Newsletter Subject

There's No Debate About Inflation

From

stansberryresearch.com

Email Address

customerservice@exct.stansberryresearch.com

Sent On

Thu, Jun 27, 2024 10:07 PM

Email Preheader Text

The debate is set... What it might mean... The 'reorder all' indicator... The latest inflation data.

The debate is set... What it might mean... The 'reorder all' indicator... The latest inflation data... The Fed admits 2% is a pipe dream... What you probably won't hear tonight... Speculative thoughts on the AI boom... [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [Stansberry Digest] The debate is set... What it might mean... The 'reorder all' indicator... The latest inflation data... The Fed admits 2% is a pipe dream... What you probably won't hear tonight... Speculative thoughts on the AI boom... --------------------------------------------------------------- We're just a few hours away... As we go to press tonight, President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump are just a few hours from starting a made-for-television debate. The ground rules: No live audience. A muted mic for the person not speaking. Hosted by broadcaster CNN in its Atlanta studio. Other than that, I (Corey McLaughlin) don't know entirely what to expect, nor will I be surprised by much. But from the sounds of it, the economy will be part of the discourse. At least, that is the hope of some. Here's a note from CNN's website today... Advisers and allies of Trump have privately encouraged him to focus intensely on the economy, crime and inflation during Thursday's debate, citing poll numbers that reflect he has the upper hand on these issues... Practically, debate about the past and hearing promises about the future shouldn't mean much for the actual future of the economy, businesses, and the markets, though the arguments certainly could influence voters one way or another come November. After all, higher prices remain on the minds of many Americans. Like [this guy](... who claims he recently hit the "reorder all" button on a Walmart order from 2022 for a month's worth of groceries and found it cost 4 times more today for the identical items. That's $414.39 instead of $126.67. As of this morning, there was more inflation... Even by Uncle Sam's statistical standards, inflation accelerated more in the first quarter of 2024 than previously reported. This morning, the Bureau of Economic Analysis published its third estimate for first-quarter GDP, which includes inflation numbers. While the report showed a 1.4% annualized GDP, a touch higher than the 1.3% previously estimated, inflation numbers ticked higher as well. The core personal consumption expenditures ("PCE") for the first three months of 2024 was a reported 3.7%, higher than the 3.6% previously reported. Core PCE is the Federal Reserve's preferred inflation gauge, though I will take this opportunity to stump for the "reorder all" indicator. (In the spirit of alternative measures, you may be interested in Shadowstats.com or Truflation.com as well, the latter of which shows a 25% aggregate price increase since January 2020.) Whatever numbers you use, you can pin the blame for the 40-year-high inflation pace the country has experienced on multiple sources. And data will back you up as far back as you want. The Federal Reserve encouraged inflation to run wild for far too long in 2021 and 2022, with near-zero interest rates, while trillions of dollars in economic stimulus were dumped into the U.S. economy amid the pandemic. And Congress, during both the Trump and Biden administrations, green-lit stimulus to begin with, without much of a second thought or consideration for the potential consequences. Meanwhile, "We the People" were just trying to live, buy things we needed (or wanted), and work or run businesses. Now, years later, some members of the Fed system are finally acknowledging what we've been saying almost from the jump of this inflation nightmare... Inflation is still not going back to 2% anytime soon... Here's the start of a press release from the Cleveland branch of the Fed, published rather quietly on May 30... A model developed by Cleveland Fed researchers suggests that if the extrinsic forces that have been pushing inflation down have run their course, it may take several years for inflation to return to the Federal Open Market Committee's 2 percent target. According to a new Cleveland Fed report, the model suggests that inflation now appears to be governed by intrinsic forces rather than extrinsic "X factors" including supply chain constraints, which returned to normal levels in the fourth quarter of 2023. The model, which has proven competitive with hard-to-beat forecasting models, suggests inflation has high intrinsic persistence. It predicts that trimmed-mean PCE inflation will move down gradually, reaching 2.7 percent by the second quarter of 2025, writes Randal Verbrugge, senior research economist at the Cleveland Fed. The model predicts that inflation won't be near 2 percent until mid-2027. "There are both theoretical and empirical reasons to think that, absent X factors such as continued favorable supply shocks or strong productivity gains, the last half-mile could well take several years," Verbrugge writes. OK, then. I doubt we'll hear that during tonight's debate. Even less likely: anyone blaming the fiat-currency system for inflation, which is the root of the matter. Inflation dates back to at least the 10th century. That's [when ancient Chinese merchants might have first invented the idea of fiat currency]( after there weren't enough precious metals to make the coins that they needed to conduct business. Speaking of, 'Is this time different?'