Newsletter Subject
The GOODEST Weekend!
From
paradigmpressgroup.com
Email Address
rude@mb.paradigmpressgroup.com
Sent On
Mon, Jul 8, 2024 11:01 AM
Email Preheader Text
Between Biden?s English, Starmer?s British, and Macron?s French, we?re in for a rough couple
HTML
Between Biden’s English, Starmer’s British, and Macron’s French, we’re in for a rough couple of years. July 08, 2024 [WEBSITE]( | [UNSUBSCRIBE]( The GOODEST Weekend! SEAN
RING Dear Reader, I woke up Saturday morning, anxious to get to a party. Micah’s friend, Lucca, was turning 6. Lucca’s parents, Angelo and Aline, are our good friends and always throw great parties. And, of course, they would, as they’re Brazilian by birth. Angelo is Italian by blood, like me, and moved his family to Italy about the same time we did. But as I was getting dressed for the party, Iowa Michael messaged me this: Have a GOODEST Day!
ððð¥ðð Michael is one of the smartest guys I know, so I knew this wasn’t a grammatical error on his part. It was a code, and I was meant to decipher it. I thought I’d sit on it for a while, and the answer would come to me. The party was wonderful. There were lots of kids, pizza, and beer. Pam had generously offered to drive, so I was free to tie one on with the other dads. We were a happy, soused bunch. At the party, we found out that my Argentinian-Italian friend Luchiano is probably the cousin of my native Italian friend Alessandro. Both have grandmothers from Nusco, about 100 kilometers east of Naples. Though I don’t think they look much alike, they’re both tall, dark, and handsome. And their sons are already good athletes. At that happy point, I noticed it was 8:30 pm, though it wasn’t dark yet. I got my phone out of my pocket and wrote to Michael: Ok, I’ve been trying to figure that out all day. I still don’t get it. What’s goodest? Michael, who had thought I read the headlines that Saturday, mercifully - if you can call it that - sent me this link: Credit: [Zero Hedge]( If you haven’t watched the entire puff-piece interview with George “Steffi” Stephanopoulos, you can watch that salient bit here. Credit: [@Geiger_Capital]( If you’re blowing softball interviews with Steffi, it’s time to hang it up. [ Strange and Powerful AI Project Revealed]( Jim Rickards was recently passed some urgent new intelligence involving a $10 million A.I. project… That could have a massive and direct impact on your life. Everything you need to know is in this 2-minute AI briefing. [Click here to play his urgent message now.]( [Click Here To Learn More]( There Are Errors and There Are Errors Lest you think I’m being a grammar snob, let’s be clear. On June 27th, I published this article: To my everlasting shame, I didn’t catch my error. And spell check won’t catch that, either. I wasn’t even aware of it until I received this hilarious email from a valued colleague: You mean Miners. From the headline, I thought you might be writing about Joe Biden sniffing little girls. I died a thousand deaths when I read that. Woe was me. But there’s a big difference between Joke Biden and me: the red button on my Lenovo ThinkPad won’t even launch an Internet browser. However, the red button in front of him will turn our little blue planet into a rotating nugget of charcoal. And it gets better: the man who says “Democracy is on the ballot” now says [only God himself can remove him from the presidential campaign](. If I were ole Joe, to be safe, I’d avoid grassy knolls and book depositories. Lest you think America is the only country in a mess, let’s hop across the pond so I can catch you up. Sir Keir Starmer is the UK’s New Prime Minister If you thought the UK couldn’t turn any more Left, you were mistaken. I knew the Tories (the Conservatives) were going to lose. And yes, they got crushed… but not quite as crushed as you’d expect. The problem with the UK is that there is no credible right wing, though Nigel Farage is trying to establish one with the new Reform Party. The Tories were Big Government conservatives and that’s why they got blown out, just five years after winning their own landslide victory. Then, the idiotic Boorish Johnson was the PM, and instead of giving the people the smaller government, lower taxes, and better services they craved, he turned The Tories into a green new scam machine. Allegedly, his woke scold of a young wife made him do it. I guess it’s not as safe as it used to be to marry much younger. And what did new Prime Minister Starmer announce as soon as he got in? - More alignment with the EU, and higher migrant allocations
