Newsletter Subject

Could A Massive Public UFO Database Eventually Help Explain Mysterious Sightings?

From

popularmechanics.com

Email Address

popularmechanics@newsletter.popularmechanics.com

Sent On

Sun, Sep 29, 2024 04:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

Soon after clicking around America’s new online database containing hundreds of thousands of hi

Soon after clicking around America’s new online database containing hundreds of thousands of historical UFO records, you may begin to wonder why the government has spent a lot of time and taxpayer dollars collecting data on a phenomenon that it doesn’t seem to believe in. As a casual observer taking a quick look at the database—an ongoing project of the National Archives, the government’s repository of historical documents—you’ll see many images of fake-looking flying saucers. You’ll hear recordings of military personnel talking at length about various sightings, concluding that there was no credible evidence that what was observed was a UFO. You’ll find a ton of grainy images and films of bright dots in the sky, as well as black-and-white 20th-century newsreel footage. But if you dig around the somewhat clunky database, you might also discover some intriguing records. For example, a 2013 blog post mentioning a Popular Mechanics news brief that same year about an Air Force project to build a flying saucer. Surely, that would pique your interest. “The Air Force, especially, has spent a significant amount of time trying to say ‘there is nothing here,’” and yet it and other government agencies have continued to investigate UAP reports, says Robert Powell, an engineer and author of UFOs: A Scientist Explains What We Know (And Don’t Know). “Why would you collect all that information if you did not believe there was something to at least a portion of it? … You’ll see some really interesting reports there in that data that indicate there’s something to the whole UAP subject, but you have to look for it,” says Powell, who is also co-founder of the Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies (SCU), a nonprofit that includes scientists and researchers who apply scientific methods to the analysis of UFO sightings. [View in Browser]( [Popular Mechanics]( [SHOP]( [EXCLUSIVE]( [SUBSCRIBE]( [Could A Massive Public UFO Database Eventually Help Explain Mysterious Sightings?]( [Could A Massive Public UFO Database Eventually Help Explain Mysterious Sightings?]( [Could A Massive Public UFO Database Eventually Help Explain Mysterious Sightings?]( Soon after clicking around America’s new online database containing hundreds of thousands of historical UFO records, you may begin to wonder why the government has spent a lot of time and taxpayer dollars collecting data on a phenomenon that it doesn’t seem to believe in. As a casual observer taking a quick look at the database—an ongoing project of the National Archives, the government’s repository of historical documents—you’ll see many images of fake-looking flying saucers. You’ll hear recordings of military personnel talking at length about various sightings, concluding that there was no credible evidence that what was observed was a UFO. You’ll find a ton of grainy images and films of bright dots in the sky, as well as black-and-white 20th-century newsreel footage. But if you dig around the somewhat clunky database, you might also discover some intriguing records. For example, a 2013 blog post mentioning a Popular Mechanics news brief that same year about an Air Force project to build a flying saucer. Surely, that would pique your interest. “The Air Force, especially, has spent a significant amount of time trying to say ‘there is nothing here,’” and yet it and other government agencies have continued to investigate UAP reports, says Robert Powell, an engineer and author of UFOs: A Scientist Explains What We Know (And Don’t Know). “Why would you collect all that information if you did not believe there was something to at least a portion of it? … You’ll see some really interesting reports there in that data that indicate there’s something to the whole UAP subject, but you have to look for it,” says Powell, who is also co-founder of the Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies (SCU), a nonprofit that includes scientists and researchers who apply scientific methods to the analysis of UFO sightings. Soon after clicking around America’s new online database containing hundreds of thousands of historical UFO records, you may begin to wonder why the government has spent a lot of time and taxpayer dollars collecting data on a phenomenon that it doesn’t seem to believe in. As a casual observer taking a quick look at the database—an ongoing project of the National Archives, the government’s repository of historical documents—you’ll see many images of fake-looking flying saucers. You’ll hear recordings of military personnel talking at length about various sightings, concluding that there was no credible evidence that what was observed was a UFO. You’ll find a ton of grainy images and films of bright dots in the sky, as well as black-and-white 20th-century newsreel footage. But if you dig around the somewhat clunky database, you might also discover some intriguing records. For example, a 2013 blog post mentioning a Popular Mechanics news brief that same year about an Air Force project to build a flying saucer. Surely, that would pique your interest. “The Air Force, especially, has spent a significant amount of time trying to say ‘there is nothing here,’” and yet it and other government agencies have continued to investigate UAP reports, says Robert Powell, an engineer and author of UFOs: A Scientist Explains What We Know (And Don’t Know). “Why would you collect all that information if you did not believe there was something to at least a portion of it? … You’ll see some really interesting reports there in that data that indicate there’s something to the whole UAP subject, but you have to look for it,” says Powell, who is also co-founder of the Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies (SCU), a nonprofit that includes scientists and researchers who apply scientific methods to the analysis of UFO sightings. [Read More]( [Read More]( [Alternate text] [Alternate text] [These Are the EDC Essentials Our Editors Use and Love]( [These Are the EDC Essentials Our Editors Use and Love]( We don’t leave home without them. [Read More]( [Have a Toast-to-Butter Morning With These Editor-Recommended Toasters]( [Have a Toast-to-Butter Morning With These Editor-Recommended Toasters]( Get the perfect crunch with these compact kitchen appliances. [Read More]( [Alternate text] [Alternate text] [Extinct Volcanoes May Be the Answer to Our Rare Earth Metal Problems]( Extinct Volcanoes May Be the Answer to Our Rare Earth Metal Problems]( Let's just use mines we already have! [Read More]( [A Biblical “Healing” Plant, Lost for Centuries, May Have Been Revived By Science]( [A Biblical “Healing” Plant, Lost for Centuries, May Have Been Revived By Science]( A recently revived plant species could possibly be a source of Biblical medicine [Read More]( [Alternate text] [Alternate text] [Archaeologists Stumbled Upon a Message in a Bottle—from 200 Years Ago]( [Archaeologists Stumbled Upon a Message in a Bottle—from 200 Years Ago]( Two centuries later and we're still searching for the same things. [Read More]( [Alternate text] [POP Membership]( [LiveIntent Logo]( [AdChoices Logo]( [Need Assistance? Contact Us.](mailto:pmpmembership@popularmechanics.com) Follow Us [Visit Popular Mechanics on Facebook]( [Visit Popular Mechanics on X formerly Twitter]( [Visit Popular Mechanics on Instagram]( [Visit Popular Mechanics on YouTube]( [Unsubscribe]( | [Privacy Notice]( | [CA Notice at Collection]( Popular Mechanics is a publication of Hearst Magazines. ©2024 Hearst Magazine Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This email was sent by Hearst Magazines, 300 West 57th Street, New York, NY 10019-3779

Marketing emails from popularmechanics.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

03/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.