Newsletter Subject

AI on the Battlefield

From

paradigmpressgroup.com

Email Address

AltucherConfidential@mb.paradigmpressgroup.com

Sent On

Tue, Aug 13, 2024 09:30 PM

Email Preheader Text

James talks to Chris Kirchhoff. August 13, 2024 | Is the US falling behind? Yes. But we?re also pi

James talks to Chris Kirchhoff. August 13, 2024 [WEBSITE]( | [UNSUBSCRIBE]( Is the US falling behind? Yes. But we’re also pivoting. AI on the Battlefield JAMES ALTUCHER Drones. Not just any drones… Drones you can buy on Amazon. That’s how Hamas got through one of the most sophisticated surveillance systems on Earth. Last week, I was talking to Chris Kirchhoff [on my podcast]( about Hamas. He’s the author of Unit X: How the Pentagon and Silicon Valley are Transforming the Future of War. “These were cheap drones,” he said, “not military grade drones. Drones that you and I would use to film ourselves skateboarding or skiing.” Last October, Hamas used them to knock out Israel’s surveillance. Then, they sent over a thousand paragliders. I wanted to know how it happened. I also wanted to know if the US is prepared to face the new era of low-cost, high-impact warfare. If Israel, with all its cutting-edge defense tech, can get caught off guard like this, what does that say about us? Are we really as invincible as we think, or are we just living off our reputation? “Where is the US failing now?” If anyone knows, it’s Chris. He spent years at the intersection of Silicon Valley and the Pentagon. As a former senior advisor to the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, he now plays a pivotal role in bridging the gap between the U.S. military and the fast-paced tech industry. (Namely through his involvement with initiatives like the Defense Innovation Unit (DIU). We’ll get to that.) His answer was clear: The metrics that used to work - more tanks, faster planes, bigger ships - don’t win wars anymore. Our adversaries have figured out how to sidestep our strengths and exploit our weaknesses with cheap, accessible tech. We talked about a lot of things. We talked about AI. We talked about political challenges. We talked about military vulnerabilities. We talked about how the Pentagon isn’t on Amazon Prime. And we talked about how the US is falling behind. And what it’s doing now to pivot. Before we go there, though, I have a message just for you… Not Everyone Will See This Message I’m going to be 100% honest with you. I emailed you about something yesterday, and - ONLY if you’re seeing this message - I didn’t hear a response from you. As much as I HATE sending multiple emails about the same topic... ...this situation demands it. Here’s why: On August 15th, I’m hosting an event that is unlike anything I’ve ever done. I’m going to be introducing YOU to one of the most successful, and well-connected investors in my rolodex. And I’m not exaggerating about that. He’s known as ‘The Chairman’. That’s all I can say for now. I’ll reveal everything this Thursday. (It has to do with our AI investment research.) [Click here for all the details and to sign up.]( Clicking the link above automatically registers you for Altucher's A-List. By reserving your spot, you will receive event updates and offers. We will not share your email address with anyone. And you can opt-out at any time. [Privacy Policy.]( Secret A.I. Facility To Shock The World! [This A.I. chip]( looks like any other chip… yet I believe it will play a major role in the artificial intelligence boom. It’s currently being mass-produced by the millions as we speak. And you’ll never believe who’s behind these powerful A.I. chips… [Click here now for the full story.]( Cracks in the Armor I’ve always been a bit skeptical. The US military is supposed to be the world’s most advanced fighting force. Yet, every now and then, you hear about some obscure tech from another country, and you start to wonder—are we losing our edge? We all know about the flashy tech—drones, AI, cyber weapons. But here’s the thing: flashy doesn’t always mean effective. “It’s important to step back in time and to realize that, just like anything, the technology that drives military superiority ebbs and flows,” said Chris. Cavalry once ruled the battlefield. Then came World War I—tanks took over. Battleships dominated that war, but World War II belonged to aircraft carriers. Another HUGE shift. Now, our adversaries are building systems specifically designed to defeat our strengths. “Just a few weeks ago,” said Chris, "the Ukrainians had to withdraw from the front lines all 31 of the M1A1 Abrams battle tanks that the U.S. had given the Ukrainian military because more than a quarter of them had been destroyed by Russian kamikaze drones.” This is the most advanced tank in the US arsenal. “In 2016, if you had gone up to any four-star general in the U.S. military and said, I would bet you a steak dinner that in 10 years drones are going to be able to defeat tanks, they would say, you're on, you know, I'll bet you 10 steak dinners.” Today? “No four-star general would take that bet.” Your iPhone vs. F-35s Sure, we’ve got the F-35s, these flying supercomputers capable of taking down anything in the sky. But these planes are a product of a bygone era when big, expensive, and complex were the hallmarks of military power. Now, we’re in a different game, one where agility and adaptability are key. “What happens in the military-industrial complex isn't by itself crazy or without logic,” Chris explained. It’s just that the world is flat… the microelectronics market is globally distributed. The consumer tech ecosystem is running laps around the military. “Our adversaries are now able to buy a lot of the same technology the US military is buying.” By the way, back during the Cold War this wasn’t true. DARPA had in their closet technology that was six or seven generations more advanced than what people used on a daily basis. Now? It’s the opposite: “The iPhones that we carry around in our pockets are actually far more advanced than the processor in the F-35 because the consumer technology ecosystem has grown so much larger.” The Politics of War That’s where Chris and his work at the Defense Innovation Unit comes in. The DIU is a Pentagon organization created to bridge the gap between the U.S. military and Silicon Valley's fast-paced tech industry. Its primary role is to scout, vet, and bring commercial technology into the military’s operations. Also, there’s the Pentagon’s new Replicator Initiative, which focuses on developing low-cost, autonomous weapons systems. The goal is to create a large number of inexpensive, yet effective, systems that can be produced rapidly and in large quantities to overwhelm adversaries. But the question remains: is it enough? One of the most interesting parts of our conversation was the political challenge. It’s one thing to know what needs to be done, and it’s another to actually do it. Shutting down tank factories and reallocating resources towards AI and autonomous systems isn’t just a military decision; it’s a political one. There are entire communities dependent on these factories. You can’t just pull the plug without facing backlash. Chris highlighted how Congress is starting to come around, slowly, but surely. They’ve even codified the Defense Innovation Unit’s mission into law, backing it with a billion-dollar budget. But this is just the beginning. They’re up against bureaucracy, against tradition, and against the inertia that comes with being the world’s leading superpower. The Future of War So, where does this leave us? Are we falling behind? Yes, in some ways, we are. But we’re also pivoting. The future of warfare won’t be about who has the most tanks or the fastest jets; it’ll be about who can innovate the quickest, who can adapt to new threats, and who can integrate new technologies most effectively. Chris’s perspective is clear: we’re at a crossroads. The US can’t afford to rest on its laurels. We’ve got the talent, the resources, and the will, but we need to align them with the realities of modern warfare. If we don’t, we risk becoming a relic of the past, outpaced by nations willing to take risks and embrace the future. [Check out the full podcast here.]( Until next time, James Altucher For Altucher Confidential Rate this email Like Dislike Thanks for rating this content! Looks like something went wrong. Please try to rate again. Five Cryptos For Less Than $4 With 100X Potential After months of research, James Altucher has compiled a list of his top 6 cryptos, and 5 of them trade for less than $4. That means almost anyone can invest today and be set up for potentially life-changing wealth in the next 12 to 18 months. But understand, these coins are poised to soar much higher than $4 any day now, and once that happens, you will have lost your shot at life-changing wealth. DO NOT DELAY.[Click here to learn about these 6 coins now.]( ☰ ⊗ [ARCHIVE]( [ABOUT]( [Contact Us]( © 2024 Paradigm Press, LLC. 1001 Cathedral Street, Baltimore, MD 21201. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press, LLC. delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your Altucher Confidential e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from Altucher Confidential, feel free to [click here.]( Please note: the mailbox associated with this email address is not monitored, so do not reply to this message. We welcome comments or suggestions at feedback@altucherconfidential.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, [contact us here]( or call (844)-731-0984. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We allow the editors of our publications to recommend securities that they own themselves. However, our policy prohibits editors from exiting a personal trade while the recommendation to subscribers is open. In no circumstance may an editor sell a security before subscribers have a fair opportunity to exit. The length of time an editor must wait after subscribers have been advised to exit a play depends on the type of publication. All other employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. Altucher Confidential is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. Please read our [Privacy Statement.]( If you are having trouble receiving your Altucher Confidential subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by [whitelisting Altucher Confidential.](