- An idiotic return to full WHO Health control
- A nationwide digital ID
- The GBP as a central bank digital currency (CBDC - Britain’s very own “Biden Buck”)
- The silly Net Zero spending program on steroids And for the cherry on top, the most progressive prison program ever: Feel good about America. And what about those frogs? France Reverses Course; The Far Left Wins Elections You may have heard that last week, Marine Le Pen’s “far right” party won the first round in the French elections. Well, so scared of the “far right” getting power in France was he that French President and Le Petit Roi, Emmanuel Macron, made a deal with the Left to not run his candidates in districts where they might split the vote. As a result, the Far Left won the second round of elections! Macron’s party came in second and Le Pen’s party came in third. It wasn’t fraud, by the way; it was completely legal electioneering that happens quite often in France. It’s cynical and leaves a bad taste in the mouth, but there’s nothing illegal about it. And now France will continue to circle the drain, not fixing any of its problems, and is closer to a euro crisis than ever. For you dollar bears out there, I ask again, what will the dollar fall against? The Euro? Don’t make me laugh! The British pound? With Starmer in charge? The Japanese Yen? When the Bank of Japan is actively trying to destroy it? Wrap Up The USA is easily the world’s safest place to invest. I simply don’t know why you’d even consider the UK or Europe—and I live here. Sure, the Nikkei is making new all-time highs, but will that beat the JPY depreciation when you try converting it back into dollars? In 2024, where “War Is Peace. Freedom Is Slavery. Ignorance Is Strength,” perhaps the goodest weekend was truly the baddest. Have a great week ahead. All the best, Sean Ring
Editor, Rude Awakening
X (formerly Twitter): [@seaniechaos]( Rate this email Like Dislike Thanks for rating this content! Looks like something went wrong. Please try to rate again. In Case You Missed It… America’s False Narratives and China’s Industrial Reality BYRON
KING Let’s discuss narrative and reality, but mostly reality; particularly, the reality of Chinese industrial power. Absolutely, this affects your life and the future of the U.S. economy. More to the point, it’s investable and I’ll offer some ideas further along. First, Let’s Discuss Cars and Trucks At Paradigm Press, my beat is geology and industry. I cover energy, rocks, minerals, and materials. I keep an eye on concrete, steel, nuts and bolts. In other words, I track people’s ability to make real things. I believe that, eventually, industrial reality will overcome fake narratives. When that happens, you want to be ahead of the crowd. Sometimes, though, my inner gearhead dominates, and I ponder things like cars and trucks. It’s okay, though, because you can’t do cars and trucks without geology. As my old college professor once quipped, “John D. Rockefeller didn’t invent oil; he invented the oil industry. And Henry Ford didn’t invent the automobile; he invented the automobile industry.” The professor’s point was that whatever you do, you need energy and basic materials to make it happen. You can’t build cars or trucks without steel, aluminum, copper, lead, rubber, etc. And internal combustion engines won’t work without gasoline or diesel. (Of course, you need roads, bridges, tunnels, etc.; but you can’t build those absent materials, heavy equipment, trucks, energy, etc.) Along these lines, Rockefeller created the 20th century’s industrial model for pumping oil and then refining and transforming it into a myriad of useful energy and chemical products. Ford created the model of an integrated manufacturing company that did everything from mine ore and make steel to roll finished vehicles out the factory gate, depicted below in this painting of the Rouge River Plant. Henry Ford’s Rouge River Plant. Courtesy Ford Museum. These business models, Rockefeller’s for energy and Ford’s for auto manufacturing, focused on ways to leverage resources and internal efficiencies. And over the past century, many things have changed on an industrial scale, but not the big picture. You still need materials and energy to build cars, trucks, and pretty much everything else. And you require internal efficiencies to be competitive. Still, it’s always important to follow change. And right now, there’s a new angle on what the old professor said. To restate his quip, China didn’t invent batteries, but