Newsletter Subject

What Could the Fed Have Done Better in 2008?

From

rogueeconomics.com

Email Address

feedback@exct.rogueeconomics.com

Sent On

Fri, Jun 21, 2024 04:30 PM

Email Preheader Text

What Could the Fed Have Done Better in 2008? By Nomi Prins, Editor, Inside Wall Street with Nomi Pri

[Inside Wall Street with Nomi Prins]( What Could the Fed Have Done Better in 2008? By Nomi Prins, Editor, Inside Wall Street with Nomi Prins Welcome to our Friday mailbag edition! Every week, we get great questions from your fellow readers. And every Friday, I do my best to answer them. Our questions today revolve around the most powerful central bank in the world – the Federal Reserve. The Fed has the unlimited, unregulated, and unelected ability to create as much money as it is deemed necessary to meet the crises of the day. It did that, to the tune of $4.5 trillion, in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis. I’ve criticized the Fed for bailing out the big banks on Wall Street at the expense of Main Street. But one reader wants to know: was there an alternative? I would like to hear from Nomi, what would she have done differently in 2008? The bailing out of the banks sounded outrageous, especially because they protected the big wigs’ salaries but did not protect the families from losing their homes. But if [then-Fed Chief Ben] Bernanke had not bailed them out, what would have happened? – Maria C. Hi Maria, thank you for your question and comments. I wrote about the alternatives to bailing out the banks in my 2009 book, It Takes a Pillage. If you have a copy, it’s in Chapter 2, called “This Was Never About the Little Guy.” I also shared an excerpt in these pages, which you can read right [here](. Recommended Link [Wall St. Icon: Looming Financial Tsunami will Wipe Out the 1%]( [image]( Wall Street icon who forecasted Black Monday and dot-com crash says a new economic event will hit the American economy like a tsunami. It doesn’t matter if you’re blue collar, white collar, working, or retired. He says, “I am literally afraid for my family’s future. I’m taking drastic steps to prepare for what I know will inevitably happen next.” [Click here to see his new prediction.]( -- The alternative comes down to the numbers. There were about half a trillion dollars’ worth of subprime loans that were in default. That’s out of $1.5 trillion that were extended to borrowers during the years that led up to the financial crisis of 2008. Yes, some of those loans should not have been extended because the borrowers couldn’t afford to repay them from the beginning. But a lot of the risks inherent to those loans weren’t properly disclosed to borrowers. Also, certain lenders were very loose with the information that they required from borrowers to provide these loans. That was one major fault of the Federal Reserve. It did not regulate the bank lending process when it could have. But nonetheless, the large Wall Street banks were able to engineer assets using these loans to the tune of $14 trillion. That’s a factor of 28 times. Even if the subprime loans that banks bought to stuff into these assets had not defaulted, the entire exercise was a house of cards. Or like an upside-down pyramid destined to topple over. Imagine you have a flat tire, and you can only pump in 1/28th of the air the tire needs to function properly. The tire isn’t going to be safe. Plus, Wall Street was lending money to institutional buyers of those assets – using the assets as collateral! When the subprime loans at the bottom of this upside-down pyramid scheme stopped paying interest out as expected, the entire scheme toppled. I would not have bailed out the banks for doing that. Instead, I would have made those mortgages whole to stop the defaults and fined the banks for that difference. The cost would have been half a trillion dollars and not the trillions we have spent since. Perhaps one or two more banks would have toppled during that time as a result. But that was the risk they took. And it would have been a whole lot cheaper. Have you written a book that explains how the Fed works? If you have, please send me the name so I can purchase it and learn. – Gray W. Hi Gray, thanks for your interest in my books. Many of my books discuss various aspects of the Fed, historically and as it’s behaved since the financial crisis. So it depends on what you are looking for exactly. My favorite for broad context on the Fed would be All the Presidents’ Bankers. In that book, I wrote extensively about the origins of the Fed. I also wrote about how the Fed has operated since its inception in 1913 through 2014, when the book came out. Read an excerpt from it [here](. For more recent behavior of the Fed since the financial crisis of 2008 with respect to Wall Street, check out my 2009 book, It Takes a Pillage. [Here]( is that excerpt again, which I shared above. Regarding the Fed as a powerful actor on the global stage, check out my 2018 book, Collusion. Read an excerpt [here](. And to see how what the Fed has done impacts The Great Distortion between the markets and the real economy that we have today, check out my latest, Permanent Distortion. Read an excerpt from it [here](. I hope that helps. And that’s all for this week’s mailbag. Thanks to everyone who wrote in! If I didn’t get to your question this week, look out for my response in a future Friday mailbag edition. I do my best to respond to as many of your questions and comments as I can. You can write me at [feedback@rogueeconomics.com](mailto:feedback@rogueeconomics.com?subject=RE:Inside Wall Street feedback). Just remember, I can’t give personal investment advice. Happy investing… and have a fantastic weekend! Regards, [signature] Nomi Prins Editor, Inside Wall Street with Nomi Prins --------------------------------------------------------------- Like what you’re reading? Send your thoughts to [feedback@rogueeconomics.com](mailto:feedback@rogueeconomics.com?subject=Inside Wall Street Feedback). [Rogue Economincs]( Rogue Economics 55 NE 5th Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33483 [www.rogueeconomics.com]( [Tweet]( [TWITTER]( To ensure our emails continue reaching your inbox, please [add our email address]( to your address book. This editorial email containing advertisements was sent to {EMAIL} because you subscribed to this service. To stop receiving these emails, click [here](. Rogue Economics welcomes your feedback and questions. But please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized advice. To contact Customer Service, call toll free Domestic/International: 1-800-681-1765, Mon–Fri, 9am–7pm ET, or email us [here](mailto:memberservices@rogueeconomics.com). © 2024 Rogue Economics. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution of our content, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Rogue Economics. [Privacy Policy]( | [Terms of Use](

Marketing emails from rogueeconomics.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

02/11/2024

Sent On

01/11/2024

Sent On

29/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.