Newsletter Subject

I Warned You This Could Happen

From

stansberryresearch.com

Email Address

customerservice@exct.stansberryresearch.com

Sent On

Fri, Jun 7, 2024 10:09 PM

Email Preheader Text

Two weird things happened on Monday... I warned you something like this could happen... The cat is o

Two weird things happened on Monday... I warned you something like this could happen... The cat is out of the bag... The power of 'I don't know'... Catastrophic losses and phantom consequences... The problem with big losses... [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [Stansberry Digest] Two weird things happened on Monday... I warned you something like this could happen... The cat is out of the bag... The power of 'I don't know'... Catastrophic losses and phantom consequences... The problem with big losses... --------------------------------------------------------------- Does the stock market even work anymore? I (Dan Ferris) ask because two weird things happened on Monday. The first probably seems normal because it has happened so many times in the past three years. But I promise you, it's not. I'm talking about another rapid, steep rise in the price of meme stock GameStop (GME). On Sunday night, GameStop's famous booster, financial analyst Keith Gill, posted a screenshot on a Reddit subreddit called r/Superstonk. The image was of a brokerage account showing that somebody – assumed (but not confirmed) to be Gill – owns 5 million shares of GameStop worth about $115.7 million as of last Friday's close. The account also has 120,000 call options with a $20 strike price, which expire on June 21, for which it paid $5.68 each. The market responded as you'd expect – by going nuts. GameStop's share price soared nearly 80% in pre-market trading Monday morning. This morning, GameStop's management decided to take full advantage of the fact that the stock was up about 100% as of yesterday's close. The company unexpectedly announced first-quarter earnings so it could quickly sell 75 million new shares into the market. The result was just as you'd expect, a 40% drop in the share price, obliterating most of the week's gains. The stock was currently up around 20% for the week as we went to press. The situation is weird because Gill's initial call on GameStop was based on the fact that the stock was very, very cheap. That's no longer the case. It's horribly overvalued today. So if the screenshot really is of Gill's account, he's betting on a massive meme-stock run over the next two weeks. I expect Gill will pull the same stunt again this Sunday night, posting to get people excited before the market opens Monday morning. Gill is finally a true meme stocker, betting that others will throw caution to the wind in an attempt to make a lot of money in a short period of time. And he's attracting some unfavorable attention... The Massachusetts securities regulator is investigating Gill's trading activity. The Wall Street Journal also reported that E-Trade is considering kicking Gill off of its platform. But something even weirder also happened on Monday... Shortly after the market opened, Class A shares of Warren Buffett's $890 billion market cap mega-conglomerate Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-A) crashed by more than $625,000. Yes, you read that right. Shares went from $625,735 Monday morning to $185.10 per share. A few trades occurred at that price before the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") could halt trading. When I logged into my Charles Schwab account, the following message popped up on my screen: NYSE Quotes may be inaccurate Technical issue with New York Stock Exchange quotes. Due to a technical issue at the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), NYSE quotes for some securities may be inaccurate industrywide. Some impacted securities may have trading halted. This may affect certain account balances, including margin buying power. As a result of this issue, we are experiencing higher call and chat volumes, and clients may experience longer wait times. The Consolidated Tape Association ("CTA"), which provides real-time price quotes for major exchanges, said the crash was a "glitch." It may have been from a software update that affected the Limit Up/Limit Down ("LULD") price bands the CTA publishes to help combat excessive trading volatility. The glitch affected 40 other stocks, including a Mexican airport stock, a Pimco bond fund, and an Argentine equity exchange-traded fund. Trading was halted for all of these stocks, and the NYSE canceled all trades below a reasonable price. By 11:45 a.m., the issue had been completely resolved and trading was back to normal. I've warned you that something like this could happen... [I've said before]( that it's possible for the S&P 500 Index to fall more than 20% in a single day, despite the NYSE's three "circuit breakers" that trigger the exchange to shut down if the market falls too far, too fast. The first circuit breaker automatically halts trading for 15 minutes if the S&P 500 falls 7% in a day. The second breaker halts trading for another 15 minutes if the market falls 13% in a day. The third breaker shuts the exchange down for the day if the market falls 20%. Now, I don't know if the LULD bands the CTA tracks are part of the NYSE's circuit breaks or not. But it doesn't matter... they're undeniably circuit-breaker-like. You see, a stock is supposed to halt trading if its price is higher than the upper band or lower than the lower band. So it's supposed to be impossible for a stock like Berkshire Hathaway to open at around $625,700 and plummet to $185.10... and still trade. The LULD bands failed on Monday... I can't spell it out any more plainly. Investors think they know how the NYSE will work under various conditions. But no one really knows for sure... or even if the NYSE and its breakers will work correctly when they need to... like if all hell is breaking loose and you and a few million of your closest friends feel the need to sell everything before it all gets worse. Now, I know the glitch was supposedly caused by a software update. But that's just what they're telling us. What large organization is in the truth-telling business? At least one trader told Forbes that he doubted Berkshire's massive price drop had anything to do with the glitch. I'm not saying he's right, but how do we know he's wrong? The point is... I warned you that something like this could