the Chinese have definitely reinvented the modern energy and automobile industries, particularly electric vehicles (EVs). So, let’s dig deeper into what’s happening and explore this new Chinese industrial reality. Modern China’s Industrial Revolution In the mid-1960s, China was firmly entrenched in Mao Zedong's revolutionary era. The country was hyper-politicized through Mao’s crackpot ideas, implemented through the disastrous “Great Leap Forward,” followed by his “Cultural Revolution.” In general, for two generations after World War II, China misused her people and resources. Consequently, under Mao, the country was so widely underdeveloped that almost the entire nation was an economic basket case. Zealous, strident Chinese Red Guards, 1960s, feeling good about ruining their economy. Big mistakes have big consequences, and even after Mao died in September 1976, China had to endure years of political and social upheaval. Well into the 1980s, internal factions competed over who would wield power. And today, leadership elements still come and go. At a more down-to-earth level (literally), a half-century ago, most roads in China were unpaved, even in large cities. To work and move about, most people walked or rode a bicycle. Only the top cadre of political and military power had access to even a basic car, likely a clunker made in the Soviet Union. But now, let’s hit the fast-forward button. Today, three generations later, China is filled with gleaming new megacities cities where people drive modern cars and trucks across elaborate road networks. No doubt, you’ve seen photos and videos. Busy Beijing; roads and high rises. China’s cities are connected by extensive systems of newly constructed highways, with nearly uncountable new bridges, tunnels, and related feats of civil engineering. China’s half-century buildout of a highway grid. Sagepub.com. Of course, we can discern a Chinese-oriented narrative here, all about rapid modernization and industrialization. But there’s also a very credible level of Chinese reality to back it all up, all quite visible within China’s automotive industrial complex. [Offer Pending: Please confirm your address…]( Your name is on a list of people eligible to claim the [“most dangerous book in America.”]( We with only 500 copies left, we may run out of stock soon. So, here’s how to claim your copy: - [Click this link]( watch Jim's short message.](
- Review your account information.
- Confirm you’d like to accept Jim’s offer. And I’ll get your copy of the most dangerous book in the mail right away. [Simply click here and learn how to claim your copy.]( [Click Here To Learn More]( China’s Really Big Numbers Today, China’s auto industry has the capacity to build over 43 million vehicles per year. Equally important, China’s energy complex can fuel and power them. This is definitely not the impoverished, undeveloped China of half a century ago. Of that new-build output, about 25 million vehicles are sold annually in China, the world’s largest market, by far. In comparison, the entire U.S. auto market moves about 17 million vehicles in a good year, and that includes large numbers of non-U.S.-made imports. Plus, the math is that China can build and export about 18 million vehicles per year, over and above domestic sales; again, that’s more exports than the entire U.S. auto market. China’s vehicle exports go everywhere except for U.S. and Canadian markets. From Jamaica to Djakarta, Lagos to Lima, you’ll find Chinese vehicles. Even London’s storied taxicabs and buses are Chinese these days. Okay, now for some bullet points: - China, Inc., so to speak, runs the world’s largest auto industry, which outpaces by far the entire U.S. automotive complex, including all domestic and foreign names. China has an energy complex of comparable scale to power it all.
- China’s auto and energy industries are massively scaled. Everything is big. China has a seemingly endless network of internal supply and manufacturing chains that provide everything involved in building cars and trucks: energy, metals, plastics, electronics, interior items, exterior paints and pigments, and much more.
- Upstream from the manufacturing plants, Chinese supply chains reach deep into many other nations for raw materials that range from oil and coal to mineral ores and primary metals, rubber for tires, and much else.
- In addition to internal combustion engines in traditional vehicles, China clearly dominates the new ecosphere of intellectual property and supply chains for EVs.
