Newsletter Subject

Does the Federal Government Want Inflation?

From

rogueeconomics.com

Email Address

feedback@exct.rogueeconomics.com

Sent On

Fri, Jun 14, 2024 04:31 PM

Email Preheader Text

Does the Federal Government Want Inflation? By Nomi Prins, Editor, Inside Wall Street with Nomi Prin

[Inside Wall Street with Nomi Prins]( Does the Federal Government Want Inflation? By Nomi Prins, Editor, Inside Wall Street with Nomi Prins Welcome to our Friday mailbag edition! Every week, we receive great questions from readers. And every Friday, I answer as many as I can. Today, I want to address two topics on the minds of many readers – the rising cost of living, and our shaky banking system. The first is in response to my recent mailbag essay, “[What Is the Fed’s Endgame?]( Your accurate explanation makes the whole government portion of the economy appear to be smoke and mirrors. I find that disturbing. In addition, doesn’t the federal government in fact want inflation, considering the fact that it’s always in the borrower’s "interest" to pay off future debt with inflated dollars? – Ken H. Hi Ken, thanks so much for your question and kind words. It’s certainly true that our government is running our country while steeped in record debt. It’s also true that if the government keeps issuing new debt to pay for old debt, it would make sense to pay for it with inflated dollars. Those dollars would stretch further, all things equal. But I’ll get to why they’re not doing this shortly. Recommended Link [The Biggest Financial Event of 2024? (Why 31 Billionaires Are Moving Their Stocks, Right Now)]( [image]( Should you buy, sell, or hold your stock? To find the answer, let’s look at the actions of the world’s wealthiest investors… Right now, the world’s wealthiest investors are preparing for what could become ‘the biggest financial event’ of 2024. [31 billionaires (including: Warren Buffett, Jeff Bezos, and Elon Musk, and more) are MOVING their stocks as we speak…]( To discover where they’re moving their money… Why… And how you can profit alongside them… [Click here to find out.]( -- First, I’ll say that the federal government doesn’t generally want price inflation. The biggest reason is public opinion. Voters tend to not like it when the costs of their basic necessities from rent to gas to food rise. The latest polls show Americans say inflation or cost of living is the single most critical financial problem they face. This has been the case for three years. Plus, the percentage of citizens that feel this is at a new high. [Chart] This year, that percentage is 41%. That is up slightly from 35% last year and 32% in 2022. We are in an election year, so the government is even more sensitive to these concerns. This is true of the Biden administration as the incumbent one, and it would be true of any other sitting administration. But, just as the [Federal Reserve can’t control supply side inflation]( neither can the government. Inflation is a complex phenomenon. Various factors can impact price inflation. Those factors include supply and demand dynamics, monetary policy, economic conditions, geopolitical tensions, weather, and banking crises. Now, back to paying off future debt with inflated dollars. It isn’t a desired outcome for the federal government, and here is the main reason why. The government has to make debt payments on that debt in the interim. And the higher the amount of outstanding debt, the higher those payments. Today, national debt stands near $35 trillion. That figure is up nearly 35% since the pandemic. Plus, the cost of paying interest on that debt has hit record highs. That’s due to the Fed’s tightening interest rate policy, which began in March 2022. The current expenditures on our national debt surpassed $1 trillion for the first quarter of 2024. [Chart] That means the first $1 trillion each year from the federal budget goes to debt payments rather than activities that could benefit economic growth, infrastructure development, upgrading power grids, or anything else. Plus, inflation can lead to economic instability, lower purchasing power, and increased costs for businesses and individuals. So the government wants to keep inflation in check. But since it isn’t keeping it in check, everyone must take steps to protect their wealth. The best thing anyone can do is invest in assets that preserve their value in the face of inflation. Two such assets are gold and Bitcoin. For my latest take on Bitcoin, see the [June 10 Inside Wall Street](. And for my favorite ways to buy gold, see my [April 6, 2023 essay](. Nomi, I am a subscriber to your newsletter. I understood you have been emphasizing the importance of not having