Newsletter Subject

Why the Fed Can’t “Pause” QE Forever

From

rogueeconomics.com

Email Address

feedback@exct.rogueeconomics.com

Sent On

Fri, Dec 2, 2022 05:32 PM

Email Preheader Text

Welcome to Inside Wall Street with Nomi Prins! It?s the only daily newsletter featuring the insigh

[Inside Wall Street with Nomi Prins]( Welcome to Inside Wall Street with Nomi Prins! It’s the only daily newsletter featuring the insights of renowned author and former Wall Street insider, Nomi Prins. Every day, Nomi shines a light on a massive wealth transfer she calls The Great Distortion. That’s the true cause of the permanent disconnect she sees between the markets and the real economy. And she shares ways you can come out ahead, if you know where the money is flowing. You’ll find all Nomi’s Inside Wall Street issues [here](. If you have questions or comments, send Nomi a note anytime [here]( or at feedback@rogueeconomics.com. Why the Fed Can’t “Pause” QE Forever By Nomi Prins, Editor, Inside Wall Street with Nomi Prins Welcome to our Friday mailbag edition! Every week, we receive great questions from your fellow readers. And every Friday, I answer as many as I can. Up first, reader Jeff S. asks a most excellent question… Why doesn't the Fed just stop QE? – Jeff S. Hi Jeff, thank you. Technically, the Fed has stopped fabricating new money in return for buying bonds. That means it’s in a holding period, or has stopped the active quantitative easing (QE) process. That said, the fact that the Fed still has a book of about $8.6 trillion worth of assets means that the QE support for the banks and the market remains in play. If the Fed were to actually stop QE altogether, and sell off all of its book of bonds, it would cause a massive liquidity crisis. It would mean the Fed would have to actively sell its bonds to Wall Street. And Wall Street would either have to come up with the money to buy them… Or more likely, not have the money or want to buy them. That would cause a major sell-off in the bond markets and a plummeting of the stock market. That means at some level, QE remains in place as a backstop or cushion. Recommended Link [Bigger than Musk’s Twitter takeover]( [image]( Forget about Elon Musk buying Twitter. Because [there’s a bigger story brewing behind the scenes at Tesla.]( In short, Musk is taking Tesla in a new direction. He says it will be worth “probably several times that of what the car business is per year”… and could soon be 50% of Tesla’s business. He’s already invested over $10 billion in [this new venture (so far).]( And it could be well worth it. Because at stake is an emerging trend Forbes reports will be worth $130 trillion. But Musk isn’t the only billionaire vying for all this money. Five of the world’s richest men are backing a tiny small-cap that could wreck Elon Musk’s plans for Tesla’s future. Don’t be left behind, this tiny company behind huge opportunity trades for around $4. [Click here to learn why you should be investing in this too.]( -- Next, reader Thomas R. makes an observation on a common topic in these pages – the U.S. government’s runaway debt… Nomi, you’re doing a bang-up job for me and all your readers! I would like to point out that the U.S. Treasury doesn't pay any interest on their debt. They just issue more bonds to cover their payments. –Thomas R. Hi Thomas, thank you for your kind words and comment. That’s a good point during these times. The U.S. Treasury does issue more new debt per year now than it has to pay in interest. So in that respect, you’re completely correct. That’s also why the more debt we have, and the higher the interest rates on it, the more debt the U.S. will have to issue just to keep up. It’s a very scary prospect. Recommended Link [Bear Market Expert Reveals His #1 Stock for December 2022]( [image]( “I went from the brink of bankruptcy to wealthy – thanks to one type of stock” [Get his top pick here.]( -- And on another note, Thomas is also skeptical of a common argument against Bitcoin… Nomi, hope this finds you well. I have an observation concerning Bitcoin mining's energy use. Actually, it is concerning the total electricity the legacy financial system uses. I find it nearly impossible to accept the claim that Bitcoin mining uses more electricity than the entire legacy financial system. There has to be literally millions of computers and large computer systems running to keep track of all the money that flows all over the Earth! One big bank probably uses as much electricity as all Bitcoin miners combined! – Thomas R. Thomas, you make some really good observations. As I mentioned in a [recent essay]( Bitcoin miners are the “energy buyer of last resort.” In other words, a guaranteed buyer of cheap energy that nobody else wants to buy. If there is a stranded or inaccessible source of cheap energy that can’t be economically transported – say an isolated source of hydroelectric power – Bitcoin miners will be there to provide a bid. The legacy financial system doesn’t enjoy this advantage. It can’t make use of isolated energy sources all over the world like waterfalls, running rivers or creatable dams. It still needs electric grids that are located close enough to residential or industrial areas “to keep track of all the money”. And you’re right… all this money moving takes millions of computers and extensive computer systems running on massive amounts of energy to happen. With that in mind, I agree – the legacy financial system is probably much more wasteful than Bitcoin. The jury is still out, but there are some numbers to back that… [Featured: Former Goldman Sachs Exec: Everyone on Wall Street is investing, should you?]