Newsletter Subject

Nuclear War Just Got Closer

From

paradigmpressgroup.com

Email Address

dr@mb.paradigmpressgroup.com

Sent On

Mon, Aug 19, 2024 09:45 PM

Email Preheader Text

Ukraine Will Get Us All Killed | Nuclear War Just Got Closer Portsmouth, New Hampshire If I?m righ

Ukraine Will Get Us All Killed [The Daily Reckoning] August 19, 2024 [WEBSITE]( | [UNSUBSCRIBE]( Nuclear War Just Got Closer Portsmouth, New Hampshire [Jim Rickards] JIM RICKARDS Dear Reader, For over two years, I’ve been warning about the dangers of escalation between the U.S. and Russia over Ukraine. Well, the U.S. and Russia have now climbed another rung on the escalation ladder that could possibly lead to nuclear war. You probably know by now that Ukraine has invaded Russia in force. Up to six Ukrainian brigades totaling between 10,000-15,000 troops with armored personnel carriers and tanks invaded a lightly defended part of the Russian border. They began to move toward a Russian nuclear power plant near the city of Kursk. The object was to capture the nuclear power plant and hold it hostage. The Russians would not attack to regain the plant because it’s too dangerous to stage a battle in proximity to a nuclear reactor. A repetition of the 1986 Chernobyl disaster when a nuclear reactor in Ukraine near the Belarus border exploded in the worst nuclear accident in history could not be ruled out. Control of a Russian reactor by Ukraine would give Ukraine leverage in forcing peace negotiations with Russia or even destabilizing the Putin regime. This Was a Big Operation The first point to make about this incursion is that it wasn’t simply a cross-border raid by a small unit. 10,000-15,000 men is a significant force. Many believe the attack took Russia by surprise. But the best available information is that Russia knew it was coming and allowed it to happen, laying a trap for Ukraine to fall into. That wouldn’t be a surprise since Russia likely has many moles within the Armed Forces of Ukraine and extensive reconnaissance assets to detect troop movements. Now Ukraine has fallen into the trap. Of course, the world press including the New York Times, the Financial Times, the Economist and the Washington Post called this a “turning point” in the war and a demonstration that the Ukrainian military was capable of surprise attack and could even win the war. It can’t, but the attack did provide a temporary morale boost. [NOW STREAMING: Jim Rickards Emergency Election Briefing]( [Click here for more...]( [Jim Rickards believes Donald J. Trump will win the 2024 election this coming Monday, August 19th.]( If I’m right, and crazy Kamala does what I’m predicting at the Democratic National Convention this week… The next 79 days could be complete and utter chaos in the markets. [Click here now to prepare BEFORE August 19th.]( [Click Here To Learn More]( ‘We Had no Idea!’ The U.S. denies having any advanced knowledge of the attack, but that’s difficult to believe. The U.S. (and NATO overall) is so deeply integrated into Ukraine’s operational planning, it strains credulity to argue that they didn’t know. Ukraine also relies heavily on U.S. reconnaissance imagery and signals intelligence. They likely used U.S.-supplied intelligence to detect weak spots in Russian defenses and which fortifications to bypass. Russia knows that. That means Russia believes the U.S. and its NATO partners helped facilitate a direct attack on Russia, which hasn’t happened since World War II. That’s enormously significant to the Russians. You might say, hey, Russia invaded Ukraine first, so turnabout is fair play. Why shouldn’t Ukraine invade Russia? You might have a point, but it’s not one that Vladimir Putin will appreciate very much. Putin has been careful since day one to call the Ukraine war a “special military operation.” He specifically does not call it a war. You might say, what’s the difference? Well, it’s a lot more than semantics. In Russia, a formal declaration of war represents an important legal threshold. ‘We’re Not Kidding Anymore’ A formal declaration of war means mass conscription and the full mobilization of the Russian economy to support the war effort. It’s certainly true that Russian war production has increased dramatically since the war began, but Putin has avoided a truly wartime economy because he wants to maintain a strong private economy. During World War II, U.S. wartime spending accounted for about half of GDP. In contrast, Russian military spending last year only accounted for about 6% of its GDP. In some ways, Russia is fighting this war with one hand tied behind its back. In fact, many Russians’ main criticism of Putin is that he isn’t doing enough to defeat Ukraine. Will Ukraine’s NATO-sponsored attack on Russia compel Putin to take an even harder line? [Response Requested 1/1000th of an ounce of gold available]( You're being offered a 1/1000th of an ounce of gold when you upgrade your account. It will come in the form of a “Gold Back” - a new type of gold currency that’s starting to spread across America ([click here to