all our cash in one bank account. How about the stock brokerage accounts? Should we also have multiple brokerage accounts to mitigate the risk in case of banking sector instability? Or are brokerage firms different from banks? – Brian L. Hi Brian, thanks for being a loyal subscriber! That’s a great question. You’re right, I believe in dividing up your cash and banking services across multiple banks. The same is true of brokerage accounts. The biggest reason is similar. Having multiple brokerage accounts can help mitigate risks associated with banking sector instability, even if they are not tied to a specific bank. They can also hedge each other in case one of them runs into trouble, in the same way that spreading your deposits across different banks can. Here are other potential benefits… 1) Diversification of Products By maintaining multiple accounts with different brokerage firms, you can spread your investments across different asset classes and market segments. This reduces the overall impact of any negative events affecting a specific brokerage firm or asset class. Some brokerages or financial platforms can give you access to certain investments that others can’t. For instance, I’ll use E*TRADE and Interactive Brokers (or IBKR) as the static examples here. IBKR allows you to purchase stock in other countries that don’t trade on U.S. stock exchanges. And it allows you to take advantage of foreign exchange trades in the process. E*TRADE doesn’t do either of these things. 2) Access to Different Trading Platforms Different brokerage firms or applications can offer different trading platforms and services. Having multiple accounts gives you wider access to a range of tools and features. That can give you more flexibility in your trading experience, which can be useful for making different investment decisions. Though not a brokerage, take Block’s Cash App. It allows you to buy fractional shares (or stock slices) and fractions of Bitcoin directly on your smartphone. E*TRADE doesn’t. 3) Lower Fees and Commissions Different banks can charge different fees or even provide different amounts of interest for money you hold with them. It’s similar with brokerage firms. They can charge different fees or commissions based on the type of investment or account. It’s useful to compare the costs and benefits of different brokerage accounts. Lower transaction fees can beef up your long-term investing portfolio over time. So can higher interest for money you keep on deposit in your brokerage account. I can’t give personal advice, but what I can tell all my readers is this. I personally have an E*TRADE account, an IBKR account, and a Cash App account. So I do put these benefits of diversifying your brokerage accounts into practice. And to all my readers, I suggest you consider diversifying as well. I can’t recommend specific platforms. – everyone has different needs. So do your research to find the brokers that best suits yours. I hope that helps. And thanks to everyone who wrote in! If you have any other questions, write me at feedback@rogueeconomics.com. I’ll do my best to address them in a future Friday mailbag edition. Just remember, I can’t give personal investment advice. In the meantime, happy investing… and have a fantastic weekend! Regards, [signature] Nomi Prins Editor, Inside Wall Street with Nomi Prins --------------------------------------------------------------- Like what you’re reading? Send your thoughts to [feedback@rogueeconomics.com](mailto:feedback@rogueeconomics.com?subject=Inside Wall Street Feedback). [Rogue Economincs]( Rogue Economics 55 NE 5th Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33483 [www.rogueeconomics.com]( [Tweet]( [TWITTER]( To ensure our emails continue reaching your inbox, please [add our email address]( to your address book. This editorial email containing advertisements was sent to {EMAIL} because you subscribed to this service. To stop receiving these emails, click [here](. Rogue Economics welcomes your feedback and questions. But please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized advice. To contact Customer Service, call toll free Domestic/International: 1-800-681-1765, Mon–Fri, 9am–7pm ET, or email us [here](mailto:memberservices@rogueeconomics.com). © 2024 Rogue Economics. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution of our content, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Rogue Economics. [Privacy Policy]( | [Terms of Use](

Marketing emails from rogueeconomics.com

View More
Sent On

24/06/2024

Sent On

24/06/2024

Sent On

23/06/2024

Sent On

23/06/2024

Sent On

22/06/2024

Sent On

22/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.