Newsletter Subject

Repeat After Me

From

stansberryresearch.com

Email Address

customerservice@exct.stansberryresearch.com

Sent On

Tue, Jul 2, 2024 10:08 PM

Email Preheader Text

Mix politics and investing at your own risk... One of my favorite stats... There's a time and a plac

Mix politics and investing at your own risk... One of my favorite stats... There's a time and a place... Lessons from the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections... The root of the problem... E.B. Tucker on Stansberry Investor Hour... [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [Stansberry Digest] Mix politics and investing at your own risk... One of my favorite stats... There's a time and a place... Lessons from the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections... The root of the problem... E.B. Tucker on Stansberry Investor Hour... --------------------------------------------------------------- The wise ones keep saying it... Ignore politics... at least when it comes to investing. I (Corey McLaughlin) am not saying it's easy, especially today. But as my friend and angel investor Howard Lindzon put it in [his free newsletter]( this morning, "Politics and investing... mix them at your own risk." I mentioned this concept [yesterday]( quoting Stansberry Research partner Dr. David "Doc" Eifrig. The idea is that politics, mainly the party in the White House or in control of Congress, historically hasn't meant as much to market performance as many people think it has. Here's one of my favorite stats that illustrates the point... Since 1926, the U.S. has had 13 years of unified Republican government (with the GOP simultaneously holding the House, Senate, and presidency). In those years, the market returned an average of 14.52% per year. There have been 34 years of unified Democratic government. In those years, the market returned an average of... 14.52%. It can't get any closer than that. This "unified" scenario could play out again after November (or not), but the point is... who was in "control" of the legislative and executive branches – even in full – didn't make a difference in the stock market's performance during those 47 years... down to two decimal points. That said, as we wrote yesterday, an extension or ending of current corporate tax policies (depending on who wins the presidential election) and a potential reworking of regulations in various industries after the Supreme Court reversed the "Chevron doctrine" last week, could matter to businesses' profits in the years ahead... Those policies (and potentially others) are practical matters that can affect the bottom line. But today, I'm going to reiterate what some of my most experienced colleagues are saying in today's political climate... Don't go 'all in' or 'all out' because of what might happen in politics... That's easier said than done, of course. I spent an hour or so yesterday reading the Supreme Court's ruling and dissents in the case of Trump v. United States. There's a lot to unpack there... and a lot we could say. But then I looked at my portfolio and did nothing. At the very least, you should be aware of the risks – and opportunities – of letting politics drive financial decisions. Strong emotions and frayed nerves are likely to be around for the next several months... into Election Day in November and Inauguration Day in January. As Doc said in the [June 18 Digest](... We will forgive you if this election feels more important than others... The world feels more polarized, and the parties seem further apart than they have been in a long time – even more than they did back in 2020. While we wish the country would be unified and rally together on many topics like less government and more freedom, we know turmoil will continue in the months to come. Republicans are worried about what will happen if Joe Biden is reelected. Democrats are worried about Donald Trump returning to the White House. And projections tell us that this race will be as tight as it gets. Uncertainty and fear are everywhere... But if you've been following my Retirement Trader strategy, you couldn't be more excited. The upcoming election is giving us a tremendous opportunity for profits in the months to come. In Retirement Trader, Doc's options trading strategy benefits from volatility when investors are fearful and want to make bearish bets on stocks. Doc sells these nervous traders protection in the options market and collects income in the deal, like selling an insurance policy. Stansberry Alliance members and Retirement Trader subscribers can find all the details about his strategy [here](. For now, Doc's recommendation is to "ignore D.C. crusaders." But there is a time and place... Our colleague and Stansberry's Investment Advisory lead editor Whitney Tilson offered his thoughts about politics and markets after last Thursday's debate [in his free daily newsletter](. He reminded folks that he correctly predicted a "blue wave" in Congress and the White House four years ago. And the eight-stock portfolio he recommended in September 2020 based on that expectation returned 86% compared with 17% for the S&P 500 Index over the life of the recommendations... The picks included a leading gun maker, a semiconductor chipmaker, a pair of green-energy stocks, a cannabis company, and a play on the legalization of sports betting in the U.S., which were all set to benefit from a Democrat-controlled government. But Whitney, a former Wall Street hedge-fund manager, also noted that he didn't pull the trigger to make these recommendations until about a month before Election Day. Similarly, he says it's too soon for any "election buys" right now. We're not there yet... As Whitney wrote on Friday... I'm always looking for big ideas like this to give my subscribers great money-making opportunities, so I'm thinking hard about whether there will be a "red wave" this November that would lead certain stocks to soar. For example, Republicans typically favor fossil fuel industries... so companies in oil, natural gas, and coal could benefit. And they generally want to reduce regulations, so heavily regulated industries like finance and pharmaceuticals could also benefit. But I think it's still too early to make such a call... That's because Whitney isn't convinced about the election outcome right now. As we mentioned yesterday, we don't even know for sure who the Democratic nominee will be. But Whitney did talk about whether either party could pull off a clean sweep – or "unified" government – to make a substantial difference in policies that would affect businesses... While Democrats were able to pull this off four years ago, it's not easy – many voters like a divided government. So, for instance, someone might vote for Trump at the top of the ticket but a Democrat for the House and/or Senate. According to Polymarket as of [Friday] morning, while Trump is 64% favored to win, [the odds of a Republican sweep]( are only 52%. [Editor's note: The odds are 50% as