Newsletter Subject

Is This Crypto’s Big Moment? Or Big Breakdown?

From

paradigmpressgroup.com

Email Address

dr@mb.paradigmpressgroup.com

Sent On

Tue, Jul 9, 2024 01:56 PM

Email Preheader Text

Another crossroads for Bitcoin during a year of hype and hope? | Is This Crypto?s Big Moment? Or

Another crossroads for Bitcoin during a year of hype and hope… [Morning Reckoning] July 09, 2024 [WEBSITE]( | [UNSUBSCRIBE]( Is This Crypto’s Big Moment? Or Big Breakdown? Baltimore, Maryland July 09, 2024 [Greg Guenthner] GREG GUENTHNER Good Morning Reader, Instead of a sizzling summer rally, crypto once again finds itself at a crossroads. The year began with hope and excitement. Bitcoin had just led stocks off their lows during the fourth-quarter melt-up rally, gaining more than 60% off its October lows. Crypto bulls were giddy as two big developments appeared on the horizon: the impending Bitcoin ETF approvals – courtesy of the Securities and Exchange Commission – and the halving. Both were seen as potentially transformational events that had the potential to spark the next leg of an already red-hot rally, finally pushing Bitcoin over the hump on the road to $100,000. But, of course, it all didn’t play out as smoothly as everyone thought. For a while, the bulls enjoyed near-perfect trading conditions. The stars aligned for Bitcoin during the first quarter as the ETFs earned approvals in January. Following a quick reset, Bitcoin launched higher, rallying 70% by March, and nearly 160% over the trailing 12 months. Bitcoin finally posted a new high in March after eclipsing $73,000, its first all-time high following the ugly “crypto winter” bear market that began in early 2022. Perhaps even more impressive was the fact that Bitcoin managed to gain more than 350% off its bear market lows. And with the halving in sight, bullish predictions got even bolder. Just how high could crypto rise by the end of the year? Was $150,000 a ridiculous target? What about $175,000? [Send Me Your Mailing Address!]( [Click here to learn more]( What I’m holding in my hands is the “most dangerous book” in America right now. It paints a grim picture of our country’s future just a few years from now…in 2029. But I’m offering to send you a copy for free today as a way to help prepare you for what could happen next. [Click here now to see how to claim your copy.]( [LEARN MORE]( Unfortunately, this is exactly when Bitcoin started to run out of steam. Nearly four months have passed since those all-time highs printed. Since this high water mark, Bitcoin’s pops and drops have been confined to a wide trading range of roughly between $57K - $72K. The halving came and went in late April, but it failed to spark a major rally right away. Bitcoin did manage to kickstart a fresh leg higher in May, yet it did not extend beyond $70K not once, but twice over the next six weeks. Since the early June retest, Bitcoin endured a slow retreat back to the bottom of its wide trading range. One failed bounce at $60K was all the bears needed to trigger a quick breakdown. This leaves Bitcoin in an uncomfortable position as it teeters in no-man’s land, a cool 25% off those all-time highs set back in March. More importantly, Bitcoin has lost a critical support level as it falls to prices not seen since February. As the crypto-HODLers lick their wounds, we should take a moment to discuss what the price action is revealing – and try to make some educated guesses as to what the next few weeks and months have in store for Bitcoin. First, it’s important to recognize that $60K was a big, obvious level for Bitcoin. We need to respect the breakdown and give the bears the benefit of the doubt until the situation improves. Not only was $60K a clear, horizontal support level – it also happens to be where we’ll find Bitcoin’s rising 200-day moving average (not pictured). While I don’t use moving average breaks as sell signals, it’s worth noting that the last time Bitcoin broke below a rising200-day moving average was August 2023. It took two months of sideways action before it reclaimed those levels. This was also part of a bigger consolidation pattern for Bitcoin – one that took nearly seven months to play out. A best-case scenario for the bulls that doesn’t involve an immediate recovery would be a similar sideways consolidation to what we witnessed last year. The sideways trend in 2023 had its fair share of rallies and dips, yet never got to a point that would have warned of a bigger breakdown (Bitcoin never fell back below $25K following the March rally). Taking a more bearish view, I could also see Bitcoin tumbling back to the $43K-$44K range, which was an area that acted as resistance back in December - January. If this scenario were to play out, I suspect we would have to endure a longer drawdown period before expecting crypto to reset for its next bull run. Another point for the bears is the complete failure of the halving to generate any sustained positive momentum. We’ve discussed the halving track record before since the past 3 halving events have led to a massive run-up in price. Yes, this is a ridiculously small sample size. But I did like our chances to at least see some positive follow-through following the event in April. Instead, all we got was more chop. As for how to react right now, I think it’s important to note that while shorter-term trends have turned bearish, I doubt crypto is completely broken. Instead, it probably just needs time to regroup. Whether this takes three weeks, three months, or longer remains to be seen. This isn’t a dip I’m rushing to buy. Not yet! Crypto is like any other over-hyped asset. No one wanted to buy Bitcoin as it languished below $20K for three months in late 2022. But everyone wanted in on the action as it roared back above $60K earlier this year. Now, these bulls that were late to the party are going to have to try to wait out this corrective action. We’ll soon see just how resilient these speculators can be… Best, [Greg Guenthner] Greg Guenthner