Lawfare Trumps Justice

Rickards Breaks Down Verdict [The Daily Reckoning] May 31, 2024 [WEBSITE]( | [UNSUBSCRIBE]( Lawfare Trumps Justice Portsmouth, New Hampshire [Jim Rickards] JIM RICKARDS Dear Reader, As you know by now, Donald Trump was found guilty yesterday on all felony counts in his hush money trial in New York. Sentencing in the case is scheduled for July 11, 2024. That’s just four days before the Republican National Convention begins in Milwaukee on July 15. That’s not a coincidence, by the way. It’s calculated to further tarnish his image ahead of the convention. It’s part of the pattern of lawfare and abuse of the judicial system that began with the Russia hoax in 2016 even before Trump was elected president that year. The campaign against Trump only increased from there, which included two impeachments. I wasn’t at all surprised by yesterday's verdict — I’ve predicted that Trump would likely be convicted in at least one of the several criminal trials against him. This is what I wrote eight months ago: The Trump indictments are already handed up. There are two federal cases, two state cases and 91 felony charges in total. Trump is highly likely to be convicted of something because the jurisdictions were carefully selected by Democrat prosecutors to be 90% Democrat… so the jury pools will be out to convict Trump… None of the possible defenses or defective charges may matter. Trump’s lawfare opponents among the prosecutors carefully selected the venues to maximize the likelihood of a conviction… The venues were chosen to ensure anti-Trump juries. Unprecedented I won’t get into the details of the verdict here. There are plenty of talking heads available on the internet to break the case down. I’ll just say that as an attorney with decades of legal experience, I can tell you that this is the weakest case I’ve ever seen. It’s a jumble of novel legal theories strung together in pursuit of a predecided outcome. That’s not just my opinion. Retired Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz says it’s the weakest case he’s seen in 60 years of legal experience. Other legal experts have expressed similar opinions. Never has a case like this been held in New York. It literally has no precedent. [ALERT: Billionaires Dumping]( Zuckerberg sold $1.2 billion of META…Bezos sold $8.5 billion of AMZN…Jamie Dimon sold $150 million of JPM…The Walton family of Walmart sold $1.5 billion of WMT…Which begs the question… [Why is the “smart money” pulling out of the market right as retail investors are piling in?]( Well, that’s why Jim Rickards—former advisor to the Pentagon, The White House, and the CIA—has uploaded a new urgent warning for you. In it, he reveals a way to “opt-out” of this crazy market panic with an entirely different strategy that no one is talking about… And help you get in position for what’s coming next. [Click Here To Learn How To “Opt Out” Now]( The fact that it ever got to trial at all is itself remarkable. Former Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. declined to pursue the case because it was so weak, as did federal prosecutors within the Justice Department. Meanwhile, Matthew Colangelo, third in line at the Biden Justice Department, left his post to join the Manhattan District Attorney’s office in 2022. That’s a downward career move. It’s difficult to escape the conclusion that it was a calculated move to coordinate federal and state efforts to pursue this case against Trump. When you add it all up, Trump was facing the full force of lawfare in a hostile venue so no one should be surprised by what happened yesterday. Having said that, the New York case will almost certainly be reversed on appeal. Here’s why… Egregious Violations The trial judge violated the First Amendment with his gag order on Trump. The idea that a defendant in a criminal case couldn’t criticize those persecuting him would have been anathema to the authors of the First Amendment. The judge also violated the Fifth Amendment because the crime was not specified in the indictment and Trump was denied due process of law. He violated the Sixth Amendment because Trump was denied the right “to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation” and was denied the right to have “process for obtaining witnesses in his favor.” The judge also violated the 14th Amendment, which applies the First, Fifth and Sixth Amendments to state actions under the due process clause. Four constitutional violations should be more than enough to get the case reversed, but there were scores of other reversible errors committed by the judge. He never should have heard the case in the first place because he had a conflict of interest. He couldn’t be impartial. He personally donated to the Biden campaign in 2020 and his daughter is a Democratic lobbyist who’s raised millions of dollars to defeat Trump. Even Democrat lawyers have said that this judge never should have been assigned the case. Also, is it coincidence that the judge assigned to this case is the same judge who presided over the case against the Trump Organization and the case against Trump’s former campaign manager Steve Bannon? It's highly unlikely. His assignment to this case was almost certainly deliberate based on his anti-Trump bona fides. The question everyone wants answered is where do things go from here? [Florida