... In response to [yesterday's edition]( we received some feedback about Chaikin Analytics founder Marc Chaikin's thoughts on the ongoing AI boom. As we shared, Marc thinks the mainstream breakthrough of AI is akin to the launch of the Netscape web browser in 1994, and a similar stock market boom could follow this time around. Marc has thoughts about what stocks to buy to take advantage (and which ones to avoid). He revealed more details about his outlook in a new presentation that he debuted last night. ([You can watch a replay here](. This got subscriber Kevin S. thinking about the timeline of all of this, given how AI itself is a technology that can accelerate more innovations. Kevin wrote in... As new technology innovation increases the speed of new (industrial revolution) cycle onsets or shortens the life-spans of cycles, how does this decreasing cycle life-span affect the onset and life-span of resulting market bubbles: faster cycle onset leading to shorter life of market bubble (apart from government interference)? Interesting thoughts, Kevin, including the astute point about potential government interference... The short answer is, I think it's impossible to know what the entirety of the ongoing AI boom – or bubble, depending on your view – will look like, or how long it might last and be reflected in the markets. But consider previous eras of significant technological advancements – like the mass production of automobiles in the 1920s, the widespread introduction of television and growth of suburban life in the 1950s and '60s, and the Internet in the late 1990s. The associated run-ups in the stock market have been more or less similar in scale. Here's a chart of the inflation-adjusted S&P 500 Index, noting bubble "peaks." It comes from a San Francisco Fed paper published back in 2008, which cited the work of Yale economist Robert Shiller and his book, Irrational Exuberance... Plenty more examples of industry-specific bubbles have also occurred over the decades... A National Bureau of Economic Research paper from 2022 identified 74 such examples between 1962 and 2017. The researchers admitted their methodology was imperfect, and it didn't include any findings about the time or length of bubbles and the technologies involved. However, some qualities were consistent across all 74 bubbles. An exuberant "overreaction" about an innovation's perceived value sent associated stocks soaring, even when the innovation didn't entirely translate into actual future production. So, when it comes to bubbles, the type of innovation associated with them may not matter as much as the enthusiasm about the breakthrough. And that comes down to human emotions. We can't say for sure what form the current run in AI-linked stocks will take. But as Marc told us, there might be more runway ahead for this run-up, given how he expects AI will allow many businesses to increase their profit margins. As he said in his presentation last night... That's the AI story that's going to be the fuel on the fire of the [market] broadening... It's one of the most potent forces I've ever seen in my life for rapidly expanding company profits. Starting now, for the next decade. And what I want to show you today is the group of companies that, by their very nature, are positioned to leverage that the most. [Check out a replay of Marc's presentation]( now to get more details about his outlook and how you can access his stock picks, his proprietary Power Guage, and all his research, including a special report he created for Stansberry Research subscribers. Which brings me to our quote of the week (penned 102 years ago)... This same paper from the San Francisco Fed ends with this terrific passage noting that speculation is as American as apple pie or anything else. J.E. Meeker, a former New York Stock Exchange economist, wrote in a 1922 book about the history and mechanics of the stock exchange... Of all the peoples in history, the American people can least afford to condemn speculation... The discovery of America was made possible by a loan based on the collateral of Queen Isabella's crown jewels, and at interest, beside which even the call rates of 1919-1920 look coy and bashful. Financing an unknown foreigner to sail the unknown deep in three cockleshell boats in the hope of discovering a mythical Zipangu [land of gold] cannot, by the widest exercise of language, be called a "conservative investment." There's some perspective. Christopher Columbus discovered the Americas because of speculation (and the collateral of hard assets)... We wouldn't be here without it, at least not due to the same sequence of history. This isn't to say that speculation is "right" or "wrong." It just is. More important for investors today is to not get lost in the hype of ongoing bubbles and to realize they will burst. (See the tulip mania in Europe about 150 years after Columbus' expedition.) You also might not get what you're looking for, either. Columbus set sail from Spain on his first voyage, seeking a trade route to Asia. He found what's now the Bahamas, Cuba, and Hispaniola, where one of his ships ran aground and was abandoned. He brought back natives of the islands to Spain rather than spices. Speculative periods, or bets, aren't new. But be careful navigating and making them. --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Links: [Here's What You Missed Last Night]( There's a massive shift playing out in U.S. stocks – one we've only seen a dozen times before, going all the way back to 1943... And now one Wall Street veteran is warning it'll impact every major stock you can think of, especially Nvidia. Last night, he shared where the stock market's going next... what it could mean for your money