of today.] So for now, there's too much uncertainty for me to have conviction about any particular outcome, much less for me to tell my subscribers to wager their hard-earned money on it. But that's OK. Things will become more clear over time – and we still have plenty of time. Neither party has even thrown its nominating convention yet. Last time around, my former team and I waited until mid-September to make our big – and highly profitable – call. If my team and I here at Stansberry Research make a similar call, our subscribers at Stansberry's Investment Advisory will be the first to know... In the meantime, resist the urge to do something rash. Whitney also quoted something he wrote a few weeks ago in his newsletter... It seems like everyone thinks the world is going to come to an end if their guy doesn't win. I think the winner of the presidential race will matter a great deal in almost every area – except stocks. Stocks did great under former President Donald Trump until COVID-19 came out of left field. And stocks have also done great under President Joe Biden. From the day Trump was inaugurated to the market's February 2020 peak before the pandemic escalated, the S&P 500 Index rose 49%. And from Biden's inauguration through yesterday's close, the S&P 500 is up 41%... The point: If you want to be a successful investor over time, you can't let your emotions – which include your political leanings – affect your analysis of economic factors and your investment decision making. The root of the problem... Our colleague Dan Ferris also covered politics in the latest issue of The Ferris Report, [published on Friday](. Dan talked about how he bet that Trump would win the 2016 presidential election, in part because of what he'd witnessed with the outcome of the Brexit referendum in the U.K. earlier that same year. It resembled the left-versus-right debate he saw unfolding in the U.S. As Dan wrote... I'm not a gambling man, but I wanted to express my insight financially without going too big. In Las Vegas, the betting odds at that time had Trump at +350, meaning that you could win $350 for every $100 you bet. As I recall, the odds on [Hillary] Clinton were around -150, meaning that you had to bet $150 just to win $100. The difference in the odds told me that everybody – even financially motivated Las Vegas gamblers – agreed Clinton was the clear front-runner and Trump was a long shot. In other words, if you had a good reason to believe Trump would win, the odds made it worth placing a bet. So I put $1,000 down. And you know what happened next... Trump succeeded in firing up a base of middle-class, blue-collar workers who had long felt betrayed by status-quo politicians. They turned up to the polls in droves. His fiery brand of patriotism took the White House. And I won $3,500. In retrospect, I could have gone even bigger... perhaps shorting Mexican peso futures (which fell as much as 10% on election night) or S&P 500 Index futures (which fell as much as 5% on election night). But I didn't have a crystal ball. I simply saw that the odds weren't tipped away from Trump nearly as much as most people thought at the time. It was a calculated bet, weighing risk and reward. That's the way accomplished traders suggest you go about investing. But getting carried away in the emotion of politics? Dan also warned against that... The left-versus-right narrative... does have real effects... but there is no meaningful difference between political parties in Western democracies. Both sides always want more power and more government, no matter what either side says. No U.S. president of either political bent has even attempted to shrink the government. If someone like Argentina's radical libertarian President Javier Milei ([whom we wrote about in January]( appeared in American politics, I'd back him or her enthusiastically. But Americans have proved as narrow minded and greedy as all voters in all democracies and have consistently elected criminals. I won't say the system is broken. It's working as designed, and that's the problem. Dan's answer for investors is to "construct the strongest investment portfolios we can." In my mind, that's owning shares of high-quality businesses. Buy them when they're attractively priced, and be prepared for buying opportunities with cash on hand. Today, you can still grow cash at a 5.5% annualized rate with a one-month Treasury bill, for example. A strong portfolio also includes additional inflation and "chaos" protection like gold, other hard assets, and exposure to bitcoin. I'm not saying to put your head in the sand about politics, but if long-term investing is your thing, stay true to your goals. Nobody else will do it for you. On this week's Stansberry Investor Hour, Dan and I were joined by E.B. Tucker, editor of The Tucker Letter and a former analyst at Stansberry Research, who is working on a new book about investing and life... [Click here to watch the interview now](... and to hear the full audio version of this week's Stansberry Investor Hour, visit [InvestorHour.com]( or find the show wherever you listen to your podcasts. --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Links: ['Nvidia Investors May Hate Me for Saying This...']( There's a massive shift playing out in U.S. stocks – one we've only seen a dozen times before, going all the way back to 1943... And now one Wall Street veteran is warning it'll impact every major stock you can think of, especially Nvidia. Today, he's sharing where the stock market's going next... what it could mean for your money in 2024... and the No. 1 investing strategy he's now recommending if you want to protect and grow your wealth in 2024. [See this before tomorrow's opening bell](. --------------------------------------------------------------- [The Presidential Candidate You Should REALLY Be Worried About]( Most Americans are overlooking the seemingly impossible candidate that should worry you. It's not Joe Biden... Donald Trump... Gavin Newsom... or even Michelle Obama. It's someone even worse. New evidence of a secret plan indicates he could soon return, and finish what he started. [Get the full story right here](. --------------------------------------------------------------- New 52-week highs (as of 7/1/24): Apple (AAPL), Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box Fund (BOXX), Coca-Cola Consolidated (COKE), Commvault Systems (CVLT), iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy Fund (DBMF), iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Fund (EMXC), Enstar (ESGR), JPMorgan Chase (JPM), KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index Fund (KEMX), Eli Lilly (LLY), Microsoft (MSFT), Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund (NBXG), Teladoc Health (TDOC), and the short position in Cracker Barrel (CBRL). In today's mailbag, feedback on [yesterday's edition]( which discussed the fallout from last week's presidential debate and recent Supreme Court decisions... Do you have