King: Our Culture of Untruth

A Deep Sickness [The Daily Reckoning] June 29, 2024 [WEBSITE]( | [UNSUBSCRIBE]( King: Our Culture of Untruth Western Pennsylvania Editor’s note: Increasing numbers of Americans no longer trust the institutions they once believed in. Whether it’s how the government handled COVID or their perception that the justice system has been weaponized, Americans have lost faith in the system. In today’s Reckoning, Paradigm’s geologist, commodities expert, lawyer and former naval officer Byron King says we live in a “culture of untruth.” [Byron King] BYRON KING Dear Reader, Today, we’ll ponder the pursuit of honest money and wealth protection in a culture that, more and more, is built on a foundation of untruth, misdirection and outright lies. First, we need to consider lawfare. That’s a combination of law and warfare. Instead of one side attacking the other with armies of soldiers, the assault comes via armies of lawyers. And instead of operational movements on a battlefield, one side works to wreck the other within the confines of the legal system. At a fundamental level, warfare and lawfare are two ends of the same spectrum, namely that of compulsion. That brings me to Donald Trump. In Trump’s case (or his numerous cases), the former president isn’t dodging real bullets but instead must fight his battles on far-flung legalistic fronts. The goal of all this anti-Trump lawfare is perfectly obvious. Trump’s political opponents want to hamstring him in terms of lost time and adverse media attention, huge legal bills, burdensome discovery, eye-popping financial penalties and possibly the stigma of a criminal conviction, if not incarceration. But as the old saying goes be careful what you wish for. Because the more Trump’s political enemies pile on, the higher he’s risen in the polls. Teflon Don In recent months, Trump has been isolated inside courthouses, listening to prosecutors accuse him, witnesses malign him and judges chastise him. Still, at the end of each day he has walked out to a sea of microphones and cameras to hold press conferences that receive global coverage. One might even say that Trump bears up well under the stress and looks rather “presidential” in his ability to absorb abuse and fire back at the other side. One way or another, and as more than a few surveys clearly demonstrate, an innate sense of the rank unfairness of the anti-Trump lawfare has spread wide and far. If the election were held today, Trump could win. As to the outcomes of all these Trump trials, we shall see. We know what happened in New York. Looking ahead months and years, no doubt we’ll watch the Trump appeals unfold from his cases, and the scope of what’s called, in antiseptic terms, “reversible error” will become manifest. Or let’s put it this way: If use of the legal system for political ends is a form of political warfare, then abominable misuse of the legal system is a form of war crime, and nobody wants to be on the side of war criminals. Apparently, the lawfare fanatics failed to think this through. [WARNING: The AI Wealth Window Is About to Accelerate]( NVIDIA just announced what will be the most powerful chip of all time – “The X Chip” – a microchip so powerful that it will send the current Wealth Window into OVERDRIVE unleashing an accelerated Wealth Window like nothing we’ve seen before. But James Altucher is warning you: do NOT just invest in any AI stock… Because this announcement is creating a 100X catalyst for a specific little-known A.I. firm, already trading on the NYSE, in 2025. [Click Here To Learn How To Play This Announcement]( Our Culture of Untruths Sad to say, one factor that enables lawfare such as what we see with Trump is that we live in a gullible, miseducated culture that is wide open to mass persuasion toward preposterous ends. When large numbers of people hear little else but a litany of tailored tales, they can be made to believe just about anything. Yeah, sure, we have our wonderful First Amendment in the U.S. Constitution, and anyone can find their inner Benjamin Franklin and publish a newspaper. Then again, we live in an era when most channels for news are wrapped up quite tightly by people and institutions that control what gets out. At root, the issue of what is the news is economic because, as with any other business, running a news site and related newspaper has expenses, and the bottom line always rules. Across the U.S., over the past two decades, more than 2,000 local and regional newspapers have closed their doors, succumbing to high costs and competition from so-called “free” news on the internet. Meanwhile, if you’re above a certain age you likely recall how three networks dominated television news in those olden days: CBS, NBC and ABC. Perhaps you remember how the late newsreader Walter Cronkite used to sign off his evening broadcast with his iconic line, “And that’s the way it is…” The Way It Is — Or the Way I See It? Well, that was the “way it is” per Cronkite’s opinion. He and his producers were ruthless about what to include in the man’s 22-minute weeknight news show. And the fact is that, over many years, Cronkite and CBS left plenty of important news and perspective on the cutting room floor; definitely, they left out anything that was contrary to what they wanted the audience to know. Or consider the inordinate power of The New York Times and The Washington Post. Over many decades, they have published innumerable stories that created national levels of narrative. In other words, if something was “in the Times” or “in the Post,” then large numbers of people believed that the story was a real thing, and that the resulting worldview was appropriate. All this while many other news sources took their cue, if not doctrine, from these two newspapers (NPR, I’m looking at you!). The point is that personal views and biases, and editorial decisions by a small handful of people, have long shaped widespread public perceptions and opinions in the U.S. Now fast-forward to today, when network news remains in the hands of corporate insiders, and the Times-Post narrative still dominates nationwide storylines. Plus, we now have all-digital sites like Google and Facebook/Meta, which are in the business of curating narratives to the point of notorious shadow bans that all but censor content that goes against certain political grains. Or recall