in the stock or bond market. You. A lot of people – even some smart ones – believe that trying to time the market is a fool's errand. They argue that the best you can do is simply plow your savings, year after year, into a mutual fund or index fund. These folks make a whole range of arguments and back them up with plenty of "facts." They'll cite academic studies and average investor results. They will say, again and again, that "no one" can beat the market, so why should anyone try? I disagree... completely. Let's start here. Let's say they're right. If the market is really efficient, it shouldn't matter when you invest or what you buy. If that's really the case, then why not try to do better? As long as you're investing in something, you should be fine, according to these folks. So what's the harm in trying to beat the market? And here's another way to look at it. The efficient-market folks love to argue that it's impossible for the average investor to beat the market because it's impossible for most people to beat the average result. At some point, it is a mathematical certainty that not everyone can beat the market. But just because something is "true" on average or across a population, that doesn't necessarily mean it must be true for you. For example, I might argue... on average, everyone who marries will end up with a marginally attractive spouse of normal intelligence. Therefore, you're probably wasting your time trying to find a beautiful and intelligent person to marry you. In theory, that might be good advice. But was that your dating strategy? If you had dated any dog that would have you, would you have married the spouse you wanted? In short... when it comes to a lot of important things in our lives, getting better-than-average results is a worthy goal. Luckily for investors, I don't believe beating the market is nearly as hard as trying to date a supermodel. I'm 100% convinced that anyone with normal intelligence and a modicum of emotional stability can do it. There are a few simple and logical reasons why... --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Links: ['The Best, by Far, of Any Investment of Any Kind I Have Ever Made']( Michael G. calls it "the best decision I have made in 25 years of investing." Jordan U. says, "I have told everyone who will listen that this is the best deal I HAVE EVER MADE." To be clear: These readers are not simply talking about stocks, bonds, options, or any particular investing strategy you've likely considered. On Tuesday, August 13, at 9 a.m. Eastern time, join us for our special 25th-anniversary broadcast and find out why these readers are raving about the [No. 1 secret of our firm](... --------------------------------------------------------------- [TILSON: 'This May Be the Most Upsetting Collapse We've Ever Seen. And It's Important You Understand Why.']( Over the past quarter-century, we've lived through several stock market crashes and major corrections. But according to Whitney Tilson, this one will be MUCH different, with dire implications far beyond the stock market. For the full story, [click here](. --------------------------------------------------------------- The reasons come from Wall Street's irrational focus on short-term "earnings" and most investors' total lack of discipline. Today, I'm going to give you my four steps to timing the market. If you use my strategy, I guarantee you can double your average investment results over 10 years... or maybe even do a lot better. But first, listen... There's an entire army of people out there whose careers depend on you never doubting the idea that the markets are perfectly efficient and that you can't beat the market. You see, the financial industry can only survive and prosper if you're willing to give it your assets to manage. The industry needs you to believe that it's always a good time to put your money into the market... And it needs you to believe that you can't do it yourself. That's why when I write things like this essay, folks in or supported by the financial industry go bananas. As far as who is right and wrong... listen to what one of the wisest newsletter writers ever, the late Richard Russell, said about market timing in his classic essay, "Rich Man, Poor Man"... In the investment world, the wealthy investor has one major advantage over the little guy, the stock market amateur and the neophyte trader. The advantage that the wealthy investor enjoys is that he doesn't need the markets... The wealthy investor tends to be an expert on values. When bonds are cheap and bond yields are irresistibly high, he buys bonds. When stocks are on the bargain table and stock yields are attractive, he buys stocks... And if no outstanding values are available, the wealthy investor waits. He can afford to wait. He has money coming in daily, weekly, monthly. The wealthy investor knows what he is looking for, and he doesn't mind waiting months or even years for his next investment. But what about the little guy? This fellow always feels pressured to "make money." And in return, he's always pressuring the market to "do something" for him. But sadly, the market isn't interested. When the little guy isn't buying stocks offering 1% or 2% yields, he's off to Las Vegas or Atlantic City trying to beat the house at roulette. Or he's spending 20 bucks a week on lottery tickets, or he's "investing" in some crackpot scheme that his neighbor told him about (in strictest confidence, of course). And because the little guy is trying to force the market to do something for him, he's a guaranteed loser. The little guy doesn't understand values, so he constantly overpays... The little guy is the typical American, and he's deeply in debt. Ask yourself, do you invest like the poor man or the rich man? How much do you know about the value of what you've bought? How long did you wait for the right opportunity to buy it? What's your downside? What are you expecting as your result? In a year? In three years? In five years? In 10 years? The poor man can't even imagine a 10-year investment return – nothing he buys lasts that long. Of course, if you want to get rich in stocks, almost everything you buy should last that long. It's the compound returns that will make you rich, not the quick trades. What does Warren Buffett, perhaps the greatest investor ever, say? Is the market so perfectly efficient that knowledgeable and patient investors have no opportunity to earn excess returns? Buffett argues that all the value investors he knows – those who broadly followed the tenets of Ben Graham and David Dodd, authors of the value-investing bible Security Analysis – have beaten the market by a wide margin. This isn't an accident or a coin flip. These investors all used the same principles to guide their choices. Their picks were not random or lucky. They involved different types of securities and strategies. The only common theme was an intense focus on understanding