Oval Office: An Insider's View

James talks to Bill O’Reilly… September 24, 2024 [WEBSITE]( | [UNSUBSCRIBE]( What's turning minor disagreements into full-blown culture wars? Here’s what Bill O’Reilly thinks. Oval Office: An Insider's View JAMES ALTUCHER Dear Reader, Are we more polarized now than ever before? Which forgotten president deserves a second look? How has the presidency evolved since America's founding? What's turning minor disagreements into full-blown culture wars? I just had Bill O’Really [on my podcast]( to ask him these questions… and a lot more. Most people don’t know this… Before he was lighting up TV screens, he was a high school history teacher in Florida. Fast forward a few decades, and O'Reilly is now the author of a ton of bestsellers on presidential history and has rubbed elbows with more presidents than a dollar bill. We talked about his new book Confronting the Presidents: No Spin Assessments from Washington to Biden. To kick it off, I asked him: “In all of your research, who did you change your opinion the most about?” His answer? James K. Polk—a name that might not ring too many bells, unless you’re a history buff or once lost a bet on obscure presidents. Forget Thomas Jefferson and the Louisiana Purchase—Polk managed to add the entire Northwest and a sizable chunk of land from Mexico. All this, while sticking to his promise of serving just one term. Bill and I then dove into how the presidency has changed over time. Back in the day, he said, many presidents treated the office like a one-time gig. They weren’t in it for the power and prestige - not as much as today. Guys like Calvin Coolidge and Polk had a checklist, ticked off their goals, and then rode off into the sunset. Compare that to today, where the allure of Air Force One and a lifetime of Secret Service protection can be harder to resist than a 24-hour news cycle. When we moved on to recent presidents, Bill didn’t hold back. JFK, he said, had a vision, especially with his cautious stance on Vietnam. But, says Bill, he lacked courage. Lyndon B. Johnson? “Unbelievably corrupt” and “massively incompetent.” Even Richard Nixon, the man synonymous with political scandal, got some credit from Bill for having a strong foreign policy vision, even if his domestic record is still wading through Watergate. Naturally, the conversation turned to the current political climate, which Bill describes as the second most polarized time in American history, after the Civil War. The culprit? Social media and a lack of journalistic standards. If the 24-hour news cycle was the match, then social media is the kerosene-soaked rag, igniting every minor disagreement into a full-blown culture war. Regarding the upcoming election, Bill was cautious about making predictions. He estimates that there's a significant "middle group" of voters who could be swayed by events in the coming weeks. Throughout our conversation, Bill emphasized the importance of understanding presidential history to make sense of our current political situation. His book aims to provide a candid look at each president, highlighting both their accomplishments and their flaws. He also had some surprising things to say about Obama, Trump, Biden, and Kamala. (Especially Obama.) [Check out the full podcast here](. Also, be sure to check out Davis Wilson’s piece below. Did Intel drop the ball on the AI revolution? Find out below. Read on. The "X" Chip This AI microchip is so powerful…. It’s powering NVIDIA’s success… And the future of AI itself… Which will send the current Wealth Window into OVERDRIVE… Positioning one stock for a 10,000% run in the coming years. [Watch this video for the full details.]( Intel’s at $23/Share... What Happened? DAVIS WILSON For decades, Intel was the world’s most valuable chipmaker. Now it is one-thirtieth the size of Nvidia, one-eighth the size of Broadcom, and roughly half the size of AMD, Qualcomm, and Texas Instruments. In the last few days, the company’s fall from grace has prompted Qualcomm to float merger talks and private equity firm Apollo to reportedly offer $5 billion to shore up the balance sheet. So how did the storied 56-year-old company get to this point? Intel’s Spiral Is A Decade In The Making To understand Intel’s downward spiral, it’s important to understand that Intel primarily produces Central Processing Units (CPUs). Think of a CPU as the head chef in a kitchen. The chef is really good at handling complex tasks one by one, like carefully crafting a dish. The chef focuses on making sure everything is done perfectly, but can only do so much at once. These CPUs are used to power PCs and laptops. Previously, Intel dominated this market. That was until Intel’s 7-nanometer and 10-nanometer chips were significantly delayed in the late 2010s and early 2020s. This opened the door for AMD to steal significant market share. Whereas AMD barely had market share in server CPUs a decade ago, Mercury Research estimates AMD had about 25% of the market as of