Newsletter Subject

NYT's Tears Kamala Apart After She Humiliates Herself

From

patriotnewsfeed.com

Email Address

mail@patriotnewsfeed.com

Sent On

Tue, Oct 1, 2024 02:32 PM

Email Preheader Text

They are getting nervous. Well, well, well. It looks like Vice President Kamala Harris's long-awaite

[Logo]( [NYT's Tears Kamala Apart After She Humiliates Herself] [NYT's Tears Kamala Apart After She Humiliates Herself]( They are getting nervous. Well, well, well. It looks like Vice President Kamala Harris's long-awaited solo interview turned out to be less of a policy deep dive and more of a dodge-fest. Sitting down with MSNBC's Stephanie Ruhle, Harris had the perfect opportunity to showcase her presidential chops ahead of 2024. Instead, she delivered a master class in avoiding direct questions. And get this-even The New York Times couldn't ignore the trainwreck! When the Times, of all places, is calling you out, you know it's bad. YIKES. Stephanie Ruhle on her softball interview with Kamala: "she doesn't answer the question." [pic.twitter.com/aPPkPGh4IV]( - Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) [September 25, 2024]( Their headline may have been polite-"[3 Takeaways From Kamala Harris's Interview on MSNBC]("-but the subheadline cut right to the point: "In her first one-on-one cable TV interview since becoming the nominee, the vice president repeatedly dodged direct questions and stuck firmly on message." Ouch. First up, Harris was asked a simple question about the economy. You know, that little issue where voters seem to trust Donald Trump over her and Biden to get things right? Instead of addressing why Trump's economic policies are resonating more with voters, she rambled on about how Trump supposedly decimated manufacturing jobs. No mention of inflation or how the Biden-Harris team plans to fix anything. It's like she forgot she was running for president and just hit "replay" on the same tired talking points. The second takeaway was even more revealing. When Ruhle asked Harris to consider what she'd do if Democrats lost the Senate (a very real possibility, by the way), Harris completely ignored the question. Instead, she stuck to her usual spiel about taxing billionaires and corporations. "Everyone should pay their fair share," she said-because, apparently, that's the solution to everything. Sure, go ahead and talk about raising corporate taxes when you're faced with a likely Republican-controlled Senate that will shut down that idea faster than you can say "filibuster." Brilliant. The third point wasn't even a critique of Harris-it was a dig at the entire interview. Epstein from the Times called it what it was: a fluff piece. He pointed out that Harris has been doing interviews recently, but only with "friendly inquisitors" like Ruhle, who let her off the hook when her answers were vague and evasive. Ruhle, for her part, admitted that Harris didn't really give straight answers but didn't seem too bothered by it. No tough follow-ups, no real accountability. Just one more [soft-ball session]( where Harris can claim she did an interview without actually having to answer anything meaningful. The New York Times absolutely evicerated Kamala's interview on MSNBC last night [pic.twitter.com/2xaolETTbq]( - Greg Price (@greg_price11) [September 26, 2024]( So what did Kamala gain from this? Honestly, not much. Sure, her team can now say she did a one-on-one interview, but if you're trying to convince voters that you're ready for the big leagues, dodging questions about the economy, the Senate, and Trump isn't exactly a winning strategy. And if even the New York Times is calling you out, maybe it's time to rethink that approach. [Trump Meeting Shows What Actual Leadership Looks Like] [Trump Meeting Shows What Actual Leadership Looks Like]( This is what leadership looks like folks. [Fox Reporter Dashes From Live Shot Rescues Woman] [Fox Reporter Dashes From Live Shot Rescues Woman]( That was close! [CNN Busted! Admits Using Digitally Altered Photos Of Trump] [CNN Busted! Admits Using Digitally Altered Photos Of Trump]( Caught red-handed. [Did Zuckerberg Just Have His 'Come To Trump' Moment?] [Did Zuckerberg Just Have His 'Come To Trump' Moment?]( Didn't have this on my 2024 bingo card. [Kamala's Interview Was A Wreck, But Her Speech was Even Worse] [Kamala's Interview Was A Wreck, But Her Speech was Even Worse]( Oh my gosh - WATCH You are receiving this email because you opted in to Patriot Newsfeed's daily newsletter. Copyright 2024. Patriot Newsfeed. All rights reserved. 30 N. Gould St, Suite 6911, Sheridan, WY 82801 [UNSUBSCRIBE]( | [VIEW IN BROWSER]( | [PRIVACY POLICY](

Marketing emails from patriotnewsfeed.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

28/11/2024

Sent On

03/11/2024

Sent On

03/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.