Newsletter Subject

Put a “P” on the Page

From

rogueeconomics.com

Email Address

feedback@exct.rogueeconomics.com

Sent On

Tue, Jun 25, 2024 04:30 PM

Email Preheader Text

Managing Editor?s Note: Yesterday, we shared an insight from Rogue Economics friend Larry Benedict

[Inside Wall Street with Nomi Prins]( Managing Editor’s Note: Yesterday, we shared an insight from Rogue Economics friend Larry Benedict. And with good reason… Larry has been on a roll at One Ticker Trader, his introductory-level trading advisory. His last five trades notched wins of 22.4%… 24.8%… 88.8%… 66.7%… and 100%. But success didn’t happen overnight for Larry. Below, he shares his most important advice for traders. It transformed him from a losing trader to one of the world’s most prolific moneymakers… --------------------------------------------------------------- Put a “P” on the Page By Larry Benedict, Editor, Trading With Larry Benedict [Larry Benedict] Want to know the secret to successful trading? It’s not about being a hot shot and taking high-risk bets. I’ve seen enough traders blow themselves up to know that’s a losing strategy. I’ve known traders with that mindset who ended up losing their homes… or even worse. They had a gambler’s mentality. And it caught up with them in the end. The secret to making money over time is to treat it not like an outing to a casino but as a business. Apply this insight to your trading, and you stand to really move the needle on your wealth. Fail to apply it, and you’ll likely end up losing money. I can’t stress enough how important it is to internalize. It’s what allowed me to thrive as a trader for the past four decades. Recommended Link [The 2024 TECH RESET]( [image]( [Are we on the edge of the biggest ‘TECH RESET’ in decades?]( The expert who called the dot-com crash of 2000, says: [“A $17 trillion stock market panic could FORCE America’s most-loved tech stocks to MELTDOWN.]( Ultimately, dragging down thousands of other stocks in their wake – in what will be an unprecedented market panic.” This is why a staggering 31 billionaires are selling their stocks, right now, at a record pace. [Click here for the step-by-step details.]( -- All the “No-Nos” My career as a trader began in 1984. I started out on the floor of the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) with $10,000 of my own money. That’s me on the right. [Chart] Larry (right) on the floor of the CBOE But I really learned the ropes as a trader at a firm called Spear, Leeds & Kellogg. At the time, it was the largest specialist trading firm in the world – meaning it traded its own money. It traded almost every stock on the New York Stock Exchange. Then from 2000 until 2013, I ran my own hedge fund. It wasn’t all smooth sailing. Far from it… Early in my career, I bet too much on risky trades and got wiped out. I chewed through all my money two or three times by making silly mistakes. I was too impulsive. I was going for home runs. I was holding onto my losers for too long. All the “no-nos” of trading. Then something changed. I’d lost so much money, I thought my trading career was over. At the same time, I had a buddy, Andy, who was making money every day. I couldn’t figure out why… I called my mom and complained to her that Andy was making so much money and I was losing all of mine. I was desperate for an answer. She said, “Just do what he’s doing.” It was a light-bulb moment. What Andy was doing was simple. Instead of going all in on a risky trade idea like me, he was taking smaller wins on lower-risk trades. That way, he was slowly but surely building a strong base of capital. Put a “P” on the Page That’s what businesses do all the time. Coca-Cola, Nike, Hershey’s… These blue-chip companies haven’t been around for decades because they take wild bets all the time. They’re in business for decades because they’re booking smaller profits day in, day out. It took me a long time to grasp this concept. But when I did, it transformed my trading. From 1990 to 2010, I didn’t have a single losing year as a trader. This winning streak got me featured in Hedge Fund Market Wizards. It’s the 2012 book about the world’s greatest hedge fund managers. (I was featured in the chapter after Ray Dalio, the manager of the world’s largest hedge fund.) It all came down to the insight I learned from Andy. I call it putting a “P” (for profit) on the page. You don’t take on much risk until you’ve had a string of smaller winners. You build a pile of capital you can speculate with. If you don’t have a big enough base of capital, you shouldn’t take on any high-risk trades. Target 5%… 10%… or 25% returns. Grab these smaller wins when you can. As the old-timers say, you never go broke taking a profit. Once you’ve built a strong foundation of capital, you’ve earned the ability to take on more risk. I’m not saying there’s no room for more speculative trades. But you have to earn them. You need to grow your capital pile with low-risk trades before you shoot for the moon. That way, you’re protected if the risky trade goes bust. That’s what keeps you in the green. Unfortunately, people tend to do the opposite. You go on a losing streak… get frustrated and emotional… and lose even more, even faster, because you’re shooting for big wins to recapture those losses. I’ve seen it happen dozens of times throughout my career. It’s one of the key factors that wipes out new traders. Instead, you want to think like a business. You earn the ability to take on more risk only after you’ve put a “P” on the page. That way, you can go the distance as a trader and build your wealth, slowly over time. Regards, Larry Benedict Editor, Trading With Larry Benedict --------------------------------------------------------------- Like what you’re reading? Send your thoughts to [feedback@rogueeconomics.com](mailto:feedback@rogueeconomics.com?subject=RE: Inside Wall Street Feedback). [Rogue Economincs]( Rogue Economics 55 NE 5th Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33483 [www.rogueeconomics.com]( [Tweet]( [TWITTER]( To ensure our emails continue reaching your inbox, please [add our email address]( to your address book. This editorial email containing advertisements was sent to {EMAIL} because you subscribed to this service. To stop receiving these emails, click [here](. Rogue Economics welcomes your feedback and questions. But please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized advice. To contact Customer Service, call toll free Domestic/International: 1-800-681-1765, Mon–Fri, 9am–7pm ET, or email us [here](mailto:memberservices@rogueeconomics.com). © 2024 Rogue Economics. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution of our content, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Rogue Economics. [Privacy Policy]( | [Terms of Use](

Marketing emails from rogueeconomics.com

View More
Sent On

27/06/2024

Sent On

27/06/2024

Sent On

26/06/2024

Sent On

26/06/2024

Sent On

25/06/2024

Sent On

24/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.