a comment or question? As always, e-mail us at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. "Thank you, Mr. McLaughlin, for the always insightful and educational Digest articles. Regarding the one today, July 1; I may take issue with your points on which party's success seems to be a more pro-business stance. I agree that historically the Republican party platform has seemed to have been more business friendly. The key word in that sentence is 'seems.' I take issue with the notion stated here many times before [that] which party is in or out has very little actual effect on business profitability, etc., compared to other more salient factors. I do believe that this cycle is quite a bit different than what is historically taken as fact regarding the Republican party... "For one thing, the platform... seems to wobble and change and shift with the tides, and from what I hear, business leaders abhor these "unknowns." Makes planning difficult, etc. Seems to me that rather than having some steady hands on the rudder guiding the economic ship in a cohesive fashion, the party leader and faithful of the Republican party prove to be doing what is best for them in the short term without any concern for how their actions impact anything else, businesses, industries, or individuals... It appears that Mr. Trump would like to create an oligarchy-type system similar to Putin's in Russia. Big monopolies headed by his hand-picked few without regard to actual success. This type of business environment would be horrible for this country, and it hasn't exactly been a proven successful system in Russia or North Korea either. Strongman governments tend to have bad economics in general... "In regard to the Chevron ruling [on Friday], I do believe less regulation is coming down the pike. However, many industries seem to do much better under some well-thought-out regulatory environments. I'm thinking of finance and transportation, to name a few. I realize that this is a minority opinion, but I just wanted to get it out there because sometimes dots get connected just because people like connecting them as opposed to being backed up by real facts. Many people now seem to believe what they want to believe as opposed to what is provably true. Thank you for your always thoughtful articles. Keep up the good work." – Subscriber Michelle C. All the best, Corey McLaughlin Baltimore, Maryland July 2, 2024 --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Top 10 Open Recommendations Top 10 highest-returning open stock positions across all Stansberry Research portfolios Investment Buy Date Return Publication Analyst MSFT Microsoft 02/10/12 1,456.3% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter MSFT Microsoft 11/11/10 1,441.7% Retirement Millionaire Doc ADP Automatic Data Processing 10/09/08 863.5% Extreme Value Ferris WRB W.R. Berkley 03/16/12 726.1% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter BRK.B Berkshire Hathaway 04/01/09 618.4% Retirement Millionaire Doc HSY Hershey 12/07/07 451.1% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter AFG American Financial 10/12/12 434.0% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter NVO Novo Nordisk 12/05/19 424.1% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Gula TT Trane Technologies 04/12/18 415.0% Retirement Millionaire Doc TTD The Trade Desk 10/17/19 375.3% Stansberry Innovations Report Engel Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 10 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the model portfolio of any Stansberry Research publication. The buy date reflects when the editor recommended the investment in the listed publication, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if a security is still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber to that publication and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 10 Totals 5 Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter/Gula 3 Retirement Millionaire Doc 1 Extreme Value Ferris 1 Stansberry Innovations Report Engel --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 5 Crypto Capital Open Recommendations Top 5 highest-returning open positions in the Crypto Capital model portfolio Investment Buy Date Return Publication Analyst wstETH Wrapped Staked Ethereum 12/07/18 2,291.8% Crypto Capital Wade BTC/USD Bitcoin 11/27/18 1,571.5% Crypto Capital Wade ONE/USD Harmony 12/16/19 1,157.6% Crypto Capital Wade MATIC/USD Polygon 02/25/21 769.5% Crypto Capital Wade AGI/USD Delysium AI 01/16/24 346.9% Crypto Capital Wade Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 5 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the Crypto Capital model portfolio. The buy date reflects when the recommendation was made, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if it's still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Hall of Fame Top 10 all-time, highest-returning closed positions across all Stansberry portfolios Investment Symbol Duration Gain Publication Analyst Nvidia^* NVDA 5.96 years 1,466% Venture Tech. Lashmet Microsoft^ MSFT 12.74 years 1,185% Retirement Millionaire Doc Inovio Pharma.^ INO 1.01 years 1,139% Venture Tech. Lashmet Seabridge Gold^ SA 4.20 years 995% Sjug Conf. Sjuggerud Nvidia^* NVDA 4.12 years 777% Venture Tech. Lashmet Intellia Therapeutics NTLA 1.95 years 775% Amer. Moonshots Root Rite Aid 8.5% bond 4.97 years 773% True Income Williams PNC Warrants PNC-WS 6.16 years 706% True Wealth Systems Sjuggerud Maxar Technologies^ MAXR 1.90 years 691% Venture Tech. Lashmet Silvergate Capital SI 1.95 years 681% Amer. Moonshots Root ^ These gains occurred with a partial position in the respective stocks. * The two partial positions in Nvidia were part of a single recommendation. Editor Dave Lashmet closed the first leg of the position in November 2016 for a gain of about 108%. Then, he closed the second leg in July 2020 for a 777% return. And finally, in May 2022, he booked a 1,466% return on the final leg. Subscribers who followed his advice on Nvidia could've recorded a total weighted average gain of more than 600%. --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Crypto Hall of Fame Top 5 highest-returning closed positions in the Crypto Capital model portfolio Investment Symbol Duration Gain Publication Analyst Band Protocol BAND/USD 0.31 years 1,169% Crypto Capital Wade Terra LUNA/USD 0.41 years 1,166% Crypto Capital Wade Polymesh POLYX/USD 3.84 years 1,157% Crypto Capital Wade Frontier FRONT/USD 0.09 years 979% Crypto Capital Wade Binance Coin BNB/USD 1.78 years 963% Crypto Capital Wade You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to Stansberry Digest. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from Stansberry Digest [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You’re receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberryresearch.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized financial advice. © 2024 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.