Q1 2024 – a major blow to Intel’s core business. The “New” Intel In the chip world, most companies don’t actually manufacture their own chips. Nvidia, AMD, Qualcomm, Broadcom and many more use what’s known as the “fabless” model, where they outsource manufacturing to companies like TSMC and Samsung. Intel is unique where they both design and manufacture their own chips. When long-time Intel employee Pat Gelsinger became CEO in early 2021, he decided to double-down on manufacturing. It was an ambitious bet, but the stage seemed to be set in their favor. Rising manufacturing demand has significantly increased wait times at existing manufacturers TSMC and Samsung. Plus, this strategy aligns with the onshoring trend we’ve seen in the aftermath of Covid-19, removing reliance on countries like China and Taiwan (where TSMC is located). Gelsinger initially planned to acquire companies to build out Intel’s manufacturing capabilities. Unfortunately, acquisitions of GlobalFoundries and Tower Semiconductor failed which forced Intel to build out its manufacturing capabilities the old-fashioned way – by spending billions of dollars over many years constructing these highly technical facilities. You can see the double-edged sword here: at the exact moment Intel was bleeding market share in its core CPU division, it began racking up billions of dollars in costs to expand its manufacturing business. The company’s financials certainly took a hit. Both revenue and earnings have declined substantially since the plan was enacted. Intel Missed The AI Revolution Occurring in tandem with Intel’s core business losing market share and the very expensive manufacturing buildout was the fact the company completely underinvested for the AI revolution. While CPUs are a head chef in the kitchen, Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) are like a team of line cooks, and they’re what is powering AI. Instead of handling one task at a time, the line cooks can handle many smaller tasks all at once – like chopping vegetables or grilling burgers. They're fast and efficient at doing repetitive tasks simultaneously, which is why GPUs are great for things like graphics and AI. Nvidia dominates this red-hot market, which is why that stock is up 135% this year. Intel is down 55% this year and currently trades around $23/share. According to Gelsinger, however, this year is supposed to be the “trough” when all of these negative factors converge and the worst gets put in the rearview. As an investor, I support the manufacturing strategy. It’s a “pickaxe and shovel” type playbook during the early stages of AI that also aligns with the onshoring trend we’ve seen in the aftermath of Covid-19. However, it will be years before Intel can compete with TSMC and Samsung. Until the company can show returns on the billions of dollars they’re currently investing and stop the bleeding in its core CPU business, expect the stock to continue trading wildly. Before that can happen, Gelsinger first needs to weigh his options regarding the recent interest from Qualcomm and Apollo. Regards, Davis Wilson For Altucher Confidential Rate this email Like Dislike Thanks for rating this content! Looks like something went wrong. Please try to rate again. Urgent Notice About Your Access We just announced a massive new change to Altucher’s Investment Network, and as one of our loyal readers, we want to make sure you know what’s going on. [Click here]( to secure your access now. ☰ ⊗ [UPDATE PREFERENCES]( [Contact Us]( © 2024 Paradigm Press, LLC. 1001 Cathedral Street, Baltimore, MD 21201. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press, LLC. delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your Altucher Confidential e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from Altucher Confidential, feel free to [click here,]( or manage your newsletter preferences [here.]( Please note: the mailbox associated with this email address is not monitored, so do not reply to this message. We welcome comments or suggestions at feedback@altucherconfidential.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, [contact us here]( or call (844)-731-0984. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We allow the editors of our publications to recommend securities that they own themselves. However, our policy prohibits editors from exiting a personal trade while the recommendation to subscribers is open. In no circumstance may an editor sell a security before subscribers have a fair opportunity to exit. The length of time an editor must wait after subscribers have been advised to exit a play depends on the type of publication. All other employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. Altucher Confidential is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. Please read our [Privacy Statement.]( If you are having trouble receiving your Altucher Confidential subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by [whitelisting Altucher Confidential.](