EDM Keywords (245)

world work wonder withdraw weaknesses ways warfare war wanted used us understand ukrainians type transforming tradition trade topic time thursday though think things technology tanks talking talked talent taking surveillance surely supposed suggestions successful subscribers submitting strengths starting start staff spot speak sky skateboarding six sign sidestep shutting shot shock share set sent seeing see security say said ruled rolodex reviewing rest response respecting resources reserving reputation reply rent relic recommendation really realize realities rating rate quickest questions quarter pull publications publication protecting prospectus product processor privacy printed prepared powerful politics poised podcast pockets plays play planes pivot perspective pentagon opt opposite open one offers needs need much months monitored mission millions military metrics message mailing mailbox made lot lost losing living list link licensed letter less length learn laurels known know knock key israel iphones involvement invincible introducing intersection innovate inertia important however hosting hear happens happened hamas hallmarks grown got gone going goal go given get gap future following focuses flat film figured feedback factories facility face exploit exiting exit exaggerating everyone event ensure end employees embrace emailed editors edge done diu details destroyed defeat deemed day currently crossroads create crazy conversation consulting consent congress complex compiled communication committed comes coins clicking click clear chris chairman buying buy bureaucracy bridging bridge bet believe behind beginning battlefield author arrival armor archive anything anyone answer another amazon always altucher allow align ai agility afford advised advertisements adversaries advanced address adaptability adapt actually account able 31 2016

Marketing emails from paradigmpressgroup.com

View More
Sent On

19/10/2024

Sent On

19/10/2024

Sent On

19/10/2024

Sent On

18/10/2024

Sent On

18/10/2024

Sent On

17/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.