EDM Keywords (325)

yet yesterday years year wrote writers worry worried world working work words wobble witnessed wish wins winner win whole whitney whether week wealth watch warning wanted want waited wager voters volatility urge unpack unified type turned trump trigger transportation top tomorrow today time tight tides ticket thoughts thinking think tell team talk system sure suggestions subscription subscribers subscriber strategy stocks still stansberry spent speak soon soar shrink shift sharing set sentence sent seen seems seemed seem security says saying say sand said russia ruling root risks risk reward retrospect responsibility resembled repeat reiterate regulations regard refer redistribution recorded recommending recommended recommendations recommendation recommend receiving received recall really realize read rather race quite questions question putin put pull published publication proved protect profits problem president presidency prepared power position portfolio polymarket polls politics policies polarized points point plenty play place performance party part pair overlooking outcome others opposed opportunities one odds nvidia november nothing note newsletter name must much months month money mind mentioned meant matter markets market make made lot looked listen likely life let legislative legalization least learned learn know joined january investors investment investing interview information individuals include inauguration inaugurated important illustrates ignore idea house hour horrible historically hear head happen guy grow greedy great government going go give get general gain full friend friday freedom forgive following followed first firing finish find finance finally fell feedback fearful fear fallout faithful extension express exposure excited example exactly everywhere enthusiastically endorse ending end employees emotions emotion edition early droves done doc dissents discussed difference details designed democrats democrat democracies debate date cycle create course country could convinced conviction control continue construct congress concern companies comment coming comes come colleague closer closed close clear change cash case call broken booked bitcoin big biden bet best benefit believe become based base backed back aware average around appears apart answer analysis americans agree affect advice address acting account able 50 41 2024 2020 2016 1943 17 108 10

Marketing emails from stansberryresearch.com

View More
Sent On

05/07/2024

Sent On

05/07/2024

Sent On

04/07/2024

Sent On

03/07/2024

Sent On

03/07/2024

Sent On

02/07/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.