in 2024... and the No. 1 investing strategy he's now recommending if you want to protect and [grow your wealth in 2024](. --------------------------------------------------------------- [Wall Street Millionaire Issues Buy Alert on 'America's No. 1 Legacy Stock']( Whitney Tilson bought Apple at $0.35, Amazon for less than $2.50, and Nvidia before it soared 1,200%. Recently, he sat down for an exclusive interview, revealing EXACTLY where to put your money this year. This is an investment vehicle he's so confident in, he says he'd put 50% of his kids' inheritance into this stock. You can get the name and ticker symbol, absolutely free, [right here](. --------------------------------------------------------------- New 52-week highs (as of 6/26/24): Amazon (AMZN), Coca-Cola Consolidated (COKE), Intuitive Surgical (ISRG), Microsoft (MSFT), and Sprouts Farmers Market (SFM). Given our extended reply above, we'll skip today's mailbag. But please keep your questions and comments coming. As always, e-mail us at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. All the best, Corey McLaughlin Baltimore, Maryland June 27, 2024 --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Top 10 Open Recommendations Top 10 highest-returning open stock positions across all Stansberry Research portfolios Investment Buy Date Return Publication Analyst MSFT Microsoft 02/10/12 1,441.4% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter MSFT Microsoft 11/11/10 1,433.2% Retirement Millionaire Doc ADP Automatic Data Processing 10/09/08 871.2% Extreme Value Ferris WRB W.R. Berkley 03/16/12 728.8% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter BRK.B Berkshire Hathaway 04/01/09 627.4% Retirement Millionaire Doc HSY Hershey 12/07/07 452.6% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter AFG American Financial 10/12/12 437.6% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter TT Trane Technologies 04/12/18 427.9% Retirement Millionaire Doc NVO Novo Nordisk 12/05/19 418.0% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Gula TTD The Trade Desk 10/17/19 374.6% Stansberry Innovations Report Engel Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 10 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the model portfolio of any Stansberry Research publication. The buy date reflects when the editor recommended the investment in the listed publication, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if a security is still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber to that publication and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 10 Totals 5 Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter/Gula 3 Retirement Millionaire Doc 1 Extreme Value Ferris 1 Stansberry Innovations Report Engel --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 5 Crypto Capital Open Recommendations Top 5 highest-returning open positions in the Crypto Capital model portfolio Investment Buy Date Return Publication Analyst wstETH Wrapped Staked Ethereum 12/07/18 2,291.8% Crypto Capital Wade BTC/USD Bitcoin 11/27/18 1,516.4% Crypto Capital Wade ONE/USD Harmony 12/16/19 1,160.9% Crypto Capital Wade MATIC/USD Polygon 02/25/21 767.7% Crypto Capital Wade AGI/USD Delysium AI 01/16/24 354.4% Crypto Capital Wade Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 5 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the Crypto Capital model portfolio. The buy date reflects when the recommendation was made, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if it's still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Hall of Fame Top 10 all-time, highest-returning closed positions across all Stansberry portfolios Investment Symbol Duration Gain Publication Analyst Nvidia^* NVDA 5.96 years 1,466% Venture Tech. Lashmet Microsoft^ MSFT 12.74 years 1,185% Retirement Millionaire Doc Inovio Pharma.^ INO 1.01 years 1,139% Venture Tech. Lashmet Seabridge Gold^ SA 4.20 years 995% Sjug Conf. Sjuggerud Nvidia^* NVDA 4.12 years 777% Venture Tech. Lashmet Intellia Therapeutics NTLA 1.95 years 775% Amer. Moonshots Root Rite Aid 8.5% bond 4.97 years 773% True Income Williams PNC Warrants PNC-WS 6.16 years 706% True Wealth Systems Sjuggerud Maxar Technologies^ MAXR 1.90 years 691% Venture Tech. Lashmet Silvergate Capital SI 1.95 years 681% Amer. Moonshots Root ^ These gains occurred with a partial position in the respective stocks. * The two partial positions in Nvidia were part of a single recommendation. Editor Dave Lashmet closed the first leg of the position in November 2016 for a gain of about 108%. Then, he closed the second leg in July 2020 for a 777% return. And finally, in May 2022, he booked a 1,466% return on the final leg. Subscribers who followed his advice on Nvidia could've recorded a total weighted average gain of more than 600%. --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Crypto Hall of Fame Top 5 highest-returning closed positions in the Crypto Capital model portfolio Investment Symbol Duration Gain Publication Analyst Band Protocol BAND/USD 0.31 years 1,169% Crypto Capital Wade Terra LUNA/USD 0.41 years 1,166% Crypto Capital Wade Polymesh POLYX/USD 3.84 years 1,157% Crypto Capital Wade Frontier FRONT/USD 0.09 years 979% Crypto Capital Wade Binance Coin BNB/USD 1.78 years 963% Crypto Capital Wade You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to Stansberry Digest. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from Stansberry Digest [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You’re receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberryresearch.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized financial advice. © 2024 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.

