Newsletter Subject

Squares, Circles, and the Real Future of Power

From

outsiderclub.com

Email Address

newsletter@outsiderclub.com

Sent On

Thu, Feb 10, 2022 09:37 PM

Email Preheader Text

Everything doesn’t have to be shiny and new. We don’t have to abandon all we’ve built

Everything doesn’t have to be shiny and new. We don’t have to abandon all we’ve built before. We just need to stop trying to force new tech to work for new problems and embrace the right tech we have already. Everything doesn’t have to be shiny and new. We don’t have to abandon all we’ve built before. We just need to stop trying to force new tech to work for new problems and embrace the right tech we have already. [Outsider Club logo] Squares, Circles, and the Real Future of Power [Adam English Photo] By [Adam English]( Written Feb 10, 2022 There is a blind spot in the massive spending that is to come that binds expectations, rankles investors, and ruins results. Call it a product of the disposable, single-use economy mindset. Call it a blind faith from acolytes of the quasi-Church of the Transcendent New Tech. But how do we avoid throwing out all the good that has been done? All the capital-intensive and immovable work already done? Why should we abandon so much as we move forward? A whole bunch of squares are being hammered into circles by fools, akin to toddlers with a simple toy set, that are testing if perseverance and sheer force can overcome reality. All the while, better options exist right now. I’ve long had a theory for how we really should be addressing the infrastructure issues we face in the USA. One that is far less aspirational than White House press releases frame them to be. One that is panning out now, though it is barely covered, is tying into a far deeper issue. The USA built a massive amount of infrastructure over the last century. We are dependent upon it as our baseline. But how do we avoid throwing out all the good that has been done? All that capital-intensive and immovable work? Why should we abandon so much as we move forward? Have You Heard of “TriFuel-238”? A single ounce could power your home for a year. Under half an ounce could get you from LA to D.C. And now, according to figures from the U.S. Energy Information Administration... The breakthrough known as "TriFuel-238"... Could trigger a wealth event unseen since the dawn of the internet... As it takes the throne as the cheapest source of energy on the planet. This has nothing to do with renewables or fossil fuels — or virtually anything you’ve ever seen before. Yet this strange substance could now claim the lion’s share of a $1.9 trillion opportunity... And hand early investors a potential life-changing fortune. [Click here for the urgent details.]( We’ve built so much that we should not neglect. The cost to society and taxpayers is so much higher to completely reinvent and replace. A hurdle ignored from the top-down perspective, but one that dominates the bottom-up reality. Last year, 31 major wind projects were vetoed, along with 13 solar projects. That’s about on par with 2020. It’s a theme for most years over the last decade, most years with even more. These are not viable projects. They never could be. They consistently fail once someone actually does the math. True solutions, I’m convinced, recognize the difference between progress and paying an ever-increasing fortune to replace some aspects that truly matter, for budgets and viability. Here are two examples that tie into exactly how we should be framing our problems that merge new tech with deeply entrenched and reliable assets we paid for, are in place right now, and can last for many decades to come. Ask anyone what the best renewable energy out there may be, and you’re going to get a whole bunch of wrong answers. Top-down analysis with little to offer for details on how we bridge the gap. A whole bunch of squares people keep trying to hammer into circles. Solar? Wind? They have their places, but their limitations are profound. What if we do not need to rebuild so much power generation from the ground up? What if all we need is another way to boil some water? That’s what’s behind a small, private company pushing to advance what was thought of as the most inefficient — yet most reliable — renewable energy. One we’ve known about for over a century. Let’s start with a picture of what we don’t want to replace, and go from there. Behold! A coal power plant turbine: [power plant steam turbine] The scale of this picture is hard to imagine, but look at the backhoe, mid-frame and to the left. This cost a fortune and will never move. What if we moved to it? Two ideas stand out for how to make these impossibly large feats of engineering work in our favor on the cheap. One is a way off, but a great example of how we should approach the problem, and one is available now and is in the works. A small, privately owned company has a novel approach — bring new power sources to the power plants. [Quaise Energy]( — small, privately owned, and recently pulling in capital for a pilot program — wants to dig beneath power