Contributing Editor, Morning Reckoning feedback@dailyreckoning.com [Ex-CIA Insider: “Prepare for Election Meltdown”]( [Click here to learn more]( After correctly predicting the Great Recession of 2008, Trump’s 2016 Election and the Covid Crisis of 2020… Former advisor to the CIA, the Pentagon and the White House Jim Rickards… Is now warning everyday patriots like you to prepare for a historic election meltdown. [Click here to learn the five steps you need to take because things are about to get ugly](. [LEARN MORE]( In Case You Missed It… The Byzantine Blueprint: A Guide for America’s Monetary Revival Sean Ring, Editor [Sean Ring] SEAN RING Dear Reader, The doom and gloom surrounding the Presidential race is both undeniable and justified. America seems tapped out. It’s out of money. It has lost the moral high ground. It resorts to coercion to keep its allies – or rather, vassal states – in line. And it prints money to cover its lies. There’s a reason the Founding Fathers wrote hard money into the Constitution. Article 1, Section 10 of the Constitution reads as follows: No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility. The Fathers knew that the new government wouldn’t succeed for very long with elastic fiat paper money. Heck, “not worth a Continental” became a saying soon after the Continental Congress began issuing Continental notes. From [AIER]( In 1775, practically at the outset of hostilities, the Continental Congress authorized an issue of $2 million in paper money. By the end of 1776, $25 million was in circulation, already at a 30 percent discount relative to silver. By the end of 1777, $38 million was in circulation, at a 70 percent discount relative to silver. By the end of 1779, $192 million was in circulation, and $1 in paper money was worth only 1 or 2¢ in silver. The states were issuing their own paper money, contributing to the inflation. So, from our own history, we know elastic currencies all go to their intrinsic value: zero. And we even know how to get out of the mess: by making gold and silver legal tender. But in these dark times, it’s worth learning how another empire bought itself another 700 years. We don’t concentrate too much on that empire in our history classes, much to our detriment. The Byzantine Empire has much to teach us, particularly about how to get out of an elastic currency hole. The Byzantine Empire offers a critical case study of the effective restoration of economic stability through monetary reform. As the United States grapples with the consequences of its long experiment with elastic money, it’s worth examining how the Byzantines saved themselves from similar turmoil. This historical blueprint could provide a roadmap for America to reclaim financial integrity and stability. But first, let’s review why elastic fiat paper money is a bad thing. Problems with Elastic Money One of the most significant risks of elastic money is inflation. As the money supply increases, the value of money decreases, leading to higher prices for goods and services. We still haven’t recovered from Bidenflation in 2022 and may never do so. With no tangible value backing it, fiat currency is susceptible to devaluation. This devaluation erodes savings and diminishes purchasing power. The dollar has lost 97% of its purchasing power since the Federal Reserve came into being in 1913. The ability to print money can lead to fiscal irresponsibility. Governments may finance deficits and debt through money creation rather than sound economic policies, leading to long-term economic instability. You’re living through a case study in fiscal dominance, which is when a legislature handcuffs a central bank from doing its rightful job of raising rates and forces the bank to buy the government’s debt. Now, let’s go back in time to see how the Byzantines made a mistake and corrected it. The Byzantine Example: From Crisis to Stability A Brief History of Byzantine Currency The Byzantine Empire, which arose from the Eastern Roman Empire, initially continued the Roman tradition of solid gold coinage with the solidus. However, by the 7th century, the empire faced severe economic pressures: invasions, plagues, and internal strife. These challenges led to the debasement of their currency. The once-reliable gold solidus became increasingly adulterated with lesser metals, undermining trust in the currency and destabilizing the economy. By the 10th century, the Byzantines had realized the perils of a debased currency and initiated a series of reforms. Under the leadership of emperors like Constantine VII, the gold content of the nomisma (the Greek term for the solidus) was restored to its former purity. This move re-established the currency’s integrity, stabilized the economy, and restored trust both domestically and internationally. The Byzantine Reforms The Byzantines recommitted to a high gold content in their primary coinage, re-establishing the nomisma as a coin of significant value and reliability. Byzantine rulers enforced strict controls to maintain the gold content, preventing future debasement. With a stable and trustworthy currency, the Byzantine economy flourished. Trade expanded, and economic confidence was restored, leading to several centuries of relative prosperity. The answer is quite simple, but not easy. Get America back on the gold standard and stop printing its way out of trouble. Money has to be reliable and trustworthy. The American Experiment with Elastic Money The United States’ monetary policy has undergone significant transformations, especially since the abandonment of the gold standard with the Nixon Shock in 1971. This shift marked the beginning of the elastic money era, characterized by the Federal Reserve’s ability to expand and contract the money supply at will. While this system offers flexibility in responding to economic crises, it also presents risks, including inflation, currency devaluation, and loss of fiscal discipline. We’ve experienced all these things in the past few years. Learning from the