EDM Keywords (276)

yesterday year wrong writers worth work without whole well wealth watch warning wanted want view use type trying trump trillions tonight today timeline time thursday thoughts thinking think theoretical television technology take surprised sure suggestions subscription subscribers subscriber stump stocks stock still starting start spirit speed speculation speak spain sounds shows show shortens shared set sequence sent seen security scale says say sat sail said run root right revealed returned return responsibility response replay reorder reflected reflect refer redistribution recorded recommending recommendation recommend receiving received realize read quote questions qualities put published publication protect probably presentation predicts positioned position pin person peoples people past part paper pandemic outlook opportunity onset ones one nvidia note new needed nature name must much move morning month money model minds might methodology members mechanics may matter markets marc making make mailbag made looking long life leverage less length least learned learn launch latter language know jump islands investment internet interested innovation information inflation indicator increase include impossible important imperfect idea hype hours hope history hispaniola hear hard guy growth grow group groceries governed going go given get gain future fuel found form followed fire findings finally feedback far experienced expect examples even europe entirety enthusiasm endorse employees edition economy dumped due doubt dollars discovery discovering discourse details decades debate date data cycles created course country consideration congress confident companies comes collateral coins cnn closed claims cited check chart called buy button bureau bubbles brings breakthrough booked blame bets begin based back avoid automobiles asia appears americas american america allies akin ai advice address acting account access accelerate abandoned 60s 2024 2023 2022 2021 2017 2008 1994 1962 1950s 1943 1920s 108

Marketing emails from stansberryresearch.com

View More
Sent On

29/06/2024

Sent On

29/06/2024

Sent On

29/06/2024

Sent On

28/06/2024

Sent On

28/06/2024

Sent On

28/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.