plants that use these kinds of massive steam turbines. The massive steam turbines will never move, but the heat source can move to them. Digging for heat is not new. The idea has been in play in the real world for over a century. You can look to Iceland for how it can provide nearly limitless geothermal energy. The question is how much it takes to dig deep enough to tap into Earth’s innate energy. Pressure and temperature ruin drill bits. They warp and fail. They have to be pulled back up and replaced at an ever-increasing pace the deeper they go. Time and materials cost a fortune. Instead, a high-power millimeter wave drill vaporizes rock and vents it out. No moving parts that are destroyed in the process, with vapor instead of solid backfill to lift out. Thus, it can bore holes directly below power plants that tie directly into the steam turbines that actually create power. Thus, the company can do work on site without new turbines, or power lines, or zoning issues. This kind of on-site modification tech really shines with its potential to use what we’ve already paid for to match the kind of efficiency we take for granted. The Biggest Event in Our Company’s History For a limited time, we’re reopening access to the most popular presentation we’ve ever produced. Hosted by biotech expert Keith Kohl, this [urgent presentation]( shows you how to capture your slice of the $1.6 trillion global pharmaceutical market... And how to set yourself up for huge potential profits every single month as the FDA approves an unprecedented amount of new drugs. Over 10,000 people have viewed [the presentation]([...]( and we may have to take it down again soon... But as of right now, you can still get access. [Click here to tune in NOW.]( The second tech is as well-defined, but more modern in its application to the power grid. We need to store what we can for baseline energy supply. Tons are trying but catastrophically failing. Look no further than Tesla building megawatt-scale batteries. Look at how its marquee pilot programs literally rip themselves apart on the atomic scale and [create runaway fires](. Look at how it takes years to install, and the first battery banks it installed already must be replaced. One size does not fit all, as much as Tesla and others want to cram their square solution into any round hole. Other tech, also long in play, is far better adapted. We have batteries, extensively tested and easy to maintain, that can last decades with no drop off. No runaway fires. No premium for over-hyped branding. We have batteries that can last for decades with no loss of power, no constant need to mine problematic materials. No perpetual replacement. We just have to use what we have well, and tailor what is to come to work in harmony. Everything doesn’t have to be shiny and new. We don’t have to abandon all we’ve built before. [We just need to add the right tech to what we have now](. Take care, [Adam English] Adam English [follow basic]( [@AdamEnglishOC on Twitter]( Adam's editorial talents and analysis drew the attention of senior editors at [Outsider Club](, which he joined in mid-2012. While he has acquired years of hands-on experience in the editorial room by working side by side with ex-brokers, options floor traders, and financial advisors, he is acutely aware of the challenges faced by retail investors after starting at the ground floor in the financial publishing field. For more on Adam, check out his editor's [page](. *Follow Outsider Club on [Facebook]( and [Twitter](. Browse Our Archives [$100 Oil Is the New Floor]( [A Bridge Too Far... From Reality]( [Bet on the Horse, Not the Jockey]( [What Stocks Are Winning Right Now?]( [Third Time’s the Charm? An Airship, NASA, and Better Batteries]( --------------------------------------------------------------- This email was sent to {EMAIL}. It is not our intention to send email to anyone who doesn't want it. If you're not sure why you've received this e-letter, or no longer wish to receive it, you may [unsubscribe here]( and view our privacy policy and information on how to manage your subscription. To ensure that you receive future issues of Outsider Club, please add newsletter@outsiderclub.com to your address book or whitelist within your spam settings. For customer service questions or issues, please contact us for assistance. Outsider Club, Copyright © 2022, Outsider Club LLC and Angel Publishing LLC. All rights reserved. 3 E Read Street, Baltimore, MD 21202. Your privacy is important to us – we will never rent or sell your e-mail or personal information. Please read our [Privacy Policy](. Neither the publisher nor the editors are registered investment advisors. Subscribers should not view this publication as offering personalized legal or investment advice. Read our [Details and Disclosures.]( ---------------------------------------------------------------

Marketing emails from outsiderclub.com

View More
Sent On

05/07/2024

Sent On

03/07/2024

Sent On

02/07/2024

Sent On

01/07/2024

Sent On

27/06/2024

Sent On

27/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.