Byzantines: Steps for U.S. Monetary Reform First Step: Reestablish a Hard Money Standard The first step for the United States is to reestablish a hard money standard, akin to the Byzantine return to the gold nomisma. This could be done in one of two ways. Pegging the U.S. dollar to a fixed quantity of gold would limit the Federal Reserve’s ability to print money indiscriminately. This move would stabilize the currency and restore confidence domestically and internationally. If returning to the gold standard is politically or practically unfeasible, the U.S. could introduce a new gold-backed currency alongside the existing dollar. This dual system would allow market forces to determine the preferred medium of exchange. Second Step: Implementing Strict Monetary Controls Just as the Byzantines enforced strict controls to maintain the gold content of their coinage, the U.S. would need robust mechanisms to uphold the integrity of its hard money standard. The U.S. must establish an independent monetary authority to oversee the implementation and maintenance of the hard money standard. This body should operate free from political influence to ensure objective decision-making. Finally, listen to Ron Paul’s excellent advice: conducting regular audits and transparent reporting on gold reserves and monetary policy would foster trust and accountability. Third Step: Fiscal Discipline and Economic Policy Monetary reform must be accompanied by sound fiscal policies to ensure long-term economic stability. The U.S. must reduce fiscal deficits through prudent spending and efficient tax policies. This move would complement the hard money standard by reducing the need for debt financing through money creation. It must also create tax incentives for savings and investment that would support economic growth and stability. A stable currency would naturally encourage these behaviors by preserving the value of savings. Fourth Step: Restoring Confidence and Encouraging Trade Hopefully, this step takes care of itself. A stable, gold-backed currency would restore confidence in the U.S. dollar, encouraging domestic and international trade. With a trustworthy currency, consumers and businesses would be more likely to engage in long-term planning and investment, driving economic growth. A gold-backed dollar would be attractive in international markets, potentially becoming the preferred currency for global trade. This move would enhance the U.S. position in the global economy and increase demand for the dollar. Wrap Up The Byzantine Empire’s return to hard money offers valuable lessons for the United States. By restoring the integrity of their currency, the Byzantines stabilized their economy and laid the foundation for centuries of prosperity. The U.S. can replicate this success by committing to a hard money standard and implementing complementary fiscal and economic policies. The United States stands at a crossroads. The experiment with elastic money has yielded the current undesirable state, and the risks of continuing on this path are becoming increasingly evident. By learning from the Byzantine Empire and returning to a hard money standard, the U.S. can restore economic stability, control inflation, and foster long-term prosperity. The path forward requires courage and discipline, but the rewards are substantial. A stable, trustworthy currency would benefit all Americans, preserving the value of their hard-earned money and fostering a more robust and resilient economy. The Byzantine blueprint is a proven model, and it’s time for the United States to embrace it. By adopting these reforms, the U.S. can overcome the economic challenges posed by elastic money and secure a stable and prosperous future for posterity. And that’s something to celebrate. Have a wonderful 4th! All the best, [Sean Ring] Sean Ring Contributing Editor, The Morning Reckoning feedback@dailyreckoning.com X (formerly Twitter): [@seaniechaos]( Thank you for reading The Morning Reckoning! We greatly value your questions and comments. Please send all feedback to [feedback@dailyreckoning.com.](mailto:dr@dailyreckoning.com) [Greg Guenthner] [Greg Guenthner, CMT,]( is chief strategist at Forge Research Group. He has spent the better part of the past two decades developing long-term and short-term strategies with a single goal in mind: to help everyday investors generate outstanding returns and control their financial futures. Greg’s charts, analysis, and insights have appeared in Marketwatch, Forbes, Yahoo Finance, and many other financial publications. [Paradigm]( ☰ ⊗ [ARCHIVE]( [ABOUT]( [Contact Us]( © 2024 Paradigm Press, LLC. 1001 Cathedral Street, Baltimore, MD 21201. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press, LLC. delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your The Daily Reckoning e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from The Daily Reckoning, feel free to [click here.]( Please note: the mailbox associated with this email address is not monitored, so do not reply to this message. We welcome comments or suggestions at feedback@dailyreckoning.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, [contact us here]( or call (844)-731-0984. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We allow the editors of our publications to recommend securities that they own themselves. However, our policy prohibits editors from exiting a personal trade while the recommendation to subscribers is open. In no circumstance may an editor sell a security before subscribers have a fair opportunity to exit. The length of time an editor must wait after subscribers have been advised to exit a play depends on the type of publication. All other employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. The Daily Reckoning is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. Please read our [Privacy Statement.]( If you are having trouble receiving your The Daily Reckoning subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by [whitelisting The Daily Reckoning.](