view](. [Click here to learn how to claim your new Gold Back Currency<]( [Click Here To Learn More]( I hear that Russian leadership, not just Putin, is furious about Ukraine’s attack on Russia. They want to take off the gloves and crush Ukraine once and for all. We’ll have to see what happens. If Russia does take the gloves off, would the U.S. double down on its efforts to keep Ukraine fighting? If so, the logic of escalation points to direct war with Russia ultimately. And we know where that ends. A Strategic Blunder From a strategic viewpoint, Ukraine’s attack on Russia will prove to be a disaster. Ukraine failed in its objective to capture the Kursk power plant. If they didn’t take it in the first couple of days, they’re not going to take it now. Russia’s surged too many troops into the area. Russia also encircled the Ukrainians and cut off their ability to retreat back to Ukraine. Ukraine has suffered enormous casualties and has lost much of the armor used in the attack. Neither of these losses can be easily replaced. Russia will now systematically destroy the Ukrainian forces offering them a choice between surrender or death. This is the Russian way of war. Ukraine fell into the Russian trap. The attacking forces were Ukraine’s only remaining reserves and some of the best troops that Ukraine had left. Once this battle is done, there will be little standing in the way of Russian troops completing their victories on the battlefront and moving to take what remains of the eastern half of Ukraine. This attack reminds me of the Battle of the Bulge in December 1944, when the Germans were well on their way to losing the war, but could still muster enough forces to launch a last desperate attack on U.S. forces in Belgium. All it ended up doing was wasting German troops and equipment, hastening Germany’s demise. I think this attack will have a similar outcome, which is part of the Russian plan. The Russians will win the war. The only question is, can the U.S. and Russia somehow get off the escalation ladder that’s leading us to nuclear war. Someone’s going to have to blink first, and I doubt that’ll be Putin. Regards, [Jim Rickards] Jim Rickards for The Daily Reckoning P.S. I believe Donald Trump could potentially broker a negotiated settlement between Ukraine and Russia, while a Harris administration would probably keep the war going. So the November election could decide war or peace. As of today, Monday, August 19th, I believe Trump will win the election. But NOT for the reasons you may think. Then what reason? [Click here to see my 2024 emergency election prediction.]( If I’m right, and crazy Kamala does what I’m predicting at the Democratic National Convention this week… The next 79 days could be complete and utter chaos in the markets. But you need to watch my urgent prediction BEFORE midnight tonight. [Click here now to prepare before midnight tonight.]( Thank you for reading The Daily Reckoning! We greatly value your questions and comments. Please send all feedback to [feedback@dailyreckoning.com.](mailto:feedback@dailyreckoning.com) [Jim Rickards][James G. Rickards]( is the editor of Strategic Intelligence. He is an American lawyer, economist, and investment banker with 35 years of experience working in capital markets on Wall Street. He is the author of The New York Times bestsellers Currency Wars and The Death of Money. [Paradigm]( ☰ ⊗ [ARCHIVE]( [ABOUT]( [Contact Us]( © 2024 Paradigm Press, LLC. 1001 Cathedral Street, Baltimore, MD 21201. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press, LLC. delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your The Daily Reckoning e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from The Daily Reckoning, feel free to [click here.]( Please note: the mailbox associated with this email address is not monitored, so do not reply to this message. We welcome comments or suggestions at feedback@dailyreckoning.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, [contact us here]( or call (844)-731-0984. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We allow the editors of our publications to recommend securities that they own themselves. However, our policy prohibits editors from exiting a personal trade while the recommendation to subscribers is open. In no circumstance may an editor sell a security before subscribers have a fair opportunity to exit. The length of time an editor must wait after subscribers have been advised to exit a play depends on the type of publication. All other employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. The Daily Reckoning is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. Please read our [Privacy Statement.]( If you are having trouble receiving your The Daily Reckoning subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by [whitelisting The Daily Reckoning.](

Marketing emails from paradigmpressgroup.com

View More
Sent On

19/10/2024

Sent On

19/10/2024

Sent On

19/10/2024

Sent On

18/10/2024

Sent On

18/10/2024

Sent On

17/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.