Financialization = Ruin

A Warning From History [The Daily Reckoning] April 11, 2024 [WEBSITE]( | [UNSUBSCRIBE]( James Altucher: “Buy These Coins Before the Bitcoin Halving” [James] This coming Sunday, at 7:00 p.m. ET, James Altucher is going to recommend his top six coins for the 4th Bitcoin Halving happening this coming week… He believes it will trigger the LAST CHANCE for everyday folks like you… To turn $1,000 into a six-figure nest egg in the next 12-18 months. [Click here to automatically save your seat for Sunday at 7pm ET…]( Clicking the link above automatically registers you for The Countdown To The 4th Boom. By reserving your spot, you will receive event updates and offers. We will not share your email address with anyone. And you can opt-out at any time. [Privacy Policy](. Financialization = Ruin Annapolis, Maryland [Brian Maher] BRIAN MAHER Dear Reader, The United States economy is largely a “financialized” economy. Financialization: “The increase in size and importance of a country's financial sector relative to its overall economy.” Is financialization a sickness of corroding empires? Do previous examples exist? These are the questions we tackle today. The financial industry represented 10% of the gross domestic product in 1970. By 2010 the financial system ballooned to 20% of the gross domestic product… inflated by the helium of artificially depressed interest rates. A financialized economy demands perpetually expanding credit — that is, debt — to keep the show going. That debt becomes a millstone set upon society’s neck. It chokes off savings and investment in productive assets. Speculation goes amok. The Great Divergence Meantime, wages wallow — and the middling classes with them. The great chasm began to open in the mid-1980s: [image 1] Is this not the United States economy? We believe — to vast extent — that it is the United States economy. Yet does history reveal parallel examples? A finance man named Johnston — Henry Johnston — stretched the historical canvas upon his work desk. He gave it a good looking-over. His conclusion: An examination of history reveals recurrent instances of financialization that bear remarkable similarities, which invites the conclusion that perhaps the predicament in the American economy in recent decades is not unique and that the ever-rising power of Wall Street was in a sense preordained. Proceed, sir — you have seized our attention. The U.S. Has Done Well by Doing Good It is in this context that it pays to revisit the work of the Italian political economist and historian of global capitalism Giovanni Arrighi (1937–2009)... [he] explored the origins and evolution of capitalist systems dating back to the Renaissance and showed how recurrent phases of financial expansion and collapse underpin broader geopolitical reconfigurations. Occupying a central place in his theory is the notion that the cycle of rise and fall of each successive hegemon terminates in a crisis of financialization. It is this phase of financialization that facilitates the shift to the next hegemon. The United States is the contemporary hegemon. It has constructed a global order that in theory butters the world’s bread — but in reality butters its own parsnips: Observers of the current American hegemony will recognize the transformation of the global system to suit American interests. The maintenance of an ideologically charged “rules-based” order — ostensibly for the benefit of everyone — fits neatly into the category of conflation of national and international interests… The period of ascendency is based on an expansion of trade and production. But this phase eventually reaches maturity, at which point it becomes more difficult to profitably reinvest capital in further expansion. In other words, the economic endeavors that propelled the rising power to its perch become increasingly less profitable as competition intensifies and, in many cases, much of the real economy is lost to the periphery, where wages are lower. Rising administrative expenses and the cost of maintaining an ever-expanding military also contribute to this. “Much of the real economy is lost to the periphery, where wages are lower”? “Rising administrative expenses and the cost of maintaining an ever-expanding military?” Only a dull, dull blade could fail to notice the American condition in these words. [External Advertisement] [The Ultimate Passive Income Play]( [Click here for more...]