- Pertinent to this last point, all EVs worldwide, whether Chinese brands or others, rely almost entirely—about 98%—on rare earth elements (REEs) produced in China; and most EVs everywhere rely significantly—over 80% is a lowball estimate—on Chinese-made battery materials. Frankly, it’s not a narrative but clearsighted reality to say that Western automakers will have a very tough time in the future. Unlike in the past, Western firms must now compete, at home and abroad, against Chinese products that benefit from those gigantic levels of scale. All this is while China dominates critical supply chains for batteries and related electrical/electronic components, over and above everything else that goes into a car or truck, down to lug nuts and seat belt buckles. Related to this, an EV is not just a new version of an old car; no, EVs are definitely not what you grew up with. Rather, EVs are electronic systems which means assemblies of electronics and software. In many ways, they’re far more sophisticated than old, legacy mechanical systems. For example, a typical EV has about 40% fewer moving parts than a similar internal combustion vehicle. And that same EV contains far more electronic components like chips and circuitry, plus highly evolved software. This electronic angle alone offers another example of China’s large-scale and broad internal efficiency in another significant industry. That is, China Inc. has a robust electronics sector that produces everything from circuit boards and components to large-screen televisions and much more. The fact is that having a world-class electronics industry literally down the road from automaker design shops greatly facilitates China’s ability to compete globally in EVs, and at an immense scale. Chinese EV firms can easily source homegrown electronic components, unlike the case with the U.S. where most electronics manufacturing long ago moved offshore (much of it to China). Not Your Father’s Chinese Car The collective West – certainly the U.S. and its automakers – have arrived at a problematic industrial reality. Namely, in recent years, Chinese EVs have improved in design and quality by leaps and bounds. It’s just a fact that China’s companies build some pretty good cars. (And it’s not me saying it; do a YouTube search for car reviews.) Image courtesy of BYD Seal, a Chinese carmaker. Consider this EV pictured above, a model named Seal (like the marine mammal) produced by a company called BYD. In late 2023, Swiss group UBS hired engineers to tear down a production specimen and see what’s inside and how it all works. The UBS team dismantled the vehicle down to bolts and wire bundles and compared quality and performance against standard industry benchmarks. The engineers concluded that compared to mass-market EVs from legacy Western makers, BYD “is the better and much cheaper car, thanks to high vertical integration.” Note those words from the engineers, that BYD is “better and much cheaper.” Uh-oh, you can always buy a better car, but you would expect to pay more for it, right? Except with this BYD, you can now buy a better car – better than Western models – and still pay less. According to the UBS team, BYD has a 25% sustainable cost advantage over legacy Western competitors, which still allows the Chinese company generous profit margins. BYD has a distinct advantage in the fields of battery cells, vehicle integration, powertrain, and electronics modules. All this, and the BYD driver assistance systems “are also state of the art.” Again, a large element of BYD’s cost advantage is the overall scale of industry in China and the related internal efficiencies. Yes, it matters when a company can control costs at every step, from ore in the ground to certifying a final assembled unit as it comes off the production line. You can’t “financial engineer” your way out of some things. Finally, it’s worth noting that BYD was founded in 1995, not as a carmaker but as a producer of batteries and electronics. In 2003, management decided to leverage its skills in power and electronic systems into making cars. Now, BYD is the largest EV maker in the world, bigger than Tesla by unit sales. The company has about 703,000 employees, of which 102,000 (no typo) work in research and development. This BYD story is like a tech company putting wheels on an iPad, versus Western legacy car companies that currently struggle to put problematic batteries and electronic systems into their old product lines. Good luck to anybody who wants to underprice and outsell BYD. Would You Buy a Chinese-branded EV? With all this in mind, would you buy a Chinese-branded EV? And no, I don’t mean a Tesla, about half of which are assembled in China. Nor do I mean Chinese-built models of Western names like, for example, certain Volvo or Volkswagen EVs. My question is, would you buy an EV built by a Chinese company like BYD, or any of numerous other names? Heck, have you even heard of some of the other Chinese brands? Or if you’ve heard the names, what do you know about them? Because, right