Newsletter Subject

Is This How We Start a War With the Aliens?

From

outsiderclub.com

Email Address

newsletter@outsiderclub.com

Sent On

Fri, Feb 17, 2023 03:06 PM

Email Preheader Text

The White House says these objects were benign, but if that were true they wouldn’t still be un

The White House says these objects were benign, but if that were true they wouldn’t still be unidentified. [Outsider Club Header] Feb 17, 2023 By Jason Simpkins for the Outsider Club Is This How We Start a War With the Aliens? A few days ago, I appeared on the Angel Research Podcast, and the very first thing we had to talk about was the Chinese spy balloon. ([You can see that conversation here](.) At the time of the recording, a lot of the details were murky. It wasn’t clear exactly what had happened, how the balloon was able to get as far as it did, or why the incident wasn’t prevented in the first place. Now, here we are a week later, and there are even more questions. American forces have since neutralized three more unidentified aerial objects. The White House wants to give the impression that the objects were “benign,” but if that were true they wouldn’t still be unidentified. They’d have come out and said exactly what it was they shot down. But as of right now, they either don’t know or aren’t saying, so any attempts by the Biden White House to dismiss the activity ring rather hollow. Especially since the description of one of the objects, spotted over Lake Huron on February 12, doesn’t sound anything like a balloon. It was described as having an “octagonal structure with strings hanging off but no discernible payload.” Prior to being shot down, the object was caught on radar over Montana where it “flew in proximity to sensitive DOD sites," the Pentagon said. And when Gen. Glen David VanHerck, who serves as the commander of United States Northern Command and the North American Aerospace Defense Command, was asked if the object could be alien in nature, he didn’t rule it out. "I haven't ruled out anything," VanHerck said. "We call them objects for a reason… I am not able to categorize how they stay aloft. It could be a gaseous type of balloon inside a structure or it could be some type of a propulsion system. But clearly, they're — they're able to stay aloft." The object, whatever it was, still hasn’t been recovered. In another instance, on February 11, a cylindrical object was shot down in Canada’s Yukon territory. Canadian officials believe that was a balloon similar to the Chinese surveillance craft that traversed the United States. However, that’s yet to be confirmed, since the area in which it was shot down is remote, mountainous, and heavy with snow, ice, and wind. Endless Energy Perfected at Last What you’re looking at is NOT oil, ethanol, or some crazy biofuel. But in the near future, every skyscraper, factory, truck, plane, train, bus, and boat could be powered by it. It’s so cheap and efficient it could wipe out every other conventional fuel source we use today... And hand early investors a shot at world-altering gains. [See the breakthrough for yourself here.]( The third object, meanwhile, was shot down off the northern coast of Alaska on Feb 10. That object was “the size of a small car," and "not similar in size or shape to the high-altitude surveillance balloon" U.S. forces shot down off the coast of South Carolina on February 4. Furthermore, the F-22 pilots who tracked and downed the aircraft said they couldn’t identify a propulsion system and had no idea how it could possibly stay in the air. They also said it interfered with their sensors. In fact, some of the pilots couldn’t even agree on an accurate description of the object. What’s also notable is that these objects were traveling at different altitudes. The Chinese spy balloon was floating at 60,000–65,000 feet, but the object over Lake Huron was much lower, at 20,000 feet, while the other two were at 40,000 feet. [UAP Map] So these objects all differ in size, shape, and altitude, and their origins are largely unknown. And that’s what makes the White House’s effort to dismiss them look like lip service. That, and the fact that the Defense Department has been increasingly forthright in acknowledging the presence and the potential threat posed by what it now calls “unknown aerial phenomena” or “unknown anomalous phenomena” — UAP, either way. Are You Sick of Market Crashes Gutting Your Retirement Account? There’s a way to flip the market carnage into a legal fortune…Without shorting a single stock…And without touching options, cryptos, or “meme" stocks. This radical “blueprint'' could help anyone turn $500 into $1.2 million in under a year. [For more details, go here now.]( It even created a new office to investigate their sightings, but that task force has only been able to explain about half of the incidents reported. The All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office has received 366 reports of UAP — 163 of which were attributed to balloons or “balloon-like entities.” Additionally, footage released by the Pentagon in 2020 showed unknown objects flying across the ocean surface that had been spotted by Navy pilots. [UAP Video] "Dude, this is a f--king drone, bro," one of the pilots exclaims in the video. Another says, "There's a whole fleet of them." "They're all going against the wind. The wind's 120 knots to the west. Look at that thing, dude!" the first person says. "It's rotating!" Another video shows an object speeding over the ocean, prompting the pilot to scream, "What the f--k is that?" $6 Billion in Funding Going to a Single Company? Biden has been dishing out funding as if these are his last days on Earth. He’s handed out more than $2 trillion in funding during his first few years in office. One of his biggest goals is to develop the future of energy. Shockingly, it has nothing to do with fossil fuels OR renewables. A full $6 billion is headed to an industry dominated by one tiny Virginia-based company. A few critical patent approvals means very few others are on the shortlist. And early investors in this game-changing technology could reap a massive windfall. [You need to immediately check this one out for yourself.]( Those videos were declassified after unauthorized leaks had already made them public in 2007 and 2017. That’s not uncommon, as a 2021 report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence noted: In 18 incidents, described in 21 reports, observers reported unusual UAP movement patterns or flight characteristics. Some UAP appeared to remain stationary in winds aloft, move against the wind, maneuver abruptly, or move at considerable speed, without discernible means of propulsion. In a small number of cases, military aircraft systems processed radio frequency (RF) energy associated with UAP sightings. However, what’s somewhat scary now is that the military is starting to shoot these things down. That’s no big deal if the object in question ends up being a balloon… But what if an object that’s mistaken for a Chinese surveillance craft turns out to be something else entirely — something alien? Then we could be in real trouble. It might start shooting back. In any case, it’s clear that our skies are far more congested than even our military thought. And that speaks to the increased militarization and aggression of rivals like China. It’s also indicative of the technological advancements that are being made overseas, which in some cases, outpace those of the United States. And that’s why I continue to remain focused on the science and technology that’s being developed to fight our next war — no matter who it’s against. You can find out more about that with [my Secret Stock Files investment service](. There I release weekly updates and monthly videos detailing the most cutting-edge military technology. So be sure to [check it out]( if this kind of thing interests you — or you just want to make money. Fight on, [Jason Simpkins Signature] Jason Simpkins [follow basic]([@OCSimpkins on Twitter]( Jason Simpkins is Assistant Managing Editor of the Outsider Club and Investment Director of Wall Street's Proving Ground, a financial advisory focused on security companies and defense contractors. For more on Jason, check out his editor's [page](. *Follow Outsider Club on [Facebook]( and [Twitter](. Follow the Outsiders [Twitter]( | [Facebook]( | [LinkedIn]( | [YouTube]( This email was sent to {EMAIL}. You can manage your subscription and get our privacy policy [here](. Outsider Club, Copyright © Outsider Club LLC, 3 E Read Street Baltimore, MD 21202. Please note: It is not our intention to send email to anyone who doesn't want it. If you're not sure why you're getting this e-letter, or no longer wish to receive it, get more info [here]( including our privacy policy and information on how to manage your subscription. If you are interested in our other publications, please call our customer service team at [1-855-496-0830](tel:/18554960830).

Marketing emails from outsiderclub.com

View More
Sent On

27/06/2024

Sent On

27/06/2024

Sent On

26/06/2024

Sent On

25/06/2024

Sent On

24/06/2024

Sent On

23/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.