EDM Keywords (344)

yielded years year wounds would worth whitelisting went weeks way warned wait value uphold unfortunately undeniable type twice try trustworthy trigger title time think things thing tender teeters take suspect susceptible suggestions success succeed substantial subscribers submitting store still states stable stability spent speculators speak spark something solidus smoothly since silver share services series send seen see security securities secure scenario savings rushing run roughly robust roadmap road risks rewards reviewing review revealing returning return restoring restored responding respecting respect resorts resilient reset reply replicate rent reliable reforms reestablish reducing recovered recommendation recognize reclaimed reason realized reading rallies questions publications publication protecting prosperity prospectus probably privacy printed prices preserving prepare potential posterity position pops politically point play pictured perils pentagon payment path past party paints oversee overcome outset open one offering obligation note nomisma nobility next need much move months monitored money moment mistake missed mind message mess marque march many manage man make maintenance maintain mailing mailbox made lows lost loss long living line likely like lies licensed levels letter let length led learning learn leadership lead late languished land laid kickstart keep issuing issue involve investment internationally integrity insights initiated inflation impressive important implementation hype hump however hostilities horizon hope holding history hands halving guide grant government got goods gold going go give giddy get generate gain future foundation fostering forces follows following first finds feedback falls failed fact experiment experienced expand exiting exit exactly event establishing established ensure engage endure end employees empire embrace editors economy drops doubt doom done domestically dollar discussed discuss discipline dip devaluation detriment determine destabilizing deemed debt debasement currency crypto crossroads crisis cover course country could corrected copy control contracts contract continuing consulting consequences consent confined concentrate company communication committing committed coinage coin coercion click claim circulation cia chop chances centuries celebrate case byzantines buy bulls breakdown bottom body bitcoin bill bidenflation benefit behaviors beginning began bears bank attractive arrival arose area appeared answer america allow allies aier advised advertisements adopting address action acted account accompanied ability abandonment 60k 60 350 20k 2029 2023 2022 1971 1913

Marketing emails from paradigmpressgroup.com

View More
Sent On

19/10/2024

Sent On

19/10/2024

Sent On

19/10/2024

Sent On

18/10/2024

Sent On

18/10/2024

Sent On

17/10/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.