Newsletter Subject

Dollar Takes a “Pounding”

From

paradigmpressgroup.com

Email Address

dr@mb.paradigmpressgroup.com

Sent On

Mon, Jun 24, 2024 10:01 PM

Email Preheader Text

A Sterling Example | Dollar Takes a ?Pounding? Portsmouth, New Hampshire JIM RICKARDS Dear Reade

A Sterling Example [The Daily Reckoning] June 24, 2024 [WEBSITE]( | [UNSUBSCRIBE]( Dollar Takes a “Pounding” Portsmouth, New Hampshire [Jim Rickards] JIM RICKARDS Dear Reader, You’ve probably heard that the U.S. economy is heavily “financialized.” What does that really mean? What is financialization? It’s a big topic and not very well defined. It can refer to the dominance of financial activity over traditional business activity in goods and services. It can refer to market bubbles. It can refer to the use of financial instruments in non-traditional arenas such as warfare or political witch hunts. In fact, it refers to all the above and more. Investors need to understand financialization in order not to be blindsided by market activity that defies fundamental analysis. We can begin our review of financialization with a look at the role of the U.S. dollar in global transactions. This is not a technical article detailing the plumbing of the financial system. But in considering the role of currencies in global finance, it's important to distinguish between reserves (basically a nation's savings account) and payments (transactions, trade, etc.). The Dollar Still Dominates The denomination of global reserves today is approximately: - 58% U.S. dollars and 20% euros - The remaining 22% is divided among yen (6%), sterling (5%), Canadian dollars or CAD (2.5%) - And other currencies are each less than 2% (AUD, CNY, CHF). In payments (measured in SWIFT message traffic), the U.S. dollar is about 59% of payments, with the euro at 13%, yen at 6%, sterling at 5% and yuan and CAD at about 3% each. All other currencies are less than 3% each. The relatively larger role of the dollar in payments is due to higher oil prices and oil being denominated in dollars. SWIFT message traffic is almost exclusively interbank payments among large banks. There are many bilateral payments (for example, Russian payments to India in local currencies) that do not go via SWIFT. There is no immediate threat to the role of the U.S. dollar in either reserves or payments. [I recently debunked the fake news that Saudi Arabia has just ended the petrodollar deal that’s been in place since 1974.]( Instead there’s a slow, steady erosion in the role of the dollar that could accelerate in the future. A good case study is the decline of sterling. In 1914, it was the dominant reserve and trade currency. By 1944, it had largely been displaced by the U.S. dollar as a result of Bretton Woods. Slow Death Today, sterling is barely a footnote in global reserves and payments. Still, that decline took 30 years (1914–1944) and continued for another 80 years (1944–2024). Major currencies don't simply disappear overnight, but they are subject to these types of declines and gradual displacement by alternatives. Contrary to what you hear from a lot of fringe analysts, the Russian ruble and Chinese yuan will not displace the U.S. dollar. Neither currency is widely accepted outside its home country. Those currencies have limited uses and lack large liquid bond markets, and their source countries lack a rule of law. Notions of a "gold-backed yuan" are nonsense. China simply doesn’t have enough gold. [URGENT: Regarding Your 2024 Strategic Intelligence Membership Dues!]( Hi, I’m Matt Insley. I’m the Publisher at Paradigm Press. Just moments ago, I just got off the phone with Jim and we agreed: it’s time we start charging more money for access to his newsletter. That’s why we may implement a massive price hike for all subscribers in the coming days. But if you [click here now]( you can lock in your current subscription price at 80% off – and never have to pay the potential new price of $500. Don’t waste any time. [Click Here ASAP]( A BRICS currency is a more likely alternative to the dollar for global payments. It won't be issued for several more years. The BRICS are currently expanding their membership and will expand it further at their summit in Kazan, Russia in October. That's critical because a larger membership increases the trading zone where the currency can be used. Non-BRICS members can also agree to accept the new BRICS currency if they wish. If you receive the BRICS currency in trade, it's more useful if you can spend it or invest it in 20 or 30 other countries rather than just one trading partner as is the case with rubles, yuan and rupees. This process of expanding the currency zone with new members will take a few more years, but the infrastructure is being put in place now. The development of the euro (which took eight years from the 1992 Maastricht Treaty to launch in 2000) is a good model for this. The Great Leap to Reserve Status While a BRICS currency will be used in trade in a few years, it will take longer to develop as a reserve currency. That requires the creation of a large, liquid bond market, which takes a legal code, issuers, dealers, settlement channels, hedging tools and much more. That process can take 10 years or longer. What we should expect is not a sudden collapse of the U.S. dollar and the U.S. Treasury market in payments and reserves, but rather a slow, steady diminution in the role of the dollar similar to what happened with sterling after World War I. In the short run, the main alternative to the U.S. dollar in reserve positions is not another currency, but gold. Central banks have been net purchasers of gold since 2010, reversing their status as net sellers that had prevailed since 1970. [Elon Musk’s Genius Plan to Save the US Dollar from Collapse?]( [click here for more...]( Elon is about to flip the switch on [his new money project…]( And it could trigger the biggest change to our financial system since the creation of the federal reserve in 1913. Could this save the US dollar from a complete collapse? Elon said he could flip the switch “as early as mid 2024.” [Click Here To See The Details]( These net purchases of gold are reflected in increases in gold as a percentage of total reserves. Gold now represents over 70% of U.S. reserves, 25% of Russian reserves and 8% of Chinese reserves. Curiously, gold isn't even reported in the IMF’s official reserve asset reports, despite the fact that the IMF itself owns over 1,000 metric tonnes of gold. Gold has the added attraction of being a physical, non-digital asset that cannot be frozen or seized by the United States. The Weaponized Dollar The most conspicuous example of financialization is the use of financial sanctions in warfare. This might better be called the weaponization of the dollar. U.S. sanctions against Russia have failed badly (as I predicted in 2022) to the point that the Russian economy is now outperforming the U.S. economy by every important metric. The U.S. hasn’t learned its lesson and is moving to more dangerous methods. The U.S. froze Russian assets (about $300 billion in U.S. Treasury securities) at the start of the war in Ukraine. Now the U.S. is moving to steal those assets. This plan was recently unveiled on June 13 at the G7 summit in Apulia, Italy. Russia will retaliate by seizing over $300 billion of Western assets still in Russia. Since the Russian assets are mostly in custody at Euroclear (about $200 billion), Russia can sue Euroclear for wrongful conversion in Russia-friendly jurisdictions where Euroclear has offices including Dubai and Hong Kong. Euroclear has about $40 trillion in assets under custody. With a court judgment in hand, Russia could proceed to freeze and seize Euroclear assets on a global basis. This could throw the global financial system into complete chaos. Financialization in its many forms is no longer a sideshow. It has become the main event in many arenas. Investors need to follow developments closely in order not to get caught in the political and military crossfire. You need to take cover. Regards, Jim Rickards for The Daily Reckoning [feedback@dailyreckoning.com.](mailto:feedback@dailyreckoning.com) P.S. I just got off the phone with my publisher. And sadly, [I have bad news to share.]( Once you hear it, you might be furious with us for our decision. But as soon as you hear [the reason why we’re implementing this change]( you’ll understand everything. There’s little time to waste, though. You only have until Wednesday at midnight to prepare. [Click here now to see this urgent announcement because it impacts you directly.]( Thank you for reading The Daily Reckoning! We greatly value your questions and comments. Please send all feedback to [feedback@dailyreckoning.com.](mailto:feedback@dailyreckoning.com) [Jim Rickards] [James G. Rickards]( is the editor of Strategic Intelligence. He is an American lawyer, economist, and investment banker with 35 years of experience working in capital markets on Wall Street. He is the author of The New York Times bestsellers Currency Wars and The Death of Money. [Paradigm]( ☰ ⊗ [ARCHIVE]( [ABOUT]( [Contact Us]( © 2024 Paradigm Press, LLC. 1001 Cathedral Street, Baltimore, MD 21201. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press, LLC. delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your The Daily Reckoning e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from The Daily Reckoning, feel free to [click here.]( Please note: the mailbox associated with this email address is not monitored, so do not reply to this message. We welcome comments or suggestions at feedback@dailyreckoning.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, [contact us here]( or call (844)-731-0984. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We allow the editors of our publications to recommend securities that they own themselves. However, our policy prohibits editors from exiting a personal trade while the recommendation to subscribers is open. In no circumstance may an editor sell a security before subscribers have a fair opportunity to exit. The length of time an editor must wait after subscribers have been advised to exit a play depends on the type of publication. All other employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. The Daily Reckoning is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. Please read our [Privacy Statement.]( If you are having trouble receiving your The Daily Reckoning subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by [whitelisting The Daily Reckoning.](

