Newsletter Subject

DEEP DIVE: How Georgia's gerrymandering threatens reproductive rights

From

ofa.us

Email Address

info@ofa.us

Sent On

Thu, Apr 4, 2019 03:23 PM

Email Preheader Text

The state legislature pushed through an extreme bill. Why? Because they're not accountable to voters

The state legislature pushed through an extreme bill. Why? Because they're not accountable to voters. [All On The Line] {NAME} -- You've probably heard us talk a lot about how All On The Line's fight for fair maps will directly affect our progress on the issues that we care about: Health care. Climate change. Economic opportunity. Preventing gun violence. But we want to show you, too. So we're going to start bringing you Deep Dives into what's happening in states across the country: How gerrymandering allows for extreme legislation, or stands in the way of progressive ideas, or how a state with fair districts is able to actually represent the will of the voters. First up? Georgia, where House Bill 481 -- otherwise known as the "Heartbeat Bill" -- is threatening reproductive rights, thanks to a gerrymandered state legislature. [ What is the "Heartbeat Bill"? HB481 is a proposed new law pushed through by a gerrymandered majority in the state legislature that would prohibit abortions after doctors can discern a fetal heartbeat -- something that happens around six weeks of pregnancy, before some women even know they're pregnant. If passed, it would be one of the most restrictive abortion laws in the country. Is that what Georgia voters want? Not even close. Almost 7 in 10 Georgia voters believe abortion should be legal, and 56% of Georgia voters -- a 2-to-1 margin -- say they're less likely to vote for a politician if they support legislation that criminalizes abortion. So why did state representatives push it through? Because Georgia's legislature has been gerrymandered to the point where its elected officials are no longer responsible to the people in their districts. They know they can't be held accountable for extreme votes like these. How did it pass? By a single vote (92-78 in the State House, needing 91). Imagine that vote in a state where just one more representative had to answer to a non-gerrymandered district -- one that was moderate like the state itself, and not like the far-right policy he or she voted for. What happens now? The bill will go to the desk of ... new Governor Brian Kemp, who won the election last November by shamelessly suppressing votes: closing polling places, purging voter rolls, and stopping voter registration applications. [These are the consequences of our unfair system and unfair elections. It's time to fix the system. Join the All On The Line team today.]( [JOIN THE TEAM]( Angry? Us, too. For all the progress we've made -- electing better representatives, passing "fair maps" ballot initiatives, spreading the word about legal victories in states like Pennsylvania -- there is a long way to go. And every day we go without fair districts is a day that allows policies like these to become law and threaten basic rights and hold us back from progress. That's why we'll keep shining a light on places like the Georgia state legislature, and work tirelessly to change things. We'll do it together: [JOIN THE TEAM]( Thanks, Erika Erika Sanchez Digital Director, All On The Line Paid for by Organizing for Action. Contributions or gifts to Organizing for Action are not tax deductible. This email was sent to: {EMAIL}. If that is not your preferred email address, you can update your information [here](=/). We believe that emails are a vital way to stay in direct contact with supporters. Click [here]( if you'd like to unsubscribe from these messages. Paid for by Organizing for Action, P.O. Box 618120 Chicago, IL 60661

Marketing emails from ofa.us

View More
Sent On

15/05/2019

Sent On

14/05/2019

Sent On

09/05/2019

Sent On

07/05/2019

Sent On

06/05/2019

Sent On

03/05/2019

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.