Biden Brought a Boomerang to a Bar Brawl

This idiotic case has turned America into a banana republic, not that that matters. May 31, 2024 [WEBSITE]( | [UNSUBSCRIBE]( Biden Brought a Boomerang to a Bar Brawl SEAN RING Dear Reader, In Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves, Alan Rickman’s Sheriff of Nottingham can’t understand why raising the bounty on Robin Hood’s head won’t increase the likelihood of his capture. Sheriff of Nottingham: Wait a minute. Robin Hood steals money from my pocket, forcing me to hurt the public, and they love him for it? [Scribe nods.] Sheriff of Nottingham: That's it then. Cancel the kitchen scraps for lepers and orphans, no more merciful beheadings, and call off Christmas! When he’s lucid enough, I imagine Joke Biden feels the same about Donald Trump. Let’s face it: Biden and his Democrat followers have thrown everything at Trump in his home city to get a guilty verdict. And now, they almost wish they hadn’t. Regrettably for them, the metaphorical weapon they hurled at him was a colossal boomerang, a symbol of their own misjudgment and unintended consequences. A guilty verdict looks like it’ll help Trump, not hurt him. Rabobank’s Michael Every wrote this (courtesy of [Zero Hedge]( We can also expect imminent market headlines from the Trump trial in New York, where the jury is still out. In every trial, there are always two opinions: the prosecution and the defense. In this trial, there are three: anti-Trump, pro-Trump, and anti-Trump, but concerned about the rule of law. Alan Dershowitz, a Democrat, has been withering in his criticism of how this trial has been prosecuted. Legal expert Jonathan Turley notes it “has seemed otherworldly, a vaguely familiar proceeding where common elements of a trial seem to have been flipped,” listing the numerous ways normal practice has not been followed - which those pro-Trump naturally allege have occurred for nefarious political purposes. Given how the judge --‘The Merchant of Vengeance’-- instructed the jury, experts think the most likely outcomes are a hung jury or a conviction. If it’s the former, Trump will gain huge publicity, and cry he was wronged by Democrat ‘lawfare’; and if he’s convicted, that is arguably even more the case (even if the latter will prompt a rapid appeal, potentially all the way up to the Supreme Court, which many observers think will then see the verdict overturned). To presume, as White House strategists must do(?) that being able to call Trump a “convicted felon” on TV will necessarily dent his electoral prospects rather than boost them may be to totally misread the current situation, as in 2016. Why is this the case? After all, aren’t Americans opposed to electing a man who’s been put in The Clink? It seems not, and here are a few reasons why. Base Mobilization Trump's core supporters often view him as a champion against the Deep State. When Trump is seen as under attack, it reinforces the belief that he’s a disruptive force challenging the establishment. This persecution invigorates his supporters, increasing activism, voter turnout, and engagement. The trial narratives of being unfairly targeted by political opponents create a rally-around-the-flag effect, where his supporters feel more united and committed to defending him. [ALERT: Billionaires Dumping]( Zuckerberg sold $1.2 billion of META…Bezos sold $8.5 billion of AMZN…Jamie Dimon sold $150 million of JPM…The Walton family of Walmart sold $1.5 billion of WMT…Which begs the question… Why is the “smart money” pulling out of the market right as retail investors are piling in? Well, that’s why Jim Rickards—former advisor to the Pentagon, The White House, and the CIA—has uploaded a new urgent warning for you. In it, he reveals a way to “opt-out” of this crazy market panic with an entirely different strategy that no one is talking about… And help you get in position for what’s coming next. [Click here to learn how to “opt-out” now.]( [Click Here To Learn More]( Media Attention Media coverage is crucial in politics, and the extensive reporting on Trump’s legal battles keeps him in the public eye. This constant coverage helps maintain his relevance in the political landscape. Even negative publicity benefits him by keeping him at the center of political discourse. The trial inadvertently ensured his name remains prominent, which is advantageous in crowded primary fields where name recognition is a critical factor. In fact, he had no real primary rival. Even Nikki Haley said she’ll vote for Trump. The adage "there's no such thing as bad publicity" often holds in politics, and Trump has historically been a master at using media attention to his advantage. Martyrdom Effect Many voters are drawn to narratives of struggle and victimization, especially when going without because of inflation. Trump's portrayal as a martyr fighting against an unjust system resonates deeply with many voters, especially those who feel the pinch of inflation. This effect is particularly potent among