happen. The cat is out of the bag... The NYSE and CTA don't control the movement of securities prices. You could say they really just don't have control over their software updates. But what's the difference? Software "ate" the world – including stock-exchange trading – like tech entrepreneur and venture-capital investor Marc Andreessen [told us it would nearly 13 years ago](. And given Monday's episode, it's obvious that we can't predict what the software will do. That's why I expect we'll see more bizarre, extreme market action – no matter what mechanisms the securities regulators and stock exchanges put in place to prevent it. Now, maybe the S&P 500 will never fall more than 20% in one day. Or maybe the complexity of markets and modern technology means the index is destined to lose much more than 20% in a single day. The point is... I don't know what'll happen... and neither does anybody else, including the NYSE and the CTA. It reminds me of something my friend, investor, and author Vitaliy Katsenelson, said... A few days ago, Vitality posted on social platform X: Every person should learn to say these 3 words: "I don't know." The problem is, nobody really likes hearing those words... which makes them harder to say. Your boss doesn't like it when you say them at work. Patients don't want their doctors saying them. And clients want asset managers who pretend they know everything (I promise there's no shortage of those folks in finance!). No matter what you do for a living, you need to learn to say, "I don't know." However, most folks never will. That's too bad, since people fail catastrophically in investing by pretending to have more certainty about the future than they could possibly ever have. It's one thing to believe the sun will come up every day for the rest of your life. But it's quite another to believe that the Federal Reserve will cut rates to save your investments... that the NYSE circuit breakers will keep your 401(k) from losing half its value in a day or two... or that GameStop soaring in price is a "lock" because some random guy on Reddit owns call options. This type of thinking exposes investors to risks they won't even acknowledge. Eventually, that could really damage their portfolios. For example, during Monday's weirdness when Berkshire Hathaway fell from more than $625,700 to $185.10 per share, several sell trades took place before trading was halted. That means somebody sold for a more than 99% loss! I sure hope they didn't have too much money in the stock. So catastrophic losses don't require the stock market to drop 75% and stay there for years. All it requires is a steep enough drop to scare folks enough to sell before it gets worse. Catastrophic losses and phantom consequences... The best book for investors that deals with catastrophic loss is Ergodicity: Definition, Examples, and Implications, As Simple As Possible by Luca Dellanna. Ergodicity is a complex mathematical concept, but Dellanna brilliantly explains it in terms anybody can understand. The important part of understanding ergodicity for investors is survival: In theory, performance determines success. The fastest skier wins the race, and the most performing employee becomes the most successful one. In practice, performance is subordinate to survival. It is the fastest race of those who survive that wins races, it is the most performing employee who doesn't burn out that becomes the most successful, and so on. Dellanna isn't merely saying that survival matters, but that it matters more than performance over the long term. Performance is how much investors make on average over their entire investing careers. Survival means avoiding a catastrophic loss. You see, if a catastrophic loss happens early enough in life, you can recover. But if it happens late enough in life, it could prevent you from rebuilding your wealth to pay for retirement. Then there are the "phantom consequences"... Dellanna says these consequences aren't necessarily observable in the short term, but they affect the long term. For example, his friend was badly injured in a ski race. The injury was a near-term consequence. But Dellanna's friend was never able to compete in another race. That was the phantom consequence. Dellanna calls ergodicity the study of phantom consequences. We started out with another phantom consequence today... On October 19, 1987, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 22.6% in one day – the biggest one-day drop ever. Lots of folks panicked that we couldn't let something like that happen again. So regulators came up with circuit breakers in 1988 and LULD bands in 2012 – confident they solved the problem. The episode on Monday was a phantom consequence of those decisions. I doubt that anyone behind these circuit breakers or LULD bands ever said, "There's a chance that if these fail, the resulting volatility could be even worse than if there were no circuit breakers or bands." The idea of doing nothing never comes up. Meanwhile, folks are lulled into a false sense that the authorities have it under control. They don't. They never have and they never will. Extreme events can always happen. The problem with big losses is it's often difficult to see them before they happen... The risks could be staring everyone in the face and almost nobody will see them. Folks either don't believe it or just don't want to hear it. For example, if I tell you AI darling Nvidia (NVDA) is a lousy bet today and lots of folks are destined to lose money buying at these levels, many folks will think I'm an idiot. They'll point to its recent performance, which has been breathtaking. Investors who got into the stock near the lows of 2018 – at prices below $40 – had the chance to make as much as 37 times their money... a truly epic run. Anyone who bought the stock in the past year has also made money. Shares are up more than 140% since January 1. The fact is that past performance is no indication of future results. And I said the stock was too expensive two years ago, after which it proceeded to rise sixfold. So I'm obviously better at avoiding great stocks than identifying big risks, right? I don't know. --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Links: ['The Strongest BUY Recommendation of My Career... Just Got Even Better']( The analyst who has delivered 14 different 10x winners in the last five years just stepped forward with a critical new update, including multiple chances at 