Newsletter Subject

A Bunch of Hot Air

From

paradigmpressgroup.com

Email Address

dr@mb.paradigmpressgroup.com

Sent On

Tue, Feb 21, 2023 11:02 PM

Email Preheader Text

The Truth About Those Balloons | ] A Bunch of Hot Air - It’s a bird, it’s a plane, it?

The Truth About Those Balloons [The Daily Reckoning] February 21, 2023 [WEBSITE]( | [UNSUBSCRIBE]( [Ed. note: Important housekeeping note: Your emails are coming from a new email address: dr@mb.paradigmpressgroup.com. Ensure delivery of every email in your subscription by following [these simple whitelisting instructions.]( A Bunch of Hot Air - It’s a bird, it’s a plane, it’s a… balloon… - A clever ruse… - Lies, lies and more lies… [Biden’s War “An Evil, illegitimate Power Grab.” -Mark Hendrickson, Economist]( In a matter of DAYS, a series of new regulations – authorized by the Biden administration –are set to go into effect. One regulation forces CEOs to pay political activists up to $200,000 a year to “observe” a company’s operations. Another, forces companies to cut ties with businesses that do not embrace radical political ideologies. But it gets even worse… [Click Here To Learn More]( Portsmouth, New Hampshire [Jim Rickards] JIM RICKARDS Dear Reader, It’s amazing — we haven’t heard about any balloon shootdowns over the past several days. White and silver, plastic and metallic, large and small, the sky has suddenly been filled with balloons. And they’ve been getting shot down almost daily by fighter aircraft (not always on the first try). Of course, I’m not referring to just any balloons. Some of these “objects” are probably sophisticated espionage packages launched by China to spy on some of the most sensitive and secure military bases in the U.S. Shooting these down is not like banging a piñata with a stick either. Some of the balloons were drifting at 150,000 feet, about 28 miles high, more than twice as high as the supersonic Concorde jet flew back in the day. National Security Implications The first balloon in the recent rash of Chinese invaders entered U.S. airspace over Alaska on Jan. 28, 2023. It was apparently not sighted immediately, but was identified by North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) within days and allowed to stay on course over the continental United States from Montana to South Carolina. This was the notorious large “white balloon” carrying surveillance and communications gear in a payload the size of several school buses. Much of that gear was recovered after the shoot-down off the coast of South Carolina. Recovery efforts are still underway. If the Pentagon hoped this flight would remain unknown, they were badly mistaken. U.S. citizens spotted the balloon in the skies over Montana. The story went viral, and within days Americans were asking what the object was, and why it wasn’t being shot down. The Pentagon admitted the existence of the balloon on Feb. 2. The white balloon was finally shot down on Feb. 4. NORAD’s tidy cover-up was blown up just as surely as the balloon. The Biden administration refused to take responsibility for letting the balloon into U.S. airspace at all, and for not shooting it down sooner. NORAD commander four-star Air Force Gen. Glen VanHerck explained lamely that the balloon exploited a “domain awareness gap.” His bureaucratic turn of phrase could be translated into plain English as, “We blew it.” The administration also deflected blame on others. Biden’s flunkies said that at least three balloons traveled over the U.S. during the Trump administration. Within hours, numerous top Trump administration officials denied that ever happened. These officials included two national security advisers, two directors of national intelligence, the head of the CIA and the secretary of state among others. This raised two questions. If the earlier incursions happened, why did the Pentagon not inform the president? And if the earlier incursions did not happen, why is the current White House lying? [Response Requested 1/1000th of an ounce of gold available for Reader]( As a The Daily Reckoning reader, Jim Rickards is offering you 1/1000th of an ounce of gold when you upgrade your account. It will come in the form of a “Gold Back” - a new type of gold currency that’s starting to spread across America. If you have not responded to Jim’s offer yet, and want to know how to claim yours… Please click the link below for details… [Click Here Now]( The White House smoothly explained that the Trump administration’s incursions were not known at the time (which is why Trump was not told) but were pieced together by the Biden administration using advanced forensic intelligence techniques. This way they defuse the issue of not telling Trump, cast the new balloon as “no big deal” and make themselves look brilliant because of their unspecified intelligence techniques. A Clever Ruse I spent over a decade working for the CIA, so I’m quite familiar with the kind of intelligence work the Biden team claims to have performed. It’s called all-source fusion where you gather intelligence from numerous channels including electronic signals (SIGINT), human sources (HUMINT) and literally scraps of paper called pocket litter. This can be put together like a mosaic and yield conclusions based on inferential methods. It’s a clever ruse, but it doesn’t hold water. Are we supposed to believe that the intelligence community mobilized all available resources in a matter of four days after the white balloon was spotted to reveal the existence of the Trump balloons? That’s nonsense. All-source fusion techniques are valuable, but the forensics takes weeks or months to perform. If the Biden administration performed these techniques in 2021 or 2022, then they were covering up the existence of the earlier balloons until it became politically expedient somehow to blame Trump. If the earlier balloons were known all along, then the Pentagon or the intelligence community were engaged in dereliction of duty for not informing Trump at the time. Again, we don’t have all the answers, but it’s safe to say that we have incompetence or worse regardless of the answer. Other Unanswered Questions Why was the white balloon not shot down over Alaska on Jan. 28? Why was it allowed to traverse most of the United States (including many sensitive military sites such as bases where U.S. ICBM launchers are located) before it finally was shot down? The administration claimed they were worried about the safety of those on the ground who might have been hit by debris. That’s nonsense. I’ve been to Alaska, Alberta, the Dakotas and other Western states and provinces where the balloon traveled. They’re beautiful, but empty. The odds of hitting anything on the ground are practically zero. The truth is they covered up the initial detection of the balloon and delayed shooting it down because they did not want to upset a planned visit to Beijing by Secretary of State Blinken to meet with Chairman Xi Jinping. In the end, this Biden cover-up failed because the balloon was detected by everyday Americans. The Blinken trip was canceled. After the white balloon shoot-down on Feb, 4, things got downright crazy. On Friday, Feb. 10, the U.S. shot down another spy balloon off the coast of Alaska. At almost the same time, on Saturday, Feb. 11, yet another spy balloon was shot down over the Yukon in Canada by an American F-22. These two balloons were metallic and flying lower than the white balloon (about 40,000 feet), but also contained surveillance and communications payloads. [BOMBSHELL: Ex-CIA Advisor Releases New Biden Evidence]( [Click here for more...]