the value of each security purchased. As Warren Buffett wrote in "The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville"... The common intellectual theme of the investors from Graham-and-Doddsville is this: They search for discrepancies between the value of a business and the price of small pieces of that business in the market. I'm convinced that there is much inefficiency in the market. These Graham-and-Doddsville investors have successfully exploited gaps between price and value. When the price of a stock can be influenced by a "herd" on Wall Street with prices set at the margin by the most emotional person, or the greediest person, or the most depressed person, it is hard to argue that the market always prices rationally. In fact, market prices are frequently nonsensical. Step 1 in our guide to beating the market is based on the ideas of the men above. Before you buy a stock or bond (or anything else), ask yourself, "What's the intrinsic value of what I'm buying? And how does that intrinsic value compare with what I'm going to have to pay for it?" Always make sure you're buying at a good price. When we look at stocks, we generally assign them an intrinsic value that's based on cash flow (how much cash this company can generate) for operating companies or a "take out" price for asset-development stocks. In general, public companies fall into one of these two categories. They're either operating businesses (which are designed to make annual profits) or asset-development businesses (which may have many years of losses as they build out something like a gold mine, oilfield, or new drug). Simple rules of thumb? Never pay more than about 10 times the maximum annual free cash flow for operating companies. Never pay more than half of the appraised value of an asset-development company. Step 2 of our strategy to "time" the market is even easier... Learn to make big commitments only when other investors are clearly panicking, stocks are cheap, and extremely safe investments are available. This is what most people mean when they refer to "market timing." This is what I mean when I say, "allocate to value." Here's a quick example... In the fall of 2008, investors were clearly panicking. Buffett even wrote a letter to the New York Times explaining why it was time to buy stocks hand over fist – and was criticized on CNBC for doing so! If there has ever been a better contrarian indicator, I've never seen it. Meanwhile, you could have bought shares of iconic beer maker Anheuser-Busch – a stock I first recommended in 2006 – for around $50 for several weeks in October and November 2008. At the time, global brewer InBev had an all-cash deal in place to buy the stock for $70 per share. I told investors the situation was so safe that they should put 25% of their assets into the shares. It was the easiest and safest way to make a lot of money I'd ever seen. Even if the deal fell through (and it couldn't – it was an all-cash deal at a reasonable price), the stock was worth far more than $50 a share. In my view, there was zero downside and an almost certain profit of $15 to $20 per share in just a few days. "Fine," you might say. "But what should I do, just hold cash for years or decades, waiting for a perfect situation?" No, I don't argue that you should stay 100% in cash until stocks crash. That is probably the biggest misunderstanding most investors have about our advice. We never advocate selling everything. We never believe that we can predict the future accurately. Instead, we want to build a portfolio that will thrive over time, no matter what happens. At market highs, we see that stocks are no longer great values. It's harder for us to find good opportunities. And so, we've told subscribers to begin building cash. When you sell something, sock away the profits until better opportunities emerge. When do you sell? Well, that depends. But no matter what, follow your trailing stop losses. And that leads us to... Step 3: Stay reasonably diversified, use trailing stop losses, and always maintain a large cash reserve. Here we part ways with most value investors. A lot of good value investors refuse to use trailing stop losses. Instead, they hope to sell when stocks become too expensive. But in our experience, it's nearly impossible for most investors to know when to sell. Therefore, we want to focus on buying at the right time. Then we simply admit that we're not going to sell at the optimal point. We just can't predict how high stocks will go... And we want to capture as much of that upside as possible. Using trailing stops allows us to do this. Keep in mind, it's important to never give your stockbroker your stop-loss points. And never, ever base your stops on intraday prices – only closing prices. If you put your stops in the market (which is what happens when you give them to your broker) events like a "flash crash" can wipe you out. If you remain dedicated to only buying stocks at a discount from their intrinsic value... if you become a connoisseur of value... and if you only make large investments when other investors are panicking, you should find that it's easy to keep a cash reserve. The last part of our strategy (Step 4) to beating the market is do everything you can to avoid the damage from fees and taxes to maximize your long-term, compound returns. Whenever possible, keep your assets in vehicles that allow you to compound your investments tax-free. Look for companies with management that is well-known for doing tax-efficient deals and rewarding shareholders in tax-efficient ways. And always reinvest your dividends – either in the same companies or in new ones that offer better value. Studies show that most investors perform terribly when managing their own assets. That doesn't mean that you can't do well, or even outperform... especially when given the right investment tools and strategies. But it does mean that the odds are stacked against you. So read and reread these steps. And start living by them. Regards, Porter Stansberry --------------------------------------------------------------- Editor's note: Join us on Tuesday, August 13, at 9 a.m. Eastern time, as we celebrate our 25th anniversary of delivering financial research. We're broadcasting a special message to share the No. 1 secret of our firm – a strategy the top 1% of our subscribers have used to amass immense wealth. And we'll explain why it's the perfect way to prepare your portfolio for where the market is headed next... [Click here to get the full details](. You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to Stansberry Digest. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from Stansberry Digest [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You’re receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberryresearch.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized financial advice. © 2024 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.

