Newsletter Subject

Thomas Edison’s $39 Million EV Blunder

From

outsiderclub.com

Email Address

newsletter@outsiderclub.com

Sent On

Mon, Jan 24, 2022 04:35 PM

Email Preheader Text

Is this the end for Tesla? Is this the end for Tesla? Written Jan 24, 2022 Dear Outsider, Thomas Edi

Is this the end for Tesla? Is this the end for Tesla? [Outsider Club logo] Thomas Edison’s $39 Million EV Blunder [Alexander Boulden Photo] By [Alexander Boulden]( Written Jan 24, 2022 Dear Outsider, Thomas Edison is best remembered for inventing the carbon filament light bulb and phonograph, without which the world would be a much darker, quieter place. Edison was known for his grit, determination, and dogged work ethic. He put all his resources into his dreams to make them a reality. Toward the end of his career, however, Edison got the EV bug and started work on an expensive battery endeavor that was doomed to fail. In the early 1900s, my great-grandfather worked at Edison’s workshop in Menlo Park, New Jersey. Back then, employees recounted seeing Edison zipping around the old dusty roads in a prototype electric car, one that used a new battery made of nickel and iron. [edison] The New “Fuel of the Future” Could Hand You a Fortune This is the most important energy innovation of the past 100 years. There’s a little-known fuel that’s set to completely revolutionize a $1 trillion sector... but it has nothing to do with hydrogen, nuclear fusion, renewables, or batteries. It’s created using only air and water, which makes this fuel 100% clean and highly affordable. And it can be used for anything and everything. Like your car... cruise ships... even aircraft! This could easily become the new fuel of the future. In fact, it’s already swallowing up the global oil market... [Which is why you should make your move now, before the price skyrockets.]( You see, early EVs used lead-acid batteries, but they were slow to charge and often spewed out the toxic mixture, eating away at the car’s internals and carriage compartment. Not to mention, they weren’t easily disposed of. So Edison decided to disrupt the EV battery industry and in 1901 founded the Edison Storage Battery Company. Even though the company faced many setbacks, Edison was determined to make it work. He eventually refined the nickel-iron battery first patented by Swedish inventor Ernst Waldemar Jungner in 1899, and Edison thought he’d struck gold. [edison battery] It was so revolutionary that even Henry Ford wanted the nickel-iron battery in his future EVs and made a deal with Edison in 1914 to release the “Ford Electric,” which would sell for $900 and have a 100-mile range. But just as we’ve seen with today’s batteries, the Edison battery was big, heavy, expensive, and needed frequent charging. By the time Edison’s project was completed, consumers had spoken and preferred the cheaper fossil fuel-powered Ford Model T. Although Edison’s batteries were used by railways for signal switches, Edison spent $1.5 million ($39 million in today’s money) on the EV battery project and it was deemed a failure... But recently scientists have uncovered a new use for the nickel-iron battery, and it doesn’t have anything to do with powering EVs... The EV Scam As you can see, EVs aren’t some revolutionary new phenomenon, despite what Elon Musk and Joe Biden might have you believe. In fact, Ferdinand Porsche’s first car, released in 1898 and called the Egger-Lohner C.2 Phaeton, was powered by an electric motor. In the early 1900s, electric cars were just as prevalent as their gas-powered counterparts, but they fell out of favor because the costs outweighed the benefits. So why the renewed enthusiasm? Well, it's about money and control over people’s movements... We hear it time and again that EVs are the future of transportation, that they’ll save the environment, and that they’ll cost you less at the pump. But this couldn’t be further from the truth. When factoring in ancillary ownership costs, including the price of electricity, EV registration taxes, the cost of home chargers, and travel expenses for driving to an EV charging station, the Anderson Economic Group found that running an EV costs $12.95 per 100 miles compared to $8.58 for driving an internal combustion vehicle. That’s not even factoring in the cost of repairs or replacing the battery. Last month, Tuomas Katainen went viral when he strapped 66 pounds of dynamite to his 2013 Tesla Model S and filmed the explosion on YouTube, saying he didn’t want to cough up the $22,600 it would have cost him to replace the battery. [tsla fire] "Miracle Mineral" at Center of Multi-Trillion Wealth Bonanza Inside each of these spheres is a natural resource more important than oil, coal, or gas. It’s called the “Miracle Mineral.” [See how this little-known resource could give savvy investors the chance to turn $500 into $82,175 over the next few months.]( And now that the Biden administration has pledged to subsidize the EV industry by mandating that 50% of private car sales be electric by 2030 and that the government purchase only EVs by 2035, people are becoming skeptical. The math just doesn’t add up. Caveat Emptor Michael Shellenberger, founder of the California-based nonprofit Environmental Progress, recently said, “One reason to be suspicious of electric cars overall is that we haven’t solved any of the real problems that we’ve always thought they had.” Those century-old problems dating back to the 1900s include price, range, reliability, and lack of infrastructure. Even Kamala Harris recently tweeted that the biggest barrier for buying an electric car is “figuring out where and how to charge it.” But that’s not even close to the biggest barrier. How about the fact that according to Kelley Blue Book, the average EV costs $51,532? That’s not an affordable option for most Americans. It shows just how out of touch our politicians are with reality and how keen they are on misrepresenting the facts to win votes. If EVs were better than fossil fuel vehicles, the government wouldn't need to step in to subsidize them. Musk holds the same sentiment and recently said at a Wall Street Journal conference, “Do we need support for gas stations? We don’t. So there’s no need for support for a charging network... I’m literally saying get rid of all subsidies.” You gotta love Musk’s free market politics. Every penny spent by the government on EVs is money that could be spent elsewhere — on healthcare, infrastructure, and national security. The government is simply putting the country into more debt to help the wealthy buy new toys. Again, if EVs are so great, companies wouldn’t need to lie about their efficacy. Tesla rivals Nikola and Lordstown Motors recently found themselves in hot water with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for defrauding investors. Former Nikola CEO and chairman Trevor Milton was charged with three counts of fraud, and the company agreed to pay $125 million in a settlement with the SEC. Lordstown Motors CEO Steve Burns inflated the company's EV truck preorders and falsely counted them as future revenue on income statements to the tune of more than $5 billion. Not a good look for the EV industry... Switching to electric cars is in many ways a step backward. Two of the greatest entrepreneurs of all time, Thomas Edison and Henry Ford, already wrestled with the idea, but self-starting internal combustion engines came out on top. If they couldn’t solve the problem, what makes you think Kamala Harris can? Sure, technology has improved, but not by much in the EV battery space. The same issues that Edison ran into are still prevalent, and if we’re not careful, we’ll fall into the same trap he did. The only difference is that when Edison created his ingenious nickel-iron EV battery, he unearthed a renewable energy source that scientists are just now uncovering. It’s something the BBC calls “a diamond in the rough,” and it’s poised to revolutionize the energy space. Vindicated Nickel-iron batteries solve many of the problems plaguing current EV batteries, namely the ethical and environmental impacts of mining the raw materials. They don't contain cobalt, which is known to be mined using child labor, nor do they contain lithium, which produces toxic wastewater that's expensive to filter and harmful to dispose of. They're also perfect for energy storage, as they don't overheat. The Edison battery had two more peculiar qualities. First, it was extremely reliable, and unlike batteries today, some are known to have lasted more than 40 years. Second, and most importantly, when electricity passed through the battery as it charged, it produced a chemical reaction that released hydrogen and oxygen. This reaction was considered dangerous at the time, but researchers at the Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands have now taken a renewed interest in it and think it could hold the key to producing clean, renewable fuel. As the BBC reported, "The team recognized the reaction as reminiscent of the one used to release hydrogen from water, known as electrolysis... This water-splitting reaction is one way hydrogen is produced for use as a fuel — and an entirely clean fuel too, provided the energy used to drive the reaction is from a renewable source." So Edison’s project may not have been a failure after all. As the saying goes, he wasn’t wrong; he was just early. If you want more information and investment ideas on the clean fuel revolution, fellow Outsider Jimmy Mengel has an entire report on [one of the smartest plays in the renewable fuel industry](. With rampant distrust and corruption in the EV sector, alternative fuels are now being heralded as the linchpins of the renewable energy revolution, as they’re easy to transport and can be utilized within the existing automobile infrastructure... [no charging stations required](. Learn how you can [invest in a company that'd make Thomas Edison proud](. To your wealth, Alexander Boulden Editor, Outsider Club After Alex’s passion for economics and investing drew him to one of the largest financial publishers in the world, where he rubbed elbows with former Chicago Board Options Exchange floor traders, Wall Street hedge fund managers, and International Monetary Fund analysts, he decided to take up the pen and guide others through this new age of investing. [Check out his editor's page here](. Browse Our Archives [3 Stocks Investors Should Revisit NOW]( [Gold's Not Dead]( [2 Ways to Beat Inflation and the Food Crisis]( [The Fed Is Full of Crap and Wall Street's Buying It]( [Hidden Costs to Honest Deals]( --------------------------------------------------------------- This email was sent to {EMAIL}. It is not our intention to send email to anyone who doesn't want it. If you're not sure why you've received this e-letter, or no longer wish to receive it, you may [unsubscribe here]( and view our privacy policy and information on how to manage your subscription. To ensure that you receive future issues of Outsider Club, please add newsletter@outsiderclub.com to your address book or whitelist within your spam settings. For customer service questions or issues, please contact us for assistance. Outsider Club, Copyright © 2022, Outsider Club LLC and Angel Publishing LLC. All rights reserved. 3 E Read Street, Baltimore, MD 21202. Your privacy is important to us – we will never rent or sell your e-mail or personal information. Please read our [Privacy Policy](. Neither the publisher nor the editors are registered investment advisors. Subscribers should not view this publication as offering personalized legal or investment advice. Read our [Details and Disclosures.]( ---------------------------------------------------------------

