Newsletter Subject

What We the People Owe

From

paradigmpressgroup.com

Email Address

dr@mb.paradigmpressgroup.com

Sent On

Wed, Jul 31, 2024 10:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

$35 Trillion in Hock | What We the People Owe Annapolis, Maryland The bull market is gearing up for

$35 Trillion in Hock [The Daily Reckoning] July 31, 2024 [WEBSITE]( | [UNSUBSCRIBE]( What We the People Owe Annapolis, Maryland [Brian Maher] BRIAN MAHER Dear Reader, Donald Trump pledges to Make America Great Again. Kamala Harris pledges… something. Yet she believes her policies will work the identical effect. We are skeptical — deeply — that either is equal to the task. The United States’ debt-to-GDP ratio exceeds 120%. Hard evidence indicates that nations with ratios exceeding 90% are destined to gutter. They are far too burdened by debt to get along much. Debt is an impossible millstone upon their straining necks. United States national debt recently scaled $35 trillion. Combined United States debt — public and private — exceeds $101 trillion. $101 trillion! Then There’s the Interest Meantime, the interest on its monstrous debts begins to devour its innards. The Congressional Budget Office projects that debt service will scale 3.2% of the United States economy next year. Only once before has debt service bulked so large — in 1991. That bill was largely the legacy of the elevated interest rates of the late 1970s. What is our excuse today? None exists. Explains the Peter G. Peterson Foundation: In the past, increases in deficits and the debt were associated with temporary or one-time episodes, such as war or economic downturns. Now, however, deficits have become the norm due to the structural mismatch between federal spending and revenues. CBO estimates that the gap will continue to grow; federal spending is projected to grow from 23.1% of GDP in 2024 to 27.9% by 2054, while revenues would only climb from 17.5% of GDP in 2024 to 18.8% in 2054. It Won’t Change Under Trump Would a President Trump declare a halt — and draw blue lines across the federal budget? We do not believe he would. The fellow spent extravagantly and luxuriously in his initial term… even prior to the plague. The frugal ghost of Calvin Coolidge is unlikely to invade him next time. Poor Cal’s shade has been absent from 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. since the Great Depression. It will remain absent from 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. And the Republican Party — that Mr. Trump would theoretically represent — long ago exorcized Cal’s penny-pinching spirit. It likes to get elected. It therefore likes to spend money. [TARGETING: 1,000% in 1 Year]( [click here for more...]( The bull market is gearing up for its second wave. And it stands to benefit a new generation of small “SUPERSTOCKS” more than any other. These are the stocks that are primed for extreme growth. And James has narrowed it all down to 5 elite picks with huge profit potential. Everything has been gearing up for this moment. These SUPERSTOCKS will define the second half of 2024 and beyond. But time’s running out. This Wednesday, an urgent announcement from the U.S. government will light the spark. After that, it will be too late to take action. [I’m In! Show Me The Full Details Now]( Harris Would Be Even Worse Meantime, the sitting vice president, la Harris, represents what has accurately been labeled “the party of government.” That is of course the Democratic Party. Would a Democratic president sever the purse strings that fund government? The question is itself the answer. If elected, Ms. Harris would only spend. She would not cut. In brief: Government will spend under either regency, Mr. Trump or Ms. Harris. The former may purchase greater quantities of guns than butter… while the latter may purchase greater quantities of butter than guns. Yet it makes no nevermind. The results will equal. Just No Political Will “Even awful fiscal problems are fixable with the right steps,” says Daily Reckoning contributor Jeffrey Tucker, adding: The problem is that the steps absolutely must include dramatic spending cuts, meaning 1–2% of GDP for starters or about $280–500 billion, which is not even on the table. “Not even on the table,” Jeffrey says. Nor will dramatic spending cuts appear upon the table. Here Jeffrey lowers his ax upon the problem’s root: The trouble is that there is very little political will in this country right now to cut the budget. And by cut, again, I don’t mean cuts in the rate of increase, like Washington language always says. I mean real cuts with whole agencies being made to disappear, dozens of them instantly. Doing this is entirely possible with political will. But I’ve yet to see any evidence that such will exists in the United States today. You see no evidence of the political will because none exists. Yet politicians do not bear sole responsibility… Look in the Mirror, Citizen It is easy to indict the politician, it is true. It is easy to say this rascal has sunk the nation $35 trillion in debt. Yet as we have argued before: If we haul the politician into the dock… We the People must go with him. That is because the politician is simply We the People’s mirror. Could politicians humbug us into a $35 trillion debt absent our knowledge — or consent? Only under a very, very strange species of democracy. We like being a big deal in this world. We therefore demand a glistening military machine with every whistle and bell. [Urgent Publisher Warning]( Hi, I’m Matt Insley. I’m the Publisher at Paradigm Press. Today, I have [bad news to share]( regarding the future of Jim Rickards’ newsletter. [Click Here Now For My Announcement]( We also like being tickled and wooed. Thus we demand heaping doses of Social Security… Medicare… a Rolls-Royce education… and a million gaudy baubles. Yet we do not wish to pay for them in full. Gimme, gimme, we bark from one corner of our mouths. But don’t raise my taxes, we bellow from the other. “Democracy in Action” We claim we are heart and soul for limited government. Yet are we simply heart and soul for ourselves? Give me that tax break, says the one. No, give it to me, says the other. You can both go scratching, says the third. I deserve it more. A fourth files a claim of his own. Meantime, the hard-luck farmer wants his back scratched. The hard-pressed businessman wants his belly rubbed. The hard-worked teacher wants her apple. Millions more are hard at the business. All scheme to work the angles, to get a bucket in the stream, to get a snout in the trough… to catch a penny. It is the triumph of “special interests” when the other fellow gets his — when his parsnips are buttered. Yet it is “democracy in action” when our own parsnips are buttered. “Every Nation Gets the Government It Deserves” Your editor does not claim a moral pristinity. He does not sit in judgment — or stand in judgment. As a scientist of American democracy, he merely observes… and studies. And as he has conceded before, he himself has parsnips. And as anyone, he enjoys a good buttering of them. Why not get when the getting is there to be gotten? If Americans en masse opted to decline the offering, your editor would fall in with them… and reject the offer. He would enlist as a dutiful member of the regiment, willingly broken to the common harness. Yet Americans en masse will not decline the offering. Why then should he? Why should you? “Every nation gets the government it deserves,” said 18th-century French philosopher Joseph de Maistre. The United States has the government it deserves… Regards, [Brian Maher] Brian Maher Managing Editor, The Daily Reckoning [feedback@dailyreckoning.com.](mailto:feedback@dailyreckoning.com) Editor’s note: In the last month, money has been bleeding out of some of the market’s largest stocks… And piling into some of the market’s smallest. Why? Because small caps have been preparing for [a 50-year financial event.]( An event that took place at 2 p.m. ET today. Already, some of the smartest players on Wall Street have started to get ahead of this. Entrepreneur James Altucher is a small-cap specialist and has been preparing for this moment for months. In fact, just days ago he held [an urgent financial summit telling you the EXACT steps you need to take to prepare.]( If you have any money in the U.S. stock market, this is a matter of vital importance. And if you hold the RIGHT stocks, this is a massive opportunity. James says the right stocks could surge 1,000% in the next year. It’ll be hard to argue once you see the evidence for yourself. To make sure you’re on the right side of history, [go here right now]( and hear what James says. But you need to hurry because the catalyst has already happened. Thank you for reading The Daily Reckoning! We greatly value your questions and comments. Please send all feedback to [feedback@dailyreckoning.com.](mailto:feedback@dailyreckoning.com) [Brian Maher] [Brian Maher]( is the Daily Reckoning's Managing Editor. Before signing on to Agora Financial, he was an independent researcher and writer who covered economics, politics and international affairs. His work has appeared in the Asia Times and other news outlets around the world. He holds a Master's degree in Defense & Strategic Studies. [Paradigm]( ☰ ⊗ [ARCHIVE]( [ABOUT]( [Contact Us]( © 2024 Paradigm Press, LLC. 1001 Cathedral Street, Baltimore, MD 21201. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press, LLC. delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your The Daily Reckoning e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from The Daily Reckoning, feel free to [click here.]( Please note: the mailbox associated with this email address is not monitored, so do not reply to this message. We welcome comments or suggestions at feedback@dailyreckoning.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, [contact us here]( or call (844)-731-0984. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We allow the editors of our publications to recommend securities that they own themselves. However, our policy prohibits editors from exiting a personal trade while the recommendation to subscribers is open. In no circumstance may an editor sell a security before subscribers have a fair opportunity to exit. The length of time an editor must wait after subscribers have been advised to exit a play depends on the type of publication. All other employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. The Daily Reckoning is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. Please read our [Privacy Statement.]( If you are having trouble receiving your The Daily Reckoning subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by [whitelisting The Daily Reckoning.](