now, no Chinese EVs are marketed or available for sale in the U.S., but what if they were? According to a recent survey by the automotive consulting group AutoPacific, U.S. buyers are beginning to accept the idea of buying a Chinese EV. Here’s a graph that lays it out: About 76% of respondents under age 40 said they would consider buying a Chinese EV. However, acceptance of Chinese brands declines by age; only about 26% of those 60 and older would consider buying a Chinese EV. This issue will inevitably diminish over time as America’s Baby Boomer generation fades away. And consider the large degree to which young people are open to high-end Chinese products like EVs. Meanwhile, there’s currently a strong anti-China narrative in Western media based, among other things, on military tensions over Taiwan. Plus, there are divisions over trade, intellectual property, and the loss of millions of former U.S. manufacturing jobs that moved offshore to China over the past 30 years. Despite the anti-China narrative, many Americans remain open to purchasing a Chinese EV. Apparently, they’re familiar with Chinese brands, likely from following social media rather than mainstream news about Chinese EVs. And when China’s EVs hit the shores of the U.S., people will buy them. Real Industry Beats Fake Narrative There’s plenty of anti-China narrative out there, depending on where you get your news. But whatever you follow, and as I just outlined above, the industrial reality is that China has built a broad, deep automobile complex that can crank out ungodly levels of cars and trucks. China holds steep cost advantages based on internal efficiencies, and scales of production up and down the supply chain. Again, this does not bode well for legacy Western automakers or their workers and suppliers. The U.S. response to China Inc. has been for politicians to make a lot of speeches, kick start a new regime of tariffs, and pass two big laws: the Inflation Reduction Act and a companion law concerning infrastructure, both of which involve government subsidies and tax breaks. Thus, goes the narrative, America is moving back onto the rails to success. But what’s the American industrial reality? Well, we all want U.S. businesses to do well, right? So, don’t count U.S. businesses out, although you must also be sanguine about things. In the 1970s and 80s, post-Mao, China made a plan and has been building industrial power for forty or more years. Meanwhile, here in the U.S., we can barely complete environmental studies within a decade. Another American reality is culture. The country spent the past forty years deindustrializing, and training two generations of people that there’s nothing wrong with that. So, Americans lost jobs, training pipelines dried up, instructors aged out, schools closed engineering departments, and the country lost much of the social milieu that used to encourage people to move into jobs and careers that involved making things down at the plant or factory. Of course, the U.S. is a high-cost jurisdiction for business; everything is expensive, including land, labor, regulations, litigation, taxes, insurance, and much more. Looking ahead, what ought to happen? Well, the U.S. must rebuild vast amounts of infrastructure and basic industry, and do it on a massive, continental scale. All this while protecting old and new firms against being smothered by low-cost imports. And how will that work out? Hey, we’ve come to the end of actual knowledge, and from here on out, it’s all speculation and connecting the future dots. We’re just going to have to figure it out as we move along. Three U.S.-Focused Ideas I’ll leave you with three ideas that should do well in the coming years. First, look at Energy Fuels (UUUU), a metals producer in Utah. Energy Fuels produces uranium yellowcake from ore and thus is a key player in domestic energy. It also produces vanadium metal, which is quite useful as a steel alloying agent and for battery systems. Finally, Energy Fuels just announced the successful completion of a system to recover REEs from ore, making it the only American company with that capability. Next, look at a name we’ve seen before, Contango Ore (CTG), a gold miner that works in Alaska. Contango has been mining ore all winter and spring, sending it to stockpile at the Fort Knox Mine, near Fairbanks and owned by Kinross. This summer, Kinross will begin processing that ore, and Contango should begin to see cash flow. I expect a serious market upgrade when that happens. Finally, consider an offshore drilling play in the event that Donald Trump wins the presidential election and changes the approach to development on federal offshore acreage. I like Transocean (RIG), which has a large fleet of drillships and crews. The company stands to benefit from a more petroleum-friendly administration. Note that these are not official recommendations and will not be tracked in a portfolio. But I watch these companies, and I expect them to do well in the years ahead. If you buy shares, follow the charts, wait for down days in the market, use limit orders, and never chase momentum. That’s all for now. And remember… stick with reality. Thank you for subscribing and reading. All the best, Byron W. King