EDM Keywords (219)

wrong would world workshop work water want view used use us unearthed uncovering uncovered two tune truth trap transportation transport touch top today time think tesla technology taken take suspicious sure support subsidize subsidies subscription step spoken spheres something solved solve slow shows settlement set sentiment sent sell seen securities scientists save running rough revolutionize revolutionary revisit resources researchers replacing replace repairs reminiscent release received receive reality reaction railways put pump publisher publication provided project produced problem privacy price prevalent preferred powered politicians poised pledged people pen passion page oxygen overheat one nothing nickel next netherlands need much movements move months money misrepresenting mining mention math mandating manage makes make made linchpins lie less lasted lack known key keen issues invest inventing internals intention information improved importantly important idea heralded help hear harmful government gold gas future full fuel fraud fortune filter filmed figuring fell fed favor fall failure fail facts factoring fact explosion expensive evs ethical environment ensure end email electrolysis electric editors editor edison economics easy early dynamite driving drive dreams doomed disrupt dispose disclosures difference diamond determined details deemed decided debt deal crap country could cough cost corruption control company charged charge chance center careful car called buying browse better benefits believe battery batteries anything anyone americans alex air add according 900 50 2030 1914 1899 1898

Marketing emails from outsiderclub.com

View More
Sent On

27/06/2024

Sent On

27/06/2024

Sent On

26/06/2024

Sent On

25/06/2024

Sent On

24/06/2024

Sent On

23/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.