( Take the Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index (CBECI). It estimates that Bitcoin consumes roughly 122 terawatt-hour (TW/H) per year. That number drops to 89 TW/H per year if you adjust for the average lifespan of Bitcoin mining machines, as well as the rate at which new modern machines are created. That’s according to a payments specialist from consultancy Value Chain. His research estimated that the banking sector uses 56 times more energy than that. He took into account the creation of money, transporting money, physical banking infrastructure, energy consumption, and other factors. And he arrived at a figure of 4,981 TW/H. Recommended Link [Market Wizard Larry Benedict revealing his best-kept secret for just $19]( [image]( Market Wizard Larry Benedict went 20 years on Wall Street without a single losing year… He delivered 23% returns in 2008 (while the market plummeted 37%)… And so far this year, he’s shown his readers how to make money nearly every week. For a limited time, he’s revealing his best-kept secret for just $19. This is the best deal he’s ever offered for his research service… and it could disappear at any time. Plus, he’s even offering a 10-second “over the shoulder” demo of his strategy in action. [Watch it here…]( -- Finally, reader Chris L. wants to know more about the math behind Bitcoin… I have frequently been told that before a Bitcoin miner can submit a new block to the network, they must compete to solve complex mathematical problems. My question is: who sets these mathematical problems? – Chris L. Thanks for writing in, Chris. This is a good question. The mathematical problems you’re talking about are just different flavors of the same single “problem” built into the Bitcoin protocol. That said, the “complex mathematical problem” analogy used in so many places isn’t quite accurate. See, Bitcoin mining is more like a lottery that’s based on random trial and error rather than complex math. And it requires an enormous amount of specialized computer hardware, processing power, and electricity to solve these problems. Just to be in the game (of solving these problems), you need racks of specialized equipment created solely for the purpose of mining Bitcoin. These are called Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs). Depending on their computing power, ASICs can cost anywhere from $500 to over $10,000 apiece. Plus, Bitcoin miners do consume an enormous amount of energy, and as I pointed out above, need access to a cheap source of electricity to stay profitable. [Featured: One Stock Doubles Your Money, During Crisis?]( In other words, miners must incur significant real-world costs to solve these problems. If they aren’t following the protocol, or are otherwise being dishonest, the network will easily detect and reject them. The dishonest miner would have wasted a significant amount of money on electricity alone, only to receive no rewards. That’s the genius of Bitcoin’s incentives and security model. And you always need to have the latest generation of ASICs to stay on top of the mining game. That’s because of something called Bitcoin’s “Difficulty Adjustment.” The Bitcoin protocol automatically adjusts the difficulty of the math problems miners must solve so that, on average, it takes about 10 minutes. Thanks to the Difficulty Adjustment, the more miners – and thus competing power – that are dedicated towards solving these problems, the more difficult they become, and vice versa. And that’s all for this week’s mailbag. Thanks to everyone who wrote in! If I didn’t get to your question this week, look out for my response in a future Friday mailbag edition. I do my best to respond to as many of your questions and comments as I can. Just remember, I can’t give personal investment advice. And if there are any other topics you’d like me to write about, I’d love to hear from you. You can write me at [feedback@rogueeconomics.com](mailto:feedback@rogueeconomics.com?subject=RE: Why the Fed Can’t “Pause” QE Forever). Happy investing… and have a fantastic weekend! Regards, [signature] Nomi Prins Editor, Inside Wall Street with Nomi Prins --------------------------------------------------------------- Like what you’re reading? Send your thoughts to [feedback@rogueeconomics.com](mailto:feedback@rogueeconomics.com?subject=RE: The Cozy Power Relationships That Drive The Great Distortion). --------------------------------------------------------------- IN CASE YOU MISSED IT… [Still making me thousands – 36 years later]( The Trading Method That I Used as a Former Money Manager (Special Demonstration Below) Hi, my name is Jeff Clark. For the past 38 years, I’ve helped people from all walks of life retire wealthy. Retired school teachers… doctors… even the occasional pro-athlete. But I haven’t done it the usual way… My method is different. It’s unlike anything you’ve probably ever seen. For the first time, I’ve put together something special to show you how it works. This is the same method I used as a former money manager. And I still use it to generate tens of thousands of dollars every year. You can [watch it here…]( [Check it out.]( [image]( Get Instant Access Click to read these free reports and automatically sign up for daily research. [The Ultimate Guide to Taking Back Your Privacy]( [The 101 Guide to Pre-IPO Investing]( [An Insider’s Guide to Making a Fortune from Small Tech Stocks]( [Rogue Economincs]( Rogue Economics 55 NE 5th Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33483 [www.rogueeconomics.com]( [Tweet]( [TWITTER]( To ensure our emails continue reaching your inbox, please [add our email address]( to your address book. This editorial email containing advertisements was sent to {EMAIL} because you subscribed to this service. To stop receiving these emails, click [here](. Rogue Economics welcomes your feedback and questions. But please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized advice. To contact Customer Service, call toll free Domestic/International: 1-800-681-1765, Mon–Fri, 9am–7pm ET, or email us [here](mailto:memberservices@rogueeconomics.com). © 2022 Rogue Economics. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution of our content, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Rogue Economics. [Privacy Policy]( | [Terms of Use](

Marketing emails from rogueeconomics.com

View More
Sent On

16/04/2024

Sent On

16/04/2024

Sent On

16/04/2024

Sent On

15/04/2024

Sent On

15/04/2024

Sent On

15/04/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.