Newsletter Subject

What NOT to Do as the Election Approaches

From

oxfordclub.com

Email Address

oxford@mb.oxfordclub.com

Sent On

Sat, Oct 26, 2024 12:30 PM

Email Preheader Text

Talking politics makes most people bitter and angry. Even, ironically, when they agree with you. SPE

Talking politics makes most people bitter and angry. Even, ironically, when they agree with you. SPECIAL OPPORTUNITIES [The Oxford Club Special Opportunities]( What NOT to Do as the Election Approaches Alexander Green, Chief Investment Strategist, The Oxford Club [Alexander Green] I'm a lifelong political junkie. But I don't write much about politics – and for good reason. Talking politics makes most people bitter and angry. Even, ironically, when they agree with you. ("Can you believe what those yahoos in Washington D.C. are up to now?") We know from our conferences, surveys, and subscriber feedback over the years that most of our readers reside on the conservative/libertarian side of the political spectrum. But certainly not all of them. And in today's hyper-partisan atmosphere, it makes no sense to inflame or offend some percentage of your readers by wading unnecessarily into political waters. The key word here, however, is "unnecessarily." I'm not just an editorialist. My primary mission is to give investment advice that works. That means at times I need to speak my mind about how pending or approved legislation will affect the economy, inflation, interest rates, or the stock and bond markets. The hilariously misnamed Inflation Reduction of Act of 2022 is a good example. Many respected economists - including those on the left like Larry Summers - predicted that the bill's massive increase in deficit spending would only drive consumer prices higher. And, of course, it did. However, given voters' great unhappiness about this, the Biden administration prefers to blame corporate price gouging. (As if competitors in a free market wouldn't attract dissatisfied customers by lowering their prices if they could.) See how easy it is to slip into political commentary even when your goal is merely to inform? Yet Oxford Club Members are not shy about letting me know how they feel about it. Whenever I opine about how some new government policy or proposal is likely to affect the financial markets, I get a blizzard of emails telling me that they "didn't pay good money" to hear me spout off about politics. This includes subscribers to our free e-letters, so they must feel strongly about it. However, I do feel a responsibility to let readers know which companies are likely to be positively affected by new laws and regulations - and which are likely to end up on the short end of the stick. It would be wrong to have insights into these matters and not share them with Members. My objective is to influence readers' investment approach, not their political views. Yet it is hard to avoid stepping on toes. For example, I've long argued that much of the public funds spent to combat climate change are wasted. Yet I was surprised to recently learn how much money is wasted. An evaluation by the Berlin-based Mercator Research Institute of more than 1,500 climate policies in 41 countries found that only 63 actually worked to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. That's about 4% of them. Still, I've recommended several clean energy companies that have delivered great returns, due in part to generous but ill-advised government subsidies. The lesson: It pays to watch closely what is happening in Washington. You might wonder why, if I generally avoid talking about politics, I'm doing so now, especially in a close and contentious election year. The truth? It's vital that investors understand how politicians - and especially political campaigns - undermine the pursuit of your investment goals and negatively influence your view of the economy and the nation. Most voters - or at least most partisans - believe that politics is about principles... and platforms... and policies. And it is. But for the politicians, it's mainly about something else: winning. Politics is about gaining, holding, and wielding power. It's a battle of ideas. It's also a zero-sum game. In every election, someone is going to win. And someone is going to lose. The stakes are huge. Our lives, our economy, and our country are enormously affected by the policies that are debated, voted on, and signed into law in Washington. Politics is war. And, as we're told from an early age, everything is fair in love and war. For example, a presidential incumbent may claim credit for everything positive that happened on their watch, no matter how tenuous the connection. (Yes, policies have consequences. But there is no lever in the Oval Office that controls inflation, interest rates, commodity prices - especially gasoline, economic growth, business developments, scientific innovation, geopolitics, the performance of the financial markets, and even the temperature of the Earth.) Incumbents (or their successors) will also claim that every negative development during their term was caused by circumstances beyond their control - or, better yet, by their opponents and their party - no matter how clear and direct the connection to the incumbent's own actions and policies. The next step is to define the opposition... in the most unflattering light possible. Deride their character. Undermine their experience. Highlight their past mistakes. Point out their flip-flops on the issues. Warn voters about their real or perceived shortcomings and their dangerous intentions. And be sure to insist that this is the most important election of our lifetime. Just like the one four years ago. And the one eight years ago. Some of the brickbats - especially the ones based on past votes and current proposals - are fair game and well deserved. But a lot of today's politics is nothing more than fearmongering about the dystopian future we will all face if the other guy (or gal) gets elected. This is where investors get scared and nervous and often flee volatile but high-returning stocks for the safety of lower-returning cash. They usually end up regretting it. Now, could a Donald Trump victory send the stock market to new heights? What about if Kamala takes over? If you prepare now, it won't matter who wins... so long as you utilize my "perfect election strategy." [Learn more about it here.]( Good investing Alex [The 27th Annual Investment U Conference 2025 - Ponte Vedra Inn & Club in Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida, March 30 - April 2, 2025.]( OPPORTUNITIES OF INTEREST - ["Bigger Than the Personal Computer, the Smartphone and Even the Internet." Man Who Called Nvidia at $1.10 Says This Will Change the World.]( - [Get Marc's Top 6 AI Dividend Stocks]( - [ChatGPT Admits, "[Industry X] Will Grow at the Same Rate as the AI Industry..." but These Stocks Sell for up to 97% Less. Click for Details.]( SPONSORED [Join Us to Discover "the Perfect Election Strategy"]( [MAL Elect]( Wondering how the election could impact your investments? You aren't alone. [Join Alexander Green on October 29 to discover "the perfect election strategy."]( It's helped Alex outperform the market by as much as 578%... in the years following every election since 2004! [Reserve your FREE spot here.]( [The Oxford Club] You are receiving this email because you subscribed to Oxford Club Special Opportunities. Oxford Club Special Opportunities is published by The Oxford Club. Questions? Check out our [FAQs](. Trying to reach us? [Contact us here.]( Please do not reply to this email as it goes to an unmonitored inbox. [Privacy Policy]( | [Whitelist Oxford Club Special Opportunities]( | [Unsubscribe]( © 2024 The Oxford Club, LLC All Rights Reserved The Oxford Club | [105 West Monument Street](#) | [Baltimore, MD 21201](#) North America: [1.800.589.3430](#) | International: [+1.443.353.4334](#) | Fax: [1.410.329.1923](#) [Oxfordclub.com]( Nothing published by The Oxford Club should be considered personalized investment advice. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed personalized investment advice. We allow the editors of our publications to recommend securities that they own themselves. However, our policy prohibits editors from exiting a personal trade while the recommendation to subscribers is open. In no circumstance may an editor sell a security before subscribers have a fair opportunity to exit. The length of time an editor must wait after subscribers have been advised to exit a play depends on the type of publication. All other employees and agents must wait 24 hours after publication before trading on a recommendation. Any investments recommended by The Oxford Club should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. The information found on this website may only be used pursuant to the membership or subscription agreement and any reproduction, copying or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of The Oxford Club, LLC, 105 West Monument Street, Baltimore, MD 21201.

Marketing emails from oxfordclub.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

27/11/2024

Sent On

10/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.