1,000%-plus gains. [See the new buy alert here](. --------------------------------------------------------------- [You Won't Believe America's Next Big Bet]( Congress, President Biden, and billionaires like Bill Gates and Peter Thiel are pouring money into one surprising technology – with early estimates expecting it to grow 12,000% starting now. Incredibly, most Americans don't know about it, but that's about to change. [Click here to see how it could become the No. 1 investment of the next decade](. --------------------------------------------------------------- New 52-week highs (as of 6/6/24): ABB (ABBNY), Altius Minerals (ALS.TO), ASML (ASML), Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box Fund (BOXX), Coca-Cola Consolidated (COKE), Costco Wholesale (COST), Commvault Systems (CVLT), Danaher (DHR), Intuitive Surgical (ISRG), Nuveen Preferred & Income Opportunities Fund (JPC), Coca-Cola (KO), Eli Lilly (LLY), Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAC), Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund (NBXG), Novo Nordisk (NVO), Pembina Pipeline (PBA), Procter & Gamble (PG), RadNet (RDNT), and Torex Gold Resources (TORXF). A quiet mailbag today. Have a comment or question? As always, e-mail us at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. Good investing, Dan Ferris Eagle Point, Oregon June 7, 2024 P.S. I'm a big fan of disaster books, especially maritime disasters. Here are a few I recommend if you're interested: - Deep Survival by Laurence Gonzales - Chapter 3 of Charles Perrow's Normal Accidents - Two Survived by Guy Pearce Jones - All Brave Sailors by J. Revell Carr - The Perfect Storm by Sebastian Junger (made into a well-known film starring George Clooney and Mark Wahlberg) - The Open Boat by Stephen Crane --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Top 10 Open Recommendations Top 10 highest-returning open stock positions across all Stansberry Research portfolios Investment Buy Date Return Publication Analyst MSFT Microsoft 11/11/10 1,381.4% Retirement Millionaire Doc MSFT Microsoft 02/10/12 1,351.6% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter ADP Automatic Data Processing 10/09/08 899.2% Extreme Value Ferris WRB W.R. Berkley 03/16/12 725.8% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter BRK.B Berkshire Hathaway 04/01/09 628.9% Retirement Millionaire Doc HSY Hershey 12/07/07 487.8% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter AFG American Financial 10/12/12 449.0% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter NVO Novo Nordisk 12/05/19 413.6% Stansberry's Investment Advisory Gula TT Trane Technologies 04/12/18 409.3% Retirement Millionaire Doc TTD The Trade Desk 10/17/19 373.3% Stansberry Innovations Report Engel Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 10 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the model portfolio of any Stansberry Research publication. The buy date reflects when the editor recommended the investment in the listed publication, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if a security is still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber to that publication and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 10 Totals 5 Stansberry's Investment Advisory Porter/Gula 3 Retirement Millionaire Doc 1 Extreme Value Ferris 1 Stansberry Innovations Report Engel --------------------------------------------------------------- Top 5 Crypto Capital Open Recommendations Top 5 highest-returning open positions in the Crypto Capital model portfolio Investment Buy Date Return Publication Analyst wstETH Wrapped Staked Ethereum 12/07/18 2,291.8% Crypto Capital Wade BTC/USD Bitcoin 11/27/18 1,782.7% Crypto Capital Wade ONE/USD Harmony 12/16/19 1,255.4% Crypto Capital Wade MATIC/USD Polygon 02/25/21 815.8% Crypto Capital Wade AGI/USD Delysium AI 01/16/24 424.8% Crypto Capital Wade Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 5 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the Crypto Capital model portfolio. The buy date reflects when the recommendation was made, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if it's still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber and refer to the most recent portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Hall of Fame Top 10 all-time, highest-returning closed positions across all Stansberry portfolios Investment Symbol Duration Gain Publication Analyst Nvidia^* NVDA 5.96 years 1,466% Venture Tech. Lashmet Microsoft^ MSFT 12.74 years 1,185% Retirement Millionaire Doc Inovio Pharma.^ INO 1.01 years 1,139% Venture Tech. Lashmet Seabridge Gold^ SA 4.20 years 995% Sjug Conf. Sjuggerud Nvidia^* NVDA 4.12 years 777% Venture Tech. Lashmet Intellia Therapeutics NTLA 1.95 years 775% Amer. Moonshots Root Rite Aid 8.5% bond 4.97 years 773% True Income Williams PNC Warrants PNC-WS 6.16 years 706% True Wealth Systems Sjuggerud Maxar Technologies^ MAXR 1.90 years 691% Venture Tech. Lashmet Silvergate Capital SI 1.95 years 681% Amer. Moonshots Root ^ These gains occurred with a partial position in the respective stocks. * The two partial positions in Nvidia were part of a single recommendation. Editor Dave Lashmet closed the first leg of the position in November 2016 for a gain of about 108%. Then, he closed the second leg in July 2020 for a 777% return. And finally, in May 2022, he booked a 1,466% return on the final leg. Subscribers who followed his advice on Nvidia could've recorded a total weighted average gain of more than 600%. --------------------------------------------------------------- Stansberry Research Crypto Hall of Fame Top 5 highest-returning closed positions in the Crypto Capital model portfolio Investment Symbol Duration Gain Publication Analyst Band Protocol BAND/USD 0.31 years 1,169% Crypto Capital Wade Terra LUNA/USD 0.41 years 1,166% Crypto Capital Wade Polymesh POLYX/USD 3.84 years 1,157% Crypto Capital Wade Frontier FRONT/USD 0.09 years 979% Crypto Capital Wade Binance Coin BNB/USD 1.78 years 963% Crypto Capital Wade You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to Stansberry Digest. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from Stansberry Digest [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You’re receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberryresearch.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized financial advice. © 2024 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.

