www.ozy.com [OZY]()
Your World.
Bold & Bright
[Daily Dose]( The newsletter to fuel â and thrill â your mind. Read for deep dives into the unmissable ideas and topics shaping our world. Jun 25, 2022 Today The World Cup is just a few months away and fans worldwide are grappling with the prospect of Qatar as the eventâs distinguished host, even as the country has made news for its troubling human rights record. In todayâs Daily Dose we visit Qatar and some famous cases of sportswashing, or the use of sports to put an attractive facade on a problematic regime. (Weâre looking at you, Russia.) Is Qatar the latest case? â with reporting by Matthew Blackman from Cape Town, South Africa
Sportswashingâs storied history Olympic shames The 1936 Olympic Games in Berlin, often referred to as the Nazi Olympics, were used by Hitler to project a vision of Germany as a powerful, modern state that was [peaceful and tolerant.]( A year before the games took place, U.S. Amateur Athletic Union president Jeremiah Mahoney tried to convince athletes to boycott Berlin. Mahoney pointed out that the games would serve only to legitimize a regime that had excluded âNon-Aryansâ from athletics. Mahoneyâs boycott initially drew support from track and field star Jesse Owens. However, Owens later changed his mind, in part due to the hypocrisy of protesting racism in Germany. As Owensâ coach Larry Snyder [said]( in reference to Americaâs anti-Black racism, âWhy should we oppose Germany for doing something that we do right here at home?â Owens went on to win four gold medals, making a mockery of Hitlerâs claims of Aryan superiority. However, [Susan Bachrach](, a historian at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, notes that New York Times political reporter Frederick Birchall came out after the games saying the Olympics had âput Germans back in the fold of nations and even made them more human again.â Three years later, Germany invaded Poland. Apartheid South Africa: To boycott or not The apartheid regime in South Africa used sport to add shiny gloss to its abysmal record. Rugby and cricket tours in particular were platforms on which the government showcased the seeming normalcy of racial segregation, with international teams competing against [makeshift Black teams]( assembled to create the impression of a âseparate but equalâ society. The movement to boycott South African sport began with the International Olympic Committee effectively banning South Africa in 1964. The fight by activists to boycott South African athletics, particularly rugby and cricket, would continue until the 1980s. According to ex-sportsman and South African historian Andre Odendaal, it was the combination of sports boycotts and economic sanctions that dealt a fatal blow to the apartheid regime. This wasnât necessarily because white South Africans changed their minds about segregation but rather because they grew tired of their pariah status and their countryâs exclusion from choice entertainment. It was this shift in public sentiment that helped bring President F.W. de Klerk to the negotiating table with Nelson Mandela, according to Odendaal, who points out that itâs important to question the idea of âsacrificeâ that athletes must endure in being prohibited from play. He told OZY, âIf you look at the human tragedy of apartheid against the discomfort some sportsmen felt over a twenty-year period, there is no equivalence.â
Recent cases, grave consequences Chinaâs wintry games Over [200]( human rights organizations objected to China hosting the 2022 Winter Olympics due to the countryâs stained record. This record included credible [reports]( publicized by the U.N. Human Rights Committee in 2018, which found China had detained as many as a million Uyghurs and other mostly Muslim ethnic groups in âre-education camps,â while imprisoning as many as hundreds of thousands more. In the run-up to this yearâs games, the U.S., Canada and the U.K. announced a diplomatic boycott, meaning they refused to send diplomatic representatives. Some nations discussed the prospect of an athletesâ boycott. However, [according to]( professor of politics and government at Pacific University Jules Boykoff, for athletes this is sometimes too much, as a given yearâs games are often their âonly chance at Olympic glory. Sacrificing this chance on the altar of human rights policy is a big ask.â As South African historian Odendaal indicated, however, it is an important calculus as the effects of a sports boycott can be considerable. China was seen to be using the games for propaganda purposes right from the opening ceremony, in which Dinigeer Yilamujiang â a Uyghur cross-country skier â was one of two Chinese athletes to light the cauldron. Human Rights Watch [tweeted](, âThe Chinese government is not just committing crimes against humanity, but also flaunting it.â To Russia, with love The 2018 soccer World Cup in Russia was allowed to proceed despite a laundry list of concerns, including the annexation of parts of Ukraine in 2014, the shooting down of [Malaysia Airlines Flight 17]( and a troubling record on LGBTQ rights. Both the U.K. and Australia declared a diplomatic boycott. Guardian soccer journalist Barney Ronay [agreed]( with many at the time who felt that a player boycott would not affect Russiaâs foreign policy. However, as politics professor Tatiana Zonova of Moscowâs MGIMO University [argues](, because the calls to boycott the tournament went unheeded, it demonstrated to Putin âthe impotence of Russiaâs detractors.â Zonova says that the 2018 World Cup helped burnish Russiaâs image. As was [reported]( by the BBC at the time, Vladimir Putin himself felt the World Cup was a great achievement and that visitors had praised Russia for its âhospitality and friendliness.â Three-and-a-half years later, Russia invaded Ukraine. [TAKE OUR POLL](
WATCH MIKE GREENBERG on [The Carlos Watson Show](! Welcome to Doha Scrubbing the Cup clean Eyebrows around the world lifted in 2010 when Qatar won the honor of hosting the 2022 World Cup. Not considered a favorite in the application process, Qatar spent nearly $200 million on its bid, [according to]( The Guardian. The U.S. [Department of Justice has since revealed]( that money was paid to five members of FIFAâs board to vote for Qatar. (Officials also received bribes to support Russiaâs 2018 bid.) In February 2021, Amnesty International reported that 6,500 migrant workers â who had been paid as little as $11.20 a day to labor in 104-degree weather â had perished in Qatar since 2010. [According]( to the Qatari government, officials are now working to end such human rights violations. Amnesty International [says]( that Qatar stifles free expression and denies women fundamental rights, while consensual sexual relations between two men is [punishable]( by up to seven yearsâ imprisonment. Dwindling protests At present, few in the sports world are advocating for a diplomatic or playersâ boycott of the 2022 World Cup, although former England player and presenter Gary Lineker reportedly [turned down]( the chance to host the event due to human rights concerns. David Beckham, in contrast, signed a [$200 million deal]( to be the âfaceâ of the tournament. Netherlands coach Louis van Gaal [called]( the selection of Qatar as host âb******t.â In last yearâs qualifying matches, players from Norway and Germany wore shirts that said âHuman Rights.â Yet, as the tournament draws closer, fewer such protests are being reported. On The Guardianâs âFootball Weeklyâ podcast, journalist James Elis perhaps summed up the feelings of many when he admitted to thinking itâs âunfairâ that sports fans are asked to grapple with such moral dilemmas. âI have got a few months to decide how I feel about it,â he said. [TAKE OUR POLL]( Community Corner What are your thoughts on the effectiveness of sportswashing in putting an attractive facade on problematic regimes? Does boycotting make a difference? Share your thoughts with us at OzyCommunity@Ozy.com. ABOUT OZY OZY is a diverse, global and forward-looking media and entertainment company focused on âthe New and the Next.â OZY creates space for fresh perspectives, and offers new takes on everything from news and culture to technology, business, learning and entertainment. [www.ozy.com]( / #OZY Curiosity. Enthusiasm. Action. Thatâs OZY!
[TV]( | [PODCASTS]( | [NEWS]( | [FESTIVALS]( A Modern Media Company OZY Media, 800 West El Camino Mountain View, California 94040 This email was sent to {EMAIL} [Manage Subscriptions]( | [Privacy Policy]( | [Read Online](