( The #1 income play for 2024 is NOT a stock, bond or private company... Rather, it's a little-known alternative investment that could hand you big monthly income from oil and gas. [Click Here To Find Out What It Is]( The “Signal Crisis” Does the United States presently confront a “signal crisis,” Mr. Johnston? What is one? This leads to the onset of what Arrighi calls a “signal crisis,” meaning an economic crisis that signals the shift from accumulation by material expansion to accumulation by financial expansion. What ensues is a phase characterized by financial intermediation and speculation. Another way to think about this is that having lost the actual basis for its economic prosperity, a nation turns to finance as the final economic field in which hegemony can be sustained. The phase of financialization is thus characterized by an exaggerated emphasis on financial markets and the finance sector. Yet the transformation from productive phase to financialized phase is temporarily gorgeous. It attains — in fact — the appearance of an economic renaissance. It is mistaken for the triumphant phoenix, rising gloriously from flames… An “Illusory Respite From the Trajectory of Decline” Mr. Johnston: The corrosive nature of financialization is not immediately evident — in fact, quite the opposite. Arrighi demonstrates how the turn to financialization, which is initially quite lucrative, can provide a temporary and illusory respite from the trajectory of decline, thus deferring the onset of the terminal crisis. Here he cites the British example: For example, the incumbent hegemon at the time, Great Britain, was the country hardest hit by the so-called Long Depression of 1873–1896, a prolonged period of malaise that saw Britain’s industrial growth decelerate and its economic standing diminished. Arrighi identifies this as the “signal crisis” — the point in the cycle where productive vigor is lost and financialization sets in. And yet: As Arrighi quotes David Landes’ 1969 book The Unbound Prometheus, “as if by magic, the wheel turned.” In the last years of the century, business suddenly improved and profits rose. “Confidence returned — not the spotty, evanescent confidence of the brief booms that had punctuated the gloom of the preceding decades, but a general euphoria such as had not prevailed since… the early 1870s… In all of Western Europe, these years live on in memory as the good old days — the Edwardian era, la belle epoque.” Industrial supremacy yielded to the gimcrack, cheapjack and ruin-racked deceptions of financialization. All was illusion. A Perfect Parallel Meantime: As surplus capital moved out of trade and production, British real wages began a decline starting after the mid-1890s — a reversal of the trend of the past five decades. We refer you to the following image. It reveals that the bottom 90% of American earners advanced steadily from the early 1940s through the early 1970s. It further reveals that the tiptop 1% of earners lost ground to the bottom 90% across the same stretch. Yet in the early 1980s the tiptop 1% went leaping ahead… and began showing society their dust: [image 2] As with British labor in the 1870s… so with American labor since the 1980s… both unfortunates of financialization. “Essentially,” Johnston continues: By embracing financialization, Britain played the last card it had to stave off its imperial decline. Beyond that lay the ruin of World War I and the subsequent instability of the interwar period, a manifestation of what Arrighi calls “systemic chaos” — a phenomenon that becomes particularly visible during signal crises and terminal crises. [Congrats, you earned this…]( As one of my readers, you qualify for this special deal. Only a small fraction of our readers will have the chance to see this. Fortunately, you’re one of them… [Click Here To Claim Your Special Deal]( The U.S. Embraced the British Model As Great Britain seized hold of financialization to brace its eroding imperial pillars, so the United States has seized hold of financialization to brace its eroding imperial pillars: The process of financialization emerging from a signal crisis was repeated with startling similarities in the case of Britain’s successor, the U.S. The 1970s was a decade of deep crisis for the U.S., with high levels of inflation, a weakening dollar after the 1971 abandonment of gold convertibility and, perhaps most importantly, a loss of competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing. With rising powers such as Germany, Japan and, later, China able to outcompete it in terms of production, the U.S. reached the same tipping point and, like its predecessors, it turned to financialization. The 1970s was, in the words of historian Judith Stein, the “pivotal decade” that “sealed a society-wide transition from industry to finance, factory floor to trading floor.” And as Great Britain’s 19th-century financialization yielded a brilliant yet false prosperity, America’s 20th- and 21st-century financialization has worked the identical effects: This, Arrighi explains, allowed the U.S. to attract massive amounts of capital and move toward a model of deficit financing — an increasing indebtedness of the U.S. economy and state to the rest of the world. But financialization also allowed the U.S. to reflate its economic and political power in the world, particularly as the dollar was ensconced as the global reserve currency. This