( This crazy new Biden story is 1,000 times worse than the media will let on. If you think Biden is a life-long corrupt politician who will do anything for money and power, you’re right. And now, former advisor to CIA and Pentagon Jim Rickards has just uncovered this new Congressional evidence that will send shockwaves through Washington. [Click Here To Learn More]( Lies, Lies and More Lies For their part, the Chinese lied as usual. They claimed these balloons were scientific efforts collecting weather information and had been “blown off course” by natural forces. In fact, the balloons were following a carefully chosen course over U.S. military bases carried mostly on the jet stream (which has dipped into the southern U.S. lately). The balloons have solar power and some propulsion equipment that allows the Chinese to make midcourse corrections as needed. Would the Chinese have launched the follow-on balloons after the embarrassment of having the white balloon shot down? Of course not. Those balloons were launched in the prior weeks and took some time to reach the U.S. and Canada before they were shot down. Finally, the Biden administration admitted that the Chinese have launched scores of spy balloons over a course of years. They admitted this on the weekend of Feb. 11–12 when most Americans were paying more attention to the Super Bowl. This last admission begs this question. Why didn’t the Biden administration do something sooner about any of these balloons? The lame explanation was that the intelligence collections by the balloons were nothing the Chinese couldn’t get anyway using their own satellites, so there was little harm in the balloon surveillance. That’s another lie. It’s true that powerful surveillance satellites are in space, and no one has suggested shooting them down with missiles or lasers. Still, intelligence is conducted by aggregating information from many channels – that’s the all-source fusion method discussed above. If the balloons could collect even minor bits of information not available from satellites, that information could be combined with other collections to gain new insights or confirm inferences from diverse channels. The Bottom Line The Chinese are embarrassed both by the shoot-downs and their own transparent lies. It’s a major loss of face for Chairman Xi and the People’s Liberation Army. The White House and Pentagon are embarrassed by their own incompetence in not detecting or stopping the white balloon, and by their own transparent lies about the relatively benign nature of the surveillance. The White House also lied about what the Trump administration knew prior to 2021. As usual, the entire matter has become politicized. The Republicans are arguing that Biden is weak on national security by letting the first balloon traverse the U.S. and that he is under the thumb of the Communist Party of China. The Democrats are posturing about their aggressiveness in shooting down four balloons over the U.S. and Canada. The problem of course is that there are probably more balloons on the way and Biden will have to keep shooting them down to avoid the charge of weakness. Politics and propaganda aside, holes in the NORAD early detection system have been exposed. The Chinese have collected valuable intelligence with the balloons. Military and diplomatic communications between the U.S. and China have broken down at a time when tensions in the Taiwan Strait have been dialed up. Unfortunately, you should expect all these trends to get worse. Regards, Jim Rickards for The Daily Reckoning [feedback@dailyreckoning.com.](mailto:feedback@dailyreckoning.com) P.S. Yesterday, I dropped a [bombshell…]( - I told how the Biden administration has secretly launched a war on U.S. investors… - I also told how a series of new regulations are set to go into effect that force companies to sacrifice profits for political brownie points. And… - I said that although these new regulations will likely destroy hundreds of companies… …they will also serve as the [ultimate impetus for 116 stocks]( all of which are slated to ignite in price. In fact, it’s already happening. Some of these companies have already started to bubble to the surface, producing gains of up to 66%, 72%, and 90%% in recent weeks. And this is only the beginning. [click here for more...]( Once you see what I’ve uncovered, you’ll understand why I believe these companies are virtually unstoppable from here on out. Unfortunately, you might not get another chance like it again. [Now is the time to make a move, click here for details.]( Thank you for reading The Daily Reckoning! We greatly value your questions and comments. Please send all feedback to [feedback@dailyreckoning.com.](mailto:feedback@dailyreckoning.com) [Jim Rickards] [James G. Rickards]( is the editor of Strategic Intelligence. He is an American lawyer, economist, and investment banker with 35 years of experience working in capital markets on Wall Street. He is the author of The New York Times bestsellers Currency Wars and The Death of Money. [Paradigm]( ☰ ⊗ [ARCHIVE]( [ABOUT]( [Contact Us]( © 2023 Paradigm Press, LLC. 808 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press, LLC. delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your The Daily Reckoning e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from The Daily Reckoning, feel free to [click here.]( Please note: the mailbox associated with this email address is not monitored, so do not reply to this message. We welcome comments or suggestions at feedback@dailyreckoning.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, [contact us here]( or call (844)-731-0984. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We allow the editors of our publications to recommend securities that they own themselves. However, our policy prohibits editors from exiting a personal trade while the recommendation to subscribers is open. In no circumstance may an editor sell a security before subscribers have a fair opportunity to exit. The length of time an editor must wait after subscribers have been advised to exit a play depends on the type of publication. All other employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. The Daily Reckoning is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. Please read our [Privacy Statement.]( If you are having trouble receiving your The Daily Reckoning subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by [whitelisting The Daily Reckoning.](