EDM Keywords (256)

yesterday years wrong writers work words wind whole went weirdness weird week wealth warned want value understand type two trigger trading trades time think tell talking survive survival sure supposed sun suggestions successful subscription subscribers subscriber subordinate stunt study stocks stock still stay started spell speak something solved software situation simple shut shortage shares sent sell see security screenshot saying say save said risks right retirement result rest responsibility requires require reminds refer redistribution recover recorded recommendation recommend receiving received rebuilding really read race questions question pull published publication promise proceeded problem prices price prevent pretending pretend press predict power possible position portfolios point plummet platform place performance pay part others open obvious nyse nvidia normal never neither need must much movement money monday million mechanisms maybe may matters matter markets market makes make made lulled lows lower lots lot longer logged lock living limit like life learned learn know keep issue investors investments investment investing injury information indication index incredibly impossible implications image idiot idea higher hell hear harder happened happen halted got glitch gill gamestop gains gain future friend followed folks finance finally feedback fast far fall fail fact face expire expect exchange example even episode endorse employees doubt destined dellanna decisions deals day date currently cta crashed crash control consequences confirmed complexity compete comment come closed close cheap chance certainty cat case career burn breakers bought boss booked betting believe becomes based bands bag back average authorities attracting attempt anything analyst americans affected affect advice address acting account 40 2018 20 1988 108 100

Marketing emails from stansberryresearch.com

View More
Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.