reprieve gave the U.S. the illusion of prosperity of the late 1980s and ’90s, when, as Arrighi says “there was this idea that the United States had ‘come back.’” Had the United States truly come back? Or did it simply enjoy a temporary and illusory bounce — a mere feint? Borrowed Time More: Financialization merely stalls the inevitable and this has only been laid bare by subsequent events in the U.S. By the late 1990s, the financialization itself was beginning to malfunction, starting with the Asia crisis of 1997 and subsequent popping of the dot-com bubble, and continuing with a reduction in interest rates that would inflate the housing bubble that detonated so spectacularly in 2008. Since then, the cascade of imbalances in the financial system has only accelerated and it has only been through a combination of increasingly desperate financial legerdemain — inflating one bubble after another — and outright coercion that has allowed the U.S. to extend its hegemony even a bit longer beyond its time. Mr. Johnston concludes with a piece co-authored by this Arrighi character and scholar Beverly Silver: The expansion can be expected to be a temporary phenomenon that will end more or less catastrophically… But the blindness that led the ruling groups of [hegemonic states of the past] to mistake the ‘autumn’ for a new ‘spring’ of their power meant that the end came sooner and more catastrophically than it might otherwise have… A similar blindness is evident today.” A similar blindness is indeed evident today. A fellow need be blind to be blinded from the blindness. And only the blind cannot see that all of Washington is blind… Regards, [Brian Maher] Brian Maher Managing Editor, The Daily Reckoning [feedback@dailyreckoning.com.](mailto:feedback@dailyreckoning.com) Editor’s note: We don’t often discuss cryptocurrencies around here. But there’s an [upcoming crypto development so dramatic]( we simply had to bring it to your attention… [Bitcoin’s Fourth Halving.]( It could create fortunes. And this coming Sunday, April 14 at 7:00 p.m. ET, top crypto expert James Altucher is hosting an urgent online strategy session... To help you prepare for the Fourth Bitcoin Halving that’s guaranteed to happen this coming week. This Sunday, James will discuss his top six coins for the coming Bitcoin halving, each with the potential to turn $1,000 into a six-figure nest egg in the next 12–18 months… Why he believes this will be a halving on steroids that could send these coins higher than anyone can imagine… And James will even give you the name and ticker symbol of one of those coins, completely free of charge. Are you in? [Click here to automatically RSVP.]( Clicking the link above automatically registers you for The Countdown To The 4th Boom. By reserving your spot, you will receive event updates and offers. We will not share your email address with anyone. And you can opt-out at any time. [Privacy Policy.]( Thank you for reading The Daily Reckoning! We greatly value your questions and comments. Please send all feedback to [feedback@dailyreckoning.com.](mailto:feedback@dailyreckoning.com) [Brian Maher] [Brian Maher]( is the Daily Reckoning's Managing Editor. Before signing on to Agora Financial, he was an independent researcher and writer who covered economics, politics and international affairs. His work has appeared in the Asia Times and other news outlets around the world. He holds a Master's degree in Defense & Strategic Studies. [Paradigm]( ☰ ⊗ [ARCHIVE]( [ABOUT]( [Contact Us]( © 2024 Paradigm Press, LLC. 1001 Cathedral Street, Baltimore, MD 21201. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press, LLC. delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your The Daily Reckoning e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from The Daily Reckoning, feel free to [click here.]( Please note: the mailbox associated with this email address is not monitored, so do not reply to this message. We welcome comments or suggestions at feedback@dailyreckoning.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, [contact us here]( or call (844)-731-0984. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We allow the editors of our publications to recommend securities that they own themselves. However, our policy prohibits editors from exiting a personal trade while the recommendation to subscribers is open. In no circumstance may an editor sell a security before subscribers have a fair opportunity to exit. The length of time an editor must wait after subscribers have been advised to exit a play depends on the type of publication. All other employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. The Daily Reckoning is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. Please read our [Privacy Statement.]( If you are having trouble receiving your The Daily Reckoning subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by [whitelisting The Daily Reckoning.](