voters who are disillusioned or disenfranchised by the current political and economic system, fostering a sense of empathy and understanding. They see Trump as someone willing to take on powerful interests on their behalf, and his legal troubles are perceived as a testament to his commitment to challenging the establishment. This narrative has swayed undecided voters who resonate with the idea of fighting back against perceived injustices. Fundraising and Support Trump's campaign is strategically leveraging the trial to solicit donations, framing the legal issues as attacks not just on Trump, but on his supporters and their values. This strategic approach empowers his supporters, making them feel crucial in combating political persecution. This has led to significant financial contributions from small donors who are motivated by the belief that their support is crucial in combating political persecution. The urgency of the trial has led to more frequent and significant donations, bolstering campaign activities and outreach efforts. Polarization In a polarized political environment, energizing the base is more crucial than appealing to the middle. Trump’s legal troubles deepen the existing divides, reinforcing the us-versus-them mentality. This polarization ensures his supporters, who have shown remarkable resilience, remain fiercely loyal and motivated to turn out in large numbers. While this alienates some moderate and independent voters, the strategy is to secure a solid and highly motivated base to outvote a fragmented opposition. Polarization also discourages defections within his party, as Republican voters may rally around Trump to avoid perceived external threats. Distrust of Institutions There is a growing distrust of institutions such as the media, judiciary, and government among a significant portion of the electorate. By positioning himself as an opponent of these institutions, Trump taps into the sentiments of voters who think these entities are corrupt or biased. This distrust is particularly prevalent among populist, anti-establishment, and blue collar segments of the population. Trump's claim that he’s being unfairly targeted by these institutions aligns with the views of voters who believe that the system is rigged against them, further solidifying their support for him as a candidate who represents their grievances. Wrap Up These dynamics collectively create a scenario where Trump’s legal troubles, rather than weakening his political position, strengthen his appeal to certain voter segments. This is enhancing his prospects in the upcoming presidential race. Biden’s boomerang was a poor weapon of choice. Have a great weekend! All the best, Sean Ring Editor, Rude Awakening X (formerly Twitter): [@seaniechaos]( Rate this email Like Dislike Thanks for rating this content! Looks like something went wrong. Please try to rate again. In Case You Missed It… The Latest Whisky Bar SEAN RING Hey, it's Sean... for the most part, today's issue is canceled. That's because many of our readership may not have watched the game-changing panel discussion that premiered yesterday. Of course, I'm talking about the [Whiskey Bar Panel Discussion]( from the Watergate Hotel in Washington, D.C. If you haven't watched that panel discussion, it's mandatory for Rude readers. Ok, I can’t make you watch. But I can’t encourage you enough to watch it. Rude reader and X buddy @thE dEwd posted, “I absolutely LOVED the Whiskey Bar discussion! It was loaded with a plethora of insights. So much knowledge in that room. Nice work, guys! @seaniechaos @ZachScheidt” Please make sure you watch it now. If you did watch it, I've included a few of my favorite sections below. --------------------------------------------------------------- If you call Jack Daniels “whiskey,” you ought to hang your head in shame. And if you’ve been reading the Rude for a while, you know I prefer whisky (no “e”), as in the Scottish stuff, single malt, if you please. Ace Paradigm copywriter and new friend Chris Cimorelli agrees with my assessment. Of course, since he’s about 20 years younger than I am, he loves the rich Islay peatiness of Laphroaig and Lagavulin. And while I still appreciate those venerable brands, I’ve been enjoying the subtle complexity of Speyside stalwart The Balvenie lately. Be all that as it may, Jim Rickards and his editors descended into Washington, DC, last week. I believe it was Obi-Wan Kenobi who referred to DC as a “wretched hive of scum and villainy.” My mistake: he was talking about Mos Eisley Spaceport… but the description applies perfectly to the imperial capital of the American Empire and its accompanying military-industrial-media-financial-pharma-tech complex. And since it’s the 50th anniversary of Tricky Dicky walking before he was pushed, or the CIA JFKed him, Paradigm Grand Poobah Matt Insley thought it a grand idea to gather at none other than The Watergate Hotel. JFKed stands for “Just F*cking Killed.” None of us there cared about Watergate