EDM Keywords (301)

years year written writers write would work wiped wipe willing whole whatever well week wealth wanted want wait view vehicles values value used use us upside understanding understand trying try true today timing time thrive things thing theory tenets taxes take survive supported supermodel superinvestors suggestions subscription subscribers strategy strategies stops stocks stockbroker stock steps start stacked spouse speak something situation simple short shares share sent sell see security securities search say savings said safe sadly roulette risk right rich return result responsibility reread refer redistribution recommendation recommend receiving received really readers read raving random questions put published protect prosper profits probably principles price prepared prepare predict portfolio population point plenty plan place picks person people pay part panicking order opportunity one odds october note needs need nearly must much money modicum mind might men meanwhile means mean may maximize matter marry marries married markets market margin managing management manage make made lucky lot losses looking look long lived listen letter let learned last knows knowledgeable know kind keep invests investors investment investing invest interested information influenced impossible important ideas idea house hope herd harm harder hard happens happening half guide guarantee graham going go given give gets get generate force fool follow folks focus fist firm find fees feedback featuring far fall facts fact explain expert experience expensive expecting example everything everyone ever essay errand endorse end employees easy easiest downside double dog doddsville discrepancies discount designed depends deeply dated date damage criticized course could convinced connoisseur compound company companies comes cnbc clear choices cheap celebrate cash case career capture buying buy business build broadcasting bought bonds bond better best believe become beautiful beating beaten beat based back avoid average available attractive assets arguments argue anyone always allow afford advice advantage address acting across account according accident 50 2014 2006 15

Marketing emails from stansberryresearch.com

View More
Sent On

19/10/2024

Sent On

17/10/2024

Sent On

16/10/2024

Sent On

15/10/2024

Sent On

14/10/2024

Sent On

13/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.