EDM Keywords (274)

yukon yesterday years year worried whitelisting weekend weak way war want valuable usual upset upgrade unfortunately understand uncovered type twice truth trump true trends traverse translated took told time thumb tensions techniques surveillance surely supposed suggestions suddenly subscription subscribers submitting stopping stay starting spy spotted spent speak space small slated sky skies size shot shooting shoot share set series sensitive see security secretary say satellites said safety safe right reviewing reveal responded respecting republicans reply rent referring recovered recommendation reading reader reach questions question publications publication provinces protecting prospectus problem probably privacy printed price president power posturing plane performed perform people pentagon payload paying part ounce open one offering odds observe objects object nothing nonsense mosaic months montana monitored money missiles might metallic message meet media matter make mailing mailbox made located link lies licensed letting letter let length learn launched lately known know kind jim issue investors information inform incursions incompetence ignite identified however hit high heard head happen ground gold go gear form following follow finally filled feedback failed fact face exposed expect exiting exit existence ensure engaged end empty employees embarrassment embarrassed emails effect editors editor duty dropped drifting dipped dialed detecting detected dereliction democrats defuse deemed debris death days dakotas covering covered course consulting consent conducted company companies communication committed coming come combined collections coast click claimed claim cia chinese china charge canceled canada called businesses bunch bubble broken bombshell blown blew bird biden believe beijing beautiful bases balloons balloon avoid available author attention asking arrival arguing apparently anything answers answer americans amazing always although along almost allows allowed allow alaska airspace aggressiveness advised advertisements admitted address account 90 2022 2021

Marketing emails from paradigmpressgroup.com

View More
Sent On

17/04/2024

Sent On

17/04/2024

Sent On

17/04/2024

Sent On

17/04/2024

Sent On

17/04/2024

Sent On

17/04/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.