EDM Keywords (237)

yet writer would world work wish whitelisting wednesday war unlikely type true trough trouble triumph time tickled third temporary taxes task take table superstocks sunk suggestions subscribers submitting studies stream stocks starters started stands stand spend speak spark soul snout smallest sit simply signing show share shade see security scientist scheme says say running root right reviewing results respecting reply rent reject recommendation reading rate rascal raise questions question publisher publications publication protecting prospectus projected problem privacy printed primed preparing prepare politician political policies plague piling people penny pay party parsnips open one offering offer note nevermind need nations narrowed mouths months monitored money moment message meantime matter master market makes mailing mailbox made luxuriously likes like light licensed letter length legacy late largely large labeled knowledge judgment james invade interest instantly innards indict hurry however holds hold hock held heart hear haul hard halt gutter guns grow government gotten give getting get gearing gdp gap future following fixable feedback far fact exiting exit exists evidence event even equal ensure enjoys end employees either editors editor easy dock devour destined deserves deserve democracy degree define deficits deemed decline debt cut course continue consulting consent conceded company communication committed climb click claim change catch catalyst butter business burdened budget bucket bleeding bill beyond benefit bellow believes believe become bark associated arrival argued argue appeared anyone answer announcement angles allow advised advertisements address action accurately account absent 2054 2024 1991

Marketing emails from paradigmpressgroup.com

View More
Sent On

19/10/2024

Sent On

19/10/2024

Sent On

19/10/2024

Sent On

18/10/2024

Sent On

18/10/2024

Sent On

17/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.