Contributing Editor
Rude Awakening ☰ ⊗
[ARCHIVE]( [ABOUT]( [Contact Us]( © 2024 Paradigm Press, LLC. 1001 Cathedral Street, Baltimore, MD 21201. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press, LLC. delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your Rude Awakening e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from Rude Awakening, feel free to [click here.]( Please note: the mailbox associated with this email address is not monitored, so do not reply to this message. We welcome comments or suggestions at feedback@rudeawakening.info. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, [contact us here]( or call (844)-731-0984. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We allow the editors of our publications to recommend securities that they own themselves. However, our policy prohibits editors from exiting a personal trade while the recommendation to subscribers is open. In no circumstance may an editor sell a security before subscribers have a fair opportunity to exit. The length of time an editor must wait after subscribers have been advised to exit a play depends on the type of publication. All other employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. Rude Awakening is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. Please read our [Privacy Statement.]( If you are having trouble receiving your Rude Awakening subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by [whitelisting Rude Awakening.](
EDM Keywords (471)
yes
wrote
writing
wrap
would
world
works
workers
work
words
wonderful
woke
woe
winter
winning
whatever
well
ways
way
watched
watch
war
wants
want
vote
vehicle
used
usa
upstream
underprice
uk
type
turned
turn
trying
truly
trucks
truck
transforming
tracked
tories
top
tires
time
thus
thought
third
think
things
tesla
tear
tariffs
system
sure
suppliers
suggestions
success
subscribing
subscribers
submitting
stockpile
still
steroids
steffi
starmer
speculation
speak
sophisticated
soon
sons
software
smothered
skills
sit
simply
shores
share
sent
seen
see
security
second
scared
scales
scale
says
saying
say
sanguine
sale
safe
run
ruining
rode
rockefeller
roads
road
right
reviewing
result
restate
response
respondents
respecting
research
reply
rent
remove
refining
recommendation
received
reality
reading
read
rating
rate
range
rails
quite
questions
question
quality
purchasing
published
publications
publication
protecting
prospectus
project
professor
production
producer
problems
problem
probably
privacy
printed
power
portfolio
pond
politicians
political
point
pocket
pm
plenty
play
plant
plan
pigments
phone
performance
people
pay
party
part
painting
owned
outpaces
outlined
ought
ore
open
one
oil
offer
nusco
numerous
noticed
nikkei
news
need
nations
narrative
names
name
myriad
much
moved
move
mouth
monitored
model
mistaken
missed
millions
might
message
meant
mean
may
matters
math
materials
massive
marketed
mao
many
man
make
mailing
mailbox
made
macron
lots
lot
loss
lose
live
list
lima
like
life
licensed
leverage
letter
let
length
left
leaves
leave
learn
leaps
lays
laugh
know
knew
kinross
keep
jobs
japan
jamaica
italy
italian
issue
investable
invest
invented
invent
instead
inside
infrastructure
industry
industrialization
improved
ideas
idea
however
home
hit
hey
heard
headlines
headline
happens
happening
happen
hang
handsome
half
guess
ground
grew
graph
grandmothers
got
going
goes
god
go
giving
get
geology
general
gbp
future
full
fuel
front
french
free
fraud
france
founded
found
forty
ford
following
follow
fixing
filled
figure
fields
feedback
father
far
family
familiar
factory
fact
eye
exports
export
explore
expect
exiting
exit
example
evs
everything
ever
event
even
ev
europe
euro
eu
errors
error
ensure
engineers
energy
end
employees
electronics
either
editors
economy
easily
drive
drillships
drain
doubt
domestic
dollars
divisions
districts
discern
diesel
died
development
destroy
design
depending
definitely
deemed
decipher
deal
days
day
dads
cynical
currently
culture
crushed
crews
craved
crank
cousin
course
country
could
copy
continue
contango
consulting
consider
conservatives
consent
connecting
connected
components
compete
comparison
compared
company
companies
communication
committed
comes
come
code
coal
closer
click
clear
claim
cities
circle
chinese
china
cherry
charge
charcoal
changes
changed
certifying
catch
case
cars
carmaker
careers
car
capacity
candidates
call
byd
buying
buyers
buy
businesses
buses
built
build
british
brazilian
bounds
bolts
biden
bicycle
better
benefit
believe
beginning
begin
beat
batteries
bank
ballot
baddest
back
available
automobile
automakers
auto
assembled
ask
article
art
arrived
arrival
approach
anybody
announced
america
although
also
almost
allow
aline
alignment
ahead
age
affects
advised
advertisements
address
addition
account
according
access
accept
abroad
ability
98
80
76
60
26
2024
1995
1970s