much. To us, Nixon’s unpardonable crime was taking the USD off the gold standard in what’s now called The Nixon Shock. On August 15, 1971, [Richard Nixon went on air]( that fateful Sunday night, interrupting Bonanza of all TV shows, he said: I have directed Secretary Connally to suspend temporarily the convertibility of the dollar into gold or other reserve assets, except in amounts and conditions determined to be in the interest of monetary stability and in the best interests of the United States. Now, what is this action—which is very technical—what does it mean for you? Let me lay to rest the bugaboo of what is called devaluation. If you want to buy a foreign car or take a trip abroad, market conditions may cause your dollar to buy slightly less. But if you are among the overwhelming majority of Americans who buy American-made products in America, your dollar will be worth just as much tomorrow as it is today. The effect of this action, in other words, will be to stabilize the dollar. As our current Oval Office participant might have said, “What a load of malarkey!” Not only did Nixon suspend (and ultimately end) the gold standard, but he also issued Executive Order 11615, imposing a 90-day freeze on wages and prices to counter inflation. An import surcharge of 10% was set to ensure that American products wouldn’t be disadvantaged because of the expected fluctuation in exchange rates. Nixon may have been a foreign policy expert, but for a Republican, he knew nothing about economics. When Nixon realized his mistake and intended to bring America back to the gold standard, Watergate happened. What an amazing coincidence! This time around, our stint at the Watergate proved much less disastrous. [Biden out June 13?]( A former CIA insider just announced a disturbing prediction… Biden will withdraw as the Democrat nominee on June 13. [See his shocking evidence in this new report](. [This former CIA advisor says the Dems already have Biden’s replacement – a shadow candidate hand-selected to defeat Trump] [See full details HERE now](. [Click Here To Learn More]( Jim and the Boys Matt Insley, Doug Hill, Byron King, Zach Scheidt, Dan Amoss, Andrew Zatlin, and I joined Jim Rickards, the man himself, for a great discussion. One of the things I noticed immediately was that we really disagreed on the Fed’s next move. What’s the Fed Going To Do? I still think the Fed will cut in June, only because it’s far enough from the election to make it look like a non-political move, even though it so nakedly is. Andrew “Led” Zatlin mentioned that foreign central banks cutting rates already is a stealth hike for the Fed. So if the Fed does cut, it’ll just be returning to what existed before. Jim was having none of it. According to him, the Fed won’t cut at all until maybe November or December. Now, I really can’t wait to see what Jay Powell does! What’s America’s Number One Problem? Dan thinks it’s a lack of religion. Matt thinks it’s a lack of education. Andrew thinks it’s a lack of shared values. Zach said it was intolerance and poor work ethic. Doug said it was accountability and ownership. I think it’s a treacherous elite. You’ll enjoy what Jim has to say about it. Wrap Up I kept this Rude short so you can slip over to the Whisky Bar and join us. Here is the link: [(. Remember, the Whisky Bar costs you nada. And we never sell or upsell you anything from here. It’s our way of saying “thanks” and getting us to express what we usually write verbally. I hope you enjoy it. All the best, Sean Ring Editor, Rude Awakening Twitter: [@seaniechaos]( ☰ ⊗ [ARCHIVE]( [ABOUT]( [Contact Us]( © 2024 Paradigm Press, LLC. 1001 Cathedral Street, Baltimore, MD 21201. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press, LLC. delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your Rude Awakening e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from Rude Awakening, feel free to [click here.]( Please note: the mailbox associated with this email address is not monitored, so do not reply to this message. We welcome comments or suggestions at feedback@rudeawakening.info. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, [contact us here]( or call (844)-731-0984. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We allow the editors of our publications to recommend securities that they own themselves. However, our policy prohibits editors from exiting a personal trade while the recommendation to subscribers is open. In no circumstance may an editor sell a security before subscribers have a fair opportunity to exit. The length of time an editor must wait after subscribers have been advised to exit a play depends on the type of publication. All other employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. Rude Awakening is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. Please read our [Privacy Statement.]( If you are having trouble receiving your Rude Awakening subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by [whitelisting Rude Awakening.](