how, for way too long, ex-Twitter shadow banned and censored people and content. [Elon Musk’s Final Masterpiece: X-9840]( After revolutionizing the payment processing industry with Paypal…The space exploration industry with SpaceX…And the auto industry with self-driving Teslas… Elon Musk is now set to revolutionize MONEY with his “Project X-9840...” A project he said could change “Your entire financial life.” There’s not much time to prepare. Elon has said he could flip the switch “as early as mid 2024.” [Click Here To See The Details]( Enter Elon Musk Things became so openly notorious that Elon Musk came in and grossly overpaid to buy the site, an act of public charity in support of honest discussion. Now called “X,” we’ll see how it all evolves. And consider Donald Trump’s site Truth Social. This is an effort to create a content platform with far less oversight and moderation than, say, Facebook, YouTube, etc. That is, Truth Social is not just Trump’s personal bullhorn; it’s an open forum, with its own hardware system, to support content creators. It won’t get canceled like how the former Parler site simply vanished way back in 2021. Again, we’ll see how this evolves over time. So as we discuss lawfare, and certainly the anti-Trump lawfare, one point to keep in mind is that it only succeeds when large numbers of people don’t know what’s going on behind the scenes, in the shadows. Because if all that one hears or sees are inflammatory headlines, atop partisan articles written by hacks who cherry-pick facts, or just plain make stuff up, then yes… one might just believe anything and to his or her long-term detriment. A Legal System Isn’t Necessarily a Justice System Finally, keep in mind the distinction between a legal system and a justice system. That is, every country has a legal system: Stalin’s Soviet Union had a legal system, Mao’s China had a legal system, Pol Pot’s Cambodia had a legal system. But were they “justice” systems? For over two centuries in the U.S., one of the great national strengths was that, overall, our legal system also focused on delivering fair and impartial justice. Yes, the country had problems at times and in places; Southern Jim Crow comes to mind, and more. But the country has never before put on such a sordid legal spectacle such as we see with former President Trump. If prosecutors can come after Trump for whatever sort of charges they can concoct, they can go after anybody. If judges and juries can personalize legal processes against people or entities that they just plain don’t like, we’re sliding down the proverbial slippery slope. Frankly, based on what we’ve seen in the courtrooms of New York City, you’d have to be crazy to trust the fairness of that jurisdiction. Meanwhile, the D.C. courts are equally hyper-partisan, with surly judges and biased jury pools that seem to be brain-melded to the editorial board of The Washington Post. This too will pass, or so we hope. Meanwhile, protect your wealth. Look for honest money while we collectively search for a way out of our current era of deep untruth. I’m talking about hard assets, meaning energy, precious metals and commodities. I’ll end with a tip: If you believe that Donald Trump will be the next president, one strong call on future energy is with U.S. offshore oil and gas. Regards, Byron King for The Daily Reckoning [feedback@dailyreckoning.com.](mailto:feedback@dailyreckoning.com) Editor’s note: Let’s switch gears a bit because this could be really important… Any day now, NVIDIA could make an announcement that will accelerate the [AI Wealth Window]( into OVERDRIVE. This is a highly urgent reminder to take advantage of the Wealth Window before that announcement is made. [Because once the world knows this powerful detail about Nvidia’s “X Chip,” it could be too late.]( You see, Nvidia has created what could be the most powerful AI microchip in the world. And they’ve partnered with a small computing firm ahead of the X Chip’s rollout… A company they could call out BY NAME any day now. [This small-cap stock has the potential to power the entire AI industry.]( It’s already partnered with Tesla, Meta and the Department of Defense. And it’s crucial to the success of the X Chip. When Nvidia names this company, its stock could shoot into the stratosphere. You need to get in before that happens — [click here now for the details.]( Thank you for reading The Daily Reckoning! We greatly value your questions and comments. Please send all feedback to [feedback@dailyreckoning.com.](mailto:feedback@dailyreckoning.com) [Byron King] [Byron King]( is a Harvard-trained geologist who has traveled to every U.S. state and territory and six of the seven continents. He has been interviewed by dozens of major print and broadcast media outlets including The Financial Times, The Guardian, The Washington Post, MSN Money, MarketWatch, Fox Business News, and PBS Newshour. [Paradigm]( ☰ ⊗ [ARCHIVE]( [ABOUT]( [Contact Us]( © 2024 Paradigm Press, LLC. 1001 Cathedral Street, Baltimore, MD 21201. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press, LLC. delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your The Daily Reckoning e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from The Daily Reckoning, feel free to [click here.]( Please note: the mailbox associated with this email address is not monitored, so do not reply to this message. We welcome comments or suggestions at feedback@dailyreckoning.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, [contact us here]( or call (844)-731-0984. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We allow the editors of our publications to recommend securities that they own themselves. However, our policy prohibits editors from exiting a personal trade while the recommendation to subscribers is open. In no circumstance may an editor sell a security before subscribers have a fair opportunity to exit. The length of time an editor must wait after subscribers have been advised to exit a play depends on the type of publication. All other employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. The Daily Reckoning is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. Please read our [Privacy Statement.]( If you are having trouble receiving your The Daily Reckoning subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by [whitelisting The Daily Reckoning.](