EDM Keywords (224)

yuan years wish whitelisting wednesday weaponization waste warfare war useful used use us ukraine types type trade time takes take switch summit suggestions subscribers submitting subject sterling steal status start spend speak soon sideshow share several services seizing seized see security save sanctions sadly russia rupees rule role reviewing review retaliate result respecting reserves requires represents reply rent reflected refers refer recommendation receive reason reading rather questions put publisher publications publication protecting prospectus process privacy printed predicted pounding political point plumbing plan place phone percentage payments pay owns outperforming order open oil october newsletter never need nation much moving mostly monitored money might midnight message membership mailing mailbox made lot look longer lock licensed letter lesson less length learned launch largely jim issued invest infrastructure india increases important implementing impacts imf however hear happened got goods gold future furious frozen freeze footnote following flip financialization feedback fact expect expanding expand exiting exit euroclear euro ensure ended end employees elon editors editor economy early due dominance dollars dollar distinguish displaced displace development develop details denomination denominated deemed declines decline decision death custody currency currencies critical creation continued consulting considering consent company communication committed click change case cannot called cad brics blindsided begin become barely author assets asap arrival allow agreed advised advertisements address account access accept 80 70 59 500 30 2022 2000 20 1944 1914

Marketing emails from paradigmpressgroup.com

View More
Sent On

27/06/2024

Sent On

27/06/2024

Sent On

27/06/2024

Sent On

27/06/2024

Sent On

27/06/2024

Sent On

27/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.