Man Wields Odd Device on Virginia Farm]( [click here for more]( He traveled 1,000 miles away from home… To show you this strange device on a farm in rural Virginia. You won’t know by looking at it, but a secret company behind this strange device could hold the potential to make you rich over the coming years. [Click Here To Find Out How]( The Next Steps Skeptics may believe that the New York appeals courts (The First Appellate Division where I was sworn in as a lawyer decades ago, and the Court of Appeals) will be as biased as the trial court. That’s not true. Appellate law is quite different from trial law. There are no witnesses and the facts are not disputed. The matters considered are all points of law. The lawyers submit briefs and deliver oral arguments. Stormy Daniels and the proven liar Michael Cohen (on whose testimony the case was largely decided) will not be in the First Division courtroom. The First Division Appellate Court will be concerned about two things: getting the law right and not being overruled by the Court of Appeals, the highest court in New York. Both considerations lean in favor of reversing Trump’s convictions and that’s likely to happen. The difficulty is that the appeals process is unlikely to be concluded before the election. It simply takes time to file the motion, prepare the briefs, schedule the oral arguments and render a judgment. An emergency appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court is possible, but that’s a legal long shot. “For My Friends, Everything; for My Enemies, the Law” The bottom line is lawfare against Trump succeeded in this case. They got their conviction and can now call Trump a convicted felon to discredit him ahead of the November election, which was always their plan. They don’t care about truth or the law. They just wanted the opportunity to call Trump a convicted felon to damage his election prospects. That’s just the reality of it. It’s what lawfare is all about. It’s purely political. After yesterday’s conviction, people from corrupt third-world nations in Latin America and elsewhere are saying that Trump now knows what it’s like for opponents of their own corrupt regimes. As the authoritarian former leader of Peru Oscar Benavides once said, “For my friends, everything; for my enemies, the law.” That’s a perfect summation of the lawfare we’re currently witnessing against Trump. And that’s sad. It’s not supposed to happen in the United States, but here we are. Love Trump or hate him, America’s a different place because of this verdict. The lawfare warriors have crossed the Rubicon. Get ready, this is going to be a wild election season. Regards, Jim Rickards for The Daily Reckoning [feedback@dailyreckoning.com.](mailto:feedback@dailyreckoning.com) P.S. I just conducted a one-of-a-kind election event called [Scandals, Secrets and Scoundrels: 2024 Election Summit]( at the famous Watergate Hotel. At this event, I shared my latest thoughts on the upcoming presidential election… from the many abuses of power we’ve already seen to the surprising twists I expect ahead. Most importantly, I explained what you should do with your money before (and after) the votes are counted. I hope you were able to join me for this live election event of the year. It was recorded before the verdict was announced, but that’s not important. If you missed this event, you can [watch the replay here.]( Thank you for reading The Daily Reckoning! We greatly value your questions and comments. Please send all feedback to [feedback@dailyreckoning.com.](mailto:feedback@dailyreckoning.com) [Jim Rickards] [James G. Rickards]( is the editor of Strategic Intelligence. He is an American lawyer, economist, and investment banker with 35 years of experience working in capital markets on Wall Street. He is the author of The New York Times bestsellers Currency Wars and The Death of Money. [Paradigm]( ☰ ⊗ [ARCHIVE]( [ABOUT]( [Contact Us]( © 2024 Paradigm Press, LLC. 1001 Cathedral Street, Baltimore, MD 21201. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press, LLC. delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your The Daily Reckoning e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from The Daily Reckoning, feel free to [click here.]( Please note: the mailbox associated with this email address is not monitored, so do not reply to this message. We welcome comments or suggestions at feedback@dailyreckoning.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, [contact us here]( or call (844)-731-0984. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We allow the editors of our publications to recommend securities that they own themselves. However, our policy prohibits editors from exiting a personal trade while the recommendation to subscribers is open. In no circumstance may an editor sell a security before subscribers have a fair opportunity to exit. The length of time an editor must wait after subscribers have been advised to exit a play depends on the type of publication. All other employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. The Daily Reckoning is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. Please read our [Privacy Statement.]( If you are having trouble receiving your The Daily Reckoning subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by [whitelisting The Daily Reckoning.](